Abstract
The effect of photoperiods of 8 h (8:16 light:dark), 12 h (12:12), and 16 h (16:8) on flowering time, plant architecture, and biomass production were investigated in an RIL population derived from a cross between domesticated foxtail millet (Setaria italica) and its wild progenitor green foxtail (S. viridis). Flowering time, height, and biomass were found to be highly and positively correlated in all three photoperiod regimes. Branching, however, is weakly and variably associated with the other three traits. After the effects of variation in daily radiation and temperature were removed, ANOVA analyses of Photoperiod and RIL (genotype) found both factors and their interaction significant for all traits, with RIL and Photoperiod * RIL also explaining large amounts of variation. However, while Photoperiod by itself explained much of the variation in flowering time and in branching, it explained little of that for height and biomass. Regions were identified where all three trials identify QTL in the same genomic regions as well as QTL found in either the 8 and 12 h trials or the 12 and 16 h trials. This pattern may be evidence for differences in regulation between shorter and longer photoperiods. Comparison of QTL with previous greenhouse and field trials finds several overlapping QTL and multiple independent QTL. A well-supported QTL region on chromosome IV has been shown previously to contain a number of genes in the CONSTANS—FT pathway, and these results suggest that this pathway is conserved across photoperiods. Further genetic analysis of the multiple non-overlapping QTL regions between the photoperiod trials will be necessary to narrow down a list of candidate genes responsible for differences in flowering time and architecture between photoperiods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Basten CJ, Weir BS, Zeng ZB, editors. Zmap-a QTL cartographer. 5th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production: Computing Strategies and Software; 1994 August 7–12, Guelph, Ontario, Canada: Organizing Committee.
Basten CJ, Weir BS, Zeng ZB. QTL Cartographer Version 1.16 (1.16 ed.). Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University; 2002.
Bennetzen JL, Schmutz J, Wang H, Percifield R, Hawkins J, Pontaroli AC, et al. Reference genome sequence of the model plant Setaria. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30(6):555–61.
Brachi B, Faure N, Horton M, Flahauw E, Vazquez A, Nordborg M, et al. Linkage and association mapping of Arabidopsis thaliana flowering time in nature. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(5):e1000940.
Churchill GA, Doerge RW. Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics. 1994;138(3):963–71.
Doerge RW, Churchill GA. Permutation tests for multiple loci affecting a quantitative character. Genetics. 1996;142(1):285–94.
Doust AN, Devos KM, Gadberry MD, Gale MD, Kellogg EA. Genetic control of branching in foxtail millet. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(24):9045–50.
Doust AN, Kellogg EA, Devos KM, Bennetzen JL. Foxtail millet: a sequence-driven grass model system. Plant Physiol. 2009;149(1):137–41.
Hayama R, Yokoi S, Tamaki S, Yano M, Shimamoto K. Adaptation of photoperiodic control pathways produces short-day flowering in rice. Nature. 2003;422(6933):719–22.
Higgins JA, Bailey PC, Laurie DA. Comparative genomics of flowering time pathways using Brachypodium distachyon as a model for the temperate grasses. PLoS One. 2010;5(4):e10065.
Hung HY, Shannon LM, Tian F, Bradbury PJ, Chen C, Flint-Garcia SA, et al. ZmCCT and the genetic basis of day-length adaptation underlying the postdomestication spread of maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(28):E1913–21.
Izawa T, Oikawa T, Sugiyama N, Tanisaka T, Yano M, Shimamoto K. Phytochrome mediates the external light signal to repress FT orthologs in photoperiodic flowering of rice. Genes Dev. 2002;16(15):2006–20.
Jansen RC, Stam P. High-resolution of quantitative traits into multiple loci via interval mapping. Genetics. 1994;136(4):1447–55.
Jia GQ, Huang XH, Zhi H, Zhao Y, Zhao Q, Li WJ, et al. A haplotype map of genomic variations and genome-wide association studies of agronomic traits in foxtail millet (Setaria italica). Nat Genet. 2013;45(8):957–61.
Komiya R, Yokoi S, Shimamoto K. A gene network for long-day flowering activates RFT1 encoding a mobile flowering signal in rice. Development. 2009;136(20):3443–50.
Lazakis CM, Coneva V, Colasanti J. ZCN8 encodes a potential orthologue of Arabidopsis FT florigen that integrates both endogenous and photoperiod flowering signals in maize. J Exp Bot. 2011;62(14):4833–42.
Li PH, Brutnell TP. Setaria viridis and Setaria italica, model genetic systems for the Panicoid grasses. J Exp Bot. 2011;62(9):3031–7.
Malmberg RL, Held S, Waits A, Mauricio R. Epistasis for fitness-related quantitative traits in Arabidopsis thaliana grown in the field and in the greenhouse. Genetics. 2005;171(4):2013–27.
Mauro-Herrera M, Doust AN. Development and genetic control of plant architecture and biomass in the Panicoid grass, Setaria. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0151346. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151346.
Mauro-Herrera M, Wang XW, Barbier H, Brutnell TP, Devos KM, Doust AN. Genetic control and comparative genomic analysis of flowering time in Setaria (Poaceae). G3. 2013;3(2):283–95.
Meng X, Muszynski MG, Danilevskaya ON. The FT-like ZCN8 gene functions as a floral activator and is involved in photoperiod sensitivity in maize. Plant Cell. 2011;23(3):942–60.
Murphy RL, Klein RR, Morishige DT, Brady JA, Rooney WL, Miller FR, et al. Coincident light and clock regulation of pseudoresponse regulator protein 37 (PRR37) controls photoperiodic flowering in sorghum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(39):16469–74.
Murphy RL, Morishige DT, Brady JA, Rooney WL, Yang SS, Klein PE, et al. Ghd7 (Ma(6)) represses Sorghum flowering in long days: Ghd7 alleles enhance biomass accumulation and grain production. Plant Genome. 2014;7(2):1–10.
Saha P, Blumwald E. Spike dip transformation of Setaria viridis. Plant J. 2016;86:89–101.
Song YH, Ito S, Imaizumi T. Similarities in the circadian clock and photoperiodism in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010;13(5):594–603.
Van Eck J, Swartwood K. Setaria viridis. In: Wang K, editor. Agrobacterium protocols. 2. New York: Springer; 2015. p. 57–67.
Vaughan DA, Lu BR, Tomooka N. The evolving story of rice evolution. Plant Sci. 2008;174(4):394–408.
Wolabu TW, Zhang F, Niu LF, Kalve S, Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Muszynski MG, et al. Three FLOWERING LOCUS T-like genes function as potential florigens and mediate photoperiod response in sorghum. New Phytol. 2016;210(3):946–59.
Yang SS, Murphy RL, Morishige DT, Klein PE, Rooney WL, Mullet JE. Sorghum phytochrome B inhibits flowering in long days by activating expression of SbPRR37 and SbGHD7, repressors of SbEHD1, SbCN8 and SbCN12. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e105352.
Zeng ZB. Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics. 1994;136(4):1457–68.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Jessica Stromski for phenotyping and plant care and Margarita Mauro-Herrera for genetic analyses and fruitful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Doust, A.N. (2017). The Effect of Photoperiod on Flowering Time, Plant Architecture, and Biomass in Setaria. In: Doust, A., Diao, X. (eds) Genetics and Genomics of Setaria. Plant Genetics and Genomics: Crops and Models, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45105-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45105-3_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45103-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45105-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)