Advertisement

Realizing the Innovation Potentials from Open Data: Stakeholders’ Perspectives on the Desired Affordances of Open Data Environment

  • Adegboyega OjoEmail author
  • Lukasz Porwol
  • Mohammad Waqar
  • Arkadiusz Stasiewicz
  • Edobor Osagie
  • Michael Hogan
  • Owen Harney
  • Fatemeh Ahmadi Zeleti
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 480)

Abstract

Despite the increasing number of datasets available on open data platforms, there has been limited adoption and use of open data by the public. This has consequently limited the innovation and transparency impact of open data on respective economies and governments. While literature is replete with articles on barriers to open data exploitation and use; these studies are yet to examine how affordances of open data platforms could help to overcome these barriers. This perspective is important since the platform directly mediates access to open data resources and their use. We describe a study carried out as part the Route-To-PA (Route-To-PA Project, Raising Open and User-friendly Transparency Enhancing Technologies for Public Administrations, H2020 Project, http://routetopa.eu/.) project to establish stakeholder’s perspectives on barriers to effective use of open data and the desired open data platform affordances to address these problems. Our results provide details on what kinds of data are needed by stakeholders, the features required to support their interactions and collaboration around open data and features that could enhance the understandability of datasets available on open data platform.

Keywords

Open data Transparency Open data platforms 

References

  1. 1.
    Ojo, A., Porwol, L., Waqar, M., Osagie, E., Stasiewicz, A., Hogan, M., Harney, O., Riordan, R.: Pathologies of open data platform and desired transparency-related affordances for future platforms. In: 17th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alexopoulos, C., Zuiderwijk, A., Charapabidis, Y., Loukis, E., Janssen, M.: Designing a second generation of open data platforms: integrating open data and social media. In: Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J., Wimmer, M.A., Bannister, F. (eds.) EGOV 2014. LNCS, vol. 8653, pp. 230–241. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baldwin, C.Y., Woodard, C.J.: The architecture of platforms: a unified view. In: Working Papers – Harvard Business School Division of Research, pp. 1–31 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Callimachus Project: http://callimachusproject.org/. Accessed 17 June 2016
  5. 5.
    Cappelli, C., et al.: Managing transparency guided by a maturity model. In: 3rd Global Conference os Transparency Research, Chung 2000, pp. 1–17 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    CKAN Open Data Portal Platform. http://ckan.org/. Accessed 17 June 2016
  7. 7.
    Colpaert, P., et al.: A three-level data publishing portal (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    DataTank. https://www.iminds.be/en/technology/datatank. Accessed 17 June 2016
  9. 9.
    Davies, T.: Open Data Barometer. Open Data Institute and World Wide Web Foundation (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davies, T., et al.: Open Data Barometer Global Report. World Wide Web Foundation (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    DKAN Open Data Platform. http://www.nucivic.com/dkan/. Accessed 17 June 2016
  12. 12.
    Enigma Publich Data Search. http://enigma.io/. Accessed 17 June 2016
  13. 13.
    European Union Open Data Portal. https://data.europa.eu/euodp/en/data. Accessed 17 June 2016
  14. 14.
    Group, W.B.: Technical Assessment of Open Data Platforms for National Statistical Organisations (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heald, D.: Varieties of transparency. In: Proceedings-British Academy, pp. 25–43 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Information Workbench. https://www.fluidops.com/en/portfolio/information_workbench/. Accessed 17 June 2016
  17. 17.
    Janssen, M., et al.: Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Inf. Syst. Manag. 29(4), 258–268 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Junar Open Data PlatformGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Keane, J.: Monitory democracy and media-saturated societies. Griffith Rev. 24(2009), 47 (2009)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Meijer, A.: Government transparency in historical perspective: from the ancient regime to open data in the netherlands. Int. J. Publ. Adm. 38(3), 189–199 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meijer, A.: Understanding modern transparency. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 75(2), 255–269 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    OpenDataSoft SaaS Platform. https://www.opendatasoft.com/. Accessed 17 June 201606-17
  23. 23.
    Peled, A.: Effective openness – the role of open data 2. 0 in a wider transparency program. In: 3rd Global Conference on Transparency Research, pp. 44–46 (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    PublishMyData Linked Data Publising Platform. http://www.swirrl.com/. Accessed 17 June 2016
  25. 25.
    ROUTE-TO-PA H2020 EU Project. http://routetopa.eu/. Accessed 17 June 2016
  26. 26.
    Semantic MediaWiki. https://www.semantic-mediawiki.org. Accessed 17 June 2016
  27. 27.
    Socrata Platform. https://www.socrata.com/. Accessed 17 June 2016

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adegboyega Ojo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lukasz Porwol
    • 1
  • Mohammad Waqar
    • 1
  • Arkadiusz Stasiewicz
    • 1
  • Edobor Osagie
    • 1
  • Michael Hogan
    • 2
  • Owen Harney
    • 2
  • Fatemeh Ahmadi Zeleti
    • 1
  1. 1.Insight Centre for Data AnalyticsGalwayIreland
  2. 2.National University of IrelandGalwayIreland

Personalised recommendations