Abstract
Critical support service operations have to run 24 × 7 and 365 days a year. Support operations therefore do contingency planning to continue operations during a crisis. In this paper we explore the use of fine-grained agent-based simulation models, which factor in human-behavioral dimensions such as stress, as a means to do better people planning for such situations. We believe the use of this approach may allow support operations managers to do more nuanced planning leading to higher resilience, and quicker return to normalcy. We model a prototypical support operation, which runs into different crisis severity levels, and show for each case, a reasonable size of the crisis team that would be required. We identify two contributions in this paper: First, emergency planning using agent based simulations have mostly focused, naturally, on societal communities such as urban populations. There has not been much attention paid to study crisis responses within support services organizations and our work is an attempt to address this deficit. Second, our use of grounded behavioral elements in our agent models allows us to build complex human behavior into the agents without sacrificing validity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Guha-Sapir, D., Santos, I.: The Economic Impacts of Natural Disasters. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013)
World Health Organization, Nepal. Humanitarian crisis after the Nepal earthquakes (2015)
Hwang, P., Lichtenthal, J.D.: Anatomy of organizational crises. J. Conting. Crisis. Manag. 8, 129–140 (2000)
Call Centre. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Call_centre
Speight, P.: Business continuity. J. Appl. Sec. Res. 6, 529–554 (2011)
Pearson, C.M., Clair, J.A.: Reframing crisis management. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23, 59–76 (1998)
Siebers, P.O., Macal, C.M., Garnett, J., Buxton, D., Pidd, M.: Discrete-event simulation is dead, long live agent-based simulation! J. Simul. 4, 204–210 (2010)
Coates, G., Hawe, G.I., McGuinness, M., Wright, N.G., Guan, D., Harries, T., McEwen, L.: A framework for organisational operational response and strategic decision making for long term flood preparedness in urban areas. WIT Trans. Built Environ. 133, 89–98 (2013)
Li, C., Coates, G., Johnson, N., Mc Guinness, M.: Designing an agent-based model of SMEs to assess flood response strategies and resilience. Int. J. Soc. Educ. Econ. Manag. Eng. 9, 7–12 (2015)
Li, C., Coates, G.: Design and development of an agent-based model for business operations faced with flood disruption. Complex Syst.: Fundam. Appl. 90, 275 (2016)
Rudolph, J.W., Repenning, N.P.: Disaster dynamics: understanding the role of quantity in organizational collapse. Adm. Sci. Q. 47, 1–30 (2002)
Balasubramanian, V., Massaguer, D., Mehrotra, S., Venkatasubramanian, N.: DrillSim: a simulation framework for emergency response drills. In: Mehrotra, S., Zeng, D.D., Chen, H., Thuraisingham, B., Wang, F.-Y. (eds.) ISI 2006. LNCS, vol. 3975, pp. 237–248. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Singh M., Duggirala M., Hayatnagarkar H., Balaraman V.: Multi-agent model of workgroup behavior in an enterprise using a compositional approach. In: Second Modeling Symposium (ModSym), ISEC (2016)
Duggirala M., Singh M., Hayatnagarkar H., Patel S., Balaraman V.: Understanding Impact of Stress on Workplace Outcomes Using an Agent Based Simulation, Summer Simulation Multi-Conference (2016, forthcoming)
Silverman, B.G.: More Realistic Human Behavior Models for Agents in Virtual Worlds: Emotion, stress, and value ontologies (2001). http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~barryg/TechRpt.pdf
Yerkes, R.M., Dodson, J.D.: The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. J. Comp. Neurol. Psychol. 18(5), 459–482 (1908)
Janis, I.L., Mann, L.: Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. Free Press, New York (1977)
Grignard, A., Taillandier, P., Gaudou, B., Vo, D.A., Huynh, N.Q., Drogoul, A.: GAMA 1.6: advancing the art of complex agent-based modeling and simulation. In: Boella, G., Elkind, E., Savarimuthu, B.T.R., Dignum, F., Purvis, M.K. (eds.) PRIMA 2013. LNCS, vol. 8291, pp. 117–131. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Connor-Smith, J.K., Flachsbart, C.: Relations between personality and coping: a meta-analysis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 93(6), 1080 (2007)
Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E.: The job demands-resources model: state of the art. J. Manag. Psychol. 22, 309–328 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Balaraman, V., Hayatnagarkar, H., Singh, M., Duggirala, M. (2016). Towards Better Crisis Management in Support Services Organizations Using Fine Grained Agent Based Simulation. In: Baldoni, M., Chopra, A., Son, T., Hirayama, K., Torroni, P. (eds) PRIMA 2016: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. PRIMA 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9862. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44832-9_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44832-9_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44831-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44832-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)