Skip to main content

Evidence-Based Assessment and Intervention for Problems with Writing in School Psychology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbook of Australian School Psychology
  • 7785 Accesses

Abstract

Writing is considered to be one of the most difficult academic areas to teach, yet it is an essential skill for academic success and communication. Research in the area of writing development and assessment is limited. Having knowledge of the instructional, linguistic and cognitive factors that impact writing development will allow school psychologists to serve as effective consultants and evaluators of writing difficulties. The definition and prevalence of written expression disorder will be discussed, in addition to common writing difficulties that are observable in a classroom setting. Tools for assessing written language (norm-referenced tests, curriculum-based measures, observations and writing rubrics) will be examined. Evidence-based instructional methods and interventions for specific writing difficulties will also be outlined. The chapter will conclude with a case study which outlines the process of evaluating and identifying specific writing difficulties and making appropriate recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 309.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 399.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. (1993). Structural equation modelling of relationships among developmental skills and writing skills in primary and intermediate grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 478–508. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altemeier, L., Jones, J., Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. (2006). Executive functions in becoming writing readers and reading writers: Note-taking and report writing in third and fifth graders. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29, 161–173. doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2901_8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Apel, K., Wolter, J. A., & Masterson, J. J. (2006). Effects of phonotactic and orthotactic probabilities during fast mapping on 5-year-olds’ learning to spell. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29(1), 21–42. doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2901_3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2014). NAPLAN Achievement in reading, persuasive writing, language conventions and numeracy: National report for 2014. Sydney: ACARA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Government Department of Education. (2014). Review of the Australian curriculum: Final report. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/documents/review-australian-curriculum-final-report

  • Ball, E. W., & Blachman, B. A. (1991). Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 49–66. doi:10.1080/10862969209547774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batorowicz, B., Missiuna, C. A., & Pollock, N. A. (2012). Technology supporting written productivity in children with learning disabilities: A critical review. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79(4), 211–224. doi:10.2182/cjot.2012.79.4.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W. (1999). Coordinating transcription and text generation in working memory during composing: Automatic and constructive processes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 99–112. doi:10.2307/1511269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W., & Amtmann, D. (2003). Preventing written expression disabilities through early and continuing assessment and intervention for handwriting and/or spelling problems: Research into practice. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 345–363). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W., & Graham, S. (1998). Language by hand: A synthesis of a decade of research on handwriting. Handwriting Review, 12, 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W., Nielsen, K. H., Abbott, R. D., Wijsman, E., & Raskind, W. (2008). Writing problems in developmental dyslexia: Under-recognized and under-treated. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 1–21. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.11.008.

  • Berninger, V. W., Rutberg, J. E., Abbott, R. D., Garcia, N., Anderson-Youngstrom, M., Brooks, A., & Fulton, C. (2006). Tier 1 and tier 2 early intervention for handwriting and composing. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 3–30. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2005.12.003.

