Abstract
Chapter 9 presents a theory of recursive hyperspectral sample processing of linear spectral mixture analysis (RHSP-LSMA) to form an adaptive linear mixing model (ALMM) that can adapt to the signatures, referred to as virtual signatures (VSs), generated directly from data in an unsupervised and recursive manner. This chapter considers an alternative approach to RHSP-LSMA, called recursive hyperspectral sample processing of maximal likelihood estimation (RHSP-MLE), that uses MLE error instead of orthogonal projection (OP) residual used by recursive hyperspectral sample processing of OSP (RHSP-OSP) in Chap. 8 and least-squares error (LSE) used by RHSP-LSMA as a criterion to generate VSs. Following approaches similar to those described in Chaps. 8 and 9, this chapter develops a theory of RHSP-MLE in conjunction with ALMM to generate unknown VSs recursively in an unsupervised manner, as RHSP-LSMA does, while implementing a binary composite hypothesis testing-based Neyman–Pearson detector (NPD) at the same time to automatically determine when RHSP-MLE should stop generating VSs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams, J.B., and M.O. Smith. 1986. Spectral mixture modeling: a new analysis of rock and soil types at the Viking lander 1 suite. Journal of Geophysical Research 91(B8): 8098–8112.
Adams, J.B., M.O. Smith, and A.R. Gillepie. 1989. Simple models for complex natural surfaces: a strategy for hyperspectral era of remote sensing. In Proceedings of IEEE international geoscience and remote sensing symposium ‘89, 16–21.
———. 1993. Image spectroscopy: interpretation based on spectral mixture analysis. In Remote geochemical analysis: elemental and mineralogical composition, ed. C.M. Pieters and P.A. Englert, 145–166. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boardman, J.W. 1994. Geometric mixture analysis of imaging spectrometry data. In International geoscience and remote sensing symposium, vol. 4, 2369–2371.
Chang, C.-I. 1998. Further results on relationship between spectral unmixing and subspace projection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 36(3): 1030–1032.
———. 2005. Orthogonal subspace projection revisited: a comprehensive study and analysis. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 43(3): 502–518.
———. 2007b. Overview. In Hyperspectral data exploitation: theory and applications, ed. C.-I. Chang, 1–16. New York: Wiley.
———. 2007c. Information-processed matched filters for hyperspectral target detection and classification. In Hyperspectral data exploitation: theory and applications, ed. C.-I. Chang, 47–74. New York: Wiley.
———. 2013. Hyperspectral data processing: algorithm design and analysis. Hoboken: Wiley.
———. 2016. Real time progressive hyperspectral image processing: endmember finding and anomaly detection. New York: Springer.
Chang, C.-I., and Q. Du. 2004. Estimation of number of spectrally distinct signal sources in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 42(3): 608–619.
Chang, C.-I., X. Zhao, M.L.G. Althouse, and J.-J. Pan. 1998b. Least squares subspace projection approach to mixed pixel classification in hyperspectral images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 36(3): 898–912.
Chang, C.-I., S. Chakravarty, and C.-S. Lo. 2010a. Spectral feature probabilistic coding for hyperspectral signatures. IEEE Sensors Journal 10(3): 395–409.
Chang, C.-I., X. Jiao, Y. Du, and H.M. Chen. 2011b. Component-based unsupervised linear spectral mixture analysis for hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 49(11): 4123–4137.
Chang, C.-I., W. Xiong, H.M. Chen, and J.W. Chai. 2011c. Maximum orthogonal subspace projection to estimating number of spectral signal sources for hyperspectral images. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing 5(3): 504–520.
Chang, C.-I., C. Gao, and S.Y. Chen. 2015g. Recursive automatic target generation process. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 12(9): 1848–1852.
Dennison, P.E., and D.A. Roberts. 2003. Endmember selection for multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis using endmember average RMSE. Remote Sensing of Environments 87: 123–135.
Du,Q. 2012. A new sequential algorithm for hyperspectral endmember extraction. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 695–699, July 2012.
Gao, C., and C.-I. Chang. 2014. Recursive automatic target generation process for unsupervised hyperspectral target detection. In 2014 I.E. international geoscience and remote sensing symposium (IGARSS), Quebec Canada, July 13–18.
Gao, C., S.Y. Chen, and C.-I. Chang. 2014. Fisher’s ratio-based criterion for finding endmembers in hyperspectral imagery. In Satellite data compression, communication and processing X (ST146), SPIE international symposium on SPIE sensing technology + applications, Baltimore, MD, 5–9 May.
Harsanyi, J.C., and C.-I. Chang. 1994. Hyperspectral image classification and dimensionality reduction: an orthogonal subspace projection approach. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 32(4): 779–785.
Heinz, D., and C.-I. Chang. 2001. Fully constrained least squares linear mixture analysis for material quantification in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 39(3): 529–545.
Kuybeda, O., D. Malah, and M. Barzohar. 2007. Rank estimation and redundancy reduction of high-dimensional noisy signals with preservation of rare vectors. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 55(12): 5579–5592.
Langrebe, D.A. 2003. Signal theory methods in multispectral remote sensing. Hoboken: Wiley.
Poor, H.V. 1994. An introduction to detection and estimation theory, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
Ren, H., and C.-I. Chang. 2003. Automatic spectral target recognition in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 39(4): 1232–1249.
Richards, J.A., and X. Jia. 1999. Remote sensing digital image analysis. New York: Springer.
Roger, R.E., and J.F. Arnold. 1996. Reliably estimating the noise in AVIRIS hyperspectral imagers. International Journal of Remote Sensing 17(10): 1951–1962.
Schowengerdt, R.A. 1997. Remote sensing: models and methods for image processing, 2nd ed. New York: Academic.
Settle, J.J. 1996. On the relationship between spectral unmixing and subspace projection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 34(4): 1045–1046.
Settle, J.J., and N.A. Drake. 1993. Linear mixing and estimation of ground cover proportions. International Journal of Remote Sensing 14(6): 1159–1177.
Shimabukuro, Y.E., and J.A. Smith. 1991. The least-squares mixing models to generate fraction images derived from remote sensing multispectral data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 29: 16–20.
Tu, T.M., C.-H. Chen, and C.-I. Chang. 1997. A posteriori least squares orthogonal subspace projection approach to weak signature extraction and detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 35(1): 127–139.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chang, CI. (2017). Recursive Hyperspectral Sample Processing of Maximum Likelihood Estimation. In: Real-Time Recursive Hyperspectral Sample and Band Processing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45171-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45171-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45170-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45171-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)