Advertisement

Indigenous East-Timorese Practices of Building and Sustaining Peace

Chapter
Part of the The Anthropocene: Politik—Economics—Society—Science book series (APESS, volume 9)

Abstract

Indigenous East Timorese peacebuilding practices, known as tarabandu, nahe biti , juramentu, matak-malarin, and halerik , are critical to transforming violence in Timor-Leste. These Indigenous peacebuilding practices are usually cheaper, more readily available and more flexible than liberal peacebuilding practices. The prioritisation of liberal peacebuilding over Indigenous peacebuilding systems by the Government and many international actors perpetuates cultural and structural violence in Indigenous communities in Timor-Leste. Despite these challenges, ordinary East Timorese continue to use and assert the importance of Indigenous peacebuilding practices to transform community violence, build relationships and maintain cultural rituals to bring the cosmos and the secular world into balance.

Keywords

Timor-Leste Indigenous Self-determination Peacebuilding Cultural concepts 

References

  1. Alfred, G.R.; Wilmer, F., 1997: “Indigenous Peoples, States, and Conflict”, in: Carment, D.; James, P. (Eds): Wars in the Midst of Peace: The International Politics of Ethnic Conflict (Pittsburg, University of Pittsburgh Press).Google Scholar
  2. Alfred, T., 1999: Peace Power Righteousness: An Indigenous Manifesto (Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  3. Avruch, K. 1991: “Introduction: Culture and Conflict Resolution”, in: Avruch, K.; Black, P.W.; Scimecca, J.A. (Eds): Conflict Resolution: Cross-Cultural Perspectives (New York, Greenwood Press): 1–17.Google Scholar
  4. Babo-Soares, D.C., 2003: “Branching from the Trunk: East Timorese Perceptions of Nationalism in Transition” (Ph.D. Thesis, Canberra, Australian National University).Google Scholar
  5. Babo-Soares, D., 2004: “Nahe Biti: The Philosophy and Process of Grassroots Reconciliation (and Justice) in East Timor”, in: The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 5,1: 15–33.Google Scholar
  6. Brigg, M., 2008: The New Politics of Conflict Resolution: Responding to Difference (London, Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
  7. Brigg, M.; Bleiker R. (Eds.), 2011: Writing Past Colonialism: Mediating Across Difference: Oceanic and Asian Approaches to Conflict Resolution (Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press).Google Scholar
  8. Brown, A.M., 2009: “Security, Development and the Nation-Building Agenda—East Timor”, in: Conflict, Security and Development, 9: 141–164.Google Scholar
  9. Chand, S.; Coffman, R. 2008: “How Soon Can Donors Exit from Post-conflict States?”, in: Centre for Global Development Working Paper Number 141, February 2008: 53.Google Scholar
  10. Collier, P., 2003: Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy (Washington DC, World Bank Publications).Google Scholar
  11. Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in Timor-Leste, 2005: Chega! The Report of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in Timor-Leste (Dili: Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconcilliation in Timor-Leste (CAVR).Google Scholar
  12. Cribb, R., 2001: “How Many Deaths? Problems in the Statistics of Massacre in Indonesia (1965–1966) and East Timor (1975–1980)”, in: Wessel, M.; Wimhoffer, G. (Eds.): Violence in Indonesia (Hamburg: Abera Verlage Markus Voss): 82–99.Google Scholar
  13. da Silva, A.B., 2012: “FRETILIN Popular Education 1973–1978 and its Relevance to Timor-Leste Today” (Ph.D. dissertation, University of New England, School of Education).Google Scholar
  14. de Oliveira, I., 2002: “The Situation of Women as Sex Slaves in East Timor”, in: Nationbuilding in East Timor (Clementsport, Canada, The Canadian Peacekeeping Press).Google Scholar
  15. Dewhurst, S.E., 2008: “Violence is Just a Part of Our Culture”: Explaining Enduring Violence in Post-Independence Timor-Leste” (M.A. dissertation, University of York, Politics Department, Post-War Reconstruction and Development Unit).Google Scholar
  16. Fox, J.J., 2000: “Tracing the Path, Recounting the Past: Historical Perspectives on Timor” in: Fox, J.J.; Babo-Soares, D. (Eds.), “Out of the Ashes”: Destruction and Reconstruction of East Timor (Adelaide, Crawford House Publishing): 1–29.Google Scholar
  17. Grenfell, D., et al., 2009: “Understanding Community: Security and Sustainability in Timor-Leste”, Report Produced by Irish Aid, Oxfam Australia, Concern Worldwide and the Globalism Research Centre, RMIT University.Google Scholar