  • Berninger, V. W., & Wagner, R. (2008). Best practices for school psychology assessment and intervention in reading and writing. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 1205–1220). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W., & Wolf, B. (2009). Teaching students with dyslexia and dysgraphia: Lessons from teaching and science. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, S., & Moats, L. C. (1997). Informed instruction for reading success: Foundations for teacher preparation. Baltimore, MD: International Dyslexia Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carreker, S. (2011). Teaching spelling. In J. R. Birsh (Ed.), Multisensory teaching of basic language skills (3rd ed., pp. 251–291). Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrow-Woolfolk, E. (2011). Oral and written language scales–second edition (OWLS-III). Torrance, CA: WPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavey, D. W. (2000). Dysgraphia: Why Johnny can’t write: A handbook for teachers and parents (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Y. (2003). Assessing writing: Are we bound by only one method? Assessing Writing, 8, 165–191. doi:10.1016/S1075-2935(03)00018-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. A. (2004). Relationship between orthographic-motor integration and computer use for the production of creative and well-structured written text. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 551–564. doi:10.1348/0007099042376373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (1992). Disability Discrimination Act 1992, Act No. 135 of 1992 as amended. Barton, ACT: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (2005). Disability standards for education 2005. Barton, ACT: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, C. J., Kelley, G. T., & Krauss, A. (2003). Relationship between visual-motor integration and handwriting skills of children in kindergarten: A modified replication study. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(4), 459–462. doi:10.5014/ajot.57.4.459.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deane, P., Williams, F., Weng, V., & Trapani, C. (2013). Automated essay scoring in innovative assessments of writing from sources. Journal of Writing Assessment, 6(1), 40–56. Retrieved from http://www.journalofwritingassessment.org/article.php?article=65.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfES (Department for Education and Skills). (2002). Primary National Strategy in England. London: DfES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dockrell, J. E., Lindsay, G., & Connelly, V. (2009). The impact of specific language impairments on adolescents’ written text. Exceptional Children, 75, 427–446. doi:10.1177/001440290907500403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edyburn, D. L. (2007). Technology‐enhanced reading performance: Defining a research agenda. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(1), 146–152. doi:10.1598/RRQ.42.1.7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. (2000). Learning to read and learning to spell: Two sides of a coin. Topics of Language Disorders, 20(3), 19–36. doi:10.1097/00011363-200020030-00005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National reading panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250–287. doi:10.1598/rrq.36.3.2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espin, C. A., De La Paz, S., Scierka, B. J., & Roelofs, L. (2005). The relationship between curriculum-based measures in written expression and quality and completeness of expository writing for middle school students. The Journal of Special Education, 38, 208–217. doi:10.1177/00224669050380040201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, D. P., Ortiz, S. O., & Alfonso, V. C., (2013). Essentials of Cross –Battery Assessment Third Edition. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder, K. P., & Majnener, A. (2007). Handwriting, development, competency, and intervention. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 49, 312–317. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00312.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fey, M. E., Catts, H. W., Proctor-Williams, K., Tomblin, J., & Zhang, X. Y. (2004). Oral and written story composition skills of children with language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1301–1318. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2004/098).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, D. P., Ortiz, S. O., & Alfonso, V. C. (2013). Essentials of cross-battery assessment (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Fuchs, L. S., & Barnes, M. A. (2007). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gansle, K. A., VanDerHeyden, A. M., Noell, G. H., Resetar, J. L., & Williams, K. L. (2006). The technical adequacy of curriculum-based and rating-based measures of written expression for elementary school students. School Psychology Review, 35, 435–450. Retrieved from http://www.nasponline.org/publications/spr/index.aspx?vol=35&issue=3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillberg, C., Gillberg, I. C., Rasmussen, P., Kadesjö, B., Söderström, H., Råstam, M., … Niklasson, L. (2004). Co-existing disorders in ADHD–Implications for diagnosis and intervention. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 13(1), i80–i92. doi:10.1007/s00787-004-1008-4

  • Graham, S. (2006). Writing. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 457–478). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Abbott, S., & Whitaker, D. (1997). The role of mechanics in composing elementary school students: A new methodological approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 170–182. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.89.1.170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Gillespie, A., & Mckeown, D. (2013). Writing: Importance, development, and instruction. Reading and Writing, 26(1), 1–15. doi:10.1007/s11145-012-9395-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD studies. In L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning disabilities (pp. 232–344). New York, NY: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2005). Improving the writing performance of young struggling writers. The Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 19–33. doi:10.1177/00224669050390010301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Loynachan, C. (1996). The directed spelling thinking activity: Application with high frequency words. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 11, 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Mason, L. (2005). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(2), 207–241. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.08.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Troia, G. (2000). Self-regulated strategy development revisited: Teaching writing strategies to struggling writers. Topics in Language Disorders, 20(4), 1–14. doi:10.1097/00011363-200020040-00003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879–896. doi:10.1037/a0029185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gravois, T., & Nelson, D. (2014). Best practices in instructional assessment of writing. In P. Harrison & A. Thomas (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology: Data-based decision making and accountability (pp. 203–218). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammill, D. D., & Larsen, S. C. (2009). Test of written language 4 (TOWL-4). San Antonio, TX: Pearson Assessments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, B. D., & Wills, H. P. (2014). The effects of goal setting, contingent reward, and instruction on writing skills. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47(1), 171–175. doi:10.1002/jaba.92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K., & Graham, S. (2013). An adjective is a word hanging down from a noun: Learning to write and students with learning disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia, 63, 65–79. doi:10.1007/s11881-011-0057-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1–27). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, M. K. (2003). Unlocking literacy: Effective decoding and spelling instruction. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, S. R., Swarz, C. W., Wakely, M. B., de Kruif, R. E., & Montgomery, J. W. (2002). Executive functions in elementary school children with and without problems in written expression. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 57–68. doi:10.1177/002221940203500105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, T. H., Roston, K. L., Sheu, C. F., & Hinojosa, J. (2013). Assessing handwriting intervention effectiveness in elementary school students: A two-group controlled study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 19–27. doi:10.5014/ajot.2013.005470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, M. M. P., Egan, M. Y., & Feder, K. P. (2011). A systematic review of interventions to improve handwriting. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 78, 13–25. doi:10.2182/cjot.2011.78.1.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katusic, S., Barbaresi, W., Colligan, R., Weaver, A., & Jacobsen, S. (2009). The forgotten learning disability: Epidemiology of written language disorder in a population-based birth cohort (1976-1982). Pediatrics, 123, 1306–1313. doi:10.1542/peds.2008-2098.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2014). Kaufman test of educational achievement–third edition (KTEA-III). Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 57–71). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. (1998). Assistive technology and learning disabilities: Today’s realities and tomorrow’s promises. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(1), 16–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, G. R., & Cutting, L. (1998). Treatment of learning disabilities. In E. Mash & R. Barkley (Eds.), Treatment of childhood disorders (pp. 468–500). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, G., Fletcher, J., Fuchs, S., & Chhabra, V. (2006). Learning disabilities. In E. J. Mash & R. Barkley (Eds.), Treatment of childhood disorders (pp. 512–592). New York, NY: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCurdy, M., Skinner, C., Watson, S., & Shriver, M. (2008). Examining the effects of a comprehensive writing program on the writing performance of middle school students with learning disabilities in written expression. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(4), 571–586. doi:10.1037/1045-3830.23.4.571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 299–325. doi:10.1007/bf01464076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMaster, K. L., & Campbell, H. (2008). New and existing curriculum-based writing measures: Technical features within and across grades. School Psychology Review, 37(4), 550–566. Retrieved from http://www.nasponline.org/publications/spr/index.aspx?vol=37&issue=4

  • Moskal, B. M. (2000). Scoring rubrics: What, when and how? Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(3). Retrieved June 3, 2013, from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=3

  • National Commission on Writing. (2003). The neglected “r”: The need for a writing revolution. New York, NY: The College Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2007). Education at a glance 2007: OECD indicators. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2007-en

  • Rapcsak, S. Z., Beeson, P., Henry, M. L., Leyden, A., Kim, E., Rising, K., … Cho, H. (2009). Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: Cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates. Cortex; A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 45(5), 575–591. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.04.006

  • Reece, C., & Treiman, R. (2001). Children’s spelling of syllabic/r/and letter-name vowels: Broadening the study of spelling development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22(2), 139–165. doi:10.1017/s0142716401002016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, A., Tucha, O., & Lange, K. W. (2005). Executive functions in children with dyslexia. Dyslexia, 11, 116–131. doi:10.1002/dys.289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R., & Mather, N. (1997). Orthographic dyslexia: The neglected subtype. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 12(4), 236–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, L. A., & Graham, S. (2008). A meta-analysis of single subject design writing intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 879–906. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.4.879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, M. M. (2009). Effective writing assessment and instruction for young English language learners. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(1), 57–62. doi:10.1007/s10643-009-0317-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrank, F. A., McGrew, K. S., Mather, N., & Woodcock, R. W. (2014). Woodcock-Johnson IV. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, B., Reid, R., & Graham, S. (2009). Teaching young students strategies for planning and drafting stories: The impact of self-regulated strategy development. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(5), 323–331. doi:10.3200/JOER.102.5.323-332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troia, G. A., & Graham, S. (2002). The effectiveness of a highly explicit, teacher-directed strategy instruction routine: Changing the writing performance of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 290–305. doi:10.1177/00222194020350040101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2009). Wechsler individual achievement test–third edition (WIAT-III). San Antonio, TX: NCS Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiser, B., & Mathes, P. (2011). Using encoding instructions to improve the reading and spelling performance of elementary students at risk for literacy difficulties: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 170–200. doi:10.3102/0034654310396719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, B. (2011). Teaching handwriting. In J. R. Birsh (Ed.), Multisensory teaching of basic language skills (3rd ed., pp. 179–206). Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicker, J., & Hadwin, A. (2009). Cognitive versus multisensory approaches to handwriting intervention: A randomized controlled trial. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 29(1), 40–48. doi:10.1177/153944920902900106.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimberley Bloor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kurasaki, R., Bloor, K., Sy, M., Huguenin, C. (2017). Evidence-Based Assessment and Intervention for Problems with Writing in School Psychology. In: Thielking, M., Terjesen, M. (eds) Handbook of Australian School Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45166-4_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics