Skip to main content

Assessing Learner-Constructed Conceptual Models and Simulations of Dynamic Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Adaptive and Adaptable Learning (EC-TEL 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9891))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Learning by conceptual modeling is seeing uptake in secondary and higher education. However, assessment of conceptual models is underdeveloped. This paper proposes an assessment method for conceptual models. The method is based on a metric that includes 36 types of issues that diminish model features. The approach was applied by educators and positively evaluated. It was considered useful and the derived grades corresponded with their intuitions about the models quality.

Research co-funded by EU FP7, Project no. 231526, http://www.dynalearn.eu.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Our method identifies 36 issue types, each with a unique number.

References

  1. Bredeweg, B., Liem, J., Beek, W., Linnebank, F., Gracia, J., Lozano, E., Wißner, M., Bühling, R., Salles, P., Noble, R., Zitek, A., Borisova, P., Mioduser, D.: DynaLearn - an intelligent learning environment for learning conceptual knowledge. AI Mag. 34(4), 46–65 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goberta, J.D., O’Dwyer, L., Horwitz, P., Buckley, B.C., Levy, S.T., Wilensky, U.: Examining the relationship between students’ understanding of the nature of models and conceptual learning in biology, physics, and chemistry. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 33(5), 653–684 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Harlen, W., James, M.: Assessment and learning: differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Assess. Educ. Principles Policy Pract. 4(3), 365–379 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liem, J.: Supporting conceptual modelling of dynamic systems: a knowledge engineering perspective on qualitative reasoning, University of Amsterdam (2013). https://jochemliem.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/liem2013-thesisdigital.pdf

  5. Songer, N.B., Ruiz-Primo, M.A.: Assessment and science education: our essential new priority? J. Res. Sci. Teach. 49(6), 683–690 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bert Bredeweg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bredeweg, B., Liem, J., Nicolaou, C. (2016). Assessing Learner-Constructed Conceptual Models and Simulations of Dynamic Systems. In: Verbert, K., Sharples, M., Klobučar, T. (eds) Adaptive and Adaptable Learning. EC-TEL 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9891. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45152-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45153-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics