Abstract
Bioenergy is the subject of a wide range of national and European policy measures. While some of these provide direct subsidies, more indirect market-based measures such as the mandating the use of bioenergy products are the major means of support. This paper examines the development of bioenergy policy in Germany, the United Kingdom and Ireland as examples of different approaches to harnessing the potential of bioenergy for public benefits. Of the three countries, Germany has led policy and technical developments. It has the largest area of agricultural land committed to bioenergy, as well as a very substantial forest resource that provides wood fuel. In contrast, support for bioenergy is new in Ireland. In the UK, market-based policy has stimulated biomass imports. Following an overview of the development of European Union policy, this paper provides an account of the public debate that has developed in Germany about the use of agricultural resources for energy. With nearly 1.9 million ha of arable land used for energy crops in 2014 (about 16 % of the total arable area), there has been a strong public reaction to the development of bioenergy from arable land. Developments in Germany have impacted on policy elsewhere and are therefore described here in detail. The comparison of the policy approaches in the three countries reveals the challenge of developing policy to support biomass crops to maximise public benefits while minimising the risks of unintended consequences. Against a background of direct intervention to promote specific bioenergy value chains, public policies in these countries are now converging with increasingly reliance on market-based approaches. While market-based policies can minimise adverse impacts on related markets, they need to be complemented by local measures to optimise land use for public benefits and stimulate the use of economically marginal land. Flexible policy instruments that are based on sound scientific evidence that is provided independent of political and commercial positions are needed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Biomass (2015) Abstracts of the Conference “Perennial biomass crops for a resource-constrained world”. www.biomass2015.eu./fileadmin/einrichtungen/biomass2015/Biomass2015_Abstracts.pdf
BMEL (2007) Wissenschaftlicher Beirat Agrarpolitik beim Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz Nutzung von Biomasse zur Energiegewinnung. Empfehlungen an die Politik
BMEL (2011) Wissenschaftlicher Beirat Agrarpolitik beim Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz. Förderung der Biogaserzeugung durch das EEG. Stellungnahme zur geplanten Novellierung zur geplanten Novellierung des Ernuebare-Energien-Gesetze
BMU (2009) Übersicht über die EEG-Vergütungsregelungen für 2009 gemäß Bundestagsbeschluss zum EEG Vergütung ct/kWh
BMWE (2014) Die EEG-Reform Biomasse. www.biogaspartner.de/fileadmin/biogas/documents/Politik_und_Recht/eeg-2014-faktenblatt-biomasse.pdf
BMWE (2016) Informationsportal Erneuebare Energien. Das Erneurbare-Energie-Gesetz. www.erneuerbare-energien.de accessed on 23.6.2016.
CCC (2011) Bioenergy review. Committee on Climate Change. www.theccc.org.uk
Clancy M (2015) Renewable heat in Ireland to 2020. Achieving Ireland’s 2020 renewable heat target: Analysis of policy options
Coombs J (1997) EU R&D programmes in the non-food area. Plant based specialty products and biopolymers. Nordic Council of Ministers
DCENR (2015) Ireland’s transition to a low carbon energy future 2015-2030. Department for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources
DECC (2012) UK Bioenergy Strategy. Department for Energy and Climate Change
European Commission (2012) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee of the Regions. Innovating for sustainable growth: a bioeconomy for Europe. COM 60
European Commission (2014) An ex-post evaluation of the rationale, implementation and impacts of EU Seventh Framework Programme (2007–2013), Cooperation Theme 2: Food, agriculture and fisheries, and biotechnology. Report to the European Commission
FNR (2015) Entwicklung der Anbaufläche für nachwachsende Rohstoffe. Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe e.V.
Görmann H, Kreins P, Breuer T (2007) Germany—the European energy-corn-belt? Agrarwirtschaft 56:263–271
Gauck J (2012) Speech of the Federal President at the opening of the Environment Week. Eröffnung der Woche der Umwelt 2012. www.bundespraesident.de
Isermeyer F, Zimmer Y (2006) Thesen zur Bioenergiepolitik in Deutschland: Agrarökonomen warnen vor negativen Folgen einer Fortführung der bisherigen Förderpolitik—Derzeit überhitzte Bioenergiekonjunktur birgt Gefahr von Fehlinvestitionen—Businessplan muss Grundlage für Neuausrichtung schaffen. Agra Europe (Bonn) 47(23):1–15
Isermeyer F, Bolte A, Dieter M, de Witte T, Zimmer Y (2012) Bewertung der Leopoldina-Studie 2012 zur Bioenergie. Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute, Braunscweig, Germany
IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Kaltschmitt M, Reinhardt GA, Stelzer T (1997) Life cycle analysis of biofuels under different environmental aspects. Biomass Energ 12(2):121–134
Klawitter N (2012) Corn-mania: Biogas boom in Germany leads to modern-day land grab. Spiegel Online International. http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/biogas-subsidies-in-germany-lead-to-modern-day-land-grab-a-852575.html
Lindegaard K (2013) Why we need an energy crops scheme. Position Paper. Crops for energy. http://www.crops4energy.co.uk
Lovett A, Sünnenberg G, Dockerty T (2014) The availability of land for perennial energy crops in Great Britain. GCB Bioenergy 6:99–107
Mildon R (1986) Surpluses and the common agricultural policy. In: Raymond WF, Larvor R (eds) Alternative uses for agricultural surpluses. Elsevier Applied Sciences, New York
Monbiot G (2014) How a false solution to climate change is damaging the natural world. Biomass and Bioenergy. George Monbiot’s blog. www.theguardian.com
Moran D, Barnes A, McVittie A (2007) The rationale for Defra investment in R&D underpinning the genetic improvement of crops and animals. Defra report for project IF0101. SAC Commercial Ltd, Scotland, United Kingdom
NLWKN (2010) Grundwasser Band 10. Niedersächsischer Landesbetrieb fürWasserwirtschaft, Küsten- und Naturschutz
Pearce D (2015) DRAX, UK—up in flames. How biomass burning wrecks Europe’s forests. Case study report. Fern
Rauch A, Thöne M (2012) Biofuels—at what cost? International Institute for Sustainable Development
Rexen F (1997) Information on Nordic and EU R&D programmes in the non-food area. Plant based specialty products and biopolymers. Nordic Council of Ministers
Rexen F, Munck L (1984) Cereal crops for industrial use in Europe. European Commission
Renewable Fuels Agency (2008) The Gallagher Review of the indirect effects of biofuels production
Rose D (2014) The bonfire of insanity http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2581887/The-bonfire-insanity-Woodland-shipped-3-800-miles-burned-Drax-power-station-It-belches-CO2-coal-huge-cost-YOU-pay-cleaner-greener-Britain.html#ixzz41DIwM8n6
Soldatos P (2015) Economic aspects of growing perennial grasses for fibre and bioenergy in South Europe. Abstracts from the International Conference on ‘Perennial biomass crops for a resource-constrained world’ 7–9 September 2015. Hohenheim, Germany. www.biomass2015.eu
Stechmesser G (n.d.) Initiativen mit Weitblick. www.initiativen-mit-weitblick.de
Stern N (2006) The economics of climate change (the stern review). HM Treasury, London
Theuvsen L, Plumeyer C-H, Emmann C (2011) Einfluss der Biogasproduktion auf den Landpachtmarkt in Niedersachsen. Niedersächsisches Ministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft, Verbraucherschutz und Landesentwicklung
Warren CR, Burton R, Buchanan O, Birnie RV (2016) Limited adoption of short rotation coppice: the role of farmers’ socio-cultural identity. J Rural Stud 45:175–183
Westhoek H, Lesschen J, Rood T, Wagner S, De Marco A, Murphy-Bokern D, Leip A, van Grinsven H, Sutton M, Oenema O (2014) Food choices, health and environment: effects of cutting Europe’s meat and dairy intake. Glob Environ Chang 26:196–205
Wintzer D, Fürniss B, Klein-Vielhauer S, Leible L, Nieke E, Rösch C, Tangen H (1993) Technikfolgenabschätzung zum Thema Nachwachsende Rohstoffe. Reihe A: Angewandte Wissenschaften, Sonderheft, Schriftenreihe des BML, Landwirtschaftsverlag, Münster-Hiltrup
Zimmer Y, Berenz S, Döhler H, Isermeyer F, Leible L, Schmitz N, Schweinle J, Toews T, Tuch U, Vetter A, Witte T de (2008) Klima- und energiepolitische Analyse ausgewählter Bioenergie-Linien. Braunschweig: vTI, V, 120 p, Landbauforsch SH 318
Acknowledgement
Donal Murphy-Bokern works on the WATBIO project (Development of improved perennial non-food biomass and bioproduct crops for water-stressed environments) which is a collaborative research project funded from the European Union’s Seventh Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement No 311929.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Murphy-Bokern, D. (2016). Pointers for Bioenergy Policy in a Resource-Constrained World. In: Barth, S., Murphy-Bokern, D., Kalinina, O., Taylor, G., Jones, M. (eds) Perennial Biomass Crops for a Resource-Constrained World. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44530-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44530-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44529-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44530-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)