Advertisement

Philosophy and Engineering: An Unconventional Work in Progress

  • Diane P. Michelfelder
  • Byron Newberry
  • Qin Zhu
Chapter
Part of the Philosophy of Engineering and Technology book series (POET, volume 26)

Abstract

This chapter serves to introduce the reader to the purpose and background of Philosophy and Engineering: Exploring Boundaries, Expanding Connections, and to the chapters that make up this work. Section 1.1 describes why, rather than being divided into parts, the book was deliberately organized to be a fluid whole. Section 1.2 addresses how fluidity is reflected in the contribution of the Forum on Philosophy, Engineering, and Technology to the development of the philosophy of engineering as a discipline, and in the ongoing debate over what engineering will look like in the future. This discussion points to a new perspective on what it means to do philosophy of engineering in a context of bridge-building between philosophers and engineers. Section 1.3 offers a window into the contents of the volume through brief chapter introductions.

Keywords

Philosophy of engineering Forum on philosophy, engineering, and technology Future of engineering Engineering and philosophy 

References

  1. Blockley, D. I. (1992). Engineering from reflective practice. Research in Engineering Design, 4(1), 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bulleit, W., Schmidt, J., Alvi, I., Nelson, E., & Rodriguez-Nikl, T. (2014). Philosophy of Engineering: What it is and why it matters. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice  10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000205, 02514003.
  3. Continental, A. G. (2006). In search of global engineering excellence: Educating the next generation of engineers for the global workplace. Hanover, Germany. http://www.contionline.com
  4. Duderstadt, J. J. (2008). Engineering for a changing world: A roadmap to the future of engineering practice, research, and education. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan. Online at www.milproj.de.umich.edu.
  5. Downey, G. (Ed.). (2015). Engineering studies 7(2–3).Google Scholar
  6. Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25, 735–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jaramillo Patiño, D. F. (2014). Filosofía de la Ingeniería: Una Disciplina Profesional en Construcción. INGE CUC, 10(1), 9–18.Google Scholar
  8. Sheppard, S. D. (2006). Taking stock: A look at engineering education at the end of the 20th century and beyond, American Society for Engineering Education, June 19.Google Scholar
  9. Simons, P. (2011). Ontology in engineering. In Philosophy of engineering (Vol. 2). London: The Royal Academy of Engineering.Google Scholar
  10. The Royal Academy of Engineering. (2010). Philosophy of engineering (Vol. 1). London: The Royal Academy of Engineering.Google Scholar
  11. The Royal Academy of Engineering. (2011). Philosophy of engineering (Vol. 2). London: The Royal Academy of Engineering.Google Scholar
  12. van de Poel, I. (2010). Philosophy and engineering: Setting the stage. In I. van de Poel & D. E. Goldberg (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: An emerging agenda (pp. 1–12). Dordrecht: Springer Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Vicenti, W. (1990). What engineers know and how they know it: Analytical studies from aeronautical history. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diane P. Michelfelder
    • 1
  • Byron Newberry
    • 2
  • Qin Zhu
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyMacalester CollegeSt. PaulUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringBaylor UniversityWacoUSA
  3. 3.Division of Liberal Arts and International StudiesColorado School of MinesGoldenUSA

Personalised recommendations