Abstract
Although early theoretical works dealing with the effects of information communication technologies on people’s relation to spatiality claim that distance is no longer important in the information age, there is a growing number of empirical results stressing on the contrary the importance of geographical factors. In the era of big data now we have the chance to give more insights on the geography of the internet-related social processes, since there are unprecedentedly large enough samples to analyse social behaviour as well as to understand the changing role of geography. Accordingly, the following paper is focusing on the geographical analysis of a nowadays very popular topic: the online social networks. Examples of iWiW, the largest Hungarian social media site, are applied to show that such networks are evolving and are structured not independently of spatial constraints. The paper attempts to present many proximity-driven characteristics of this network starting from distance-based examples of space-time evolution and with examples of proximity-focused statistical analysis of the spatial structure. The calculations highlighted that—although it was changing in time—proximity-driven processes have been predominant in city-to-city diffusion, especially when dealing with intracity spreading, but also at cases of short distance neighbourhood diffusion. Calculations by comparing factors like the average strength of connectivity, population size and average relative distance rates of cities also confirmed that proximity had an influence on the network structure.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barabási AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286:509–512
Boschma R, Frenken K (2010) The spatial evolution of innovation networks. A proximity perspective. In: Boschma R, Martin R (eds) The handbook of evolutionary economic geography. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 120–135
Boyd D, Ellison NB (2007) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J Comput Mediat Commun 13:210–230
Cairncross F (1997) The death of distance. How the communication revolution will change our lives. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Cliff AD (1968) The neighbourhood effect in the diffusion of innovations. Trans Inst Br Geogr 44:75–84
de Blij H (2012) Why geography matters: more than ever, 2nd edn. Oxford, New York
Ellison N, Steinfeld C, Lampe C (2006) Spatially bounded online social networks and social capital: the role of Facebook. Paper presented at the annual conference of the international communication association, Dresden, 19–23 June. http://www.ucalgary.ca/files/stas341/Facebook_ICA_2006.pdf. Accessed 30 Nov 2015
Gould PR (1975) Spatial diffusion: the spread of ideas and innovations in geographic space. Learning Resources in International Studies, New York
Hägerstand T (1967) Innovation diffusion as a spatial process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Hecht B, Hong L, Suh B, Chi EH (2011) Tweets from Justin Bieber’s heart: the dynamics of the “location” field in user profiles. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM Press, New York, pp 237–246
Johnston RJ, Pattie C (2011) Social networks, geography and neighbourhood effects. In: Scott J, Carrington P (eds) The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. SAGE Publications Ltd, London, pp 301–311
Lan T, Lan C, Tserendondog O (2011) Analysis of social network sites diffusion in Mongolia. Afr J Bus Manag 5(23):9889–9895
Lazer D, Pentland A, Adamic L, Aral S, Barabasi AL, Brewer D, Christakis N, Contractor N, Fowler J, Gutmann M, Jebara T, King G, Macy M, Roy D, Van Alstyne M (2009) Computational social science. Science 323(5915):721–723. doi:10.1126/science.1167742
Lengyel B, Varga A, Ságvári B, Jakobi Á, Kertész J (2015) Geographies of an online social network. PLoS One 10(9):e0137248. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137248
Liben-Nowell D, Novak J, Kumar R, Raghavan P, Tomkins A (2005) Geographic routing in social networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:11623–11628
Oh J, Susarla A, Tan Y (2008) Examining the diffusion of user-generated content in online social networks. SSRN eLibrary. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1182631. Accessed 27 Nov 2015
Storper M, Venables A (2004) Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy. J Econ Geogr 4:351–370
Takhteyev Y, Gruzd A, Wellman B (2012) Geography of Twitter networks. Soc Netw 34:73–81
Tranos E, Nijkamp P (2012) The death of distance revisited: cyberplace, physical and relational proximities. Working Paper Tinbergen Institute, TI 2012-066/3. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2103024. Accessed 20 Nov 2015
Ugander J, Karrer B, Backstrom L, Marlow C (2011) The anatomy of the Facebook social graph. http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.4503. Accessed 30 Nov 2013
Wellmann B (2002) Little boxes, glocalization, and networked individualism. In: Tanabe M, van den Besselaar P, Ishida T (eds) Digital cities II: computational and sociological approaches. Springer, Berlin, pp 10–25
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jakobi, Á. (2017). Proximity-Driven Motives in the Evolution of an Online Social Network. In: Ivan, I., Singleton, A., Horák, J., Inspektor, T. (eds) The Rise of Big Spatial Data. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45123-7_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45123-7_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45122-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45123-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)