Hedonic and Utilitarian Effects of the Adoption and Use of Social Commerce

  • Ángela Plaza-Lora
  • Ángel Francisco Villarejo-Ramos
Chapter

Abstract

The aim of this research is to contribute to the field of study which explores the consumer behaviour model in social commerce, introducing the social commerce concept as a new commercial formula.

To study the acceptance and use of social commerce by consumers, we have proposed the social commerce acceptance model. This brings together several models of technology acceptance, including the technology acceptance model, its successor technology acceptance model 2 and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). It also includes hedonic and utilitarian values which will help us identify the key variables influencing the intention to use social commerce.

To carry out this research, we distributed a survey answered by 486 individuals. The results obtained confirm satisfactory results for the relationships proposed, highlighting the influence of hedonic and utilitarian values on attitude and perceived usefulness.

References

  1. Amin, H. (2008). Factors affecting the intentions of customers in Malaysia to use mobile phone credit cards. Management Research News, 31(7), 493–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armesh, H., Saljoughi, Z. S., & Kord, B. (2010). Electronic payment and its implications. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 2(8), 246–255.Google Scholar
  3. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhatti, T. (2007). Exploring factors influencing the adoption of mobile commerce. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 12(3), 1–13.Google Scholar
  5. Bontis, N., & De Castro, A. (2000). The first world congress on the management of electronic commerce: Review and commentary. Internet Research, 10(5), 365–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng, Y.-M. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of e-learning acceptance. Information Systems Journal, 21, 269–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2001). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77, 511–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modelling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  9. Chong, A. Y.-L., Chan, F. T., & Ooi, K.-B. (2012). Predicting consumer decisions to adopt mobile commerce: Cross country empirical examination between China and Malaysia. Decision Support Systems, 53(1), 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Constantinides, E., & Fountain, S. J. (2008). Web 2.0: Conceptual foundations and marketing issues. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 9(3), 231–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Constantinides, E., Lorenzo, C., & Gόmez, M. A. (2008). Social media: A new frontier for retailers? European Retail Research, 22, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Curty, R.G., & Zhang, P. (2011). Social commerce: Looking back and forward. ASIST 2011, October 9–13, 2011, New Orleans, LA, USA.Google Scholar
  13. Davis, F.D., & Venkatesh, V. (1996) A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments. International Journal Human-Computer Studies, 45, 19–45.Google Scholar
  14. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dlodlo, N. (2014). Developing an online shopping value framework for consumers of non-store fashion brands. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 13(6), 1359–1374.Google Scholar
  16. Fong, K. K., & Wong, S. K. S. (2015). Factors influencing the behavior intention of mobile commerce service users: An exploratory study in Hong Kong. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(7), 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gao, L., & Bai, X. (2014a). A unified perspective on the factors influencing consumer acceptance of internet of things technology. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 26(2), 211–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gao, L., & Bai, X. (2014b). An empirical study on continuance intention of mobile social networking services: Integrating the IS success model, network externalities and flow theory. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 26(2), 168–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hajli, M. (2012a). A research framework for social commerce adoption. Information Management & Computer Security, 21(3), 144–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hajli, M. (2012). An integrated model for e-commerce adoption at the customer level with the impact of social commerce. International Journal of Information Science and Management, Special Issue (ECDC), 77–97.Google Scholar
  22. Hajli, M., Hajli, M., & Khani, F. (2013). Establishing trust in social commerce through social word of mouth. 7th International Conference on e-Commerce in Developing Countries: With Focus on e-Security (ECDC), 1–22.Google Scholar
  23. Hassouneh, D., & Brengman, M. (2011). Shopping in virtual worlds: Perceptions, motivations, and behavior. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 12(4), 320–335.Google Scholar
  24. Henseler, J., Hubbona, G., & Ash Ray, P. (forthcoming). Using PLS path modelling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Accepted for publication in Industrial Management & Data Systems. Google Scholar
  25. Hernández-García, A., Iglesias-Pradas, S., Chaparro-Peláez, J., & Pascual-Miguel, F. (2011). Exploring the attitudes and intentions of non-shoppers in the acceptance of e-commerce. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 17(9), 1314–1328.Google Scholar
  26. Holsapple, C. W. (2007). User acceptance of virtual worlds: The hedonic framework. Database for Advances in Information Systems, 38(4), 86–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huang, Z., & Benyoucef, M. (2013). From e-commerce to social commerce: A close look at design features. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12, 246–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hughes, S., & Beukes, C. (2012). Growth and implications of social e-commerce and group buying daily deal sites: The case of Groupon and Livingsocial. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 11(8), 921–934.Google Scholar
  29. Hughes, S., & Breytenbach, C. (2013). Groupon’s growth and globalization strategy: Structural and technological implications of international markets. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 12(12), 1589–1604.Google Scholar
  30. Kim, D. J., & Hwang, Y. (2012). A study of mobile internet user’s service quality perceptions from a user’s utilitarian and hedonic value tendency perspectives. Information Systems Frontiers, 14(2), 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kim, Y. A.,& Srivastava, J. (2007). Impact of social influence in e-commerce decision making. ICEC’07, August 19–22, 2007, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. Google Scholar
  32. Kleijnen, M., Wetzels, M., & De Ruyter, K. (2004). Consumer acceptance of wireless finance. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 8(3), 206–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kuthiala, S. K. (2003). E-commerce in India: Challenges and choices. Journal of Services Research, 2(2), 139–155.Google Scholar
  34. Lee, I. (2014). A collaborative management of social commerce deals: Decisions on pricing and commission rate with a capacity consideration. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 13(3), 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee, S. H., De Wester, D., & Park, S. R. (2008). Web 2.0 and opportunities for small businesses. Service Business, 2(4), 335–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee, M.-Y., Kim, Y.-K., & Lee, H.-J. (2013). Adventure versus gratification: Emotional shopping in online auctions. European Journal of Marketing, 47(1/2), 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lévy Mangin, J.-P., Bourgault, N., & Moriano León, J. (2012). Testing control, innovation and enjoy as external variables to the technology acceptance model in a north American French banking environment. International Business Research, 5(2), 13–26.Google Scholar
  38. Liang, T.-P., & Turban, E. (2011). Introduction to the special issue: Social commerce: A research framework for social commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16(2), 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Liao, S., & Chu, H. (2013). Influence of consumer online resale awareness on purchase decisions: A mental accounting perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 47(10), 1576–1597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Liébana-Cabanillas, F., & Villarejo-Ramos, A.F. (2014). Mobile social commerce acceptance model: Factors and influences on intention to use s-commerce. European Marketing Academy Congress, June, Valencia (Spain). Google Scholar
  41. Liébana-Cabanillas, F., & Villarejo-Ramos, A. F. (2015). Applications of mobile social networks: Consumer behavior in mobile social commerce. Forthcoming. Google Scholar
  42. Lim, W. M., & Ting, D. H. (2014). Consumer acceptance and continuance of online group buying. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 54(3), 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lu, J., Yao, J. E., & Yu, C.-S. (2005). Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14, 245–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Malik, A., Kumra, R., & Srivastava, V. (2013). Determinants of consumer acceptance of m-commerce. South Asian Journal of Management, 20(2), 102–126.Google Scholar
  45. Marsden, P. (2009). How social commerce works: The social psychology of social shopping. London, UK: Social Commerce Today, Syzygy London. Retrieved from: http://www.digitalintelligencetoday.com/how-social-commerce-works-the-social-psychology-of-social-shopping/.
  46. Nasri, W., & Charfeddine, L. (2012). An exploration of facebook.com adoption in tunisia using technology acceptance model (TAM) and theory of reasoned action (TRA). Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(5), 948–968.Google Scholar
  47. Noh, M., Lee, K., Kim, S., & Garrison, G. (2013). Effects of collectivism on actual s-commerce use and the moderating effect of price consciousness. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 14(3), 244–260.Google Scholar
  48. Nunally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  49. Nysveen, H. (2005). Intentions to use mobile services: Antecedents and cross-service comparisons. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(3), 330–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ozen, H., & Engizek, N. (2014). Shopping online without thinking: Being emotional or rational? Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 26(1), 78–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Real, J. C., Leal, A., & Roldán, J. L. (2006). Information technology as a determinant of organizational learning and technological distinctive competencies. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(4), 505–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sabir, R. J., Ahmad, W., Noor, N., & Rehman, A. (2013). Adoption of social networking sites among Pakistani university students: A case of face-book. Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 3(6), 125–139.Google Scholar
  53. Sanzo, M. J., Santos, M. L., Vázquez, R., & Álvarez, L. I. (2003). The effect of market orientation on buyer-seller relationship satisfaction. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(4), 327–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sharma, A., & Sheth, J. N. (2004). Web-based marketing: The coming revolution in marketing thought and strategy. Journal of Business Research, 57, 696–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stephen, A. T., & Toubia, O. (2010). Deriving value from social commerce networks. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sun, H. (2011). Designing for social commerce experience as cultural consumption. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6775, 402–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Van der Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695–704.Google Scholar
  58. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.Google Scholar
  60. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.Google Scholar
  61. Wakefield, R. L., & Whitten, D. (2006). Mobile computing: A user study on hedonic/utilitarian mobile device usage. European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 292–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wang, E. T., & Chou, N. P. (2014). Consumer characteristics, social influence, and system factors on online group-buying repurchasing intention. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2), 119–132.Google Scholar
  63. Wattanasupachoke, T. (2011). Success factors of online social networks. Journal of Global Business Issues, 5(2), 11–21.Google Scholar
  64. Williams, M. D., Slade, E. L., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2014). Consumers’ intentions to use e-readers. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 54(2), 66–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yang, K., & Lee, H.-Y. (2010). Gender differences in using mobile data services: Utilitarian and hedonic value approaches. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 4(2), 142–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ángela Plaza-Lora
    • 1
  • Ángel Francisco Villarejo-Ramos
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidad de SevillaSevillaSpain

Personalised recommendations