Abstract
The impact of technology has been overwhelming and its usefulness, as far as adaptation is concerned, continues to increase, but it is difficult to predict how it would shape our behavior during this millennium. At best, we are currently able to predict its influence for the next 20 years, as argued in an NSF study. Kurzweil had also predicted that we would witness a furious growth of technology during the current century but would be unsure of its impact on us. One can say that the adverse effects of technology have been historically documented, from the Mayan prediction of the Balktun period to George Orwell’s 1984, but the violation of personal privacy through surveillance techniques and questions about our very existence as humans has never before been so obvious. This chapter focuses on how, in our craving for more technology, we have reduced human beings to factors (as in human factors engineering), and put the user of technology in the back seat. During the twenty-first century, new technologies would continue to challenge its users in a variety of ways. Some of these new challenges would be the creation of new moral dilemmas, the inability to differentiate between what we are born with and what has been made for our body, the assessment of the impact of genetic engineering and neurosurgery, and the experience of why changes caused by technology could not be identified in advance. The chapter discusses some of the ways in which psychology would thrive through extended interdisciplinary research, such as in convergent technologies (a combination of nanotechnology, biotechnology, informational technology, and cognitive sciences (nano-bio-info-cogno). This would certainly go to increase the scope of technology, in terms of forms of intervention for human behavior during the twenty-first century. Many of the ethical issues that would apply to this subfield of psychology of technology in such a scenario have been identified and analyzed. They would range from our understanding of “what does it mean to be human” to the elimination of certain myths. Of prime concern, and one that would have to be tackled, however, would be the fact that though the role of psychologists in the twenty-first century would expand, working as they would, hand-in-glove with engineers, biologists, and other specialists, their work or comments might not receive the type of attention required to put the user in the driver’s seat.
“I fear the day that technology will surpass our human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots”
—Albert Einstein.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ackerman, S. (2012, June 26). CIA Chief: We’ll spy on you through your dishwasher. Wired.
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9, 204–215.
Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Bateson, G. (1991). A sacred unity: Further steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Cornelia and Michael Bessie, Harper Collins.
Berkowitz, L. (1993). Aggression: Its causes, consequences, and control. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brooks, R. (2001). The relationship between matter and life. Nature, 409, 409–411.
Butler, S. (1872). Erewhon. Mineola, NY: Dover Thrift Edition.
Clark, A. (2003). Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dennett, D. D. (1991). Consciousness explained. New York: Little, Brown.
Dror, I. E., & Harnad, S. (Eds.). (2008). Cognition distributed: How cognitive technology extends our minds. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Engelhart, D. (2000). Bootstrapping: Coevolution and the origins of personal computing. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Forlines, C., Vogel, D., & Balakrishnan, R. (2006). HybridPointing: Fluid switching between absolute and relative pointing with a direct input device. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM Symposium on User interface Software and Technology, Montreux, Switzerland, October 15–18 (pp 211–220). UIST ’06. New York: ACM Press.
Foster, P. (2013, July 5). George Orwell and climates of fear. The Financial Post. Retrieved from http://business.financialpost.com.
Gartner Inc. (2013, December 12). Gartner says the Internet of Things installed base will grow to 26 billion units by 2020. Stamford, CT: Gartner Inc. Retrieved from www.gartner.com.
Glassman, M. (2012, September 14). Occupying the noosphere: The evolution of media platforms and webs of community protest. The Urban Fringe.
GOV.IN. (2015, March 31). Budget 2015: Some of the things we’ve announced. GOV.UK.
Greenberg, A. (2015, July 21). Hackers remotely kill a jeep on the highway—With me in it. Wired.
Hancock, P. A., & Szalma, J. L. (2003). The future of ergonomics. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Sciences, 44, 238–249.
Hawking, S., Russell, S., Tegmark, M., Wilczek, F. (2014, May 2). Stephen Hawking: ‘Transcendence looks at the implications of artificial intelligence—But are we taking AI seriously enough?’ Retrieved from www.independent.co.uk.
Hill, C. (2016, September, 13). How your Facebook account can slowly destroy your finances. Retrieved from http://www.msn.com.
Hughes, T. P. (1989). American genesis: A century of invention and technological enthusiasm, 1870-1970. New York: Viking.
Karwoski, W. (2012). The discipline of human factors and ergonomics. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Kipnis, D. (1994). Accounting for the use of behavior technologies in psychology. American Psychologist, 49, 165–172.
Kompridis, N. (2009). Technology’s challenge to democracy: What of the human? Parrhesia, 8, 22–33.
Kool, V. K., & Agrawal, R. (2006). Applied social psychology: A global perspective. New Delhi, India: Atlantic Books.
Kurzweil, R. (1999). The age of spiritual machines. New York: Viking Books.
Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near. New York: Viking Books.
Marsden, P., & Hollnagel, E. (1996). Human interaction with technology: The accidental user. Acta Psychologia, 91, 345–358.
Muller, V. C., & Bostrom, N. (2016). Future progress in artificial intelligence: A survey of expert opinion. In V. C. Müller (Ed.), Fundamental issues of artificial intelligence. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Nada, E., Khater, A., & Saeed, A. (2014). Value of early intervention for hearing impairment of language and speech acquisition. The Egyptian Journal of Otolarygology, 30, 237–242.
Noe, A. (2009). Out of our heads: Why you are not your brain and other lessons from the biology of consciousness. New York: Hill and Wang.
Norman, D. A. (1999). The invisible computer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
Ogburn, W. F. (1922). Social change with respect to culture and original nature. New York: B. W. Huebsch.
Osborne, C. (2011, February 12) ‘Phone on the table’ students: Driven by social status. iGeneration. Retrieved from http://www.znet.com/blog/igeneration/phone-on-the-table-students-driven-by-social-status/8376.
Oskamp, S., & Spacaman, S. (Eds.). (1990). People’s reactions to technology: In factories, offices, and aerospace (Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology). New York: Sage.
Parasuraman, R. (2011). Neuroergonomics: Brain, cognition, and performance at work. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences, 20, 181–186.
Parasuraman, R., & Rizzo, M. (Eds.). (2007). Neuroergonomics: The brain at work. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pew Research Center. (2013). Majority of Americans expect NASA astronauts to land on Mars by 2050. Retrieved June 21, from www.pewresearch.org.
Pew Research Center, Internet Science and Technology. (2014). Main report: An indepth look at expert responses. Retrieved May 14, from www.pewresearch.org.
Pittinsky, T. L., & Diamante, N. (2015, October). Going beyond fun in STEM. Phi Delta Kappan (pp. 47–51).
Poeter, D. (2013, July 25). U.K. scientists cook up Mars ‘Concept Mission.’ Retrieved from www.pcmag.com.
Prilleltensky, I. (1989). Psychology and the status quo. American Psychologist, 44, 795–802.
Pyszczysnki, T., Sheldon, S., & Greenberg, J. (2003). In the wake of 9/11: The psychology of terror. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Rauterberg, M. (2006). From personal to cultural computing: How to assess a cultural experience. In G. Kemper & P. von Hellberg (Eds.), uDayIV—Information nutzbar machen. Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science.
Rocco, M. C., & Bainbridge, W. S. (Eds.) (2002). Converging technologies for improving human performance: Nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science. NSF/DOC-sponsored report. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Rosen, L. D. (2010). Rewired: Understanding the iGeneration and the way they learn. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rosen, L. D. (2012). idisorder: Understanding our obsession with technology and overcoming its hold on us. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Saariluoma, P., & Oulasvirta, A. (2010). User psychology: Re-assessing the boundaries of a discipline. Psychology, 1, 317–328.
Salvendy, G. (Ed.). (2012). Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Scott, K. (2012, July 29). Individual relationships with technology. AMCIS 2012 Proceedings. Paper 25. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2012/proceedings/HCIStudies/.
Surowiecki, J. (2005). The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations. New York: Anchor Books.
Turkle, S. (2004). How computers change the way we think. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 50(B), 26.
van Gorp, A. (2007). Ethical issues in engineering design processes: Regulative frameworks for safety and sustainability. Design Studies, 28, 117–131.
Vincenti, W. G. (1990). What engineers know and how they know it: Analytical studies from aeronautical history. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Webb, G. (2015, February 15). Say goodbye to privacy. WIRED.
Weil, M. M., & Rosen, L. D. (1994). The psychological impact of technology. Computers and Society, 24, 3–9.
Wills, S. (2013, July 17). PayPal accidentally credits man $92 quadrillion. CNN. Retrieved from www.cnn.com.
Zegas, A. (2013, July 5). We’re closer to George Orwell than we may think. Star-Ledger.
Zwart, S. D., Poel, van de, I. R., Mil, van, H. G. J., & Brumsen, M. (2006). A network approach for distinguishing ethical issues in research and development. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12, 663–684.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Appendices
Chapter Summary
Continuing from Chap. 6, this chapter starts out by pointing out favorable and unfavorable aspects of behavior in the context of interventional technology and the impact of the greater availability of free-market type of products. The focus is on, “where is the user in user technology?” and shows how psychology of technology will help us to understand the user as an actor, not merely as a factor. In short, the growth of psychology during the twenty-first century will continue to focus on two viewpoints: the Engineer’s Psychology of Technology (EPT) and the Humanists’ Psychology of Technology (HPT). Second, the growth of this subfield will become increasingly interdisciplinary with the advent of new techniques of research, for example, convergent technologies comprising inputs from nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology, and cognitive science. Third, several social psychological explanations of behavior will need to be adapted in the context of technology, for example, how our attributions will change—say, attributing failures to the machine or its operators, treating robots and humans alike, blurring the boundaries between what is technologically determined vs. what is naturally determined, and more. Obviously, such issues will raise questions regarding “What does it mean to be human?”, as Nikolas Kompridis put it. Undoubtedly, such ethical issues will continue to dominate the relationship between technology and human behavior in this millennium. The applicability issue, as discussed in Chap. 1, will, thus, often set limits to the role of technology. Overall, predicting behavior in the context of technology will become a challenge for the psychological sciences, with technology making it easier on the one hand but more complex on the other.
Suggestions for Further Reading
Kurzweil, R. (1999).The age of spiritual machines: When computers exceed human intelligence. New York: Penguin Books.
Roco, M. C., & Bainbridge, W. S. (2002).Converging technologies for improving human performance: Nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science. NSF/DOC-sponsored report, Arlington, Virginia.
Salvendi, G. (2012). Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kool, V.K., Agrawal, R. (2016). Psychology of Technology in the Twenty-First Century. In: Psychology of Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45333-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45333-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45332-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45333-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)