Market Structure and Innovation Policies in Denmark

Chapter
Part of the Media Business and Innovation book series (MEDIA)

Abstract

The Danish media system is a hybrid one where strong public service broadcasters and private print and broadcast media co-exist. This chapter, first, analyzes the market structure, measuring the degree of market concentration in newspapers, television, and radio and mapping state intervention. The analysis shows that all these media markets are highly concentrated: the four dominant television and radio broadcasters account for 80–90 % of total viewing/listening, the four dominant newspaper publishers for around 75 % of total circulation. The extent of state intervention also is high in Denmark, where the state owns the dominant television and radio actors and subsidizes the newspapers directly as well as indirectly. Second, the chapter outlines the policies in place for supporting innovation in the news media industry, focusing in particular on Act no. 1604 of 2013, which introduced subsidies for digital publishers and an earmarked pool to stimulate media innovation. However, the fact that not the entire innovation pool has actually been allotted to media innovation questions how appropriate the criteria for eligibility are. Third, the chapter makes recommendations for future revision of the media subsidy and innovation policy framework.

References

  1. Act no. 1604. (2013). Lov om mediestøtte. Copenhagen: The Ministry of Culture.Google Scholar
  2. Act no. 869. (2015). Bekendtgørelse af konkurrenceloven. Copenhagen: The Ministry of Business and Growth.Google Scholar
  3. Albarran, A. B. (2010). The media economy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bill no. L 20. (2013). Forslag til Lov om mediestøtte. Copenhagen: The Ministry of Culture.Google Scholar
  5. Colbjørnsen, T. (2014). What is VAT? The policies and practices of value added tax on ebooks in Europe. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 21(3), 326–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Executive Order no. 1653. (2013). Bekendtgørelse om mediestøtte. Copenhagen: The Ministry of Culture.Google Scholar
  7. Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems. Three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hjarvard, S., & Kammer, A. (2015). Online news: Between private enterprise and public subsidy. Media, Culture & Society, 37(1), 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Madsen, T. N. (2015). TV 2 Play runder 200.000 brugere. MediaWatch. Accessed November 6, 2015, from http://mediawatch.dk/secure/Medienyt/Web/article8108624.ece
  10. Minke, K. (2008). Aviskrigen. Dagblade i overlevelseskamp. Valby: Borgen.Google Scholar
  11. Mortensen, F. (2006). Catch 22: The privatization of Danish TV 2 vs. EU rules on state aid. Politik, 9(2), 74–82.Google Scholar
  12. Nielsen, R. K. (2012). Ten years that shook the media world. Big questions and big trends in international media developments. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.Google Scholar
  13. Nordicom. (2015). Mediestatistik. Accessed November 2, 2015, from http://www.nordicom.gu.se/mediefakta/mediestatistik
  14. Poulsen, E. (2014). Medieinnovation for halv kraft. Journalisten.dk. Accessed November 6, 2015, from http://journalisten.dk/medieinnovation-halv-kraft
  15. Rambøll. (2009). Udredning af den fremtidige offentlige mediestøtte (2nd ed.). Copenhagen: Rambøll Management Consulting.Google Scholar
  16. Søndergaard, H. (2003). Programfladestyring og organisationsforandringer i nordisk public service-fjernsyn. MedieKultur, 35, 5–22.Google Scholar
  17. Søndergaard, H. (2014). Når en fælles fjende er den bedste ven i nøden. Dansk mediepolitik til debat. Nordicom Information, 36(1), 65–72.Google Scholar
  18. Storsul, T., & Krumsvik, A. H. (2013). What is media innovation? In T. Storsul & A. H. Krumsvik (Eds.), Media innovations. A multidisciplinary study of change (pp. 13–26). Gothenburg: Nordicom.Google Scholar
  19. Syvertsen, T., Enli, G., Mjøs, O. J., & Moe, H. (2014). The media welfare state. Nordic media in the digital era. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. The Agency for Libraries and Media. (2011). Demokratistøtte. Fremtidens offentlige mediestøtte. Copenhagen: The Agency for Libraries and Media.Google Scholar
  21. The Danish Agency for Culture. (2014a). DRs public service-kontrakt for 2015–2018. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  22. The Danish Agency for Culture. (2014b). Mediernes udvikling i Danmark 2014. Accessed November 2, 2015, from http://www.kulturstyrelsen.dk/mediernes-udvikling-2014/
  23. The Danish Agency for Culture. (2015). Mediernes udvikling i Danmark 2015. Accessed November 2, 2015, from http://www.kulturstyrelsen.dk/mediernes-udvikling-2015/
  24. The Danish Union of Journalists. (2014). Gamle lønstatistikker. Accessed November 2, 2015, from http://journalistforbundet.dk/Job--lon/DJ-lonstatistik/Gamle-lonstatistikker/
  25. The Ministry of Culture. (2010). Fokus på kvalitet og mangfoldighed. Mediepolitisk aftale for 2011–2014. Copenhagen: The Ministry of Culture.Google Scholar
  26. The Ministry of Culture. (2014). Tilladelse til TV 2 DANMARK A/S til at udøve public service-programvirksomhed. Copenhagen: The Ministry of Culture.Google Scholar
  27. Thomsen, N., & Søllinge, J. D. (1991). De danske aviser, 1634–1991. Bind 3: 1918–1991. København: Dagspressens Fond.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The IT University of CopenhagenCopenhagen SDenmark

Personalised recommendations