Skip to main content

The Dichotomy for Conservative Constraint Satisfaction is Polynomially Decidable

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 9892))

Abstract

Given a fixed constraint language \(\varGamma \), the conservative CSP over \(\varGamma \) (denoted by c-CSP(\(\varGamma \))) is a variant of CSP(\(\varGamma \)) where the domain of each variable can be restricted arbitrarily. In [5] a dichotomy has been proven for conservative CSP: for every fixed language \(\varGamma \), c-CSP(\(\varGamma \)) is either in P or NP-complete. However, the characterization of conservatively tractable languages is of algebraic nature and the recognition algorithm provided in [5] is super-exponential in the domain size. The main contribution of this paper is a polynomial-time algorithm that, given a constraint language \(\varGamma \) as input, decides if c-CSP(\(\varGamma \)) is tractable. In addition, if \(\varGamma \) is proven tractable the algorithm also outputs its coloured graph, which contains valuable information on the structure of \(\varGamma \).

Supported by ANR Project ANR-10-BLAN-0210.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barto, L.: The dichotomy for conservative constraint satisfaction problems revisited. In: LICS, pp. 301–310. IEEE Computer Society (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barto, L.: The collapse of the bounded width hierarchy. J. Logic Comput. 26, 923–943 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Berman, J., Idziak, P., Marković, P., McKenzie, R., Valeriote, M., Willard, R.: Varieties with few subalgebras of powers. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 362(3), 1445–1473 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bessière, C., Carbonnel, C., Hébrard, E., Katsirelos, G., Walsh, T.: Detecting and exploiting subproblem tractability. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 468–474. AAAI Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bulatov, A.A.: Complexity of conservative constraint satisfaction problems. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 12(4), 24 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bulatov, A.A.: Conservative constraint satisfaction re-revisited. preprint. arXiv:1408.3690v1 (2014)

  7. Carbonnel, C.: The meta-problem for conservative Mal’tsev constraints. In: Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2016), Phoenix, Arizona, United States, February 2016

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, H., Larose, B.: Asking the metaquestions in constraint tractability. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1604.00932 (2016)

  9. Dalmau, V.: Generalized majority-minority operations are tractable. Logical Methods Comput. Sci. 2(4), 1–15 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Feder, T., Vardi, M.Y.: The computational structure of monotone monadic SNP and constraint satisfaction: a study through Datalog and group theory. SIAM J. Comput. 28(1), 57–104 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Green, M.J., Cohen, D.A.: Domain permutation reduction for constraint satisfaction problems. Artif. Intell. 172(8–9), 1094–1118 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Idziak, P.M., Markovic, P., McKenzie, R., Valeriote, M., Willard, R.: Tractability and learnability arising from algebras with few subpowers. In: LICS, pp. 213–224. IEEE Computer Society (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jeavons, P., Cohen, D.A., Gyssens, M.: Closure properties of constraints. J. ACM 44(4), 527–548 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Jeavons, P.G.: On the algebraic structure of combinatorial problems. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 200, 185–204 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Ladner, R.E.: On the structure of polynomial time reducibility. J. ACM 22(1), 155–171 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Mackworth, A.K.: Consistency in networks of relations. Artif. Intell. 8, 99–118 (1977)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Post, E.L.: The Two-Valued Iterative Systems of Mathematical Logic. Annals Mathematical Studies, vol. 5. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1941)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Siggers, M.H.: A strong malcev condition for locally finite varieties omitting the unary type. Algebra Univers. 64(1–2), 15–20 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Williams, R., Gomes, C.P., Selman, B.: Backdoors to typical case complexity. In: Gottlob, G., Walsh, T. (eds.) IJCAI, pp. 1173–1178. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clément Carbonnel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Carbonnel, C. (2016). The Dichotomy for Conservative Constraint Satisfaction is Polynomially Decidable. In: Rueher, M. (eds) Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming. CP 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9892. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44953-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44953-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44952-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44953-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics