Toward a Play Management System for Play-Based Learning

  • Eric Sanchez
  • Claudine Piau-Toffolon
  • Lahcen Oubahssi
  • Audrey Serna
  • Iza Marfisi-Schottman
  • Guillaume Loup
  • Sébastien George
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9891)

Abstract

This position paper is dedicated to describing a preliminary model of an integrated system, called Play Management System (PMS). PMS is designed to support both players and teachers to deliver, use, manage and track play situations. This PMS model results from a design-based research methodology. Our approach focuses on (1) the learners and the situation that emerges when they play the game, rather than the system dedicated to play and (2) the teachers who want to manage a game-based learning situation. Thus, we argue for a shift from a game-based to a play-based perspective.

Keywords

Game-based learning Play management system Classroom orchestration Design-based research Teachers’ requirement analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Sanchez, E.: Learning, Serious Games, and Gamification. Inmedia (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shaffer, D.: Epistemic frames for epistemic games. Comput. Educ. 3(46), 223–234 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ohlsson, S.: Learning to do and learning to understand: a lesson and a challenge for cognitive modeling. In: Reiman, P., Spade, H. (eds.) Learning in Humans and Machines: Towards an Interdisciplinary Learning Science, pp. 37–62. Elsevier Science, Oxford (1995)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Milgram, P., Kishino, F.: A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE (Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers) Trans. Inf. Syst. 77(12), 1321–1329 (1994). Special Issue on Networked RealityGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Henriot, J.: Le jeu. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris (1969)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Suits, B.: Grasshopper: Games Life and Utopia. David R. Godine, Boston (1990)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dillenbourg, P.: Design for classroom orchestration. J. Comput. Educ. 69, 485–492 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sanchez, E., Young, S., Jouneau-Sion, C.: Classcraft: from gamification to ludicization of classroom management. Educ. Inf. Technol. 5(20), 1–17 (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garris, R., Ahlers, R., Driskell, J.E.: Games, motivation, and learning: a research and practice model. Simul. Gaming 33(4), 441–467 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Design-Based Research Collective: Design-based research: an emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educ. Researcher 1(32), 5–8 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schuler, D., Namioka, A. (eds.): Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1993)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Highsmith, J.: Agile Software Development Ecosystems. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Giesbers, B., van Bruggen, J., Joosten-ten Brinke, D., Burgers, J., Koper, R., Latour, I.: Towards a methodology for educational modelling: a case in educational assessment. Educ. Technol. Soc. 10(1), 237–247 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ellis, C.A., Gibbs, S.J., Rein, G.L.: Groupware: some issues and experiences. Commun. ACM 34(1), 39–58 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Long, P., Siemens, G.: Penetrating the fog: analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Rev. Online 5(46), 31–40 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Sanchez
    • 1
    • 2
  • Claudine Piau-Toffolon
    • 3
  • Lahcen Oubahssi
    • 3
  • Audrey Serna
    • 4
  • Iza Marfisi-Schottman
    • 3
  • Guillaume Loup
    • 3
  • Sébastien George
    • 3
  1. 1.Ecole Normale Supérieure de LyonLyonFrance
  2. 2.University of FribourgFribourgSwitzerland
  3. 3.Université Bretagne Loire, Université du Maine, LIUMLe MansFrance
  4. 4.INSA de Lyon, LIRIS, UMR5205LyonFrance

Personalised recommendations