Understanding Collective Behavior of Learning Design Communities

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9891)

Abstract

Social computing enables collective actions and social interaction with rich exchange of information. In the context of educators’ networks where they create and share learning design artifacts, little is known about their collective behavior. Learning design tooling focuses on supporting educators (learning designers) in making explicit their design ideas and encourages the development of “learning design communities”. Building on social elements, this paper aims to identify the level of engagement and interactions in three communities using an Integrated Learning Design Environment (ILDE). The results show a relationship between the exploration of different artifacts and creation of content in all the three communities confirming that browsing influence the community’s outcomes. Different patterns of interaction suggest specific impact of language and length of support for users.

Keywords

Learning design Communities of educators Collective behavior Social network analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Mor, Y., Craft, B., Hernández-Leo, D.: The art and science of learning design: editoral. Res. Learn. Technol. 21, 1–8 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lockyer, L., Bennett, S., Agostinho, S., Harper, B.: Handbook of Research on Learning Design and Learning Objects: Issues, Applications, and Technologies (2 volumes). IGI Global, Hershey (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Parameswaran, M., Whinston, A.B.: Social computing: an overview. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 19(1), 37, 762–780 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jiang, J., Wilson, C., Wang, X., Sha, W., Huang, P., Dai, Y., Zhao, B.Y.: Understanding latent interactions in online social networks. ACM Trans. Web (TWEB) 7(4), 18 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Recker, M.M., Yuan, M., Ye, L.: CrowdTeaching: supporting teachers as designers in collective intelligence communities. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 15(4), 138–160 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pynoo, B., van Braak, J.: Predicting teachers’ generative and receptive use of an educational portal by intention, attitude and self-reported use. Comput. Hum. Behav. 34, 315–322 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hernández-Leo, D., Asensio-Pérez, J.I., Derntl, M., Prieto, L.P., Chacón, J.: ILDE: community environment for conceptualizing, authoring and deploying learning activities. In: Proceedings of 9th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2014, September 2014, Graz, Austria, pp. 490–493 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garreta-Domingo, M., Hernández-Leo, D., Mor, Y., Sloep, P.: Teachers’ perceptions about the HANDSON MOOC: a learning design studio case. In: Proceedings of 10th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2015, September 2015, Toledo, Spain, pp. 420–427 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ICT DepartmentUniversitat Pompeu FabraBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations