Multielement Geochemical Modelling for Mine Planning: Case Study from an Epithermal Gold Deposit

Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics book series (PROMS, volume 187)

Abstract

Mineralisation and alteration processes will result in zones with distinct geochemical characteristics within an orebody. To visualise the mine scale variability that arises as a result of these processes, geochemical domains are defined using a k-means clustering algorithm to analyse multielement data. The fact that the chemical values can be grouped in a defined 3D location clearly suggests that the clusters have meaning in terms of geological process. Principal component analysis (PCA) of these clusters can further improve the understanding of this variability. These clusters form the basis of the geochemical domains which have direct implications for characterization and proportional sampling of geometallurgical and waste rock domains. In the case study presented, pre-mining geochemical characterisations were undertaken at an epithermal gold deposit to support metallurgical sampling and mine planning. k-means cluster analysis and principal component analysis of the geochemical clusters was used to support the metallurgical sampling programme by identifying domains for variability testing. The geochemical clusters identified were used to define the oxide, sulphide and transition zones, a critical factor for mineral processing and recoveries and a key variable in the economics of the project. The R software environment for statistical computing was used for exploratory data analysis (e.g. PCA; zCompositions, robCompositions) and k-means analysis (fpc).

Keywords

Compositional data analysis PCA Cluster analysis geology Mining 

References

  1. 1.
    Aitchison, J.: The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data (Reprinted in 2003 by The Blackburn Press), p. 416. Chapman & Hall Ltd., London (UK) (1986)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Egozcue, J.J., et al.: Isometric log ratio transformations for compositional data analysis. Math. Geology. 35(3), 279–300 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Filmozer, P., Hron, K.: Robust statistical analysis. In: Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., Buccianti, A. (eds.) Compositional Data Analysis. Theory and Applications, pp. 59-71, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (UK) (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grunsky, E.C.: The interpretation of geochemical survey data. Geochem. Explor. Environ. Anal. 10, 27–74 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hennig, C.: fpc: flexible procedures for clustering. R package version 2.1-9 (2014). http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=fpc
  6. 6.
    Palarea-Albaladejo, J., Martín-Fernández, J. A.: zCompositions: Imputation of Zeros and Nondetects in Compositional Data Sets. R package version 1.0.3 (2014). http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=zCompositions
  7. 7.
    R Core Team: R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2013). http://www.R-project.org/
  8. 8.
    Templ, M., Hron K., Filzmoser, P. robCompositions: Robust Estimation for Compositional Data. Manual and package, version 1.9.0 (2011). http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/robCompositions/index.html
  9. 9.
    Templ, M., Hron K., Filzmoser P.: robCompositions: an R-package for robust statistical analysis of compositional data. In: Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., Buccianti, A. (eds.) Compositional Data Analysis. Theory and Applications, pp. 341–355, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (UK) (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kinross Gold CorporationTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations