Abstract
This article is based on a fieldwork-study of the religious life of a peasant woman in Southern Hungary. The interviews took place in the 1990s, in her home. Her everyday life is determined by her special, intimate relationship with her sacred beings, whose immediate presence she experiences day and night. She considers herself to be a servant and clerk of God. She gets the holy messages as suggestions, and perceives them “in her forehead”—as she says: “It is the mind that hears it, not the ear.” She writes down these texts immediately and regularly just after the vision. These texts form “The Scripture”—as she calls it—which she regards as a sacred text, consisting of the “Truth.” She receives not only sounds but also different lights and visions. She takes them as meaningful heavenly signs to be decoded, and she makes regular notations and interprets them in “The Scripture.” This study first tries to understand the role of these divine suggestions appearing in the form of acoustic sounds and visual images. Secondly, it tries to show how “The Scripture” as a diary documents her everyday practices of sacred communication, and the concepts and rituals of her daily religious practices. Thirdly, it tries to understand the peasant mysticism underlying the worldview of a contemporary woman who writes “The Scripture” with absolute awareness of the importance of her tasks, with the consciousness of prophets, visionaries and healers.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
It was in 1993 when my supervisor and professor of folklore and folk religion, Zsuzsanna Erdélyi, first took me to the village of Madaras, to study the folk prayers of this lady. But her special mystical religiousity provided such rich anthropological material, that it needed a deeper and more complex study of religion, and I myself went back to the village several times, conducting lots of interviews with her. We also kept on writing letters to each other for years. That is how I started to approach visions and other elements of her peasant mysticism within an anthropological study of religion.
- 2.
Barthes, Roland: The Pleasure of the Text, New York, 1975; Idem, Image–Music–Text. Transl. and ed. by S. Heath, London, Fontana, 1977, 9. and 164.
- 3.
Emic and etic are terms used by anthropologists and by others in the social and behavioral sciences to refer to two kinds of data concerning human behavior. The terms were coined by linguist Kenneth Pike, who argued that the tools developed for describing linguistic behaviors could be adapted to the description of any human social behavior. Emic and etic are derived from the linguistic terms phonemic and phonetic. See: Pike, Kenneth: Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behaviour. The Hague, Mouton, 1967, 1–3.
The emic approach investigates how local people think, how they perceive, categorize and interpret the world, while etic is a scientist-oriented approach. See: Kottak, Conrad: Mirror for Humanity, McGraw-Hill, New York. 2006, 47.
- 4.
Geertz, Clifford: “Religion as a Cultural System.” In N. M. Banton, ed.: Anthropological Approach to the Study of Religion. Edinborough, 1966, 7–8.
- 5.
Lovász Irén: Szakrális kommunikáció. Budapest, L’Harmattan-KRE, 2011, 19.
- 6.
Pike, Kenneth: Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behaviour. The Hague, Mouton, 1967, 1–3.
- 7.
Csordas, Thomas J.: The Sacred Self. The Cultural Phenomenology of Charismatic Healing. University of California Press, London, 1994. 4–7.; Stephen, Michael: Dreams of Change: The Innovative Role of Altered States Consciousness in Traditional Melanesian Religion. Oceania, 1979, 50:3–22.; Stephen, Michael: “Cargo Cults, Cultural Creativity and Autonomous Imagination.” Ethnos 1997 (vol. 25.), 333–358. Bowers, K.S., and D. Meichenbaum (eds.). 1984. The unconscious reconsidered, 227–272. New York: Wiley.
- 8.
Stephen, Michael: “Self, the Sacred Other and Autonomous Imagination.” In Herdt, M.–Stephen, M., eds.: The Religious Imagination in New Guinea. New Brunswick and London, Rutgers University Press, 1989, 41–66; especially 47.
- 9.
Rycroft, C. A: A Critical Dictionary of Psychoanalysis. Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1972, 66–67.
- 10.
Stephen, M. and Suryani, L. K.: “Shamanism, Psychosis and Autonomous Imagination.” In Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry. 2000, 5–40.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lovász, I. (2017). “It is the Mind That Hears it, Not the Ear…” Sounds, Lights, Visions in Peasant Mysticism. In: Vassányi, M., Sepsi, E., Daróczi, A. (eds) The Immediacy of Mystical Experience in the European Tradition. Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45069-8_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45069-8_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45067-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45069-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)