  18. Hohe, T.; Nixon, R., 2003: Reconciling Justice: Traditional: Law and State Judiciary in East Timor (Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace): 76.Google Scholar
  19. Hull, G., 1998: “The Languages of Timor 1772–1997: A Literature Review”, in: Studies in Languages and Cultures of East Timor, 1: 1–38.Google Scholar
  20. Hunt, J.E., 2008: Local NGOs in National Development: The Case of East Timor (Melbourne: RMIT University).Google Scholar
  21. Lederach, J.P, 1995: Preparing for Peace: Conflict Transformation across Cultures (New York: Syracuse University Press).Google Scholar
  22. Macginty, R., 2008: “Indigenous Peace-Making Versus the Liberal Peace”, in: Cooperation and Conflict: Journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, 43,2: 141–163.Google Scholar
  23. Martin, I., 2001: Self-Determination in East Timor: The United Nations, the Ballot, and International Intervention (Boulder, Col.: Lynne Rienner Publishers).Google Scholar
  24. McWilliam, A., 2007: “Meto Disputes and Peacemaking: Cultural Notes on Conflict and its Resolution in West Timor”, in: The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 8,1: 75–91.Google Scholar
  25. McWilliam, A., et al., 2014: “Lulik Encounters and Cultural Frictions in East Timor: Past and Present”, in: The Australian Journal of Anthropology, 25,3: 304–320.Google Scholar
  26. Meitzner Yoder, L.S., 2007: “Hybridising Justice: State-Customary Interactions over Forest Crime and Punishment in Oecusse, East Timor”, in: The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 8,1: 43–57.Google Scholar
  27. O’Connor, S., 2007: “New Evidence from East Timor Contributes to Our Understanding of Earliest Modern Human Civilisation East of the Sunda Shelf”, in: Antiquity, 81: 523–535.Google Scholar
  28. O’Connor, S., et al., 2013: “The Dynamics of Culture and Nature in a ‘Protected’ Fataluku Landscape”, in Brockwell, S.; O’Connor, S.; Byrne, D. (Eds.): Transcending the Culture-Nature Divide in Cultural Heritage: Views from the Asia-Pacific Region (Canberra, Australia: ANU ePress): 203–233.Google Scholar
  29. Ospina, S.; Hohe, T., 2002: Traditional Power Structures and Local Governance in East Timor: A Case Study of the Community Empowerment Project (CEP) (Geneva: Graduate Institute of Development Studies): 182.Google Scholar
  30. Palmer, L., 2015: Water Politics and Spiritual Ecology: Custom, Environmental Governance and Development (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  31. Rawnsley, C., 2004: “East Timor, a Theology of Death: Massacres, Memorials, Rites and Reconciliation”, Paper for Peaceworks, the 3rd Triennial Conference of Women Scholars of Religion and Theology, Latrobe University, Melbourne: 15.Google Scholar
  32. Richmond, O.P., 2015: “The Dilemmas of a Hybrid Peace: Negative or Positive?”, in: Cooperation and Conflict, 50,1: 50–68.Google Scholar
  33. Richmond, O.P.; Mitchell A. (Eds.), 2011: Hybrid Forms of Peace: From Everyday Agency to Post-Liberalism (London, Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
  34. Taylor, J.G., 1999: East Timor: The Price of Freedom (Sydney, Pluto Press).Google Scholar
  35. Traube, E.G., 1986: Cosmology and Social Life: Ritual Exchange Among the Mambai of East Timor (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  36. Trindade, J., 2013: “Matak-Malirin, Tempu Rai-Diak no Halerik: Expressions of what Timorese Longed-for, Fought-for and Died-for”, Paper for the 4th Timor-Leste Studies Association Conference. Liceu Campus, Universidade Nasional Timor-Leste.Google Scholar
  37. Trindade, J.; Castro, B., 2007: “Technical Assistance to the National Dialogue Process in Timor-Leste: Rethinking Timorese Identity as a Peacebuilding Strategy”, in: The Lorosa’e - Loromonu Conflict from a Traditional Perspective (Dili, Timor-Leste: The European Union’s Rapid Reaction Mechanism Programme): 60.Google Scholar
  38. Turner, D., 2006: This is Not a Peace Pipe: Towards a Critical Indigenous Philosophy (Toronto, University of Toronto).Google Scholar
  39. United Nations Development Programme, 2013: Human Development Report 2013: The Rise of the South: Human Progress in a Diverse World (New York, United Nations Development Programme).Google Scholar
  40. World Bank, 2011: World Development Report: Conflict, Security and Development (Washington DC, World Bank).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations