Skip to main content

Disruption of Pollination Services by Invasive Pollinator Species

Part of the Invading Nature - Springer Series in Invasion Ecology book series (INNA,volume 12)

Abstract

Plant–pollinator interactions and associated pollination services are essential for crop production and the integrity of terrestrial ecosystem services. Introduced pollinators, in particular social bees such as honeybees and bumblebees, have become invaders in many regions of the world, strongly affecting the pollination of native, cultivated, and non-native plants. These effects can be direct, when invaders interact with local flowering plants, or indirect, when invaders modify the interaction of native pollinators with flowering plants. Direct effects on pollination depend on whether the plant benefits from the flower visits are greater than their costs, a relationship that can be density dependent. Shifts from mutualism to antagonism occur when invasive pollinators reach extremely high densities, because the interaction costs exceed the benefits. Indirect effects depend on whether pollinator invaders alter the benefit–cost ratio of native pollinator visits, displace them, or trigger reductions in native pollinator diversity. Through a literature review, we found that the impacts of invasive pollinators on pollination were predominantly negative for native plants, mixed for crops, and positive for invasive plants. Furthermore, they can synergistically interact with other stressors on pollination such as climate change and habitat disturbance. Although invasive pollinators can back up pollination of some native plants in highly disturbed habitats, and some crops in intensively modified agro-ecosystems, they cannot replace the role of a diverse pollinator assemblage for wild plant reproduction and crop yield. Hence, managing agro-ecosystems for enhancing wild pollinator diversity, and avoiding further introductions of non-native pollinators, are realistic cost-effective measures for the provision and stability of pollination services.

Keywords

  • Apis
  • Bombus
  • Climate change
  • Crop
  • Disturbance
  • Indirect effects
  • Introduced pollinators
  • Mutualism

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-45121-3_13
  • Chapter length: 18 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-45121-3
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 13.1
Fig. 13.2
Fig. 13.3
Fig. 13.4
Fig. 13.5

References

  • Aguilar R, Ashworth L, Galetto L et al (2006) Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 9:968–980

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aizen MA, Morales CL, Morales JM (2008) Invasive mutualists erode native pollination webs. PLoS Biol 6:0396–0403

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Aizen MA, Garibaldi LA, Cunningham SA et al (2009) How much does agriculture depend on pollinators? Lessons from long-term trends in crop production. Ann Bot 103:1579–1588

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Aizen MA, Morales CL, Vázquez DP et al (2014) When mutualism goes bad: density-dependent impacts of introduced bees on plant reproduction. New Phytol 204:322–328

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bartomeus I, Ascher JS, Gibbs J et al (2013) Historical changes in northeastern US bee pollinators related to shared ecological traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:4656–4660

    CAS  CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S et al (2011) A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 26:333–339

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brittain C, Williams N, Kremen C et al (2013) Synergistic effects of non-Apis bees and honeybees for pollination services. Proc Biol Sci 280:2012–2767

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest JRK (2015) Plant–pollinator interactions and phenological change: what can we learn about climate impacts from experiments and observations? Oikos 124:4–13

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fründ J, Dormann CF, Holzschuh A et al (2013) Bee diversity effects on pollination depend on functional complementarity and niche shifts. Ecology 94:2042–2054

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gagic V, Bartomeus I, Jonsson T et al (2015) Functional identity and diversity of animals predict ecosystem functioning better than species-based indices. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 282:2014–2620

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Garibaldi LA, Steffan-Dewenter I, Winfree R et al (2013) Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science 339:1608–1611

    CAS  CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garibaldi LA, Carvalheiro LG, Leonhardt SD et al (2014) From research to action: enhancing crop yield through wild pollinators. Front Ecol Environ 12(8):439–447

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs J, Sheffield CS (2009) Rapid range expansion of the wool-carder bee, Anthidium manicatum (Linnaeus) (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae), in North America. J Kansas Entomol Soc 82:21–29

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • González-Varo JP, Biesmeijer JC, Bommarco R et al (2013) Combined effects of global change pressures on animal-mediated pollination. Trends Ecol Evol 28:524–530

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goulson D (2003) Effects of introduced bees on native ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:1–26

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Goulson D, Stout JC, Kells AR (2002) Do exotic bumblebees and honeybees compete with native flower-visiting insects in Tasmania? J Insect Conserv 6:179–189

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kenis M, Auger-Rozenberg M-A, Roques A et al (2008) Ecological effects of invasive alien insects. Biol Invasions 11:21–45

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Klein A-M, Vaissière BE, Cane JH et al (2007) Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc Biol Sci 274:303–313

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Memmott J, Waser NM (2002) Integration of alien plants into a native flower-pollinator visitation web. Proc Biol Sci 269:2395–2399

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Montero-Castaño A, Vilà M (2012) Impact of landscape alteration and invasions on pollinators: a meta-analysis. J Ecol 100:884–893

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Morales CL, Arbetman MP, Cameron SA et al (2013) Rapid ecological replacement of a native bumble bee by invasive species. Front Ecol Environ 11:529–534

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ollerton J, Winfree R, Tarrant S (2011) How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos 120:321–326

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Roubik DW (2002) The value of bees to the coffee harvest. Nature (Lond) 417:2002

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schleuning M, Fründ J, García D (2015) Predicting ecosystem functions from biodiversity and mutualistic networks: an extension of trait-based concepts to plant–animal interactions. Ecography 38:1–13

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider S, DeGrandi-Hoffman G, Smith DR (2004) The African honey bee: factors contributing to a successful biological invasion. Annu Rev Entomol 49:351–376

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger O, Biesmeijer JC, Bommarco R et al (2010) Multiple stressors on biotic interactions: how climate change and alien species interact to affect pollination. Biol Rev 85:777–795

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Von Holle B (1999) Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown ? Biol Invasions 1:21–32

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Traveset A, Richardson DM (2006) Biological invasions as disruptors of plant reproductive mutualisms. Trends Ecol Evol 21:208–216

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity–ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8:857–874

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank N. Bartomeus and M. Vilà for helpful comments on a previous draft. We also thank PICT 2012–3015 funding. A.S. holds a doctoral scholarship from CONICET.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolina L. Morales .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morales, C.L., Sáez, A., Garibaldi, L.A., Aizen, M.A. (2017). Disruption of Pollination Services by Invasive Pollinator Species. In: Vilà, M., Hulme, P. (eds) Impact of Biological Invasions on Ecosystem Services. Invading Nature - Springer Series in Invasion Ecology, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45121-3_13

Download citation