Advertisement

Towards a Richer Account of Cyberharm: The Value of Self-Determination in the Context of Cyberwarfare

  • Patrick Taylor SmithEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Philosophical Studies Series book series (PSSP, volume 124)

Abstract

Cyberharm is an increasingly used and useful concept for the ethical analysis of actions in cyberspace. At the moment, two accounts of cyberharm dominate the discussion: the instrumentalist view where only harm to material human interests is morally relevant and the intrinsic view where information systems have independent moral status. I reject the latter as ontologically implausible and the former as normatively impoverished. I then describe a richer account of the human interests that are affected and constituted by our relationships with information systems. Relying upon legitimate human entitlements to the social bases for friendship, proper pride, and theoretical reasoning, I show that the richer account can incorporate the best elements of both, rival views. I then apply this richer account to the issue of when cyberharm constitutes a casus belli, arguing that the value of political self-determination is essential to understanding when cyberattacks generate unilateral rights to self-defense.

Keywords

Cyberwarfare Just war theory Information ethics Sovereignty 

References

  1. Altman, Andrew, and Christopher Wellman. 2009. A liberal theory of international justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blake, Michael. 2001. Distributive justice, state coercion, and autonomy. Philosophy and Public Affairs 30: 257–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brownlie, Ian. 1963. International law and the use of force by states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark, Andy, and David Chalmers. 1998. The extended mind. Analysis 58: 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cook, James. 2010. ‘Cyberation’ and just war doctrine: A response to Dipert. The Journal of Military Ethics 9: 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Devall, Bill, and George Sessions. 1985. Deep ecology: Living as if nature matter. Salt Lake City: Peregrine Smith.Google Scholar
  7. Dipert, Randall. 2010. The ethics of cyberwarfare. Journal of Military Ethics 9: 384–2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eberle, Christopher. 2013. Just war and cyberwar. The Journal of Military Ethics 12: 54–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Floridi, Luciano. 2003. On the intrinsic value of information objects and the infosphere. Ethics and Information Technology 4: 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jenkins, Ryan. 2013. Is stuxnet physical? Does it matter? The Journal of Military Ethics 12: 68–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kahn, Leonard. 2013. Understanding just cause in Cyberwar. In: Routledge handbook of war and ethics: Just war, ed. Fritz Alhoff, Evans, Nicholas G., and Henschke, Adam, 382–393. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Levitov, Alex. 2015. Human rights, self-determination, and external legitimacy. Politics, Philosophy, and Economics 14(3): 291–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Naess, Arne. 1973. The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement. Inquiry 16: 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nozick, Robert. 1969. Coercion. In Philosophy, science, and method: Essays in honor of Ernest Nagel, ed. White Morgenbesser, 440–772. New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  15. Nussbaum, Martha. 2008. Human capabilities, female human beings. In Global justice: Seminal essays, ed. T. Pogge and D. Mollendorf, 495–552. St. Paul: Paragon Press.Google Scholar
  16. Pogge, Thomas. 2005. Baselines for determining harm. In Ethics and international affairs, ed. Joel Rosenthal and Christian Barry, 329–334. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Rawls, John. 1999. The law of peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Risse, Mathias. 2005. How does the global order harm the poor? Philosophy and Public Affairs 33: 2349–2376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schmitt, Michael. 1999. Computer network attack and the use of force in international law: Thoughts on a normative framework. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 37: 885–937.Google Scholar
  20. Singer, Peter. 1975. Animal liberation. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  21. Smith, Patrick Taylor. 2016. Cyberattacks as Casus Belli: A sovereignty-based account. Journal of Applied Philosophy: doi:  10.1111/japp.12169.
  22. Taddeo, Mariarosaria. 2012. Information warfare: A philosophical perspective. Philosophy and Technology 25: 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Taddeo, Mariarosaria. 2016. Just information warfare. Topoi 35(1): 213–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Walzer, Michael. 1980. The moral standing of states: A response to four critics. Philosophy and Public Affairs 9: 209–229.Google Scholar
  25. Walzer, Michael. 2000. Just and unjust wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations, 3rd ed. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. Ypi, Lea. 2013. What’s wrong with colonialism. Philosophy and Public Affairs 41: 158–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National University SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations