Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigating Internal CSR Communication: Building a Theoretical Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbook of Integrated CSR Communication

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

Abstract

Using an integrated CSR communication perspective, this chapter examines the role of internal CSR communication in achieving a successful, participative CSR approach. The special characteristics of CSR communication in general, and the distinctive challenges of internal CSR communication in particular, are identified. This allows a focus on and discussion of the challenges of the attitude-behavior gap regarding sustainable behavior in the work context. This perspective produces findings for how best to develop effective internal CSR communication that narrows the attitude-behavior gap. First, employees’ attitudes towards sustainability and the consequences for communication strategies that aim at changing these employee attitudes are discussed. Second, we investigate to what extent subjective norms and perceived behavioral control influence sustainable behavior at the workplace, in addition to the influence of attitudes toward sustainability and CSR. These discussions outline that every company has its own CSR specific environment and CSR specific organizational conditions for developing an effective, internal CSR approach. This chapter, however, identifies important antecedents and characteristics, which should be taken into consideration for an effective, internal CSR communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychology and Health, 26(9), 1113–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173–221). Mahwa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, C. W., & Skitka, L. J. (2012). Corporate social responsibility as a source of employee satisfaction. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 63–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekmeier-Feuerhahn, S., & Bögel, P. M. (2013). The selective use of corporate social responsibility communication: Who wants to know? Accessed July 4, 2013, from http://www.emac2013.org/

  • Bhattacharya, C. B., Korschun, D., & Sen, S. (2009). Strengthening stakeholder–company relationships through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bögel, P. M. (2015). Processing of CSR communication: Insights from the ELM. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, S. C., Kim, R. C., & O’Gorman, K. D. (2011). Corporate social responsibility as a dynamic internal organizational process: A case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(1), 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. R., & Hung-Baesecke, C. F. (2014). Examining the internal aspect of corporate social responsibility (CSR): Leader behavior and employee CSR participation. Communication Research Reports, 31(2), 210–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheney, G., & Christensen, L. T. (2001). Organizational identity: Linkages between internal and external communication. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 231–269). London: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., Matten, D., & Spence, L. J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: Readings and cases in a global context. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. C., & Challenger, R. (2009). Climate change—Warming to the task. The Psychologist, 22(2), 112–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Pelsmacker, P., Driesen, L., & Rayp, G. (2005). Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair-trade coffee. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(2), 363–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhanesh, G. (2012). The view from within: Internal publics and CSR. Journal of Communication Management, 16(1), 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elving, W. (2013). Scepticism and corporate social responsibility communications: The influence of fit and reputation. Journal of Marketing Communications, 19(4), 277–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farooq, O., Payaud, M., Merunka, D., & Valette-Florence, P. (2014). The impact of corporate social responsibility on organizational commitment: Exploring multiple mediation mechanism. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 563–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (2004). The stakeholder approach revisited. Zeitschrift Für Wirtschafts-Und Unternehmensethik, 5(1), 228–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golob, U., Podnar, K., Elving, W. J., Nielsen, A. E., Thomsen, C., & Schultz, F. (2013). CSR communication: Quo vadis? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18(2), 176–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. O., & Hunton-Clarke, L. (2003). A typology of stakeholder participation for company environmental decision-making. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(5), 292–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ihlen, Ø., May, S., & Bartlett, J. (2014). Four aces: Bringing communication perspectives to corporate social responsibility. In R. Tench, W. Sun, & B. Jones (Eds.), Critical studies on corporate responsibility, governance and sustainability (Vol. 6, pp. 25–41). Bingley: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingenhoff, D., & Sommer, K. (2011). Corporate social responsibility communication. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 42, 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. (2005). Motivating sustainable consumption: A review of evidence on consumer behaviour and behavioural change. London: Policy Studies Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques, P. J., Dunlap, R. E., & Freeman, M. (2008). The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental skepticism. Environmental Politics, 17(3), 349–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. R., Lee, M., Lee, H. T., & Kim, N. M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and employee-company identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(4), 557–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marz, J. W., Powers, T. L., & Queisser, T. (2003). Corporate and individual influences on managers’ social orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattila, A. S., & Hanks, L. (2012). Antecedents to participation in corporate social responsibility programs. Journal of Service Management, 23(5), 664–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, S. (2011). Green behaviour: Differences in recycling behaviour between the home and the workplace. In D. Bartlett (Ed.), Going green: The psychology of sustainability in the workplace (pp. 59–64). Leicester: The British Psychological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michailides, T. P., & Lipsett, M. G. (2013). Surveying employee attitudes on corporate social responsibility at the frontline level of an energy transportation company. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(5), 296–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsing, M., Schultz, M., & Nielsen, K. U. (2008). The “Catch 22” of communicating CSR: Findings from a Danish study. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(2), 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muster, V. (2011). Companies promoting sustainable consumption of employees. Journal of Consumer Policy, 34(1), 161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen. (2013). Consumer who cares and say they’ll reward companies with their wallets. New York, NY: The Nielsen Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen. (2014). Doing well by doing good—Increasingly, consumers care about corporate social responsibility, but does concern convert into consumption? New York, NY: The Nielsen Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, A. E., & Thomsen, C. (2009). CSR communication in small and medium-sized enterprises: A study of attitudes and beliefs of middle managers. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 14(2), 172–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan, L., & Fairbrass, J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Models and theories in stakeholder dialogue. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 745–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paillé, P., & Mejía-Morelos, J. H. (2014). Antecedents of pro-environmental behaviours at work: The moderating influence of psychological contract breach. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 124–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & Priester, J. R. (2009). Mass media attitude change: Implications of the Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 125–164). New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion. Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plank, R. (2011). Green behaviour: Barriers, facilitators and the role of attributions. In D. Bartlett (Ed.), Going green: The psychology of sustainability in the workplace (pp. 47–58). Leicester: The British Psychological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomering, A., & Johnson, L. W. (2009). Advertising corporate social responsibility initiatives to communicate corporate image. Inhibiting scepticism to enhance persuasion. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 14(4), 420–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigo, P., & Arenas, D. (2007). Do employees care about CSR programs? A typology of employees according to their attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, F., & Wehmeier, S. (2010). Institutionalization of corporate social responsibility within corporate communications: Combining institutional, sensemaking and communication perspectives. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 15(1), 9–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slack, R. E., Corlett, S., & Morris, R. (2015). Exploring employee engagement with (corporate) social responsibility: A social exchange perspective on organisational participation. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 537–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tench, R., Sun, W., & Jones, B. (2014). CSR communication as an emerging field of study. Communicating corporate social responsibility: Perspective and practice. In R. Tench, W. Sun, & B. Jones (Eds.), Critical studies on corporate responsibility, governance and sustainability (Vol. 6, pp. 3–21). Bingley: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uusi-Rauva, C., & Nurkka, J. (2010). Effective internal environment-related communication: An employee perspective. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 15(3), 299–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlachos, P. A., Panagopoulos, N. G., & Rapp, A. (2014). Employee judgments of and behavior toward corporate social responsibility: A multi-study investigation of direct, cascading, and moderating effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(7), 990–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, W., Hwang, K., McDonald, S., & Oates, C. J. (2010). Sustainable consumption: Green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustainable Development, 18(1), 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Corporate Development, Leuphana University, Lüneburg, Germany

    Sigrid Bekmeier-Feuerhahn, Paula Maria Bögel & Carina Koch

Authors
  1. Sigrid Bekmeier-Feuerhahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paula Maria Bögel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carina Koch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sigrid Bekmeier-Feuerhahn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Inst. f. Media a. Communication Studies, Klagenfurt University, Klagenfurt, Austria

    Sandra Diehl

  2. Inst. f. Media a. Communication Studies, Klagenfurt University, Klagenfurt, Austria

    Matthias Karmasin

  3. School of Journalism & Media Studies, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA

    Barbara Mueller

  4. Dpt. of Marketing and Int. Management, Klagenfurt University, Klagenfurt, Austria

    Ralf Terlutter

  5. Inst. f. Media a. Communication Studies, Klagenfurt University, Klagenfurt, Austria

    Franzisca Weder

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bekmeier-Feuerhahn, S., Bögel, P.M., Koch, C. (2017). Investigating Internal CSR Communication: Building a Theoretical Framework. In: Diehl, S., Karmasin, M., Mueller, B., Terlutter, R., Weder, F. (eds) Handbook of Integrated CSR Communication. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44700-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation