Abstract
Widespread emphasis on developing students’ algorithmic competency and symbol manipulation has resulted in students failing to think analytically and critically. If students are not encouraged to think flexibly about arithmetic and algebra in school, then this needs to be addressed by developmental courses and tasks designed to change the procedural orientation and superficial, fragmented knowledge of too many of our undergraduate students. Those who teach mathematics at the postsecondary level often dismiss the increasing number of students enrolled in precollege mathematics courses as “not my problem,” not realizing that “just algebra” is the downfall for many college students. Learning “just algebra” is a much more complex task than it appears. In this chapter, prior knowledge will be shown to have become problematic for many students, and we provide evidence of the need to improve the effectiveness of our own teaching and that of our future teachers in ways that help students develop deeper understanding of mathematics and promote mathematical thinking.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges. (2004). Beyond crossroads: Implementing mathematics standards in the first two years of college. Memphis, TN: American Mathematical Association of Two Year Colleges.
Attewell, P., Lavin, D., Domina, T., & Levey, T. (2006). New evidence on college remediation. Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 886–924.
Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view.
Bailey, T. (2009). Challenge and opportunity: Rethinking the role and function of developmental education in community college. New Directions for Community Colleges, 145, 11–30.
Barker, W., Bressoud, D., Epp, S., Ganter, S., Haver, B., & Pollatsek, H. (2004). Undergraduate programs and courses in the mathematical sciences: CUPM curriculum guide, 2004. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
Bautsch, B. (2013). Hot topics in higher education: Reforming remedial education. In National Conference of State Legislatures. http://www.ncsl.org/documents/educ/REMEDIALEDUCATION_2013.pdf.
Beaton, A. E. (1996). Mathematics achievement in the middle school years. IEA’s third international mathematics and science study (TIMSS). Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.
Blair, R. M., Kirkman, E. E., Maxwell, J. W., & American Mathematical Society. (2013). Statistical abstract of undergraduate programs in the mathematical sciences in the United States: Fall 2010 CBMS survey (pp. 131–136, Table TYE4).
Breneman, D. W., & Haarlow, W. N. (1998). Remediation in higher education. A symposium featuring “Remedial education: Costs and consequences”. Fordham Report, 2(9), 9.
Bright, G. W., & Joyner, J. M. (2003). Dynamic classroom assessment: Linking mathematical understanding to instruction. Vernon Hills, IL: ETA/Cuisenaire.
Brothen, T., & Wambach, C. A. (2004). Refocusing developmental education. Journal of Developmental Education, 2, 16–18, 20, 22, 33.
Carlson, M. P. (1998). A cross-sectional investigation of the development of the function concept. In A. H. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), CBMS issues in mathematics education: Research in collegiate mathematics education III (Vol. 7, pp. 114–162).
Cohen, D. (1995). Crossroads in mathematics: Standards for introductory college mathematics before calculus. Memphis, TN: AMATYC.
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers.
Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences. (2001). The mathematical education of teachers. Part I and Part II. Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America in cooperation with American Mathematical Society.
Crane, S. (1972). The wayfarer. In The complete poems of Stephen crane. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Crane, S. (1972). The complete poems of Stephen Crane (Vol. 130). Cornell University Press.
Davis, G. E., & McGowen, M. A. (2002). Function machines & flexible algebraic thought. In Proceedings of the 26th international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 273–280). Norwick, UK: University of East Anglia.
Davis, G. E., & McGowen, M. A. (2007). Formative feedback and the mindful teaching of mathematics. Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 21(1), 19.
De Lima, R. N., & Tall, D. (2008). Procedural embodiment and magic in linear equations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(1), 3–18.
DeMarois, P. (1998). Facets and layers of function for college students in beginning algebra (Doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick).
DeMarois, P., & McGowen, M. (1996b). Understanding of function notation by college students in a reform developmental algebra curriculum. In Proceedings of the 18th annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, Panama City, Florida (Vol. 1, pp. 183–186).
DeMarois, P., McGowen, M., & Whitkanack, D. (1996). Applying algebraic thinking to data (Preliminaryth ed.). Glenview, IL: Harper Collins Publishers.
Ganter, S., & Barker, W. (2004). The curriculum foundations project: Voices of the partner disciplines. AMC, 10, 12.
Krutetskii, V. A. (1969). Mathematical aptitudes. In J. Kilpatrick & I. Wirszup (Eds.), Soviet studies in the psychology of learning and teaching mathematics (Vol. II, pp. 113–128). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
McGowen, M. A. (1998). Cognitive units, concept images, and cognitive collages: An examination of the processes of knowledge construction. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick). ERIC: ED466377. http://www.dissertation.com/book.php?method=ISBN&book=1612337732.
McGowen, M. A. (2006). Developmental algebra. In N. Baxter-Hastings (Ed.), MAA Notes 69: A fresh start for collegiate mathematics (pp. 369–375).
McGowen, M., DeMarois, P., & Tall, D. (2000). Using the function machine as a cognitive root for building a rich concept image of the function concept. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics, Tucson, AZ (pp. 247–254).
McGowen, M. A., & Tall, D. O. (2010). Metaphor or met-before? The effects of previous experience on practice and theory of learning mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29(3), 169–179.
McGowen, M. A., & Tall, D. O. (2013). Flexible thinking and met-befores: Impact on learning mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 527–537.
National Center on Education and the Economy (2013). What does it mean to be college and work ready? The Mathematics Required of First-Year Cmmunity College Students. Washington, DC. Available online at: http://www.ncee.org/college-and-work-ready.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
National Research Council. (2000). Mathematics education in the middle grades: Teaching to meet the needs of middle grades learners and to maintain high expectations. In Proceedings of national convocation and action conferences/center for science, mathematics, and engineering education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2001). Educating teachers of science, mathematics, and technology: New practices for the new millennium. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Oehrtman, M. C., Carlson, M. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2008). Foundational reasoning abilities that promote coherence in students’ understandings of function. In M. P. Carlson & C. Rasmussen (Eds.), Making the connection: Research and practice in undergraduate mathematics (pp. 27–42). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
Recorde, R. (1543). The grounde of artes. London: Reynold Wolff. http://www.alibris.com/The-Grounde-of-Artes-Robert-Recorde/book/14453565.
Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 1–36.
Skemp, R. (1987). The psychology of learning mathematics expanded (Americanth ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates, Publishers.
Smith, J. P., III. (1996). Efficacy and teaching mathematics by telling: A challenge for reform. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 387–402.
Stigler, J. W., Givvin, K. B., & Thompson, B. J. (2010). What community college developmental mathematics students understand about mathematics. MathAMATYC Educator, 1(3), 4–16.
Stump, S. (1999). Secondary mathematics teachers’ knowledge of slope. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 2(11), 124–144.
Tall, D. O. (2004). The three worlds of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 23(3), 29–33.
Tall, D., McGowen, M., & DeMarois, P. (2000). The function machine as a cognitive root for the function concept. In Proceedings of 22nd annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education. Tucson, AZ (pp. 255–261).
Thompson, P. W. (1994). Students, functions, and the undergraduate curriculum. In E. Dubinsky, A. Schoenfeld, & J. Kaput (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education. I. CBMS issues in mathematics education (Vol. 4, pp. 21–44).
Thompson, P. (1996). If you say it, will they hear? In A slide presentation given at the American Mathematical Association of two-year colleges annual conference, Long Beach, CA.
Tucker, A. (1995). Models that work: Case studies in effective undergraduate mathematics programs. MAA Notes No. 38.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McGowen, M. (2017). Examining the Role of Prior Experience in the Learning of Algebra. In: Stewart, S. (eds) And the Rest is Just Algebra. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45053-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45053-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45052-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45053-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)