Abstract
The present chapter aims to assemble information related to teacher qualifications and professional knowledge, as well as theoretical rationales for the realization of questionnaire material on this topic. Policy relevance is demonstrated by gleaning information on international conferences and implementations in large-scale assessments. The centrepiece of this chapter is the development of a framework that allows classifying relevant issues in a systematic way: The two main categories, Teacher Qualifications and Teacher Competence, together contain five components. Teacher Qualifications can be split into (1) the initial education of teachers, which describes the educational pathways of future teachers in their studies at university (e.g., level of education) and (2) professional development, which in turn addresses continuous, formal and informal formats for gaining further qualification on the job. The Teacher Competence category is structured into (3) professional knowledge, (4) beliefs and (5) noncognitive/motivational factors. The chapter concludes with a list of constructs that were implemented in the PISA 2015 field trial and their relation to this overarching framework.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This chapter expands on a proposal for PISA 2015 international questionnaire options presented to the PISA Governing board (PGB) in April 2012 (Doc.: EDU/PISA/GB(2012)7) and on a technical paper that was presented to the PISA 2015 Questionnaire Expert Group (QEG) in May 2012 (Doc. QEG 2012−05 Doc 07).
- 2.
For more information, TALIS questionnaires and data, see http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/talis-2013-results.htm.
References
Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2006). Stichwort: Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 9(4), 469–520.
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & Tsai, Y.-M. (2009). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 133–180.
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., & Jordan, A. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180.
Bayer, S., Klieme, E. & Jude, N. (2016). Assessment and evaluation in educational contexts. In S. Kuger, E. Klieme, N. Jude, & D. Kaplan (Eds.), Assessing contexts of learning: An international perspective. Dordrecht: Springer.
Blömeke, S., Suhl, U., Kaiser, G., & Döhrmann, M. (2012). Family background, entry selectivity and opportunities to learn: What matters in primary teacher education? An international comparison of fifteen countries. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 44–55.
Bromme, R. (1997). Kompetenzen, Funktionen und unterrichtliches Handeln des Lehrers [Teachers‘competencies, functions, and teaching actions]. In F. E. Weinert (Ed.), Reihe: Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Pädagogische Psychologie (Psychologie des Unterrichts und der Schule, Vol. 3, pp. 177–212). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Bryk, A. S., & Driscoll, M. E. (1988). The high school as community: Contextual influences and consequences for students and teachers. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Center on Effective Secondary Schools.
Cuevas, P., Lee, O., Hart, J., & Deaktor, R. (2005). Improving science inquiry with elementary students of diverse backgrounds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 337–357.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1996). What matters most: A competent teacher for every child. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(3), 193–200.
Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81–112.
DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement, association for supervision and curriculum development. Alexandria: National Educational Service.
European Commission. (2013). Supporting teacher competence development for better learning outcomes. Brussels: European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/education/policy/school/doc/teachercomp_en.pdf . Accessed 6 June 2016.
Gansle, K. A., Noell, G. H., & Burns, J. M. (2012). Do student achievement outcomes differ across teacher preparation programs?: An analysis of teacher education in Louisiana. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 304–317. doi:10.1177/0022487112439894.
Green, C. L., Walker, J. M. T., Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. (2007). Parents’ motivations for involvement in children’s education: An empirical test of a theoretical model of parental involvement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 532–544.
Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5–12.
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 381–391.
Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2007). Teacher quality. In E. A. Hanushek & F. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (pp. 1051–1078). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge (1. publ).
Henry, G. T., Purtell, K. M., Bastian, K. C., Fortner, C. K., Thompson, C. L., Campbell, S. L., & Patterson, K. M. (2013). The effects of teacher entry portals on student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(1), 7–23. doi:10.1177/0022487113503871.
Hertel, S., Bruder, S., & Schmitz, B. (2009). Beratungs- und Kommunikationskompetenz von Lehrern [Teachers’ counselling and communication competence]. In O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, K. Beck, D. Sembill, R. Nickolaus, & R. H. Mulder (Eds.), Lehrerprofessionalität: Bedingungen, Genese, Wirkungen und Messung (pp. 117–128). Weinheim: Beltz.
Hertel and Jude. (2016). Parental support and involvement in school. In S. Kuger, E. Klieme, N. Jude, & D. Kaplan (Eds.), Assessing contexts of learning: An international perspective. Dordrecht: Springer.
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Loewenberg Ball, D. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406.
Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
Hord, S. M. (Ed.). (2004). Learning together, leading together: Changing schools through professional learning communities. New York: Teachers College Press.
ISTP 2015. (2015). Implementing highly effective teacher policy and practive: The 2015 international summit on the teaching profession. Banff, Canada. http://istp2015.org/Documents/ISTP-Asia-Society-report_Final_EN.pdf. Accessed 6 June 2016.
Jeanpierre, B., Oberhauser, K., & Freeman, C. (2005). Characteristics of professional development that effect change in secondary science teachers’ classroom practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 668–690.
Jude. (2016). The assessment of learning contexts in PISA. In S. Kuger, E. Klieme, N. Jude, & D. Kaplan (Eds.), Assessing contexts of learning: An international perspective. Dordrecht: Springer.
King, G., Murray, C., Salomon, J. A., & Tandon, A. (2004). Enhancing the validity and cross-cultural comparability of measurement in survey research. American Political Science Review, 98, 191–207.
Klassen, R., Chong, W. H., Huan, V. S., & Wong, Y. F. I. (2008). Motivation beliefs of secondary school teachers in Canada and Singapore: A mixed methods study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1919–1934.
Krauss, S., Baumert, J., & Blum, W. (2008). Secondary mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge: Validation of the COACTIV constructs. ZDM, 40(5), 873–892. doi:10.1007/s11858-008-0141-9.
Kruse, S., Louis, K. L., & Bryk, A. (1995). Let’s build teachers’ professional community. WCER Highlights. www.wcer.wisc.edu/publications/WCER_Highlights/Vol.7_No.1_Spring_1_995/Teachers_prof_community.html. Accessed 1 June 2016.
Kuger, S., Jude, N., Klieme, E., & Kaplan, D. (2016). An introduction to the PISA 2015 field trial: Study design and analyses procedures. In S. Kuger, E. Klieme, N. Jude, & D. Kaplan (Eds.), Assessing contexts of learning: An international perspective. Dordrecht: Springer.
Kunter, M., Frenzel, A., Nagy, G., Baumert, J., & Pekrun, R. (2011). Teacher enthusiasm: Dimensionality and context specificity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 289–301.
Leithwood, K., & Louis, K. S. (1998). Organisational learning in schools: An introduction. In K. Leithwood & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Organisational learning in schools (pp. 1–14). Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
Libman, Z. (2009). Teacher licensing examinations—true progress or illusion? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 35(1), 7–15.
Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129–151.
Little, J. W. (2002). Locating learning in teachers’ professional community: Opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 917–946.
Loughran, J., & Hamilton, M. L. (2016). International handbook of teacher education. Singapore: Springer.
Louis, K. S., & Kruse, S. D. (1995). Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
McDowall, S., Cameron, M., Dingle, R., Gilmore, A., & MacGibbon, L. (2007). Evaluation of the literacy professional development project. New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
Müller, K., Prenzel, M., Seidel, T., Schiepe-Tiska, A., & Kjærnsli, M. (2016). Science teaching and learning in schools: Theoretical and empirical foundations for investigating classroom-level processes. In S. Kuger, E. Klieme, N. Jude, & D. Kaplan (Eds.), Assessing contexts of learning: An international perspective. Springer: Dordrecht.
Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (2007). TIMSS in perspective: Lessons learned from IEA’s four decades of international mathematics assessments. In T. Loveless (Ed.), Lessons learned: What international assessments tell us about math achievement (pp. 9–36). Washington, DC: Brookings.
Murray, H. G. (1983). Low-inference classroom teaching behaviors and student ratings of college teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 138–149.
OECD. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2014). TALIS 2013 results: An international perspective on teaching and learning. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2015). Education at a glance. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Patrick, H., Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., & Midgley, C. (2003). How teachers establish psychological environments during the first days of school: Associations with avoidance in mathematics. Teachers College Record, 105, 1521–1558.
Radford, D. L. (1998). Transferring theory into practice: A model for professional development for science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(10), 73–88.
Richardson, V. (2003). Preservice teachers’ beliefs. In J. Raths & A. C. McAninch (Eds.), Teacher beliefs and classroom performance: The impact of teacher education. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
Rosenholtz, S. J. (1989). Workplace conditions that affect teacher quality and commitment: Implications for teacher induction programs. Elementary School Journal, 89(4), 421–439.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organisation. New York: Doubleday.
Shayer, M., & Adhami, M. (2007). Fostering cognitive development through the context of mathematics: Results of the CAME project. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64, 256–291.
Shulman, L. S. (1985). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 3–36). New York: Macmillan.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., & Silver, E. A. (1999). The development of professional developers. Harvard Educational Review, 69(3), 237–269.
Steinert, B., Klieme, E., Maag Merki, K., Döbrich, P., Halbheer, U., & Kunz, A. (2006). Lehrerkooperation in der Schule: Konzeption, Erfassung, Ergebnisse [Teacher cooperation in school: Concepts, assessment, and results]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 52(2), 185–204.
Stiggins, R. J. (2007). Conquering the formative assessment frontier. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Formative classroom assessment (pp. 8–28). New York: Teachers’ College Press.
Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 963–980.
Supovitz, J. A., Mayer, D. P., & Kahle, J. B. (2000). Promoting inquiry-based instructional practice: The longitudinal impact of professional development in the context of systemic reform. Educational Policy, 14(3), 331–356.
Sykes, G. (1996). Reform of and as professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 465–467.
Tatto, M. T., Ingvarson, L., Schwille, J., Peck, R., Senk, S. L., & Rowley, G. (2008). Teacher education and development study in mathematics (TEDS-M): Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics. Conceptual framework. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration [BES]. Wellington: Ministry of Education, http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/16901/TPLandDBESentireWeb.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2016.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Barr, M. (2004). Fostering student learning: The relationship of collective teacher efficacy and student achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(3), 189–209.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805.
Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., Cox, K. E., Logan, C., DiCintio, M., & Thomas, C. T. (1998). Creating contexts for involvement in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 730–745.
UNESCO. (2012). International standard classification of education. ISCED 2011. Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
van de Vijver, F. J. R., & He, J. (2016). Bias assessment and prevention in noncognitive outcome measures in context assessments. In S. Kuger, E. Klieme, N. Jude, & D. Kaplan (Eds.), Assessing contexts of learning: An international perspective. Dordrecht: Springer.
Vieluf, S., Kaplan, D., Klieme, E., & Bayer, S. (2012). Profiles of teaching practices and insights into innovation: Results from TALIS 2008. Paris: OECD.
Zuzovsky, R. (2009). Teachers’ qualifications and their impact on student achievement: Findings from TIMSS 2003 data for Israel. Issues and Methodologies in Large-Scale Assessments, 2, 37–62.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Klingebiel, F., Klieme, E. (2016). Teacher Qualifications and Professional Knowledge. In: Kuger, S., Klieme, E., Jude, N., Kaplan, D. (eds) Assessing Contexts of Learning. Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45357-6_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45357-6_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45356-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45357-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)