Advertisement

From Caravaggio to Braque: Digital Technology and the Illusion of Augmented Responsibility

  • Donatella Padua
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 474)

Abstract

According to the Situational Context Theory, the recent accelerated evolution of digital technology (IoT, Microchips) reinforces the trend of progressive reduction of the physical distances between an ‘Augmented individual’ (technology-empowered subjects playing their daily life decision-making processes based on multidimensional choice-sets) and technology. Technology becomes further more competent than the subject in dialoguing with the situational environment, both in the area of information building (search engines) and of location-based dialogue with the daily environment (IoT, NFC, VR). Because of reduced physical distances and the growth in competence of technology, the free-choice based subject’s responsibility, which initially appeared ‘augmented’, in reality decreases and becomes an illusion, quite as the cubism illusionism of Braque and Picasso painting. Indeed, in this frame of work, responsibility appears to shift from the augmented individual to organisations and institutions managing technology with competence, within a frame of a digital technology Corporate Social Responsibility.

Keywords

Multidimensionality Digital technology ecosystem Augmented responsibility Choice-sets Situational Context Theory (SIT) Cubism Digital technology Corporate Social Responsibility 

References

  1. 1.
    Appadurai, A.: Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimension of Globalisation. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Castells, M.: Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. The Rise of the Network Society, vol. 1. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Giddens, A.: The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto (1990)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bauman, Z., Battiston, G.: Modernità e globalizzazione. Edizioni dell’asino, Roma (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    McLuhan, M.: The Global Village Transformations in World Life and Media in the 21st Century. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1992)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Andrews, E.L.: Greenspan Concedes Error on Regulation. NY Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/24/business/economy/24panel.html?_r=0. Accessed 3 June 2016
  7. 7.
    Bresser-Pereira, L.C.: The global financial crisis, neoclassical economics, and the neoliberal years of capitalism. Revue de la régulation [En ligne], 7 | 1er semestre/Spring 2010. http://regulation.revues.org/7729. Accessed 25 May 2016
  8. 8.
    Archer, M.S., Tritter, J.Q.: Rational Choice Theory. Resisting Colonization. Routledge, London (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Magatti, M.: La libertà immaginaria. Le illusioni del capitalismo techno-nichilista. Feltrinelli, Milano (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Takahashi, H.: A simple method for treating the statistical mechanics of one-dimensional substances. Proc. Phys.-Math. Soc. Jpn. 24, 60 (1942)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bar-Yam, Y.: General Features of Complex Systems. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems. EOLSS UNESCO Publishers, Oxford (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chapouthier, G.: Mosaic structures – a working hypothesis for the complexity of living organisms. E-Logos (Electron. J. Philos.) 17 (2009). http://nb.vse.cz/kfil/elogos/biocosmology/chapouthier09.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2016
  13. 13.
    Irfan, H.: Open and Closed System - Thermodynamic Systems. EngPedia. http://www.enggpedia.com/chemical-engineering-encyclopedia/dictionary/thermodynamics/1773-systems-open-and-closed-system. Accessed 3 June 2016
  14. 14.
    Lorenz, K.: King Salomon’s Ring. New Light on Animal Ways. Routledge, London (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Luhmann, N.: Social Systems. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto (1995)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lakahani, K.R., Lonstein, E., Healy Pokriva, S.: Topcoder case study. In: Harvard Business Review, 29 September 2011Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bauman, Z.: La società individualizzata: come cambia la nostra esperienza. Il Mulino, Bologna, p. 49 (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bauman, Z.: Paura liquida. Laterza, Roma (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Galbraith, J.K.: La morte definitiva (e la prossima vita) di Keynes. In: Opening Speech at the XV Annual Congress on Post-Keynesian Economics. Roskilde University, Copenhagen (2011). cogitoergo.it/?p=6523. Accessed 27 May 2016
  20. 20.
    Beck, U.: World Risk Society. Polity, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tönnies, F.: Comunità e società. Laterza, Rome (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Putnam, R.D.: Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ehrenberg, A.: La fatica di essere se stessi. Einaudi, Torino (1999)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Padua, D.: Trust, Social Relations and Engagement. Understanding Customer Behaviour on the Web. Macmillan Palgrave, Basingstoke (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cofta, P.: Trust, Complexity and Control. Confidence in a Convergent World. Wiley, Hoboken (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Prygogine, I.: La fin des certitudes. Temps, Chaos et les lois de la nature, Editions Odile Jacob, Paris [Tr. It. La fine delle certezze. Il tempo, il caos e le leggi della natura, Bollati Boringhieri, p. 31] (1996)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gupta, D., Ossenblok, P., van Luijtelaar, G.: Space-time network connectivity and cortical activations preceding spike wave discharges in human absence epilepsy: a MEG study. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 49(5), 555–565 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vidal, G., Latorre, J.I, Rico, E., Kitaev, A.: Entanglement in quantum critical phenomena. arXiv:quant-ph/0211074v1 (2002). http://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0211074.pdf. Accessed 4 June 2016
  29. 29.
    Gladwell, M.: The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference, p. 7. Little, Brown, London (2000)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gleick, J.: Chaos: Making a New Science. Penguin, London (1988)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hiles, A. (ed.): Reputation Management. Building and Protecting Your Company’s Profile in a Digital World. Bloomsbury, London (2011)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ramo, J.C.: Il secolo imprevedibile [Or. Ed. The Age of Unthinkable. Why the New World Disorder Constantly Surprises Us and What We Can Do about It], Elliot ed. pp. 168–176 (2009)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Morin, E.: La testa ben fatta [tr. It. La téte bien fait], p. 19 (2000)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Coleman, J.: Foundations of Social Theory. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1990)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Putnam, R.D.: Bowling together. Am. Prospect 13(3), 20–22 (2002)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Donati, P.: Relational Sociology: A New Paradigm for the Social Sciences. Taylor & Francis, London (2011)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lathrop, D., Ruma, L. (eds.): Open Government. Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practise. O’Reilly, Sebastopol (2010)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Anderson, C.: The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More. Random House Business Books, Rushden (2009)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Malinowski, E.: The problem of meaning in primitive language. In: Ogden, C.K., Richards, I.A. (eds.) The Meaning of Meaning. A Study of the Influence of Language Upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism, pp. 296–336. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, London (1923). Supplement I, (Fourth edition revised 1936)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mechkour, S.: Overview of Situation Theory and its Application in Modelling Context. DIUF – Department of Informatics. University of Fribourg, Switzerland. https://diuf.unifr.ch/main/pai/sites/diuf.unifr.ch.main.pai/files/education_situationtheory_smechkour.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2016
  41. 41.
    Follett, J. (ed.): Designing for Emerging Technologies: UX for Genomics, Robotics, and the Internet of Things. O Reilly, Sebastopol (2014)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Matsekh, M.: The Who, What, When, Wear, and Why of Wearable Technology. UXMagazine, Article No: 1313, 24 September 2014. https://uxmag.com/articles/the-who-what-when-wear-and-why-of-wearable-technology. Accessed 4 June 2016
  43. 43.
    Giddens, A.: Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis. University of California Press, Los Angeles (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bandura, A.: Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1986)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Smith, L.D., Woodward, W.R.: B. F. Skinner and Behaviorism in American Culture. Lehigh University Press, Bethlehem (1996)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Luhmann, N.: La Fiducia. Mulino, Bologna (2002)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bauman, Z.: Il disagio della postmodernità. Mondadori Bruno, Milano (2007)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hirshman, A.D.: Le passioni e gli interessi, Feltrinelli, Milano (or. Ed. 1970) (1979)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Durkheim, E.: La divisione del lavoro sociale. Comunità, Milano (or. Ed. 1893)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Dahrendorf, R.: Homo Sociologicus. Uno studio sulla storia, il significato e la critica della categoria di ruolo sociale. Armando, Roma (or. Ed 1964), p. 51 (1966)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Cesareo, V., Vaccarini, I.: La libertà responsabile. Vita e Pensiero, Milano, p. 139 (2006)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Cesareo, V. Vaccarini, I.: La libertà responsabile. Vita e Pensiero, Milano, p. 31 (2006)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Giaccardi, C., Magatti, M.: L’io globale. Dinamiche della società contemporanea. Laterza, Roma-Bari (2003)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Levy, P.: Collective Intelligence: Mankind’s Emerging World in Cyberspace. Perseus, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Archer, M.: La conversazione interiore. Come nasce l’agire sociale. Erikson, Gandolo (or. Ed. 2003), p. 70 (2006)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Taylor, C.: Radici dell’io. La costruzione dell’identità moderna. Feltrinelli, Milano (or. Ed. 1989), p. 171 (1993)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Luhmann, N.: Potere e complessità sociale. Il saggiatore, Milano (2010)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Iyengar, S.S., Lepper, M.R.: When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 79(6), 995–1006 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Pariser, E.: The Filter Bubble. Penguin, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Simon, H.: A behavioral model of rational choice. In: Models of Man, Social and Rational: Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting, Wiley, New York (1957)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ganesan, M., Prashant, S., Jhunjhunwala, A.: A review on challenges in implementing mobile phone based data collection in developing countries. J. Health Inform. Developing Countries 6, 1 (2012)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Kulwin, N.: Meet Zipline. Recode. http://recode.net/2016/04/04/drone-delivery-rwanda-zipline-medicine-sequoia-google/. Accessed 2 June 2016
  63. 63.
  64. 64.
    Russel, J.: Google search is now providing access to basic healthcare. TechCrunch. http://techcrunch.com/2016/04/05/google-is-providing-access-to-basic-healthcare-information-in-india/. Accessed 27 May 2016
  65. 65.
    Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D.: An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20(3), 709–734 (1995)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Bauman, Z.: Voglia di Comunità. Laterza, Roma-Bari (2001)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Beck, U.: I rischi della libertà. L’individuo nell’epoca della globalizzazione. Il Mulino, Bologna (2012)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Castells, M.: Galassia Internet. Feltrinelli, Milano (2013)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Dahrendorf, R.: Dopo la democrazia. Laterza, Roma-Bari (2001)Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Crouch, C.: Postdemocrazia. Laterza, Roma-Bari (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Università per Stranieri di PerugiaPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations