Skip to main content

Integrated CSR Communication of NGOs: The Dilemma to Communicate and Cooperate in CSR Project Partnerships

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Integrated CSR Communication

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

Abstract

Integrated communication has expanded as a concept during the last 10 years. It is not about tightly controlling communication tactics any more, but instead it involves the strategic integration of stakeholders. On the other hand, CSR has become a common part of management practice, and CSR communication is an ongoing challenge that needs to be embedded in an overall integrated marketing communication (IMC) framework. The chapter describes the development of the recent IMC discourse, discusses the chances and challenges that IMC holds for NGO communication—and applies the IMC framework to the CSR communication of NGOs. The chapter lays out the role of NGOs in relation to businesses and focuses on the intersection of NGOs and CSR—and how this affects the communication aspect. It systematically unfolds what CSR means to NGOs and proposes a communication-collaboration challenge for NGOs in cooperating with businesses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Looking, for example, at anti-Corporate Campaigns it is quite easy to figure out that the most active NGOs in these conflicts would lose their edge and of course seize to exist, if the corporation itself or the critical aspects of their behavior would have vanished (cf. Baringhorst, Kneip, Niesyto, & März, 2010).

  2. 2.

    When Greenpeace asks for a change, they usually address the company itself. If they do not agree to enter into a discussion with Greenpeace (like in the Kitkat campaign against Swiss food company Nestlé), the next step is a public campaign.

  3. 3.

    Identifying CSR of NGOs with self-control in terms of safeguarding the reputation and legitimacy or being transparent is only one way of applying the CSR approach to NGOs. Other authors like Waters and Ott (2014) seem to offer a broader interpretation; but if you look at the findings of their study (interviews with 17 communication managers of the San Francisco Bay area) the only descriptions for what CSR means to NGOs are “doing something for community good” and “demonstrating that the organization is accountable” (Waters & Ott, 2014, p. 13).

  4. 4.

    The framework is similar to other literature on communication affectivity that is already more developed, namely Coombs’ (2006) SCCT model for crisis communication that has already been empirically tested and could have been a good model in terms of dealing with attribution theory. Also, the question of the interplay of variables and how they impact each other remains unmentioned.

References

  • Arenas, D., Lozano, J. M., & Abareda, L. (2009). The role of NGOs in CSR: Mutual perceptions among stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 175–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baetzgen, A., & Tropp, J. (2013). Owned media: Developing a theory from a buzzword. Studies in Communication and Media, 1(2), 1–10. doi:10.11114/smc.v1i2.172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baringhorst, S., Kneip, V., Niesyto, J., & März, A. (2010). Unternehmenskritische Kampagnen im Zeichen digitaler Kommunikation. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn, M. (2014). Integrierte Unternehmens- und Markenkommunikation. Strategische Planung und operative Umsetzung (6th ed.). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Cheney, G. (2008). Corporate communications. convention, complexity, and critique. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L. T., Torp, S., & Firat, A. F. (2005). Integrated marketing communication and postmodernity: An odd couple? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 10(2), 156–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clow, K. E., & Baack, D. (2011). Integrated advertising, promotion, and marketing communications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W. T. (2006). The protective powers of crisis response strategies: Managing reputational assets during a crisis. Journal of Promotion Management, 12, 241–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Den Hond, F., & de Bakker, F. G. A. (2007). Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities. Academy of Management Review, 32, 901–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, T., & Caywood, C. (1996). The concept, process, and evolution of integrated marketing communications. In E. Thorson & J. Moore (Eds.), Integrated Communication: synergy of persuasive voices (pp. 13–34). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N. A., & Barnett, M. L. (2000). Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review, 105, 85–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ind, N., Iglesias, O., & Schultz, M. (2013). Building brands together: Emergence and outcomes of co-creation. California Management Review, 55(3), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D., & Keshishian, T. (2009). Uneasy alliances: Lessons learned from partnerships between businesses and NGOs in the context of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 277–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonker, J., & Nijhof, A. (2006). Looking through the eye of others: Assessing mutual expectations and experiences in order to shape dialogue and collaboration between business and NGOs with respect to CSR. Corporate Governance, 14(5), 456–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1994). Collaborative advantage: The art of alliances. Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 96–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmasin, M. (2015). PR im Stakeholder Management. In R. Froehlich, P. Szyszka, & G. Bentele (Eds.), Handbuch Public Relations. Wissenschaftliche Grundlagen und berufliches Handeln (3rd ed., pp. 341–355). Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen, D. D., & Schultz, E. (1999). A multi-country comparison of the drive for IMC. Journal of Advertising Research, 39(1), 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen, P. J., Brignell, J., Tao, L., & Jones, G. S. (2004). The emergence of IMC: a theoretical perspective. Journal of Advertising Research, 44(1), 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner, K. (2001). Integrierte Unternehmenskommunikation. Theoretische und empirische Bestandsaufnahme und eine Analyse amerikanischer GroĂźunternehmen. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kliatchko, J. G. (2005). Towards a new definition of integrated marketing communications (IMC). International Journal of Advertising, 24(1), 7–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kliatchko, J. (2008). Revisiting the IMC construct. A revised definition and four pillars. International Journal of Advertising, 27(1), 133–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale Systeme. Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marell, S. (2016). The role of NGOs in the Edelman Trust Barometer 2015. In N. Remus & L. Rademacher (Eds.), Handbuch NGO Kommunikation. Wiesbaden: Springer (in print).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rademacher, L. (2015). Integrierte Kommunikation. In R. Froehlich, P. Szyszka, & G. Bentele (Eds.), Handbuch Public Relations. Wissenschaftliche Grundlagen und berufliches Handeln (3rd ed., pp. 739–756). Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragas, M., & Culp, R. (2014). Business essentials for strategic communicators. Creating shared value for the organization and its stakeholders. NewYork: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Samii, R., Van Wassenhove, L. N., & Bhattacharya, S. (2002). An innovative public private partnership: new approach to development. World Development, 30(6), 991–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, D. E., & Schultz, H. F. (1998). Transitioning marketing communication into the twenty-first century. Journal of Marketing Communications, 1(4), 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, D. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Lauterborn, R. F. (1993). Integrated marketing communications. Putting it together & making it work. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, D. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Lauterborn, R. F. (1996). The new marketing paradigm. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitanidi, M. M., & Crane, A. (2009). Implementing CSR through partnerships: Understanding the selection, design and institutionalization of nonprofit-business partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 413–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spies, M. (2012). Branded Interactions. Digitale Markenerlebnisse planen und gestalten. Mainz: Hermann Schmidt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toker, H. (2013). NGOs and CSR. Encyclopedia of corporate social responsibility, 1759–1765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Riel, C. B. M. (1995). Principles of corporate communication. London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, R. D., & Ott, H. K. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and the nonprofit sector: Assessing the thoughts and practices across three nonprofit subsectors. Public Relations Journal, 8(3), 1–18. http://www.prsa.org/Intelligence/PRJournal/Vol8/No3/.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZerfaĂź, A. (2004). UnternehmensfĂĽhrung und Ă–ffentlichkeitsarbeit. Grundlegung einer Theorie der Unternehmenskommunikation und Public Relations (2nd ed.). Wiesbaden: VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZerfaĂź, A. (2008). Corporate communications revisited: Integrating business strategy and strategic communication. In A. ZerfaĂź, B. van Ruler, & K. Sriramesh (Eds.), Public relations research. European and international perspectives and innovations (pp. 65–96). Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Rademacher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rademacher, L., Remus, N. (2017). Integrated CSR Communication of NGOs: The Dilemma to Communicate and Cooperate in CSR Project Partnerships. In: Diehl, S., Karmasin, M., Mueller, B., Terlutter, R., Weder, F. (eds) Handbook of Integrated CSR Communication. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44700-1_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics