Skip to main content

Optimal Noise Filtering of Sensory Array Gaseous Air Pollution Measurements

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances and New Trends in Environmental Informatics

Part of the book series: Progress in IS ((PROIS))

  • 1438 Accesses

Abstract

One of the fundamental components in assessing air quality is continuous monitoring. However, all measuring devices are bound to sensing noise. Commonly the noise is assumed to have zero mean and, thus, is removed by averaging data over temporal windows. Generally speaking, the larger the window, the better the noise removal. This operation, however, which corresponds to low pass filtering, might result in loss of real abrupt changes in the signal. Therefore, the need arises to set the window size so it optimally removes noise with minimum corruption of real data. This article presents a mathematical model for finding the optimal averaging window size. The suggested method is based on the assumption that while real measured physical phenomenon affects the measurements of all collocated sensors, sensing noise manifests itself independently in each of the sensors. Hence, the smallest window size which presents the highest correlation between the collocated sensors, is deemed as optimal. The results presented here show the great potential of the method in air quality measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AQMesh. (2015). Aqmesh website.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boas, M. L. (1966). Mathematical methods in the physical sciences (vol. 2). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullis, C., Hirschler, M. (1980). Atmospheric sulphur: Natural and man-made sources. Atmospheric Environment (1967), 14(11), 1263–1278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duyzer, J., van den Hout, D., Zandveld, P., & van Ratingen, S. (2015). Representativeness of air quality monitoring networks. Atmospheric Environment, 104, 88–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbain, B. & Moreno-Centeno, E. (2016). Self calibrated wireless distributed environmental sensory networks. Scientific reports, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbain, B., Yaroslavsky, L. P., & Ideses, I. (2008). Spatial, temporal, and interchannel image data fusion for long-distance terrestrial observation systems. Advances in Optical Technologies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, M., Shum, L. V., Bodanese, E., & Hailes, S. (2011). Design and evaluation of an adaptive sampling strategy for a wireless air pollution sensor network. In 2011 IEEE 36th Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN) (pp. 1003–1010). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampa, M., & Castanas, E. (2008). Human health effects of air pollution. Environmental Pollution, 151(2), 362–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Künzli, N., Kaiser, R., Medina, S., Studnicka, M., Chanel, O., Filliger, P., et al. (2000). Public-health impact of outdoor and traffic-related air pollution: a european assessment. The Lancet, 356(9232), 795–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laumbach, R. J., & Kipen, H. M. (2012). Respiratory health effects of air pollution: Update on biomass smoke and traffic pollution. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 129(1), 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leighton, P. (2012). Photochemistry of air pollution. Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, U., Yacobi, T., Levy, I., Moltchanov, S. A., Cole-Hunter, T., & Fishbain, B. (2015). The effect of ego-motion on environmental monitoring. Science of the Total Environment, 533, 8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, I., Mihele, C., Lu, G., Narayan, J., & Brook, J. R. (2014). Evaluating multipollutant exposure and urban air quality: Pollutant interrelationships, neighborhood variability, and nitrogen dioxide as a proxy pollutant. Environmental Health Perspectives, 122(1), 65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M., Popoola, O., Stewart, G., Landshoff, P., Calleja, M., Hayes, M., et al. (2013). The use of electrochemical sensors for monitoring urban air quality in low-cost, high-density networks. Atmospheric Environment, 70, 186–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moltchanov, S., Levy, I., Etzion, Y., Lerner, U., Broday, D. M., & Fishbain, B. (2015). On the feasibility of measuring urban air pollution by wireless distributed sensor networks. Science of The Total Environment, 502, 537–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazaroff, W., & Alvarez-Cohen, L. (2001). Environmental Engineering Science. John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, R. D., Dominici, F., & Louis, T. A. (2006). Model choice in time series studies of air pollution and mortality. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 169(2), 179–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, S. T., & Zurbenko, I. G. (1994). Detecting and tracking changes in ozone air quality. Air & waste, 44(9), 1089–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, E., & Robbins, R. C. (1970). Gaseous nitrogen compound pollutants from urban and natural sources. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, 20(5), 303–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J., & Marcus, A. (1990). Mortality and air pollution j london: A time series analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 131(1), 185–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tchepel, O., & Borrego, C. (2010). Frequency analysis of air quality time series for traffic related pollutants. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 12(2), 544–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Environmental Protection Agency. (2012). Epa national ambient air quality standards. Technical report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varotsos, C., Ondov, J., & Efstathiou, M. (2005). Scaling properties of air pollution in Athens, Greece and Baltimore, Maryland. Atmospheric Environment, 39(22), 4041–4047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T., Poon, C., Kwok, Y., & Li, Y. (2003). Characterizing the temporal variability and emission patterns of pollution plumes in the pearl river delta of China. Atmospheric Environment, 37(25), 3539–3550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, B., Steyn, D., & Jackson, P. (2016). Modelling photochemical air pollutants from industrial emissions in a constrained coastal valley with complex terrain. In Air pollution modeling and its application XXIV (pp. 289–294). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. E., Henshaw, G. S., Bart, M., Laing, G., Wagner, J., Naisbitt, S., et al. (2013). Validation of low-cost ozone measurement instruments suitable for use in an air-quality monitoring network. Measurement Science and Technology, 24(6), 065803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Z., & Huang, N. E. (2009). Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: A noise-assisted data analysis method. Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, 1(01), 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaroslavsky, L. (2014). Signal Resotoration by means of linear filtering. In Digital signal processing in experimental research—Fast transform methods in digital signal processing (pp. 67–80). Sharjah, U.A.E: Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurbenko, I. (1986). The spectral analysis of time series.North-Holland, Inc.: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the 7th European Framework Program (FP7) ENV.2012.6.5-1, grant agreement no. 308524 (CITI-SENSE), the Technion Center of Excellence in Exposure Science and Environmental Health (TCEEH) and the Environmental Health Fund (EHF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barak Fishbain .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fishbain, B., Moshenberg, S., Lerner, U. (2017). Optimal Noise Filtering of Sensory Array Gaseous Air Pollution Measurements. In: Wohlgemuth, V., Fuchs-Kittowski, F., Wittmann, J. (eds) Advances and New Trends in Environmental Informatics. Progress in IS. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44711-7_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics