Pedo-geochemical Assessment of a Holsteinian Occupation Site

Conference paper


A preliminary geochemical examination of materials from the archaeological sequence at Medzhibozh A reveals evidence of the use of fire. Irregular, dark ochre, ashy circles that look like the remains of hearths were unearthed in 2012 and 2013 in the uppermost artifact-bearing layer associated with episode zv-1 of the Zavadovka stratigraphic layer (Holsteinian MIS 11). We present the methodology, results, and interpretation of a geochemical study of these remains to determine whether they are natural or anthropogenic. The main conclusion is that we are dealing with hearths which, at the moment, are the oldest probable remains of controlled fireplaces in Ukraine.


Ukraine Lower Paleolithic Holsteinian Early hearth Geochemical analysis Soil  Microelements 



Medzhibozh A archaeological projects were funded as part of state research program 0109U008921 (2010–2014) of the Stone Age Dept of IA NASU, by the State Fund for Fundamental Research, Ukraine 0113U004362 (F53.5/005-2013).


  1. Alperson-Afil N (2008) Continual fire-making by hominins at Gesher Benot Ya’aqov, Israel. Quat Sci Rev 27:1733–1739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbetti M (1986) Traces of fire in the archaeological record before one million years ago? J Hum Evol 15:771–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butler DH, Dawson PC (2013) Accessing hunter-gatherer site structures using Fourier transform infra-red spectroscopy: applications at a Taltheilei settlement in the Canadian Sub-Arctic. J Archaeol Sci 40:1731–1742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davidson DA, Wilson CA, Meharg AA et al (2007) The legacy of past manuring practices on soil contamination in remote rural areas. Environ Int 33:78–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dirix K, Muchez P, Degryse P et al (2013) Multi-element soil prospection aiding geophysical and archaeological survey on an archaeological site in suburban Sagalassos (SWTurkey). J Archaeol Sci 40:2961–2970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dmytruk YM (2006) Ecological and geochemical analysis of soil cover in agroecosystems. Ruta, Chernivtsi (Ukrainian)Google Scholar
  7. Dmytruk YM (2013) Evaluation of the geochemical status of soil in agroecosystems, 75–80. In: Transactions of the international scientific conference celebrating 10 years of the Faculty of Natural Sciences and Agroecology, Alecu Russo Balti State University, Republic of Moldova, Oct 10–11 2013. BaltiGoogle Scholar
  8. Entwistle JA, Abrahams PW (1997) Multi-element analysis of soils and sediments from Scottish historical sites. The potential of inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry for rapid site investigation. J Archaeol Sci 24:407–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Entwistle JA, McCaffrey KJW, Dodgson RA (2007) Geostatistical and multi-elemental analysis of soils to interpret land-use history in the Hebrides, Scotland. Geoarchaeology 22(4):391–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldberg P, Dibble H, Berna F et al (2012) New evidence on Neanderthal use of fire: examples from Roc de Marsal and Pech de l’Azé IV. Quat Int 247:325–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Linderholm J, Lundberg E (1994) Chemical characterization of various archaeological soil samples using main and trace elements determined by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry. J Archaeol Sci 21:303–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Matschullat J, Ottenstein R, Reimann C (2000) Geochemical background: can we calculate it? Environ Geol 39:990–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Matviishyna ZM, Karmazynenko SP (2014) Results of paleopedological study of Quaternary deposits of Medzhibozh Palaeolithic, 49–69. In: Mestonahozhdenie “Medzhibozh” i problemy izucheniya nizhnego paleolita Vostochnoevropejskoj ravniny. Terno-graf, Ternopil (Ukrainian)Google Scholar
  14. Rekovets L, Chepalyga A, Povodyrenko V (2007) Geology and mammalian fauna of the Middle Pleistocene site Medzhibozh, Ukraine. Quatern Int 160:70–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rodriguez-Barroso MR et al (2009) Evaluation of metal contamination in sediments from north of Morocco: geochemical and statistical approaches. Environ Monit Assess 159:169–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shimelmitz R, Kuhn SL, Jelinek AJ et al (2014) ‘Fire at will’: the emergence of habitual fire use 350,000 years ago. J Hum Evol 77:196–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stepanchuk VN (ed) (2014) Medzhybizh locality and problems of Lower Paleolithic studies on the East European plain. Terno-graf, Ternopil (Russian and Ukrainian)Google Scholar
  18. Stepanchuk V, Ryzhov S, Rekovet I, Matviishina Z (2010) The Lower Palaeolithic of Ukraine: current evidence. Quatern Int 223–224:131–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wells EC, Terry RE, Parnell JJ et al (2000) Chemical analyses of ancient anthrosols in residential areas at Piedras Negras, Guatemala. J Archaeol Sci 27:449–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wilson CA, Davidson DA, Cresser MS (2007) Evaluating the use of multi-element soil analysis in archaeology: a study of a post-medieval croft (olligarth) in Shetland. Atti Soc Tosc Sci Nat Mem A 112:69–77Google Scholar
  21. Wilson CA, Davidson DA, Cresser MS (2008) Multi-element soil analysis: an assessment of its potential as an aid to archaeological interpretation. J Archaeol Sci 35:412–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wilson CA, Davidson DA, Cresser MS (2009) An evaluation of the site specificity of soil elemental signatures for identifying and interpreting former functional areas. J Archaeol Sci 36:2327–2334CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National UniversityChernivtsiUkraine
  2. 2.Institute of ArchaeologyNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineKyivUkraine

Personalised recommendations