Advertisement

A Step Towards Customized Product Realization: Methodology for Sensing, Smart and Sustainable Enterprise

  • Dante Chavarria-BarrientosEmail author
  • Rafael Batres
  • Roberto Perez
  • Paul K. Wright
  • Arturo Molina
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 480)

Abstract

New trends such as mass customization have appeared, where production volumes are flexible, customers require One of a Kind production, and product variety is large. To accomplish these demands, there is a necessity of flexible enterprise operations and reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Enterprise models, integration frameworks, collaborative systems and flexible/reconfigurable manufacturing systems allow facing such challenges. This paper presents a methodology aiming to support the design, creation and implementation of sustainable, smart and sensing manufacturing systems. S3 Enterprise (Sensing, Smart and Sustainable) Reference Model has been developed and used to create such systems. The S3 Enterprise Reference Model uses a methodology based on action-research concept to pursue understanding and facilitating its implementation in Small and Medium Enterprises. The reference model is instantiated to define a Collaborative Networked Organization that is able to manufacture customized products. Finally, a case study is presented to demonstrate the usage and application of the methodology.

Keywords

Enterprise modelling Sustainable manufacturing Smart organization Sensing enterprise Collaborative networks Instantiation methodology 

References

  1. 1.
    Tseng, M.M., Hu, S.J.: Mass Customization, Cirp Encyclopedia of Production Engineering, pp. 836–843. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jorysz, H.R., Verndat, F.B.: CIM-OSA Part 1: total enterprise modelling and function view. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 3(3–4), 144–156 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berio, G., Vernadat, F.: Enterprise modelling with CIMOSA: functional and organizational aspects. Prod. Plan. Control 12(2), 128–136 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hanneghan, M., Merabti, M., Colquhoun, G.: A viewpoint analysis reference model for Concurrent Engineering. Comput. Ind. 41(1), 35–49 (2000). ISSN 0166-3615, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-3615(99)00038-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Monfared, R.P., West, A.A., Harrison, R., Weston, R.H.: An implementation of the business process modelling approach in the automotive industry. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 216(11), 1413–1427 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nogueira, J.M., Romero, D., Espadas, J., Molina, A.: Leveraging the Zachman framework implementation using action–research methodology–a case study: aligning the enterprise architecture and the business goals. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 7(1), 100–132 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zwegers, A., Tolle, M., Vesterager, J.: VERAM: virtual enterprise reference architecture and methodology. In: VTT Symposium, vol. 224, pp. 17–38. VTT (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bernus, P., Noran, O., Riedlinger, J.: Using the globemen reference model for virtual enterprise design in after sales service. In: VTT Symposium, vol. 224, pp. 71–90. VTT (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weichhart, G., Molina, A., Chen, D., Whitman, L.E., Vernadat, F.: Challenges and current developments for sensing, smart and sustainable enterprise systems. Comput. Ind. 79, 34–46 (2015). ISSN 0166-3615, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2015.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chavarría-Barrientos, D., Molina Espinosa, J.M., Batres, R., Ramírez-Cadena, M., Molina, A.: Reference model for smart x sensing manufacturing collaborative networks - formalization using unified modeling language. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., et al. (eds.) PRO-VE 2015. IFIP AICT, vol. 463, pp. 243–254. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24141-8_22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    ISO ISO/IEC 10743-3. Information Technology – Open Distributed Processing – Reference Model: Architecture, International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baskerville, R.L., Wood-Harper, A.T.: A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. J. Inf. Technol. 11(3), 235–246 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Avison, D., Baskerville, R., Myers, M.: Controlling action research projects. Inf. Technol. People 14(1), 28–45 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Tucci, C.L.: Clarifying business models: origins, present, and future of the concept. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 16, 1–25 (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mehrsai, A., Karimi, H.R., Thoben, K.D.: Integration of supply networks for customization with modularity in cloud and make-to-upgrade strategy. Syst. Sci. Control Eng.: Open Access J. 1(1), 28–42 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H., Galeano, N., Molina, A.: Collaborative networked organizations–concepts and practice in manufacturing enterprises. Comput. Ind. Eng. 57(1), 46–60 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Benson-Rea, M., Brodie, R.J., Sima, H.: The plurality of co-existing business models: investigating the complexity of value drivers. Ind. Mark. Manag. 42(5), 717–729 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pérez, R., Molina, A., Ramírez-Cadena, M.: Development of an integrated approach to the design of reconfigurable micro/mesoscale CNC machine tools. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 136(3), 031003.3 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Frankenberger, K., Weiblen, T., Gassmann, O.: Network configuration, customer centricity, and performance of open business models: a solution provider perspective. Ind. Mark. Manag. 42(5), 671–682.2 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dante Chavarria-Barrientos
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rafael Batres
    • 1
  • Roberto Perez
    • 1
  • Paul K. Wright
    • 2
  • Arturo Molina
    • 1
  1. 1.Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Ingeniería y CienciasMexico CityMexico
  2. 2.University of California, BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations