A Change Management Review: Extracting Concepts to Preserve Business and IT Alignment

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 261)

Abstract

Organisations introduce changes in order to adapt themselves to the extremely changing context. These changes often impact Information Technology (IT) and Business domains. In most of the cases, the scope of the organisational elements in these domains requiring adaptation is not well defined, leaving out elements, this can lead to misalignment. Thus, it is important to know the impact scope with the purpose of performing a full adaptation. When reviewing the literature in the Business-IT alignment research field, we found that there are no works providing support to deal with this aspect. However, there are several works in adjacent areas that have studied change management. In this paper, we report a systematic review of related work in these areas. From the review, we extract a set of clues applicable to the Business-IT alignment field what results in a change analysis framework and a set of rules to estimate impact scope and potential adaptation. Framework elements and rules are illustrated by means of a small example.

Keywords

Change forces Organisation Alignment Information technology Business-IT alignment Strategic alignment 

References

  1. 1.
    Buckley, J., Mens, T., Zenger, M., Rashid, A., Kniesel, G.: Towards a taxonomy of software change. J. Softw. Mainten. Evol. Res. Pract. 17(5), 309–332 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Avila, O., Goepp, V., Kiefer, F.: Understanding and classifying information system alignment approaches. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 50(1), 2–14 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ullah, A., Lai, R.: A systematic review of business and information technology alignment. ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst. (TMIS) 4(1), 4 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Williams, B.J., Carver, J.C.: Characterizing software architecture changes: a systematic review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 52(1), 31–51 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bohner, S.A.: Impact analysis in the software change process: a year 2000 perspective. In: Conference on Software Maintenance, pp. 42–51 (1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jang, Y.K., Chae, H.S., Kwon, Y.R., Bae, D.H.: Change impact analysis for a class hierarchy. In: Proceedings of Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference, pp. 304–311 (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen, C., Chen, P.: A holistic approach to managing software change impact. J. Syst. Softw. 82(12), 2051–2067 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marzullo, F.P., De Mario, V.F., Da Silva, J.P., Nunes, L.S., De Souza, J.M.: A model-driven development (MDD) approach to change impact analysis. In: ICIS 2010 Proceedings - 31st International Conference on Information Systems (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li, B., Sun, X., Keung, J.: Fca-cia: An approach of using fca to support cross-level change impact analysis for object oriented java programs. Inf. Softw. Technol. 55(8), 1437–1449 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Boer, F.S., Bonsangue, M.M., Groenewegen, L.P.J., Stam, A.W., Stevens, S., Van Der Torre, L.: Change impact analysis of enterprise architectures. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on IRI, pp. 177–181 (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kumar, A., Raghavan, P., Ramanathan, J., Ramnath, R.: Enterprise interaction ontology for change impact analysis of complex systems. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Asia-Pacific Services Computing Conference, pp. 303–309 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Díaz, J., Pérez, J., Garbajosa, J., Wolf, A.L.: Change impact analysis in product-line architectures. In: Crnkovic, I., Gruhn, V., Book, M. (eds.) ECSA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6903, pp. 114–129. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang, Y., Yang, J., Zhao, W., Su, J.: Change impact analysis in service-based business processes. Serv. Orient. Comput. Appl. 6(2), 131–149 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weidlich, M., Mendling, J., Weske, M.: Propagating changes between aligned process models. J. Syst. Softw. 85(8), 1885–1898 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fdhila, W., Indiono, C., Rinderle-Ma, S., Reichert, M.: Dealing with change in process choreographies: design and implementation of propagation algorithms. Inf. Syst. 49, 1–24 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goknil, A., Kurtev, I., Berg, K., Spijkerman, W.: Change impact analysis for requirements: a metamodeling approach. Inf. Softw. Technol. 56(8), 950–972 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang, H., Li, J., Zhu, L., Jeffery, R., Liu, Y., Wang, Q., Li, M.: Investigating dependencies in software requirements for change propagation analysis. Inf. Softw. Technol. 56(1), 40–53 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Avila, O., Garcés, K.: Change management contributions for business-IT alignment. In: Abramowicz, W., Kokkinaki, A. (eds.) BIS 2014 Workshops. LNBIP, vol. 183, pp. 156–167. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Henderson, J., Venkatraman, N.: Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Syst. J. 32(1), 4–17 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Systems and Computing Engineering, School of EngineeringUniversity of Los AndesBogotaColombia

Personalised recommendations