Advertisement

Changes in Primary Production and Carbon Sequestration after Plant Invasions

  • Ming Nie
  • Lei Shang
  • Chengzhang Liao
  • Bo LiEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Invading Nature - Springer Series in Invasion Ecology book series (INNA, volume 12)

Abstract

The potential differences in ecophysiological traits between native and invasive plants can change ecosystem functioning. In this chapter, we discuss the effects of plant invasions on ecosystem carbon (C) cycling in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. In general, plant invasions increase ecosystem C fluxes and pool sizes. Most experiments testing plant invasion effects on C cycling have focused primarily on plant aboveground production and its associated processes, especially in terrestrial ecosystems. The impacts of plant invasions on belowground C cycling are relatively poorly understood, especially belowground C decomposition and the associated root effects and microbial processes. In addition, most experiments have been conducted to examine the effects of plant invasions on C sequestration in laboratory or small-scale field conditions, whereas ecosystem-scale experiments are underrepresented. This chapter highlights the need for multifactorial experimental approaches to understanding invasion-induced changes in ecosystem C processes in the context of multiple global environmental changes. The combination of experimental and modelling studies will help to predict feedbacks between plant invasions and ecosystem C cycling in a changing world.

Keywords

Carbon cycling Global environmental change Photosynthesis Plant ecophysiological traits Primary production Soil respiration 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank M. Vilà and two anonymous reviewers for comments on an earlier draft of this chapter. This research was financially supported by National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2013CB430404), National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41630528 and 31670491), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Grant No. 14DZ1206003), and Shanghai Pujiang Scholar Program (Grant No. 16PJ1400900).

References

  1. Baruch Z, Goldstein G (1999) Leaf construction cost, nutrient concentration, and net CO2 assimilation of native and invasive species in Hawaii. Oecologia (Berl) 121:183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bastlová D, Květ J (2002) Differences in dry weight partitioning and flowering phenology between native and non-native plants of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.). Flora 197:332–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blumenthal DM, Resco V, Morgan JA et al (2013) Invasive forb benefits from water savings by native plants and carbon fertilization under elevated CO2 and warming. New Phytol 200:1156–1165CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradley BA, Blumenthal DM, Wilcove DS et al (2010) Predicting plant invasions in an era of global change. Trends Ecol Evol 25:310–318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bu NS, Qu JF, Li ZL et al (2015) Effects of Spartina alterniflora invasion on soil respiration in the Yangtze River Estuary, China. PLoS One 10Google Scholar
  6. Cavaleri MA, Sack L (2010) Comparative water use of native and invasive plants at multiple scales: a global meta-analysis. Ecology 91:2705–2715CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Davidson AM, Jennions M, Nicotra AB (2011) Do invasive species show higher phenotypic plasticity than native species, and if so, is it adaptive? A meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 14:419–431CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ehrenfeld JG (2010) Ecosystem consequences of biological invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:59–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feng YL, Lei YB, Wang RF et al (2009) Evolutionary tradeoffs for nitrogen allocation to photosynthesis versus cell walls in an invasive plant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:1853–1856CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Fridley JD (2012) Extended leaf phenology and the autumn niche in deciduous forest invasions. Nature (Lond) 485:359–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Funk JL, Vitousek PM (2007) Resource-use efficiency and plant invasion in low-resource systems. Nature (Lond) 446:1079–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hussner A (2009) Growth and photosynthesis of four invasive aquatic plant species in Europe. Weed Res 49:506–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hussner A (2012) Alien aquatic plant species in European countries. Weed Res 52:297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jiang LF, Luo YQ, Chen JK et al (2009) Ecophysiological characteristics of invasive Spartina alterniflora and native species in salt marshes of Yangtze River estuary, China. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 81:74–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kao-Kniffin J, Freyre DS, Balser TC (2010) Methane dynamics across wetland plant species. Aquat Bot 93:107–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kelly DJ, Hawes I (2005) Effects of invasive macrophytes on littoral-zone productivity and foodweb dynamics in a New Zealand high-country lake. J N Am Benthol Soc 24:300–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Le Quéré C, Moriarty R, Andrew RM et al (2015) Global carbon budget 2014. Earth Syst Sci Data 7:47–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leishman MR, Haslehurst T, Ares A et al (2007) Leaf trait relationships of native and invasive plants: community- and global-scale comparisons. New Phytol 176:635–643CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Liao CZ, Luo YQ, Jiang LF et al (2007) Invasion of Spartina alterniflora enhanced ecosystem carbon and nitrogen stocks in the Yangtze Estuary, China. Ecosystems 10:1351–1361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liao CZ, Peng RH, Luo YQ et al (2008) Altered ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycles by plant invasion: a meta-analysis. New Phytol 177:706–714CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Mauritz M, Lipson D (2013) Altered phenology and temperature sensitivity of invasive annual grasses and forbs changes autotrophic and heterotrophic respiration rates in a semi-arid shrub community. Biogeosci Discuss 10:6335–6375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nagel JM, Griffin KL (2001) Construction cost and invasive potential: comparing Lythrum salicaria (Lythraceae) with co-occurring native species along pond banks. Am J Bot 88:2252–2258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Prater M, Obrist D, Arnone J III et al (2006) Net carbon exchange and evapotranspiration in postfire and intact sagebrush communities in the Great Basin. Oecologia (Berl) 146:595–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sage RF, Monson RK (1999) Preface. In: Monson RFSK (ed) C4 plant biology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp xiii–xvCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schmidt MWI, Torn MS, Abiven S et al (2011) Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature (Lond) 478:49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sorte CJB, Ibañez I, Blumenthal DM et al (2013) Poised to prosper? A cross-system comparison of climate change effects on native and non-native species performance. Ecol Lett 16:261–270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Vourlitis GL, Kroon JL (2013) Growth and resource use of the invasive grass, pampas grass (Cortaderia selloana), in response to nitrogen and water availability. Weed Sci 61:117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yamashita N, Ishida A, Kushima H et al (2000) Acclimation to sudden increase in light favoring an invasive over native trees in subtropical islands, Japan. Oecologia (Berl) 125:412–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yuan J, Ding W, Liu D et al (2014) Exotic Spartina alterniflora invasion alters ecosystem–atmosphere exchange of CH4 and N2O and carbon sequestration in a coastal salt marsh in China. Glob Change Biol 21(4):1567–1580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhou L, Yin S, An S et al (2014) Spartina alterniflora invasion alters carbon exchange and soil organic carbon in Eastern salt marsh of China. CLEAN Soil, Air, Water 42:1–8Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ministry of Education Key Lab for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, The Institute of Biodiversity ScienceFudan UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations