Skip to main content

Two-Fluid Model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Two-Fluid Model Stability, Simulation and Chaos

Abstract

The stability analysis of the four-equation incompressible TFM for horizontal stratified flow is presented. Both the characteristic equation and the dispersion relation are obtained. A von Neumann analysis of the semi-implicit First-Order Upwind (FOU) scheme, currently used in industrial reactor safety codes, is performed and compared to the dispersion analysis. A second-order finite difference scheme is then implemented and verified with the modified water faucet problem of Ransom (Course A—Numerical modeling of two-phase flows. Technical Report EGG-EAST-8546, EG&G Idaho, 1989). The difference with the previous chapter is that the flux is not fixed as a spatiotemporal constant. Removing the fixed-flux condition of the previous chapter brings in the implicit pressure Poisson technique which makes the algorithm significantly more elaborate.

This chapter also presents the nonlinear simulations of the four-equation TFM for the experiment of Thorpe (Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 39, 25–48, 1969) that is used to validate the model. The major outcome of this chapter is the implementation of surface tension and of the dissipative Reynolds stresses together into a validated well-posed TFM that has the capability to simulate local instabilities. These mechanisms are neglected in industrial 1D TFM codes but they have a strong impact on the numerical simulations of KH unstable flows for two reasons: they provide physical mechanisms to stabilize the TFM both linearly and nonlinearly and they allow the numerical model to converge in a statistical sense.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Lax’s Equivalence Theorem : Given a properly posed initial value problem and a finite-difference approximation to it that satisfies the consistency condition, stability is the necessary and sufficient condition for convergence.

  2. 2.

    While this is a rapid ramping up of the axial force, it is a smooth transition. Previous simulations that did not include this tilting essentially impose a step change in the gravity vector at time zero.

  3. 3.

    It should be pointed out that the reported time of onset of instability (Thorpe 1969) had much smaller error bars. However, it should also include “half the time taken to tilt the tube” which was reported to be “usually about 0.25 s.” Therefore, this value is used as the uncertainty.

References

  • Agrawal, S. S., Gregory, G. A., & Govier, G. W. (1973). An analysis of horizontal stratified two-phase flow in pipes. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 51, 280–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T. B., & Jackson, R. (1967). Fluid mechanical description of fluidized beds. Equations of motion. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, 6(4), 527–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arai, M. (1980). Characteristics and stability analyses for two-phase flow equation systems with viscous terms. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 74, 77–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barmak, I., Gelfgat, A., Ullmann, A., Brauner, N., & Vitoshkin, H. (2016). Stability of stratified two-phase flows in horizontal channels. Physics of Fluids, 28, 044101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bestion, D. (1990). The physical closure laws in the CATHARE code. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 124, 229–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drew, D. A. (1983). Mathematical modelling of two-phase flow. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 15, 261–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drew, D. A., & Passman, S. L. (1999). Theory of multicomponent fluids. Applied mathematical sciences. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Drikakis, D., & Rider, W. (2005). High resolution methods for incompressible and low-speed flows. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullmer, W. (2014). Dynamic simulation of wavy-stratified two-phase flow with the one-dimensional two-fluid model. Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullmer, W., Lopez De Bertodano, M., & Ransom V. H. (2011). The Kelvin-Helmholtz instability: Comparisons of one and two-dimensional simulations. In The 14th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics (NURETH-14), Toronto, ON, Sept 25–29, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullmer, W., Prabhudharwadkar, D., Vaidheeswaran, A., Ransom V. H., & Lopez-de-Bertodano, M. (2010). Linear and nonlinear analysis of the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability with the 1D Two Fluid model. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Multiphase Flow, Tampa, FL, May 30–June 4, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaskell, P. H., & Lau, A. K. C. (1988). Curvature-compensated convective transport: SMART, a new boundedness-preserving transport algorithm. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 8, 617–641.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gidaspow, D. (1974). Round table discussion (RT-1-2): Modeling of two-phase flow. In Proceedings of the 5th International Heat Transfer Conference, Tokyo, Japan, Sept 3–7, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gidaspow, D. (1994). Multiphase flow and fluidization: Continuum and kinetic theory descriptions. San Diego, CA: Academic.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, S., & Shu, C.-W. (1998). Total variation diminishing Runge-Kutta schemes. Mathematics of Computation, 67, 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guermond, J. L., Minev, P., & Shen, J. (2006). An overview of projection methods for incompressible flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 195, 6011–6045.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guermond, J. L., & Shen, J. (2003). A new class of truly consistent splitting schemes for incompressible flows. Journal of Computational Physics, 192, 262–276.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, F. H. (2004). Fluid dynamics in group T-3 Los Alamos National Laboratory (LA-UR-03-3852). Journal of Computational Physics, 195(2), 414–433.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, F. H., & Welch, E. J. (1965). Numerical calculation of time-dependent viscous incompressible flow of fluid with free surface. Physics of Fluids, 8(12), 2182–2189.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Holmås, H., Sira, T., Nordsveen, M., Langtangen, H. P., & Schulkes, R. (2008). Analysis of a 1D incompressible two fluid model including artificial diffusion. IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics, 73, 651–667.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlburt, E. T., & Hanratty, T. J. (2001). Prediction of the transition from stratified to slug and plug flow for long pipes. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 28, 707–729.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, Y.-H. (2003). Upwind scheme for non-hyperbolic systems. Journal of Computational Physics, 192, 643–676.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Information Systems Laboratories. (2003). RELAP5/MOD3.3 Code manual, Vol. 1: Code structure, system models, and solution methods. NUREG/CR-5535/Rev P3-Vol I.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, M., & Hibiki, T. (2006). Thermo-fluid dynamics of two-phase flow. New York: Springer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. (1997). Locally averaged equations of motion for a mixture of identical spherical particles and a Newtonian fluid. Chemical Engineering Science, 52(15), 2457–2469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreiss, K. O., & Ystrom, J. (2006). A note on viscous conservation laws with complex characteristics. BIT Numerical Mathematics, 46, S55–S59.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy, R., & Ransom, V. H. (1992). A non-linear stability study of the RELAP5/MOD3 two-phase model. In Proceedings of the Japan-US Seminar on Two-Phase Flow, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakehal, D., Smith, B. L., & Milelli, M. (2002). Large-eddy simulation of bubbly turbulent shear flows. Journal of Turbulence, 3, N25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lile, D. R., & Reed, W. H. (1978). A semi-implicit method for two-phase fluid dynamics. Journal of Computational Physics, 26, 390.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lyczkowski, R. W. (2010). The history of multiphase computational fluid dynamics. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 49, 5029–5036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahaffy, John H (1982). A stability-enhancing two-step method for fluid flow calculations. Journal of Computational Physics 46(3): 329–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel, C. (2015). Mathematical modeling of disperse two-phase flows. New York: Springer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Morel, C., Goreaud, N., & Delhaye, J.-M. (1999). The local volumetric interfacial area transport equation: Derivation and physical significance. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 25(6), 1099–1128.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pannala, S., Syamlal, M., & O’Brien, T. J. (Eds.). (2010). Computational gas-solids flows and reacting systems: Theory, methods and practice. Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patankar, Suhas (1980). Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow. CRC press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, S. B. (2009). Turbulent flows. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ramshaw, J. D., & Trapp, J. A. (1978). Characteristics, stability and short wavelength phenomena in two-phase flow equation systems. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 66, 93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransom, V. H. (1989). Course A—Numerical modeling of two-phase flows. Technical Report EGG-EAST-8546, EG&G Idaho, Idaho Falls, ID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransom, V. H., & Mousseau, V. (1991). Convergence and accuracy of the RELAP5 two-phase flow model. In ANS International Topical Meeting: Advances in Mathematics, Computations and Reactor Physics, Pittsburgh, April 28–May 2, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransom, V. H. (2000) Summary of research on numerical methods for two-fluid modeling of two-phase flow, Consulting and Information Systems Laboratories.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, P. L. (1986). Characteristic-based schemes for the Euler equations. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 18, 337–365.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting, H. (1955). Boundary layer theory. London: Pergamon.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stadtke, H. (2006). Gasdynamic aspects of two-phase flow: Hyperbolicity, wave propagation phenomena, and related numerical methods. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taitel, Y., & Dukler, A. E. (1976a). A model for prediction of flow regime transitions in horizontal and near horizontal gas-liquid flow. AIChE Journal, 22, 47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taitel, Y., & Dukler, A. E. (1976b). A theoretical approach to the Lockhart-Martinelli correlation for stratified flow. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2, 591–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannehill, J. C., Anderson, D. A., & Pletcher, R. H. (1997). Computational fluid mechanics and heat transfer. Boca Raton: CRC.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, J. A. (1969). Experiments on the instability of stratified shear flow: Immiscible fluids. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 39, 25–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trapp, J. A. and Mortensen, G. A. (1993) A discrete particle model for bubble-slug two-phase flows. Journal of Computational Physics, 107, 367–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Leer, B. (1979). Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A Second-order sequel to Godunov’s method. Journal of Computational Physics, 32, 101–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J., & Richtmyer, R. D. (1949). A method for the numerical calculation of hydrodynamic shocks. Journal of Applied Physics, 21, 232–237.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Waterson, N. P., & Deconinck, H. (2007). Design principles for bounded higher-order convection schemes—A unified approach. Journal of Computational Physics, 224, 182–207.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D. Z., & Prosperetti, A. (1994). Averaged equations for inviscid disperse two-phase flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 267, 185–220.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, L., Zhao, H., & Zhang, H. (2016). New analytical solutions to the two-phase water faucet problem. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 91, 389–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Bertodano, M.L., Fullmer, W., Clausse, A., Ransom, V.H. (2017). Two-Fluid Model. In: Two-Fluid Model Stability, Simulation and Chaos. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44968-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44968-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44967-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44968-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics