Advertisement

Connecting Business Processes and Sensor Data in Proactive Manufacturing Enterprises

  • Sobah Abbas PetersenEmail author
  • Rimmert van der Kooij
  • Primoz Puhar
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 480)

Abstract

Real time sensor data is used often to monitor and control industrial applications. Such data is used to detect unexpected events and to take timely action to prevent industrial accidents or breakdowns. We introduce the concept of proactive sensing enterprises. The EU ProaSense project explores the use of real time sensor data and historical data to detect the likelihood of undesired events and to take proactive action to avoid undesired events and improve the resilience of the business. In this paper, we describe how enterprise modelling and process models may be used to connect the key performance indicators and business processes to data from sensors on technical components on the shop floor. We describe the benefits of connecting the business processes to sensor data and how modelling could contribute to reducing maintenance costs, improving proactive decision making and resilience in industry. An example from the manufacturing industry will be described.

Keywords

Proactive maintenance Enterprise model Real-time sensor data Sensing enterprise Proactive enterprise 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work was conducted in the EU FP7 project ProaSense. The authors wish to thank the project participants and HELLA for sharing their knowledge and example case.

References

  1. 1.
    Iansiti, M., Lakhani, K.R.: Digital Ubiquity: How Connections, Sensors, and Data are Revolutionizing Business. Harvard Business Review, Brighton (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Camarinha-Matos, L., Afsarmanesh, H.: Collaborative networks: a new scientific discipline. J. Intell. Manufact. 16, 439–452 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Camarinha-Matos, L., Benaben, F., Picard, W.: Risks and Resilience of Collaborative Networks. 16th IFIP WG 5.5 Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises PRO-VE. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Andres, B., Poler, R., Sanchis, R.: Collaborative strategies alignment to enhance the collaborative network agility and resilience. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M. (ed.) PRO-VE 2015. IFIP AICT, vol. 463, pp. 88–99. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24141-8_8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schuh, G., et al.: Collaboration mechanisms to increase productivity in the context of industrie 4.0. Procedia CIRP 19, 51–56 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    EU Systems. The 4 Basic Maintenance Modes (2014). http://www.uesystems.com/mechanical-inspection/the-4-basic-maintenance-modes. Accessed 25 Apr 2016
  7. 7.
    Muller, A., Suhner, M.C., Lung, B.: Formalisation of a new prognosis model for supporting proactive maintenance implementation on industrial system. Reliab. Eng. Saf. Syst. 93(2), 234–253 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bousdekis, A., et al.: A proactive decision making framework for condition-based maintenance. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 115(7), 1225–1250 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Proasense. Proasence - The Proactive Sensing Enterprise (2012). http://www.proasense.eu/. Accessed 25 Apr 2016
  10. 10.
    Boyd, J.R.: The essence of winning and losing, 28 June 1995, a five slide set by Boyd (1995). http://www.danford.net/boyd/essence.htm. Accessed 25 Apr 2016
  11. 11.
    Magoutas, B., et al.: Anticipation-driven architecture for proactive enterprise decision making. In: CAiSE-Forum-DC 2014, Thessaloniki, Greece (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bousdekis, A., Papageorgiou, N., Magoutas, B., Apostolou, D., Mentzas, G.: A real-time architecture for proactive decision making in manufacturing enterprises. In: Ciuciu, I. (ed.) OTM 2015 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 9416, pp. 137–146. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-26138-6_17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lankhorst, M.: Enterprise Architecture at Work – Modelling, Communication and Analysis. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Semantic Sensor Network Ontology, 10 June 2011. http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/wiki/SSN
  15. 15.
    Leger, J.-B., Morel, G.: Integration of maintenance in the enterprise: towards an enterprise modelling-based framework compliant with proactive maintenance strategy. Prod. Plann. Control: Manag. Oper. 12(2), 176–187 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sobah Abbas Petersen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rimmert van der Kooij
    • 1
  • Primoz Puhar
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Industrial ManagementSINTEF Technology and SocietyTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.Hella Saturnus SlovenijaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations