Advertisement

Modification of Habitat Quality by Non-native Species

  • Jorge L. GutiérrezEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Invading Nature - Springer Series in Invasion Ecology book series (INNA, volume 12)

Abstract

Non-native species can affect the quality of habitats available to other organisms and, in turn, the ecosystem services they provide or regulate. Although much research to date has focused on the impacts of non-native species on habitats, the links between habitat impacts and the provision or modulation of ecosystem services have remained elusive. This review illustrates two general kinds of non-native species impact on the abiotic conditions and resources available in a habitat: (1) assimilatory-dissimilatory impacts from the uptake and release of energy and materials and (2) physical ecosystem engineering impacts that arise from structural modification of environments caused by species presence and/or activities. Additionally, it distinguishes between physical ecosystem engineering impacts that result from the creation or modification of physical structures per se (e.g., effects on living space) and those that occur because of the interactions of physical structures and different forms of kinetic energy, such as heat or fluid flows (e.g., wind attenuation by trees). Examples are given to illustrate the co-occurrence of multiple impact pathways and their often compound impacts on single habitat attributes. Finally, the habitat-mediated impacts of non-native species on food and raw materials, climate, and tourism and recreation are discussed as examples of cascading impacts on provisioning, regulating, and cultural services, respectively.

Keywords

Abiotic conditions Ecosystem services Ecological impact Invasive species Habitat Ecosystem engineers Resources Physical structures 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank M. Vilà and an anonymous reviewer for their useful comments on the manuscript. This review is a contribution to the GrIETA program.

References

  1. Anderson CB, Martínez Pastur G, Lencinas MV et al (2009) Do introduced North American beavers Castor canadensis engineer differently in southern South America? An overview with implications for restoration. Mammal Rev 39:33–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bohlen PJ, Scheu S, Hale CM et al (2004) Non-native invasive earthworms as agents of change in northern temperate forests. Front Ecol Environ 2:427–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caraco NF, Cole JJ, Findlay SEG et al (2006) Vascular plants as engineers of oxygen in aquatic systems. Bioscience 56:219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Catford J (2017) Hydrological impacts of biological invasion. In: Vilà M & Hulme PE (eds) Impact of biological invasions on ecosystem services. Springer, Cham, pp 63–80Google Scholar
  5. Crooks JA (2002) Characterizing ecosystem-level consequences of biological invasions: the role of ecosystem engineers. Oikos 97:153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Farber S, Costanza R, Childers DL et al (2006) Linking ecology and economics for ecosystem management. Bioscience 56:121–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fischer A, van der Wal R (2007) Invasive plant suppresses charismatic seabird: the construction of attitudes towards biodiversity management options. Biol Conserv 135:256–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fowler D, Cape JN, Unsworth MH et al (1989) Deposition of atmospheric pollutants on forests [and discussion]. Philos Trans R Soc B 324:247–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fried G, Chauvel B, Reynaud P et al (2017) Decreases in crop production by non-native weeds, pests and pathogens. In: Vilà M, Hulme PE (eds) Impact of biological invasions on ecosystem services. Springer, Cham, pp 83–101Google Scholar
  10. Gaertner M, Le Maitre DC, Esler KJ (2017) Alterations of disturbance regimes by plant and animal invaders. In: Vilà M, Hulme PE (eds) Impact of biological invasions on ecosystem services. Springer, Cham, pp 249–259Google Scholar
  11. Gan X, Cai Y, Choi C et al (2009) Potential impacts of invasive Spartina alterniflora on spring bird communities at Chongming Dongtan, a Chinese wetland of international importance. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 83:211–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grand M, Gaidos E (2010) Methane emission from a tropical wetland in Ka’au Crater, O’ahu, Hawai’i. Pac Sci 64:57–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Green DS, Boots B, Crowe TP (2012) Effects of non-indigenous oysters on microbial diversity and ecosystem functioning. PLoS One 7(10):e48410CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Gutiérrez JL, Jones CG, Sousa R (2014) Toward an integrated ecosystem perspective of invasive species impacts. Acta Oecol 54:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hall LS, Krausman PR, Morrison ML (1997) The habitat concept and a plea for standard terminology. Wildlife Soc Bull 25:173–182Google Scholar
  16. Horgan FG, Stuart AM, Kudavidanage EP (2014) Impact of invasive apple snails on the functioning and services of natural and managed wetlands. Acta Oecol 54:90–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jivoff PR, Able KW (2003) Blue crab, Callinectes sapidus, response to the invasive common reed, Phragmites australis: abundance, size, sex ratio, and molting frequency. Estuaries 26:587–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones CG, Gutiérrez JL (2007) On the purpose, meaning, and usage of the ecosystem engineering concept. In: Cuddington K, Byers JE, Wilson WG, Hastings A (eds) Ecosystem engineers: plants to protists. Academic Press, New York, pp 3–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones CG, Gutiérrez JL, Byers JE et al (2010) A framework for understanding physical ecosystem engineering by organisms. Oikos 119:1862–1869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karschon R (1960) Deposit and grain-size distribution of wind-borne sand as affected by Eucalypt roadside plantations. In: 4th session working party on eucalypts, FAO Joint Subcommittee on Mediterranean Forestry Problems, Lisbon, 1960, p 3Google Scholar
  22. Kiviat E (2013) Ecosystem services of Phragmites in North America with emphasis on habitat functions. AoB Plants 5:plt008Google Scholar
  23. Lal R (2004) Agricultural activities and the global carbon cycle. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 70:103–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lubbers IM, van Groenigen KJ, Fonte SJ et al (2013) Greenhouse-gas emissions from soils increased by earthworms. Nat Clim Change 3:187–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mozdzer TJ, Megonigal JP (2013) Increased methane emissions by an introduced Phragmites australis lineage under global change. Wetlands 33:609–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nie M, Shang L, Liao C et al (2017) Changes in primary production and carbon sequestration after plant invasions. In: Vilà M, Hulme PE (eds) Impact of biological invasions on ecosystem services. Springer, Cham, pp 17–31Google Scholar
  27. Peh KSH, Balmford A, Birch JC et al (2015) Potential impact of invasive alien species on ecosystem services provided by a tropical forested ecosystem: a case study from Montserrat. Biol Invasions 17:461–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rajcan I, Swanton CJ (2001) Understanding maize-weed competition: resource competition, light quality and the whole plant. Field Crop Res 71:139–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reinhart KO, Gurnee J, Tirado R et al (2006) Invasion through quantitative effects: intense shade drives native decline and invasive success. Ecol Appl 16:1821–1831CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Slipke JW, Maceina MJ, Grizzle JM (1998) Analysis of the recreational fishery and angler attitudes toward Hydrilla in Lake Seminole, a southeastern reservoir. J Aquat Plant Manag 36:101–106Google Scholar
  31. Sousa R, Gutiérrez JL, Aldridge DC (2009) Non-indigenous invasive bivalves as ecosystem engineers. Biol Invasions 11:2367–2385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Strayer DL, Hattala KA, Kahnle AW (2004) Effects of an invasive bivalve (Dreissena polymorpha) on fish in the Hudson River estuary. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61:924–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sutton-Grier AE, Megonigal JP (2011) Plant species traits regulate methane production in freshwater wetland soils. Soil Biol Biochem 43:413–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Talley TS, Crooks JA (2007) Habitat conversion associated with bioeroding marine isopods. In: Cuddington K, Byers JE, Wilson WG, Hastings A (eds) Ecosystem engineers: plants to protists. Academic Press, New York, pp 185–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Villamagna AM, Murphy BR (2010) Ecological and socio-economic impacts of invasive water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes): a review. Freshw Biol 55:282–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Whitfield CJ, Baulch HM, Chun KP et al (2015) Beaver-mediated methane emission: the effects of population growth in Eurasia and the Americas. Ambio 44:7–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Wright JT, Byers JE, DeVore JL et al (2014) Engineering or food? Mechanisms of facilitation by a habitat-forming invasive seaweed. Ecology 95:2699–2706CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Grupo de Investigación y Educación en Temas Ambientales (GrIETA)San Eduardo del MarArgentina
  2. 2.Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales & CONICETUniversidad Nacional de Mar del PlataMar del PlataArgentina
  3. 3.Cary Institute of Ecosystem StudiesMillbrookUSA

Personalised recommendations