Advertisement

Cognitive Modelling of Emotion Contagion in a Crowd of Soccer Supporter Agents

  • Berend Jutte
  • C. Natalie van der Wal
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9875)

Abstract

This paper introduces a cognitive computational model of emotion contagion in a crowd of soccer supporters. It is useful for: (1) better understanding of the emotion contagion processes and (2) further development into a predictive and advising application for soccer stadium managers to enhance and improve the ambiance during the soccer game for safety or economic reasons. The model is neurologically grounded and focuses on the emotions “pleasure” and “sadness”. Structured simulations showed the following four emergent patterns of emotion contagion: (1) hooligans are very impulsive and are not fully open for other emotions, (2) fanatic supporters are very impulsive and open for other emotions, (3) family members are very easily influenced and are not very extravert, (4) the media is less sensible to the ambiance in the stadium. For validation of the model, the model outcomes were compared to the heart rate of 100 supporters and reported emotions. The model produced similar heart rate and emotional patterns. Further implications of the model are discussed.

Keywords

Cognitive modelling Crowd behaviour Emotion contagion 

References

  1. 1.
    Back, L., Crabbe, T., Solomos, J.: Beyond the racist/hooligan couplet race, social theory and football culture. Br. J. Soc. 50, 419–442 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aknin, L.B., Barrington-Leigh, C.P., Dunn, E.W., Helliwell, J.F., Burns, J., Biswar-Diener, R., Kemeza, I., Nyende, P., Ashton-James, C.E., Norton, M.I.: Prosocial spending and well-being: cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 104, 635 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Football Passions: report of research conducted by the social issues of research cenre commissioned (2008). http://www.sirc.org/football/football_passions.pdf
  4. 4.
    Okaya, M., Yotsukura, S., Sato, K., Takahashi, T.: Agent evacuation simulation using a hybrid network and free space models. In: Yang, J.-J., Yokoo, M., Ito, T., Jin, Z., Scerri, P. (eds.) PRIMA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5925, pp. 563–570. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lacoboni, M., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Gallese, V., Buccino, G., Mazziotta, J.C., Rizzolatti, G.: Grasping the Intentions of Others with One’s Own Mirror Neuron System (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rizzolatti, G.: The mirror-neuron system and imitation. In: Hurley, S., Chater, N. (eds.) Perspectives on Imitation: From Cognitive Neuroscience to Social Science, vol. 1, pp. 55–76. MIT Press (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bosse, T., Duell, R., Memon, Z.A., Treur, J., van der Wal, C.N.: A multi- agent model for emotion contagion spirals integrated within a supporting ambient agent model. Cogn. Comput. 7(1), 111–136 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bosse, T., Hoogendoorn, M., Klein, M.C., Treur, J., Van Der Wal, C.N., Van Wissen, A.: Modelling collective decision making in groups and crowds: Integrating social contagion and interacting emotions, beliefs and intentions. Aut. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. 27(1), 52–84 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sharpanskykh, A., Treur, J.: Modelling and analysis of social contagion in dynamic networks. Neurocomputing 146, 140–150 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Adang, O.M.J.: Systematic observations of violent interactions between football hooligans. In: Thienpont, K., Cliquet, R. (eds.) In-Group/Out- Group Behaviour In Modern Societies, pp. 1–172. Vlaamse Gemeenschap, Brussel (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McLean, J., Brennan, D., Wyper, D., Condon, B., Hadley, D., Cavanagh, J.: Localisation of regions of intense pleasure response evoked by soccer goals. Psychiatry Res. 17(1), 33–43 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Knutson, B., Adams, C.M., Fong, G.W., Hommer, D.: Anticipation of Increasing monetary reward selectively recruits nucleus accumbens. J. Neurosci. 21, 1–5 (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Knutson, B., Fong, G.W., Adams, C.M., Varner, J.L., Hommer, D.: Dissociation of reward anticipation and outcome with event- related fMRI. NeuroReport 12, 3683–3687 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schacter, D.L.: Psychology (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kringelbach, M.L.: The Pleasure Center: Trust Your Animal Instincts. Oxford University Press, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Seymour, B., Daw, N., Dayan, P., Singer, T., Dolan, R.: Differential encoding of losses and gains in the human striatum. J. Neurosci. 27, 4826–4831 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    O’Doherty, J.P., Buchanan, T.W., Seymour, B., Dolan, R.J.: Predictive neural coding of reward preference involves dissociable responses in human ventral midbrain and ventral striatum. Neuron 49, 157–166 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goligorsky, M.S.: The concept of cellular “flight-or-fight” reaction to stress. Am. J. Physiol. 280(4), F551–F561 (2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Frederickson, B.L., Branigan, C.: Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought–action repertoires. Cogn. Emot. 19(3), 313–332 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shima, K., Tanji, J.: Science 282, 1335–1338 (1998)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bush, G., Luu, P., Posner, M.I.: Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4(6), 215–222 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceVrije UniversiteitAmsterdamNetherlands

Personalised recommendations