Advertisement

Assessing the Suitability of Supplier Consortia for Public Procurement Contracts

  • Andrew CrossleyEmail author
  • Jane Lynch
  • Sue Hurrell
  • Rhian Edwards
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 480)

Abstract

This study offers a unique contribution to the existing research on collaborative working by exploring the buy side challenges facing public procurement teams when managing Collaborative Network Organizations (CNOs) termed ‘supplier consortia’ in this study. Two online management tools are proposed. A Procurement Assessment Model (PAM) guides buyers in assessing the suitability of public contracts for consortia bids. A Bid/No Bid model is offered to help suppliers align their CNO to the procurement and specification. This study is relevant for the public and private sectors but both tools proposed have been adopted by the Welsh Government (UK) and included as updates within the formal Joint Bidding Guide. The Joint Bidding Guide has been developed, published and tested by the Welsh Government since 2013.

Keywords

Supplier selection Joint bidding Consortia Public procurement Tendering process 

References

  1. 1.
    Stankovic, J.: Research directions for the internet of things. IEEE Internet Things J. 1(1), 3–9 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bettis, R., Hitt, M.: The new competitive landscape. Strateg. Manag. J. 16(S1), 7–19 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baker, E., Kan, M., Teo, S.: Developing a collaborative network organization: leadership challenges at multiple levels. J. Organ. Change Manag. 24(6), 853–875 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mason, R., Lalwani, C., Boughton, R.: Combining vertical and horizontal collaboration for transport optimisation. Supply Chain Manag.: Int. J. 12(3), 187–199 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dai, Q., Kauffman, R.: B2B e-commerce revisited: leading perspectives on the key issues and research directions. Electron. Mark. 12(2), 67–83 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Walker, H., Preuss, L.: Fostering sustainability through sourcing from smaller businesses: public sector perspectives. J. Clean. Prod. 16(15), 1600–1609 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Walker, H., Schotanus, F., Bakker, E., Harland, C.: Collaborative procurement: a relational view of buyer-buyer relationships. Public Adm. Rev. 73(4), 588–598 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bakker, E., Walker, H., Schotanus, F., Harland, C.: Choosing an organisational form: the case of collaborative procurement initiatives. Int. J. Procure. Manag. 1(3), 297–317 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jost, G., Dawson, M., Shaw, D.: Private sector consortia working for a public sector client-factors that build successful relationships: lessons from the UK. Eur. Manag. J. 23(3), 336–350 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cagnazzo, L., Taticchi, P., Bidini, G., Sameh, M.: Collaborative procurement within enterprise networks: a literature review, a reference framework and a case study. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Paraskakis, I., Afsarmanesh, H. (eds.) PRO-VE 2009. IFIP AICT, vol. 307, pp. 351–360. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rabelo, R.J., Costa, S.N., Romero, D.: A governance reference model for virtual enterprises. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H. (eds.) Collaborative Systems for Smart Networked Environments. IFIP AICT, vol. 434, pp. 60–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lynch, J., Uenk, N., Walker, H., Schotanus, F.: Community benefits of public procurement: a comparison between Wales (UK) and the Netherlands local governments. In: Conference Proceedings for 25th IPSERA 2016, Dortmund, Germany (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crossley, A., Coles, G., Edwards, R., Hurrell, S., Ruddle, N.: The development and adoption of a new joint bidding system for public contracts in Wales. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., et al. (eds.) PRO-VE 2015. IFIP AICT, vol. 463, pp. 622–630. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24141-8_58 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    BS ISO/IEC 30105-3. Information technology. IT Enabled Services-Business Process Outsourcing (ITES-BPO) lifecycle processes. Part 3. Measurement framework and organizational maturity modelGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    BS 11000-1:2010 Framework specification for collaborative business relationships. BSi, Annex B & C, pp. 35–38 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    De Boer, L., Labro, E., Morlacchi, P.: A review of methods supporting supplier selection. Eur. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 7(2), 75–89 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Karsak, E., Dursun, M.: Taxonomy and review of non-deterministic analytical methods for supplier selection. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 29(3), 263–286 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bergman, M., Lundberg, S.: Tender evaluation and supplier selection methods in public procurement. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 19(2), 73–83 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Falagario, M., Sciancalepore, F., Costantino, N., Pietroforte, R.: Using a DEA-cross efficiency approach in public procurement tenders. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 218(2), 523–529 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Blaikie, N.: Approaches to Social Enquiry: Advancing Knowledge. Polity Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mason, J.: Qualitative Researching, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, London (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
    BS 11000-2:2011 Collaborative Business Relationships – Part 2 BSi Table A1 (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sell2Wales. https://www.sell2wales.gov.wales/. Accessed 20 Apr 2016
  26. 26.
    Public Procurement: Public Regulations. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/102/pdfs/uksi_20150102_en.pdf. Accessed 21 Apr 2016

Copyright information

© UK Crown Copyright 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Crossley
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Jane Lynch
    • 3
  • Sue Hurrell
    • 4
  • Rhian Edwards
    • 5
  1. 1.ServQ AllianceCardiffWales, UK
  2. 2.University of BristolBristolUK
  3. 3.Cardiff Business SchoolCardiffWales, UK
  4. 4.Values Wales, Welsh GovernmentCardiffWales, UK
  5. 5.Wales Co-operative CentreCaerphillyWales, UK

Personalised recommendations