Abstract
Learning semi-physical fuzzy models of rechargeable Li-Ion batteries from data involves solving a complex multicriteria optimization task where the accuracies of the approximations of the different observable variables are balanced. The fitness function of this problem depends on the recursive evaluation of a set of differential equations, where fuzzy rule-based systems are embedded as nonlinear blocks. Evaluating this function is a time consuming process, thus algorithms that efficiently promote diversity and hence demand a low number of evaluations of the fitness function are preferred. In this paper, a comparison is carried out between some recent genetic algorithms, whose performances are assessed in this particular modelling problem. It is concluded that the combination of the recent \(\theta \)-Dominance Evolutionary Algorithm (\(\theta \)-DEA) with a Knowledge-based precedence operator, that improves the selection, is a sensible choice. Dominance relations between the Pareto fronts are assessed in terms of binary additive \(\epsilon \)-quality indicators.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Data publicly available at http://www.unioviedo.es/batterylab/.
References
Cuma, M.U., Koroglu, T.: A comprehensive review on estimation strategies used in hybrid and battery electric vehicles. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 42, 517–531 (2015)
Waag, W., Fleischer, C., Sauer, D.U.: Critical review of the methods for monitoring of lithium-ion batteries in electric and hybrid vehicles. J. Power Sources 258, 321–339 (2014)
Sanchez, L., Blanco, C., Anton, J.C., Garcia, V., Gonzalez, M., Viera, J.C.: A variable effective capacity model for LiFePO4 traction batteries using computational intelligence techniques. IEEE Trans. Industr. Electron. 62(1), 555–563 (2015)
Drechsler, N., Drechsler, R., Becker, B.: Multi-objective optimisation based on relation favour. In: Zitzler, E., Thiele, L., Deb, K., Coello, C.A.C., Corne, D. (eds.) EMO 2001. LNCS, vol. 1993, pp. 154–166. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Laumanns, M., Thiele, L., Deb, K., Zitzler, E.: Combining convergence and diversity in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. Evol. Comput. 10(3), 263–282 (2002)
Farina, M., Amato, P.: A fuzzy definition of “optimality” for many-criteria optimization problems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A: Syst. Hum. 34(3), 315–326 (2004)
di Pierro, F., Khu, S.T., Savic, D.A.: An investigation on preference ordering ranking scheme in multiobjective evolutionary optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 11(1), 17–45 (2007)
Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M., Thiele, L.: SPEA2: improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm, pp. 95–100 (2001)
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002)
Sierra, M.R., Coello, C.A.C.: Improving PSO-based multi-objective optimization using crowding, mutation and \(\epsilon \)-dominance. In: Coello Coello, C.A., Hernández Aguirre, A., Zitzler, E. (eds.) EMO 2005. LNCS, vol. 3410, pp. 505–519. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Deb, K., Jain, H.: An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based nondominated sorting approach, part I: solving problems with box constraints. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 18(4), 577–601 (2014)
Zhang, Q., Li, H.: MOEA/D: a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 11(6), 712–731 (2007)
Yuan, Y., Xu, H., Wang, B., Yao, X.: A new dominance relation based evolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. PP(99), 1 (2015)
Tutum, C.C., Deb, K.: A multimodal approach for evolutionary multi-objective optimization (MEMO): proof-of-principle results. In: Gaspar-Cunha, A., Antunes, C.H., Coello, C.C. (eds.) EMO 2015. LNCS, vol. 9018, pp. 3–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)
Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M., Thiele, L., Fonseca, C.M., da Fonseca, V.G.: Why quality assessment of multiobjective optimizers is difficult. In: GECCO 2002: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 666–674. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., July 2002
Sánchez, L., Couso, I., González, M.: A design methodology for semi-physical fuzzy models applied to the dynamic characterization of LiFePO4 batteries. Appl. Soft Comput. 14, 269–288 (2014)
Linden, D.: Linden’s Handbook of Batteries, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (2011)
Li, K., Deb, K., Zhang, Q., Kwong, S.: An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm based on dominance and decomposition. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 19(5), 694–716 (2015)
Zitzler, E., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Fonseca, C., da Fonseca, V.: Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 7(2), 117–132 (2003)
Acknowledgements
This work funded by the Eureka SD project (agreement number 2013-2591), that is supported by the Erasmus Mundus programme of the European Union. In addition, was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN) and the Regional Ministry of the Principality of Asturias under Grants TIN2014-56967-R, DPI2013-46541-R and FC-15-GRUPIN14-073.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Echevarría, Y., Sánchez, L., Blanco, C. (2016). Genetic Fuzzy Modelling of Li-Ion Batteries Through a Combination of Theta-DEA and Knowledge-Based Preference Ordering. In: Luaces , O., et al. Advances in Artificial Intelligence. CAEPIA 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9868. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44636-3_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44636-3_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44635-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44636-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)