Skip to main content

A Computational Mathematics View of Space, Time and Complexity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Space, Time and the Limits of Human Understanding

Part of the book series: The Frontiers Collection ((FRONTCOLL))

Abstract

Modern computational mathematics requires a philosophical perspective largely at odds with that of traditional mathematics, since current computational mathematics (as distinct from computer science) is by its very nature is discrete, not continuous, and tied to the real world in ways that the more theoretical branches of mathematics (and computer science) often are not. Indeed, computational mathematics provides a means to escape the trap feared by John von Neumann when he wrote,

[T]here is a grave danger that the subject [of mathematics] will develop along the line of least resistance, that the stream so far from its source [in empirical reality] will separate into a multitude of insignificant branches, and that the discipline will become a disorganized mass of details and complexities.

But even a computational approach to mathematics has limits, not the least of which are the uncertainties of errors in hardware, software and algorithms that inevitably are part-and-parcel with computation, although there are ways to limit these uncertainties. In our chapter, bulwarked by concrete examples, we will try to situate past, present and future mathematical views of space, time, infinity and certainty within a computational context in which, for example, error due to quantum effects begins to compete with traditional sources of logical and numerical inaccuracy. We shall also argue that traditional taxonomies of complexity and completeness are not only outmoded but actually destructive of progress.

\(^{\dagger }\) Borwein sadly passed away on 2nd August 2016

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Epstein, D., & Levy, S. (1995). Experimentation and proof in mathematics. Notices of the American Mathematical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Borwein, J. M., & Bailey, D. H. (2008). Mathematics by experiment: Plausible reasoning in the 21st century (2nd ed.). Natick, MA: A. K. Peters Ltd.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bailey, D. H., Borwein, P. B., & Plouffe, S. (1997). On the rapid computation of various polylogarithmic constants. Mathematics of Computation, 66, 903–913.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Carleson, L. A. E. University of St. Andrews, Scotland. http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/history/Biographies/Carleson.html.

  5. Bailey, D. H., Borwein, J. M., & Stodden, V. (2016). Facilitating reproducibility in scientific computing: Principles and practice. In H. Atmanspacher & S. Maasen (Eds.), Reproducibility: Principles, problems, practices. New York: John Wiley and Sons. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bailey, D. H., Borwein, J. M., Calude, C. S., Dinneen, M. J., Dumitrescu, M., & Yee, A. (2012). An empirical approach to the normality of pi. Experimental Mathematics, 21, 375–384.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Yee, A. J., & Kondo, S. 12.1 trillion digits of pi, and we’re out of disk space. http://www.numberworld.org/misc_runs/pi-12t/.

  8. Borwein, J. M., Bailey, D. H., & Girgensohn, R. (2004). Experimentation in mathematics: Computational paths to discovery. Natick, MA: A. K. Peters Ltd.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. MacHale, D. (1993). Comic sections: Book of mathematical jokes. New York: Humour: Wit and Wisdom, Boole Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bailey, D. H., Borwein, J. M., Kapoor, V., & Weisstein, E. (2006). Ten problems in experimental mathematics. American Mathematical Monthly, 113, 481–509.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Bailey, D. H., & Borwein, J. M. (2011). Exploratory experimentation and computation. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 58, 1410–1419.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Baillie, R., Borwein, D., & Borwein, J. (2008). Surprising sinc sums and integrals. American Mathematical Monthly, 115, 888–901.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Bekenstein, J. D. (1981). Universal upper bound on the entropy-to-energy ratio for bounded systems. Physical Review D, 23, 287–298.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Bekenstein bound. Wikipedia. Retrieved January 08, 2016 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bekenstein_bound.

  15. Vilenkin, A. (2006). Many words in one: The search for other universe. New York: Hill and Wang.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Holographic principle (2016). Wikipedia, Retrieved January 08, 2016 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_principle.

  17. Tegmark, M. (2014). Our mathematical universe: My quest for the ultimate nature of reality. New York: Knopf.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Kline, M. (1980). Mathematics: The loss of certainty. London: Oxford University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Borwein, J. M., & Borwein. (1997). Pi and the AGM: A study in analytic number theory and computational complexity. New York: John Wiley., paperback 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P versus NP problem. Wikipedia. Retrieved January 10, 2016 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P_versus_NP_problem.

  21. Borwein, J. M., & Vanderwerff, J. D. (2010). Functions. Convex. Constructions. Characterizations and Counterexamples. London: Cambridge University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Culler, D., Karp, R., Patterson, D., Sahay, A., Schauser, K. E., Santos, E., et al. (1993). LogP: Towards a realistic model of parallel computation. In proceedigns of the fourth ACM SIGPLAN symposium on principles and practice of parallel programming. CA: San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Williams, S. W. (2011). The roofline model. In D. H. Bailey, R. F. Lucas, & S. W. Williams (Eds.), Performance tuning of scientific applications. CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bailey, D. H., Wang, L.-W., Shan, H., Zhao, Z., Meza, J., Strohmaier, E., & Lee, B. (2011). Tuning an electronic structure code. In D. H. Bailey., R. F. Lucas., R. F., Williams, S. W. (Eds.) Performance tuning of scientific applications. CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David H. Bailey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bailey, D.H., Borwein, J.M. (2017). A Computational Mathematics View of Space, Time and Complexity. In: Wuppuluri, S., Ghirardi, G. (eds) Space, Time and the Limits of Human Understanding. The Frontiers Collection. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44418-5_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics