European Arrest Warrant (Surrender Procedure)

Klimek, Libor

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44377-5_5

European Arrest Warrant (Surrender Procedure)

Libor Klimek²

Chapter
First Online: 10 December 2016

915 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter deals with the European arrest warrant and surrender procedure in the European Union. It is divided into six sections and includes concluding observations at the end. Section 5.1 is introduction of the chapter. Section 5.2 analyses its legal basis: the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant. While Sect. 5.3 analyses its definition, scope of application and key terms, Sect. 5.4 analyses procedural issues. Section 5.5 focuses on implementation of the mechanism and Sect. 5.6 focuses on its evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter: USD 29.95; Price excludes VAT (USA)

eBook: USD 229.00; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Softcover Book: USD 299.99; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Hardcover Book: USD 299.99; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

1.
De Witte et al. (2008), p. 399.
2.
See: Delmas-Marty and Van den Wyngaert (1998).
3.
Radtke (2005), p. 105.
4.
Spencer (2002), p. 64.
5.
Delmas-Marty and Vervaele (2000).
6.
Regan and O’Mahony (2002), pp. 306–307.
7.
Articles 1–17 of the Corpus Juris 2000.
8.
Articles 18–35 of the Corpus Juris 2000.
9.
Article 25ter of the Corpus Juris 2000.
10.
Article 25ter(4) of the Corpus Juris 2000.
11.
Spencer (2000), p. 357.
12.
European Council (1999): ‘Presidency Conclusions, Tampere European Council 15th–16th October 1999, European Council’, available in: Vermeulen (2005), pp. 327–341.
13.
Presidency Conclusions, para. 35.
14.
Mackarel (2007), p. 43.
15.
Balzacq and Carrera (2006), p. 5.
16.
Programme of measures to implement the principle of mutual recognition of decisions in criminal matters. Official Journal of the European Union, C 12/10 of 15th January 2001.
17.
Point 2.2.1 of the Mutual Recognition Programme.
18.
Point 8 of the table A of priorities of the Mutual Recognition Programme.
19.
Casale (2008), p. 116.
20.
Spencer (2005), p. 202.
21.
Plachta and Van Ballegooij (2005), p. 33.
22.
Commission of the European Communities (2001): ‘Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States’, COM(2001) 522 final/2.
23.
Treaty between the Italian Republic and the Kingdom of Spain for the Pursuit of Serious Crime through the Superseding of Extradition in a Common Area of Justice [It.: Trattato tra la Repubblica Italiana ed il Regno di Spagna per il perseguimento di gravi reati attraverso il superamento dell’estradizione in uno spazio di giustizia]. Rome, 28th November 2000.
24.
Burgess and Vllaard (2006), p. 238.
25.
Marin (2008), pp. 252 and 253.
26.
Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13th June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States as amended by the Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 190/1 of 18th July 2002.
27.
Wahl (2009), p. 138.
28.
Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA of 13th June 2002 on combating terrorism. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 164/3 of 22nd June 2002.
29.
Council Framework Decision 2002/465/JHA of 13th June 2002 on joint investigation teams. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 162/1 of 20th June 2002; see: Klimek (2012a), pp. 63–67; Rijken (2006), pp. 99–118; Rijken and Vermeulen (2006).
30.
Bomberg et al. (2008), p. 150.
31.
See: Alegre and Leaf (2004), pp. 200–217.
32.
Directive 2010/64/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20th October 2010 on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings. Official Journal of the European Union, L 280/1 of 26th October 2010.
33.
Directive 2012/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22nd May 2012 on the right to information in criminal proceedings. Official Journal of the European Union, L 142/1 of 1st June 2012.
34.
Directive 2013/48/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22nd October 2013 on the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings, and on the right to have a third party informed upon deprivation of liberty and to communicate with third persons and with consular authorities while deprived of liberty. Official Journal of the European Union, L 294/1 of 6th November 2013.
35.
Directive (EU) 2016/800 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11th May 2016 on procedural safeguards for children who are suspects or accused persons in criminal proceedings. Official Journal of the European Union, L 132/1 of 21st May 2016.
36.
Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway on the surrender procedure between the Member States of the European Union and Iceland and Norway. Official Journal of the European Union, L 292/13 of 21st October 2006.
37.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 3rd May 2007—case C-303/05 —Advocaten voor de Wereld VZW v Leden van de Ministerraad.
38.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 18th July 2007—case C-288/05 —Criminal proceedings against Jürgen Kretzinger.
39.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 17th July 2008—case C-66/08 —Proceedings concerning the execution of a European arrest warrant issued against Szymon Kozłowski.
40.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 1st December 2008—case C-388/08 PPU —Criminal proceedings against Artur Leymann and Aleksei Pustovarov.
41.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 12th August 2008—case C-296/08 PPU —Extradition proceedings against Ignacio Pedro Santesteban Goicoechea.
42.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 6th October 2009—case C-123/08 —Dominic Wolzenburg.
43.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 16th November 2010—case C-261/09 —Gaetano Mantello.
44.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 21st October 2010—case C-306/09 —I. B.
45.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 28th June 2012—case C-192/12 PPU —Melvin West.
46.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 5th September 2012—case C-42/11 —João Pedro Lopes Da Silva Jorge.
47.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 29th January 2013—case C-396/11 —Ciprian Vasile Radu.
48.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 26th February 2013—case C-399/11 —Stefano Melloni v Ministerio Fiscal.
49.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 30th May 2013—case C-168/13 PPU —Jeremy F v Premier ministre.
50.
Order of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 25th September 2015—case C-463/15 PPU—Openbaar Ministerie v A.
51.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 5th April 2016—joined cases C-404/15 and C-659/15 PPU —Pál Aranyosi (C-404/15) and Robert Căldăraru (C-659/15 PPU).
52.
European Parliament (2014): ‘Report with recommendations to the Commission on the review of the European Arrest Warrant’, (2013/2109(INL)), Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, p. 8.
53.
The term ‘European judicial area’ has its origins at the Brussels European Summit of December 1977. The then French President d’Estaing introduced the idea of a so-called ‘European judicial area’ (fr. Espace judiciaire européen; translated also as ‘European legal area’ or ‘European judicial space’). It was intended as an ambitious instrument to combat terrorism in a situation where individual European States were subject to blackmailing pressure from Middle Eastern terrorist groups . However, it only began to become a reality after the Treaty of Amsterdam of 1997, which entered into force in 1999; see: Bainbridge and Teasdale (1995), p. 141; Anderson and Apap (2002), p. 41; or Tomášek (2009), p. 16.
54.
Sinn and Wörner (2007), p. 207.
55.
Klimek (2015), pp. 2, 37, 312 and 366.
56.
Klimek (2015), p. 37.
57.
Article 31(1) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
58.
European Convention on Extradition . Council of Europe , European Treaty Series No. 24 [1957], Paris, 13th December 1957.
59.
Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Extradition. Council of Europe, European Treaty Series No. 86 [1975], Strasbourg, 15th October 1975.
60.
Second Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Extradition. Council of Europe, European Treaty Series No. 98 [1978], Strasbourg, 17th March 1978.
61.
European Convention on the Suppression of Terrorism. Council of Europe, European Treaty Series No. 90 [1977], Strasbourg, 27th January 1977.
62.
Convention drawn up on the Basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union on a simplified extradition Procedure between the Member States of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Communities, C 78/2 of 30th March 1995.
63.
Convention drawn up on the Basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, relating to extradition between the Member States of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Communities, C 313/12 of 23rd October 1996.
64.
Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14th June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders . Official Journal of the European Communities, L 239/19 of 22nd September 2000.
65.
Article 31(2) first subparagraph of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
66.
In Norway: the Nordic Extradition Act—Act No. 27 of 3 February 1960 as amended by Act No. 251 of 12 June 1975, Act No. 433 of 31 May 2000 and Act No. 378 of 6 June 2002; in Finland: the Nordic Extradition Act No. 270/1960; in Sweden: the Act No. 1959:254 concerning extradition to Denmark, Finland, Iceland and Norway for criminal offences.
67.
Statements provided for in Article 31(2) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13th June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedure between Member States. Official Journal of the European Union, L 246/1 of 29th September 2003.
68.
Article 31(2) second subparagraph of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
69.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 3rd May 2007—case C-303/05 —Advocaten voor de Wereld VZW v. Leden van de Ministerraad.
70.
Sarmiento (2008), p. 171.
71.
Judgment Advocaten voor de Wereld, rulings.
72.
Klimek (2012d), pp. 129–136. As regards national traditions , see: Šramel (2015a), 104 pp.
73.
Łazowski (2005), p. 572.
74.
Code of Criminal Procedure—Act of 6th June 1997 (Journal of Laws, No. 89, Item 555 with amendments) [Polish: Kodeks postępowania karnego—Ustawa z dnia 6 czerwca 1997 r. (Dziennik Ustaw, Nr 89, poz. 555 ze zmianami)]; the provisions transposing the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant were implemented as Chapter 65a (Articles 607a–607j), which regulates the issuing of European arrest warrants by the Polish authorities, and Chapter 65b (Articles 607 k–607zc), which regulates the execution of the European arrest warrants originating from other EU Member States; details on national legislation available in English—Council of the European Union (2007): ‘Evaluation report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations : “The practical application of the European arrest warrant and corresponding surrender procedures between Member States” : Report on Poland’, 14240/1/07, REV 1.
75.
Act of 18th March 2004 amending the Criminal Code, Criminal Procedure Code and Minor Offences Code [Polish: Ustawa z dnia 18 marca 2004 r. o zmianie ustawy Kodeks karny, ustawy—Kodeks postçpowania karnego oraz ustawy—Kodeks wykroczen]; Journal of Laws [Dziennik Ustaw], 2004, No. 69, Item 626.
76.
Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2nd April 1997 [Polish: Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 2 kwietnia 1997 r.)].
77.
Łazowski (2005), pp. 573 and 574.
78.
Judgment of the Constitutional Tribunal of Poland of 27th April 2005—file reference No. P 1/05 [Polish: Wyrok Trybunału Konstytucyjnego w Polsce z dnia 27 kwietnia 2005—r. sygn. akt P 1/05]. 42/4/A/2005, published in Journal of Laws—Dz.U. No 77, item 680, 4th May 2005.
79.
Judgment […], Pt. I, para. 2.3.
80.
Łazowski (2005), p. 575.
81.
Judgment […], Pt. III, para. 3.
82.
Judgment […], Pt. III, para. 3.6.
83.
Judgment […], Pt. I, ruling.
84.
Komárek (2007), p. 19.
85.
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 of the Council Framework Decision of 13th June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States’, COM(2007) 407, p. 5.
86.
Judgment […], Pt. III, para. 5.4.
87.
Łazowski (2005), p. 581.
88.
Judgment […], Pt. III, para. 5.9.
89.
Van Sliedregt (2007), p. 246.
90.
Judgment […], Pt. III, para. 5.
91.
Judgment […], Pt. III, para. 5.7.
92.
Łazowski (2007), pp. 148–150.
93.
Komárek (2007), p. 21.
94.
Sievers (2008), pp. 114 and 115.
95.
Act to Implement the Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant and the Surrender Procedures between the Member States of the European Union (European Arrest Warrant Act) of 21st July 2004 [Ger.: Gesetz zur Umsetzung des Rahmenbeschlusses über den Europäischen Haftbefehl und die Übergabeverfahren zwischen den Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Union (Europäisches Haftbefehlsgesetz—EuHbG) Vom 21. Juli 2004], Federal Law Gazette (Bundesgesetzblatt) I, 2004, p. 1748.
96.
Act on the International Judicial Assistance in Criminal Matters of 3rd December 1982 [Ger.: Gesetz über die internationale Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen Vom 3. Dezember 1982]. Federal Law Gazette (Bundesgesetzblatt) I, 1982, p. 2071; details on national legislation available in English—Council of the European Union (2009): ‘Evaluation report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations : “The practical application of the European arrest warrant and corresponding surrender procedures between Member States” : Report on Germany’, 7058/2/09, REV 2.
97.
Sinn and Wörner (2007), pp. 206 and 207.
98.
Judgment of the Second Senate of the Federal High Constitutional Court of Germany of 18th July 2005—2 BvR 2236/04 [Ger.: Urteil des Zweiten Senats des Bundesverfassungsgericht in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland vom 18. Juli 2005—2 BvR 2236/04].
99.
Mackarel (2007), p. 55.
100.
Komárek (2007), p. 21.
101.
Mitsilegas (2006), pp. 1294 and 1295.
102.
Judgment […], ruling.
103.
Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany of 23rd May 1949 [Ger.: Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland vom 23. Mai 1949].
104.
Sievers (2008), pp. 114 and 115.
105.
In Germany under the Constitution (Basic Law) the extradition of a German national to a foreign State was initially forbidden absolutely. However, the 47th Amendment to the Basic Law (Bundesgesetzblatt 2000, part I, p. 1633), adopted in 2000, softened this rigid prohibition. Nowadays, in spite of the fact that no German may be extradited to a foreign country, the national law can provide otherwise for extraditions to an EU Member State or to the International Criminal Court.
106.
Judgment […], para. 77.
107.
Judgment […], para. 84.
108.
Judgment […], para. 143.
109.
Long (2009), p. 17.
110.
Mann (2007), p. 716.
111.
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 of the Council Framework Decision of 13th June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States’, COM(2007) 407, p. 5.
112.
Van Sliedregt (2007), p. 246.
113.
Tomuschat (2006), p. 209.
114.
Pollicino (2008), p. 1329.
115.
Mitsilegas (2006), p. 1295.
116.
Pollicino (2008), pp. 1318 and 1329.
117.
Sinn and Wörner (2007), p. 208; Sinn and Wörner (2008), p. 249.
118.
Hinarejos Parga (2006), pp. 587 and 588.
119.
Mitsilegas (2006), p. 1297 and 1298.
120.
Deen-Racsmány and Blekxtoon (2005), p. 340.
121.
See: Mann (2007), p. 717 et seq.
122.
Sinn and Wörner (2007), p. 219.
123.
Mölders (2006), p. 46.
124.
Mann (2007), pp. 729 and 730.
125.
Council of the European Union (2005): ‘European Arrest Warrant – Decision of the German Constitutional Court’, document 11600/05 limite, p. 3.
126.
Act to Implement the Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant and the Surrender Procedures between the Member States of the European Union (European Arrest Warrant Act) of 20th July 2006 [Ger.: Gesetz zur Umsetzung des Rahmenbeschlusses über den Europäischen Haftbefehl und die Übergabeverfahren zwischen den Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Union (Europäisches Haftbefehlsgesetz—EuHbG) Vom 20. Juli 2006], Federal Law Gazette (Bundesgesetzblatt) I, 2006, p. 1721.
127.
Sinn and Wörner (2008), p. 249.
128.
Act No. 141/1961 Coll. of 29th November 1961 on Criminal Procedure as amended by later legislation [Czech: Zákon č. 141/1961 Sb. ze dne 29. listopadu 1961 o trestním řízení soudním ve znení pozdejších predpisu]; details on national legislation available in English—Council of the European Union (2008): ‘Evaluation report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations : “The practical application of the European arrest warrant and corresponding surrender procedures between Member States” : Report on the Czech Republic’, 15691/2/08, REV 2. However, later a new legislation containing all mutual recognition instruments, including the European arrest warrant and repealing the former provisions in the Code of Criminal Procedure, was adopted—the Act of the Parliament of the Czech Republic of 20th March No. 140/2013 Coll. on the International Judicial Co-operation in Criminal Matters [Czech: zákon Parlamentu České republiky ze dne 20. března 2013 č. 140/2013 Sb. o mezinárodní justiční spolupráci ve věcech trestních].
129.
Act of the Parliament of the Czech Republic No. 539/2004 Coll. of 29th July 2004 amending Act No. 141/1961 Coll., Code of Criminal Procedure (Criminal Code) as amended by later legislation, and certain other Acts [Czech: zákon Parlamentu České republiky č. 539/2004 Sb. ze dne 29. července 2004, kterým se mění zákon č. 141/1961 Sb., o trestním řízení soudním (trestní řád) ve znění pozdějších předpisů, a některé další zákony].
130.
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic of 3rd May 2006—Pl. ÚS 66/04 [Czech: Nález Ústavního soudu České republiky ze dne 3. května 2006—Pl. ÚS 66/04]; 434/2006 Coll.
131.
Hamuľák (2011), pp. 42 and 43.
132.
Resolution of the Presidium of the Czech National Council of 16th December 1992 on the Declaration of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms as a part of the constitutional order of the Czech Republic [Czech: Usnesení předsednictva České národní rady ze dne 16. prosince 1992 o vyhlášení Listiny základních práv a svobod jako součásti ústavního pořádku České republiky].
133.
It should be emphasised that the Constitutional Court faced with the dilemma of whether it should suspend judgment while “awaiting” the answer of the Court of Justice in the case of Advocaten voor de Wereld, or rather rule on the matter. It chose the second option.
134.
Herczeg (2009), p. 348; Kloučková (2008), p. 171.
135.
See: Judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic of 13th September 1994—Pl. ÚS 9/94 [Czech: Nález Ústavního soudu České republiky ze dne 13. září 1994—Pl. ÚS 9/94]; 207/1994 Coll.
136.
Judgment […], Pt. I, paras 3, 4, 5 and 8; Pt. II, para. 14.
137.
Judgment […], Pt. I, para. 10.
138.
See: Judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic of 8th March 2006—Pl. ÚS 50/04 [Czech: Nález Ústavního soudu České republiky ze dne 8. března 2006—Pl. ÚS 50/04]; 154/2006 Coll.
139.
Judgment […], Pt. II, para. 39.
140.
Judgment […], Pt. II, para. 15.
141.
Judgment […], Pt. II, paras 26 and 29.
142.
Pollicino (2008), p. 1335.
143.
Judgment […], Pt. II, paras 30 and 31.
144.
Judgment […], Pt. VIII/a, para. 70.
145.
Judgment […], Pt. VIII/a, para. 71.
146.
Pollicino (2008), p. 1338.
147.
Judgment […], Pt. IX, para. 100.
148.
Judgment […], Pt. IX, para. 102.
149.
Van Sliedregt (2007), p. 245.
150.
Komárek (2007), p. 25.
151.
Act to Provide for the European Arrest Warrant and the Surrender Procedures of Requested Persons between Member States of the European Union 2004 (133(I)/2004) [Greek: O περί Eυρωπαϊkoύ Eντάλματoς Σύλληψης kαι των Διαδιkασιών Παράδoσης Ekζητoυμένων Mεταξύ των Kρατών Mελών της Eυρωπαϊkής Ένωσης Nόμoς τoυ 2004 (133(I)/2004)]; Official Gazette of the Republic of Cyprus (Eπίσημη Eφημερίδα), Issue No. 3850, Appendix I, Pt. I, p. 2750; details on national legislation available in English—Council of the European Union (2007): ‘Evaluation report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations: “The practical application of the European arrest warrant and corresponding surrender procedures between Member States”: Report on Cyprus’, 14135/2/07, REV2.
152.
Constitution of the Republic of Cyprus, 6th July 1960 [Greek: To Σύνταγμα της Kυπριαkής Δημokρατίας, 6 Ioυλ 1960].
153.
Tsadiras (2007), p. 1516.
154.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of Cyprus of 7th November 2005 (Ap. No. 294/2005) [Greek: Aπόφαση τoυ Aνώτατoυ Διkαστηρίoυ Kύπρoυ της 7 Noεμβρίoυ 2005 (Eφεση Aρ. 294/2005)]. The judgment is not numbered into paragraphs. More precise reference therefore cannot be provided.
155.
Council of the European Union (2005): ‘Decisions of Supreme Courts and Constitutional Courts concerning the European Arrest Warrant’, 14281/05, p. 2.
156.
Tsadiras (2007), p. 1521.
157.
Mitsilegas (2006), p. 1298.
158.
Judgment […]. The judgment is not numbered into paragraphs. More precise reference therefore cannot be provided.
159.
Council of the European Union (2005): ‘Decisions of Supreme Courts and Constitutional Courts concerning the European Arrest Warrant’, 14281/05, p. 2.
160.
Tsadiras (2007), p. 1521.
161.
Council of the European Union (2005): ‘Decisions of Supreme Courts and Constitutional Courts concerning the European Arrest Warrant’, 14281/05, p. 3.
162.
Fifth Amendment of the Constitution (127(I)/2006) [Greek: O περί της πέμπτης τρoπoπoίησης τoυ Συντάγματoς νόμoς τoυ 2006 (127(I)/2006)]; Official Gazette of the Republic of Cyprus (Eπίσημη Eφημερίδα), Issue No. 4090, Appendix I, Pt. I, p. 1372.
163.
Tsadiras (2007), p. 1526.
164.
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 of the Council Framework Decision of 13th June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States’, COM(2007) 407, pp. 5 and 6.
165.
Deen-Racsmány (2007), p. 183.
166.
Mitsilegas (2006), p. 1297.
167.
Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA of 26th February 2009 amending Framework Decisions 2002/584/JHA, 2005/214/JHA , 2006/783/JHA , 2008/909/JHA and 2008/947/JHA , thereby enhancing the procedural rights of persons and fostering the application of the principle of mutual recognition to decisions rendered in the absence of the person concerned at the trial. Official Journal of the European Union, L 81/24 of 27th March 2009. See: Klimek (2009b), pp. 1282–1288.
168.
Initiative of the Republic of Slovenia, the French Republic, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Sweden, the Slovak Republic, the United Kingdom and the Federal Republic of Germany with a view to adopting a Council Framework Decision 2008/…/JHA on the enforcement of decisions rendered in absentia and amending Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States, Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties , Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders , and Framework Decision 2008/…/JHA on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, C 52/1 of 26th February 2008.
169.
Article 1(1) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant. In-depth analysis see: Klimek (2015), p. 51 et seq.
170.
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic of 3rd May 2006—Pl. ÚS 66/04 [Czech: Nález Ústavního soudu České republiky ze dne 3. května 2006—Pl. ÚS 66/04], Pt. VI, para. 51.
171.
Apap and Carrera (2004), p. 16.
172.
Bureš (2009), p. 25.
173.
Zurek (2012), pp. 66–70.
174.
Commission of the European Communities (2001): ‘Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States ’, COM(2001) 522 final/2, p. 5 et seq.; Spencer (2005), p. 205 et seq.
175.
Treaty Between the Italian Republic and the Kingdom of Spain For the Pursuit of Serious Crime Through the Superseding of Extradition in a Common Area of Justice [Trattato tra la Repubblica Italiana ed il Regno di Spagna per il perseguimento di gravi reati attraverso il superamento dell’estradizione in uno spazio di giustizia]. Rome, 28th November 2000.
176.
Bureš (2011), p. 153.
177.
Treaty on European Union introduced the legal concept of the European citizenship into EU law. Every national of a Member State is a citizen of the EU. Citizenship of the EU is additional to and not replaces national citizenship (Article 9 of the Treaty on European Union as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon ). The European citizenship is emphasised also in the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union (Article 20 as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon ); see: Bellamy and Warleigh (2005); or European Commission (2000): ‘Dismantling the obstacles to EU citizens’ rights’, EU Citizenship Report 2010, COM(2000) 495.
178.
Shaw (2008), p. 687.
179.
Hailbronner (2006), p. 88.
180.
Long (2009), p. 12; Klimek (2011b), pp. 442–448.
181.
Council of the European Union (2008): ‘European Handbook on How to Issue a European Arrest Warrant’, 8216/2/08, REV 2, p. 10.
182.
Deen-Racsmány (2007), p. 170; see also: Deen-Racsmány (2006), pp. 293–299.
183.
Deen-Racsmány and Blekxtoon (2005), p. 340.
184.
Mackarel (2007), p. 40.
185.
Article 2(2) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
186.
Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston—case C-396/11 —Ministerul Public—Parchetul de pe lângă Curtea de Apel Constanţa v Ciprian Vasile Radu, para. 36.
187.
Official Journal of the European Union, C 83/389 of 30th March 2010. In-depth analysis see: Peers et al. (2014).
188.
Recital 12 of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
189.
Article 47 of the EU Charter. In-depth analysis see: Peers et al. (2014), p. 1197 et seq.
190.
Article 48 of the EU Charter. In-depth analysis see: Peers et al. (2014), p. 1303 et seq.
191.
Article 49 of the EU Charter. In-depth analysis see: Peers et al. (2014), p. 1351 et seq.
192.
Article 50 of the EU Charter. In-depth analysis see: Peers et al. (2014), p. 1373 et seq.
193.
Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty Establishing the European Union and the Treaty Establishing the European Community. Official Journal of the European Union, C 306/231 of 13th December 2006.
194.
Treaty on European Union as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon. Official Journal of the European Union, C 83/13 of 30th March 2010.
195.
Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon. In-depth analysis see: Grabenwarter and Pabel (2013), pp. 287–348.
196.
Paladinu (2011), p. 266.
197.
Commission of the European Communities (2000): ‘Commission Communication on the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union ’, COM(2000) 559 final, p. 3.
198.
Smith (2007), p. 105.
199.
Chalmers et al. (2010), p. 239.
200.
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Council of Europe , European Treaty Series No. 5 [1950], Rome, 4th November 1950. In-depth analysis see: Schabas (2015).
201.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 30th May 2013—case C-168/13 PPU —Jeremy F v Premier ministre.
202.
Judgment Jeremy F, paras 46 and 47.
203.
Recital 12 of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
204.
Vennemann (2003), p. 115.
205.
Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston—case C-396/11 —Ministerul Public—Parchetul de pe lângă Curtea de Apel Constanţa v Ciprian Vasile Radu, para. 41.
206.
European Commission (2011): ‘Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation since 2007 of the Council Framework Decision of 13th June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States’, COM(2011) 175, p. 3.
207.
Resolution of the Council of 30th November 2009 on a Roadmap for strengthening procedural rights of suspected or accused persons in criminal proceedings. Official Journal of the European Union, C 295/1 of 4th December 2009.
208.
European Commission (2011): ‘Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation since 2007 of the Council Framework Decision of 13th June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States’, COM(2011) 175.
209.
The list of the principles of surrender procedure has been previously elaborated in author’s former works , namely: Klimek (2009a), p. 15 et seq.; Klimek (2010), p. 22 et sq.; Ivor et al. (2013), p. 542 et seq.; Klimek (2013a), p. 88 et seq.; Klimek (2014a), pp. 33–43; Klimek (2015), p. 67 et seq.
210.
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon . Official Journal of the European Union, C 83/47 of 30th March 2010.
211.
Article 82(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon.
212.
Article 1(2) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
213.
Commission of the European Communities (2001): ‘Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States’, COM(2001) 522 final/2, p. 5.
214.
Tomuschat (2006), p. 210.
215.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 1st December 2008—case C-388/08 PPU —Criminal proceedings against Artur Leymann and Aleksei Pustovarov, para. 51; Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 16th November 2010—case C-261/09 —Gaetano Mantello, para. 36; Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 5th September 2012—case C-42/11—João Pedro Lopes Da Silva Jorge, para. 29; Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 30th May 2013—case C-168/13 PPU —Jeremy F v Premier ministre, para. 36.
216.
Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston—case C-396/11 —Ministerul Public—Parchetul de pe lângă Curtea de Apel Constanţa v Ciprian Vasile Radu, para. 68.
217.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 21st October 2010—case C-306/09 —I.B., para. 50; Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 28th June 2012—case C-192/12 PPU —Melvin West, para. 64; Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 5th September 2012—case C-42/11 —João Pedro Lopes Da Silva Jorge, para. 30.
218.
Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi—case C-42/11—Joao Pedro Lopes Da Silva Jorge, para. 36.
219.
Recital 10 of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
220.
See: Opinion of Advocate General Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer—case C-303/05 —Advocaten voor de Wereld VZW v Leden van de Ministerraad, paras 17, 46, 62 and 81; Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston—case C-288/05 —Staatsanwaltschaft Augsburg v Jürgen Kretzinger, para. 12; Opinion of Advocate General Yves Bot—case C-123/08 —Execution of a European arrest warrant issued against Dominic Wolzenburg, paras 16, 128, 133, 134, 136 and 138; Opinion of Advocate General Bot—case C-261/09 —Criminal proceedings against Gaetano Mantello, paras 1, 14, 73 and 82; Opinion of Advocate General Cruz Villalón—case C-306/09—I.B. v Conseil des ministres, para. 2; Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston—case C-396/11—Ministerul Public—Parchetul de pe lângă Curtea de Apel Constanţa v Ciprian Vasile Radu, paras 34, 38, 60 and 67; Opinion of Advocate General Bot—case C-399/11—Criminal proceedings against Stefano Melloni, para. 115.
221.
See: Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 1st December 2008—case C-388/08 PPU—Criminal proceedings against Artur Leymann and Aleksei Pustovarov, para. 50; Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 16th November 2010—case C-261/09—Gaetano Mantello, para. 3; Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 21st October 2010—case C-306/09 —I.B., para. 5; Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 28th June 2012—case C-192/12 PPU—Melvin West, paras 5, 53, 62, 68 and 77; Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 29th January 2013—case C-396/11 —Ciprian Vasile Radu, paras 3 and 34; Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 26th February 2013—case C-399/11 —Stefano Melloni v Ministerio Fiscal, para. 63; Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 30th May 2013—case C-168/13 PPU—Jeremy F v Premier ministre, para. 50.
222.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 30th May 2013—case C-168/13 PPU—Jeremy F v Premier ministre.
223.
Judgment Jeremy F, para. 50.
224.
Jones et al. (2010), pp. 25 and 26.
225.
Long (2009), p. 11.
226.
Recital 9 of the Preamble to the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
227.
Bureš (2011), p. 153.
228.
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic of 3rd May 2006—Pl. ÚS 66/04 [Czech: Nález Ústavního soudu České republiky ze dne 3. května 2006—Pl. ÚS 66/04], Pt. VI, para. 49.
229.
Article 9(1) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
230.
Article 8(1)(2) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
231.
Article 7(1)(2) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
232.
European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters. Council of Europe , European Treaty Series No. 30 [1959], Strasbourg, 20th April 1959.
233.
Council Framework Decision 2008/978/JHA of 18th December 2008 on the European evidence warrant for the purpose of obtaining objects, documents and data for use in proceedings in criminal matters. Official Journal of the European Union, C 115/13 of 9th May 2008.
234.
De Hert et al. (2009), p. 62.
235.
Vestergaard (2008), p. 212.
236.
Van Sliedregt (2007), p. 248.
237.
Mackarel (2007), p. 40.
238.
Article 4(7) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
239.
Van der Wilt (2005b), p. 74.
240.
Details see: Van der Wilt (2005b), p. 74 et seq.
241.
European Convention on Extradition . Council of Europe , European Treaty Series No. 24 [1957], Paris, 13th December 1957.
242.
Article 14(1) of the European Convention on Extradition.
243.
Convention drawn up on the Basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union on a simplified extradition procedure between the Member States of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Communities, C 78 of 30th March 1995; see: Article 9 of the Convention.
244.
Convention of 27th September 1995 drawn up on the Basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, relating to extradition between the Member States of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Communities, C 313 of 13th October 1996; see: Articles 10 and 11 of the Convention.
245.
Article 27(2) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
246.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 1st December 2008—case C-388/08 PPU —Criminal proceedings against Artur Leymann and Aleksei Pustovarov, para. 44.
247.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 28th June 2012—case C-192/12 PPU —Melvin West, para. 41.
248.
Blekxtoon (2005), pp. 261 and 262.
249.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 1st December 2008—case C-388/08 PPU —Criminal proceedings against Artur Leymann and Aleksei Pustovarov.
250.
Details see: Klimek (2015), p. 253 et seq.
251.
Provisions on the rule of speciality see: Pt. 1, Chapter 41, Section 17(1).
252.
Mitsilegas (2008), p. 211.
253.
Council of the European Union (2007): ‘Evaluation report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations : “The practical application of the European arrest warrant and corresponding surrender procedures between Member States” : Report on the United Kingdom’, 9974/2/07, REV 2 EXT 1, p. 49; Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 of the Council Framework Decision of 13th June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States’, Commission staff working document, SEC(2007) 979, p. 34.
254.
European Convention on Extradition . Council of Europe , European Treaty Series No. 24 [1957], Paris, 13th December 1957.
255.
Lagodny and Rosbaud (2009), p. 265.
256.
Article 27(3) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
257.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 1st December 2008—C-388/08 PPU —Criminal proceedings against Artur Leymann and Aleksei Pustovarov, para. 68.
258.
Convention drawn up on the Basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, relating to extradition between the Member States of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Communities, C 313/12 of 23rd October 1996.
259.
See: Article 10(1)(a)(b)(c) of the Convention relating to Extradition between the Member States of the EU.
260.
Article 28(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant; rules for consent are covered in Article 28(3).
261.
Council of the European Union (2006): ‘Implementation of the Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant – Statements by Romania’, 16907/06, p. 6 of the annex (Statements notified to the General Secretariat of the Council in the context of the implementation of the European arrest warrant with reference to Framework Decision 584/JHA of 13th June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States of the EU).
262.
Article 28(2) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
263.
In accordance with Article 27(3)(a) and Article 27(3)(e-g) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
264.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 28th June 2012—case C-192/12 PPU —Melvin West.
265.
Details see: Klimek (2015), p. 258 et seq.
266.
Article 28(4) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
267.
European Convention on Extradition . Council of Europe , European Treaty Series No. 24 [1957], Paris, 13th December 1957.
268.
Article 21 of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
269.
Article 1(2) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
270.
Klimek (2015), pp. 89 and 90.
271.
Opinion of Advocate General Cruz Villalón—case C-306/09 —I.B. v Conseil des ministres, paras 43 and 45.
272.
Zurek (2012), pp. 67 and 68.
273.
Murphy (2011), p. 232; Klimek (2015), pp. 95 and 96.
274.
Article 2(1) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
275.
Article 2(2) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
276.
Article 2(1) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
277.
Mackarel (2007), p. 40.
278.
Article 2(2) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
279.
Convention drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests. Official Journal of the European Communities, C 316/49 of 27th November 1995.
280.
Pursuant to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court is limited to the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole. It has jurisdiction with respect to: the crime of genocide , crimes against humanity, war crimes , and the crime of aggression (Article 5(1) of the Rome Statute); details see: Askin (1999), pp. 33–59; or Doria et al. (2009).
281.
Article 2(3) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
282.
Murphy (2011), p. 233.
283.
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 of the Council Framework Decision of 13th June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States ’, COM(2007) 407, p. 8.
284.
Council Framework Decision 2008/978/JHA of 18th December 2008 on the European evidence warrant for the purpose of obtaining objects, documents and data for use in proceedings in criminal matters. Official Journal of the European Union, C 115/13 of 9th May 2008.
285.
Article 14(2) of the Framework Decision 2008/978/JHA on the European evidence warrant.
286.
Murphy (2011), p. 234.
287.
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Report from the Commission based on Article 11 of the Council Framework Decision of 13th June 2002 on combating terrorism ’, COM(2007) 681 final, p. 10; see also: Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission based on Article 11 of the Council Framework Decision of 13th June 2002 on combating terrorism’, Commission staff working document, SEC(2007) 1463.
288.
Council of the European Union (2009): ‘Final report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations – The practical application of the European Arrest Warrant and corresponding surrender procedures between Member States’, 8302/2/09, REV 2, p. 14.
289.
Council of the European Union (2009): ‘Final report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations – The practical application of the European Arrest Warrant and corresponding surrender procedures between Member States ’, 8302/2/09, REV 2, p. 14.
290.
Council of the European Union (2008): ‘European Handbook on How to Issue a European Arrest Warrant’, 8216/2/08, REV 2, p. 11.
291.
Council of the European Union (2008): ‘European Handbook on How to Issue a European Arrest Warrant’, 8216/2/08, REV 2, p. 17.
292.
Article 8(a) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
293.
See: Annex to the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant (consolidated version).
294.
Zazra (2014), p. 150.
295.
Article 9(1) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
296.
See http://www.ejn-crimjust.europa.eu/ejn/EJN_EAWAtlas.aspx (available 2013-04-04).
297.
Article 10(1)(2) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
298.
Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14th June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders. Official Journal of the European Union, L 239/19 of 22nd September 2000.
299.
Article 9(2)(3) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant; the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant replaces Articles 95(1) and (2) of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement in this respect.
300.
Council of the European Union (2008): ‘European Handbook on How to Issue a European Arrest Warrant’, 8216/2/08, REV 2, p. 19.
301.
Interpol is the world’s largest international police organisation with almost 200 member countries. Its role is to enable police around the world to work together to make the world a safer place.
302.
Council of the European Union (2008): ‘European Handbook on How to Issue a European Arrest Warrant’, 8216/2/08, REV 2, p. 19.
303.
Article 10(4)(5) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
304.
Article 10(6) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
305.
Article 8(2) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
306.
Bednarek (2009), pp. 90 and 91.
307.
Bednarek (2009), p. 94.
308.
Bednarek (2009), p. 94.
309.
Eurojust (2013): ‘Annual Report 2012’, p. 22.
310.
Article 9(1) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
311.
Article 15(1)(2)(3) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
312.
Article 1(2) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
313.
Commission of the European Communities (2001): ‘Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States’, COM(2001) 522 final/2, p. 5.
314.
Vennemann (2003), p. 103.
315.
Recital 8 of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
316.
Article 22 of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
317.
Article 24(1) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
318.
Article 24(2) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
319.
Article 16(2) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
320.
Article 16(3) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant .
321.
Article 13(1)(2)(3)(4) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
322.
Article 14 of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
323.
Article 17(1) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
324.
Gay (2006).
325.
Article 17(2)(3) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
326.
Article 17(4) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
327.
Article 17(5)(7) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
328.
Article 20(1) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
329.
Article 23(1)(2) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
330.
Article 23(3) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
331.
Article 23(4) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
332.
Blekxtoon (2005), p. 258.
333.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 30th May 2013—case C-168/13 PPU —Jeremy F v Premier ministre.
334.
Judgment Jeremy F, para. 64.
335.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 21st October 2010—case C-306/09 —I.B., para. 50; Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 28th June 2012—case C-192/12 PPU – Melvin West, para. 64; Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 5th September 2012—case C-42/11 —João Pedro Lopes Da Silva Jorge, para. 30; Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi—case C-42/11—Joao Pedro Lopes Da Silva Jorge, para. 36.
336.
Klimek (2015), p. 150.
337.
Vermeulen and De Bondt (2015), p. 122.
338.
Łazowski and Nash (2009), p. 40.
339.
Van Sliedregt (2007), pp. 248 and 249.
340.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 30th May 2013 – case C-168/13 PPU—Jeremy F v Premier ministre.
341.
Judgment Jeremy F, para. 36.
342.
Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi—case C-42/11 —Joao Pedro Lopes Da Silva Jorge, para. 36.
343.
Article 3 of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
344.
Article 3(1) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
345.
Blekxtoon (2005), p. 233.
346.
Article 3(2) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
347.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 16th November 2010—case C-261/09—Gaetano Mantello.
348.
Details see: Klimek (2015), p. 225 et seq.
349.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 18th July 2007—case C-288/05 —Criminal proceedings against Jürgen Kretzinger.
350.
Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14th June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders . Official Journal of the European Communities, L 239/19 of 22th September 2000.
351.
Details see: Klimek (2015), p. 231 et seq.
352.
European Convention on Extradition . Council of Europe , European Treaty Series No. 24 [1957], Paris, 13th December 1957.
353.
Cimamoti (2009), p. 112.
354.
Opinion of Advocate General Bot—case C-261/09 —Criminal proceedings against Gaetano Mantello, paras 36, 37 and 39; analysis of the elements bis and idem see: Cimamoti (2009), p. 118 et seq.; or Van Bockel (2010), p. 41 et seq.
355.
Van der Wilt (2005a), p. 103.
356.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 16th November 2010—case C-261/09 —Gaetano Mantello.
357.
Details see: Klimek (2015), p. 225 et seq.
358.
Article 3(3) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant. See also: Šramel (2014), pp. 139–149; Šramel (2015b), pp. 116–122.
359.
Article 4 of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
360.
Article 4(1) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
361.
Blekxtoon (2005), pp. 261–262.
362.
Order of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 25th September 2015—case C-463/15 PPU—Openbaar Ministerie v A., rulings.
363.
Article 4(2) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
364.
Article 4(3) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
365.
Article 4(4) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
366.
European Convention on Extradition. Council of Europe , European Treaty Series No. 24 [1957], Paris, 13th December 1957.
367.
Blekxtoon (2005), pp. 261 and 262.
368.
Article 10 of the European Convention on Extradition .
369.
Article 4(5) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
370.
Article 4(6) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
371.
Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons . Council of Europe , European Treaty Series No. 112 [1983], Strasbourg, 21st March 1983.
372.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 17th July 2008—case C-66/08 —Proceedings concerning the execution of a European arrest warrant issued against Szymon Kozłowski, para. 45; Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 6th October 2009—case C-123/08 —Dominic Wolzenburg, paras 62 and 67; Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 21st October 2010—case C-306/09 —I. B., para. 52; Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 5th September 2012—case C-42/11 —João Pedro Lopes Da Silva Jorge, para. 32.
373.
Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi—case C-42/11—Joao Pedro Lopes Da Silva Jorge, para. 36.
374.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 17th July 2008—case C-66/08—Proceedings concerning the execution of a European arrest warrant issued against Szymon Kozłowski.
375.
Details see: Klimek (2015), p. 236 et seq.
376.
Article 4(7)(a)(b) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
377.
Article 12 of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
378.
Łazowski and Nash (2009), p. 36.
379.
Article 26(1)(2) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant .
380.
The rule applies except when a Member State avails itself of the possibility of refusal when the transit of a national or a resident is requested for the purpose of the execution of a custodial sentence or detention order.
381.
Article 25(1) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
382.
Article 25(2) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
383.
Article 25(4) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
384.
Blekxtoon (2005), p. 260.
385.
Article 30(1)(2) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
386.
Commission of the European Communities (2001): ‘Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States ’, COM(2001) 522 final/2, p. 23.
387.
Article 29(1) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
388.
Article 29(2)(3)(4) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
389.
European Convention on Extradition. Council of Europe , European Treaty Series No. 24 [1957], Paris, 13th December 1957.
390.
Commission of the European Communities (2001): ‘Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States’, COM(2001) 522 final/2, p. 21.
391.
Gless and Schaffner (2009), pp. 305 and 312.
392.
Council Framework Decision 2003/577/JHA of 22nd July 2003 on the execution in the European Union of orders freezing property or evidence. Official Journal of the European Union, L 195/45 of 2nd August 2003 as amended by the corrigendum—see Official Journal of the European Union, L 374/20 of 27th December 2006.
393.
Article 2(d) of the Framework Decision 2003/577/JHA on the execution of orders freezing property or evidence.
394.
Gless and Schaffner (2009), p. 301.
395.
Article 32(1) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
396.
Article 32(1) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
397.
Statements made by certain Member States on the adoption of the Framework Decision [2002/584/JHA of 13th June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States]. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 190/19 of 18th July 2002.
398.
Kapaedis and Stephanou (2008), p. 164.
399.
Vestergaard (2008), p. 217.
400.
Mickevicius (2008), p. 294.
401.
Bulnes (2008), p. 362.
402.
Van der Wilt (2008), p. 312.
403.
Vermeulen (2008), p. 156.
404.
Article 5(2) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
405.
Article 5(3) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
406.
Blekxtoon (2005), p. 242.
407.
Opinion of Advocate General Cruz Villalón—case C-306/09 —I.B. v Conseil des ministres, para. 32.
408.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 5th April 2016—joined cases C-404/15 and C-659/15 PPU—Pál Aranyosi (C-404/15) and Robert Căldăraru (C-659/15 PPU), rulings.
409.
Article 11(1) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
410.
Directive 2012/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22nd May 2012 on the right to information in criminal proceedings. Official Journal of the European Union, L 142/1 of 1st June 2012. Analysis of the Directive see Chap. 15.
411.
Article 5(1) of the Directive 2012/13/EU on the right to information; Klimek (2013b), pp. 159–166; Klimek (2015), p. 168.
412.
Article 5(2) of the Directive 2012/13/EU on the right to information; Recital 38 of the Directive 2012/13/EU on the right to information.
413.
Article 4(5) of the Directive 2012/13/EU on the right to information.
414.
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Council of Europe , European Treaty Series No. 5 [1950], Rome, 4th November 1950. In-depth analysis see: Schabas (2015).
415.
Article 5(2) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms .
416.
Article 11(2) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
417.
Directive 2013/48/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22nd October 2013 on the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings, and on the right to have a third party informed upon deprivation of liberty and to communicate with third persons and with consular authorities while deprived of liberty. Official Journal of the European Union, L 294/1 of 6th November 2013.
418.
Article 10(1) of the Directive 2013/48/EU on the right of access to a lawyer; Klimek (2014b), pp. 1559–1574; Klimek (2015), p. 169.
419.
Article 10(2)(a)(b)(c) of the Directive 2013/48/EU on the right of access to a lawyer.
420.
Article 12(1) of the Directive 2013/48/EU on the right of access to a lawyer.
421.
Article 2(2) of the Directive 2013/48/EU on the right of access to a lawyer.
422.
Article 10(4)(5) of the Directive 2013/48/EU on the right of access to a lawyer .
423.
Article 11(2) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
424.
Directive 2010/64/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20th October 2010 on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings. Official Journal of the European Union, L 280/1 of 26th October 2010. Analysis of the Directive see: see Chap. 15.
425.
Article 2(7) of the Directive 2010/64/EU on the right to interpretation and translation; Klimek (2011c), pp. 262–269.
426.
Article 2(8) of the Directive 2010/64/EU on the right to interpretation and translation; Klimek (2011c), pp. 262–269; Klimek (2015), p. 170.
427.
Recital 22 of the Directive 2010/64/EU on the right to interpretation and translation.
428.
Recital 22 of the Directive 2010/64/EU on the right to interpretation and translation .
429.
Article 3(6) of the Directive 2010/64/EU on the right to interpretation and translation; Klimek (2011c), pp. 262–269; Klimek (2015), p. 170.
430.
Recital 22 of the Directive 2010/64/EU on the right to interpretation and translation.
431.
Recital 22 of the Directive 2010/64/EU on the right to interpretation and translation .
432.
Article 11(1) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
433.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 29th January 2013—case C-396/11 —Ciprian Vasile Radu, paras 40 amd 41.
434.
Article 14 of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
435.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 29th January 2013—case C-396/11—Ciprian Vasile Radu.
436.
Klimek (2014c), p. 76.
437.
Article 27(2) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
438.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 30th May 2013—case C-168/13 PPU —Jeremy F v Premier ministre.
439.
Judgment Jeremy F, para. 52.
440.
Recital 12 of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
441.
Judgment Jeremy F, para. 53.
442.
Recital 12 of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
443.
Spencer (2005), p. 206.
444.
European Convention on Extradition. Council of Europe , European Treaty Series No. 24 [1957], Paris, 13th December 1957.
445.
Council Decision 2006/697/EC of 27th June 2006 on the signing of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway on the surrender procedure between the Member States of the European Union and Iceland and Norway. Official Journal of the European Union, L 292/1 of 21st October 2006; the signing of the Agreement on the Surrender Procedure between the EU Member States and Iceland and Norway was approved on behalf of the EU, however, subject to its conclusion (Article 1 of the Decision).
446.
Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway on the surrender procedure between the Member States of the European Union and Iceland and Norway. Official Journal of the European Union, L 292/13 of 21st October 2006.
447.
European Commission (2009): ‘Proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway on the surrender procedure between the Member States of the European Union and Iceland and Norway’, COM(2009)705 final, p. 2.
448.
With the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty on 1st December 2009, the procedures to be followed to that end by the EU are governed by Article 218 of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union. In the case of agreements covering fields to which the ordinary legislative procedure applies, the Council of the European Union shall adopt a decision concluding the agreement, after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament (Article 218(6)(a) of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union).
449.
Convention drawn up on the Basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, relating to extradition between the Member States of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Communities, C 313/12 of 23rd October 1996.
450.
Article 1(1)(2) of the Agreement on the Surrender Procedure.
451.
Article 2(5) of the Agreement on the Surrender Procedure.
452.
Article 1(1) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
453.
Article 41(1)(2) of the Agreement on the Surrender Procedure .
454.
Klimek (2011d), p. 57.
455.
Article 3(1) of the Agreement on the Surrender Procedure .
456.
Article 3(2) of the Agreement on the Surrender Procedure.
457.
Article 3(4) of the Agreement on the Surrender Procedure.
458.
Article 3(4) of the Agreement on the Surrender Procedure .
459.
Klimek (2015), pp. 2, 37, 312 and 366.
460.
Lagodny (2005), pp. 39 and 40.
461.
Klip (2012), p. 411.
462.
Deen-Racsmány (2007), pp. 170 and 171.
463.
Zurek (2012), p. 66.
464.
Judgment of the Constitutional Tribunal of Poland of 27th April 2005—file reference No. P 1/05 [Polish: Wyrok Trybunału Konstytucyjnego w Polsce z dnia 27 kwietnia 2005—r. sygn. akt P 1/05], Pt. III—para. 3.6.
465.
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic of 3rd May 2006—Pl. ÚS 66/04 [Czech: Nález Ústavního soudu České republiky ze dne 3. května 2006—Pl. ÚS 66/04], Pt. VI—para. 48.
466.
European Convention on Extradition. Council of Europe , European Treaty Series No. 24 [1957], Paris, 13th December 1957.
467.
Article 34(2)(b) of the Treaty on European Union as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam . Official Journal of the European Communities, C 340 of 10th November 1997; Article 34(2)(b) of the Treaty on European Union as amended by the Treaty of Nice . Official Journal of the European Union, C 321/E/5 of 29th December 2006.
468.
Commission of the European Communities (2001): ‘Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States’, COM(2001) 522 final/2, p. 4; see: Klimek (2012c), pp. 451–458.
469.
Calderoni (2010), p. 8.
470.
Shaw (2008), p. 686.
471.
Article 1(2) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
472.
Commission of the European Communities (2001): ‘Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States’, COM(2001) 522 final/2, p. 5.
473.
Tomuschat (2006), p. 210.
474.
Cryer et al. (2010), p. 88.
475.
Bureš (2011), p. 153.
476.
Vestergaard (2008), p. 212.
477.
European Convention on Extradition. Council of Europe , European Treaty Series No. 24 [1957], Paris, 13th December 1957.
478.
Convention drawn up on the Basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, relating to extradition between the Member States of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Communities, C 313/12 of 23rd October 1996.
479.
Mann (2007), p. 718.
480.
Deen-Racsmány (2007), p. 170; see also: Deen-Racsmány (2006), pp. 293–299.
481.
Deen-Racsmány and Blekxtoon (2005), p. 340.
482.
Díez (2015), p. 41.
483.
Hailbronner (2006), p. 88.
484.
Long (2009), p. 12; Klimek (2011b), pp. 442–448.
485.
Klip (2012), pp. 344 and 345.
486.
European Convention on Extradition. Council of Europe , European Treaty Series No. 24 [1957], Paris, 13th December 1957.
487.
Article 2 of the European Convention of Extradition.
488.
Van Sliedregt (2007), p. 248.
489.
Mackarel (2007), p. 40.
490.
Article 17(1) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
491.
Article 17(2)(3) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
492.
Article 17(4) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
493.
Article 23(1)(2) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
494.
Article 23(3) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
495.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 21st October 2010—case C-306/09 —I.B., para. 50; Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 28th June 2012—case C-192/12 PPU —Melvin West, para. 64.
496.
Łazowski and Nash (2009), p. 40.
497.
Van Sliedregt (2007), pp. 248 and 249.
498.
Article 34(1) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
499.
Commission of the European Communities (2008): ‘Report from the Commission based on Article 34 of the Council Framework Decision of 13th June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States’ (revised version), COM(2008) 8 final, p. 2.
500.
Mackarel (2007), p. 46.
501.
Council of the European Union (2009): ‘Final report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations – The practical application of the European Arrest Warrant and corresponding surrender procedures between Member States’, 8302/2/09, REV 2, p. 6.
502.
Sievers (2008), pp. 114 and 115.
503.
Act to Implement the Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant and the Surrender Procedures between the Member States of the European Union (European Arrest Warrant Act) of 21st July 2004 [Ger.: Gesetz zur Umsetzung des Rahmenbeschlusses über den Europäischen Haftbefehl und die Übergabeverfahren zwischen den Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Union (Europäisches Haftbefehlsgesetz—EuHbG) Vom 21. Juli 2004], Federal Law Gazette (Bundesgesetzblatt) I, 2004, p. 1748.
504.
Act on the International Judicial Assistance in Criminal Matters of 3rd December 1982 [Ger.: Gesetz über die internationale Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen Vom 3. Dezember 1982]. Federal Law Gazette (Bundesgesetzblatt) I, 1982, p. 2071; details on national legislation available in English—Council of the European Union: ‘Evaluation report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations : “The practical application of the European arrest warrant and corresponding surrender procedures between Member States” : Report on Germany’, 7058/2/09, REV 2.
505.
Judgment of the Second Senate of the Federal High Constitutional Court of Germany of 18th July 2005—2 BvR 2236/04 [Ger.: Urteil des Zweiten Senats des Bundesverfassungsgericht in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland vom 18. Juli 2005—2 BvR 2236/04], ruling.
506.
Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany of 23rd May 1949 [Ger.: Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland vom 23. Mai 1949].
507.
Act to Implement the Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant and the Surrender Procedures between the Member States of the European Union (European Arrest Warrant Act) of 20th July 2006 [Ger.: Gesetz zur Umsetzung des Rahmenbeschlusses über den Europäischen Haftbefehl und die Übergabeverfahren zwischen den Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Union (Europäisches Haftbefehlsgesetz—EuHbG) Vom 20. Juli 2006], Federal Law Gazette (Bundesgesetzblatt) I, 2006, p. 1721.
508.
Łazowski (2005), p. 572.
509.
Code of Criminal Procedure—Act of 6th June 1997 (Journal of Laws, No. 89, Item 555 with amendments) [Polish: Kodeks postępowania karnego—Ustawa z dnia 6 czerwca 1997 r. (Dziennik Ustaw, Nr 89, poz. 555 ze zmianami)]; details on national legislation available in English—Council of the European Union (2007): ‘Evaluation report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations : “The practical application of the European arrest warrant and corresponding surrender procedures between Member States” : Report on Poland’, 14240/1/07, REV 1.
510.
Act of 18th March 2004 amending the Criminal Code, Criminal Procedure Code and Minor Offences Code [Polish: Ustawa z dnia 18 marca 2004 r. o zmianie ustawy Kodeks karny, ustawy—Kodeks postçpowania karnego oraz ustawy—Kodeks wykroczen]; Journal of Laws [Dziennik Ustaw], 2004, No. 69, Item 626.
511.
Act of the National Council of the Slovak Republic of 24th June 2004 No. 403/2004 Coll. on the European Arrest Warrant and on Amending and Supplementing Certain Laws [Slovak: Zákon Národnej rady Slovenskej republiky zo dňa 24. júna 2004 č. 403/2004 Z. z. o európskom zatýkacom rozkaze (a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov)].
512.
Act of the National Council of the Slovak Republic of 9th March 2010 No. 154/2010 Coll. on the European Arrest Warrant [Slovak: Zákon Národnej rady Slovenskej republiky zo dňa 9. marca 2010 č. 154/2010 Z. z. o európskom zatýkacom rozkaze]. See: Klimek (2012b), pp. 181–192.
513.
Act of 19th December 2003 on the European arrest warrant [French: Loi du 19 décembre 2003 relative au mandat d’arrêt européen; Dutch: Wet van 19 December 2003 betreffende het Europees aanhoudingsbevel]; details on national legislation available in English—Council of the European Union (2006): ‘Evaluation report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations : “The practical application of the European arrest warrant and corresponding surrender procedures between Member States” : Report on Belgium’, 16454/2/06, REV2.
514.
Extradition Act 2003; details on national legislation—Council of the European Union (2007): ‘Evaluation report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations: “The practical application of the European arrest warrant and corresponding surrender procedures between Member States”: Report on the United Kingdom’, 9974/2/07, REV 2 EXT 1.
515.
Mitsilegas (2008), pp. 202, 203 and 211.
516.
Gay (2006).
517.
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 of the Council Framework Decision of 13th June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States’, Commission staff working document, SEC(2007) 979, pp. 4 and 5.
518.
Sinn and Wörner (2007), p. 207.
519.
Mitsilegas (2008), p. 211.
520.
Klimek (2012b), pp. 185 and 186; Klimek (2011e), pp. 54 and 55; Klimek (2011a), p. 477; Klimek (2011b), pp. 442–448; Ivor et al. (2013), pp. 535–574.
521.
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 6.
522.
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 6.
523.
Burgess and Vllaard (2006), p. 238.
524.
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, pp. 6 and 7.
525.
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 7.
526.
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 7.
527.
Specimens of the European arrest warrant in all EU’s languages see European Judicial Network online http://www.ejn-crimjust.europa.eu/ejn/libcategories.aspx?Id=14; in addition, as regards accepted languages, see the document of the Council of the European Union (2008): ‘European Handbook on How to Issue a European Arrest Warrant’, 8216/2/08, REV 2, Annex IV—Languages Accepted by the Member States When Receiving a European Arrest Warrant, p. 76 et seq.
528.
Council of the European Union (2008): ‘European Handbook on How to Issue a European Arrest Warrant’, 8216/2/08, REV 2, p. 11.
529.
Council of the European Union (2007): ‘Evaluation report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations: “The practical application of the European arrest warrant and corresponding surrender procedures between Member States”: Report on the United Kingdom’, 9974/2/07, REV 2 EXT 1, p. 64.
530.
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 19.
531.
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 27.
532.
Council of the European Union (2006): ‘Evaluation report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations: “The practical application of the European arrest warrant and corresponding surrender procedures between Member States”: Report on Ireland’, 11843/2/06, REV 2, p. 44.
533.
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, pp. 27 and 28.
534.
Council of the European Union (2006): ‘Evaluation report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations: “The practical application of the European arrest warrant and corresponding surrender procedures between Member States”: Report on Belgium’, 16454/2/06, REV 2, p. 55.
535.
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 28.
536.
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 32.
537.
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 8.
538.
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 9.
539.
Council of the European Union (2008): ‘Evaluation report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations : “The practical application of the European arrest warrant and corresponding surrender procedures between Member States” : Report on the Netherlands’, 15370/2/08, REV 2, p. 31.
540.
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 40.
541.
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 11.
542.
Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi—case C-42/11 —Joao Pedro Lopes Da Silva Jorge, para. 31.
543.
Klimek (2015), pp. 1 and 323.
544.
Opinion of Advocate General Bot—case C-261/09 —Criminal proceedings against Gaetano Mantello, para. 1.
545.
Commission of the European Communities (2005): ‘Report from the Commission based on Article 34 of the Council Framework Decision of 13th June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States’, COM(2005) 63 final; Commission of the European Communities (2005): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission based on Article 34 of the Council Framework Decision of 13th June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States’, Commission staff working document, SEC(2005) 267.
546.
Commission of the European Communities (2006): ‘Report from the Commission based on Article 34 of the Council Framework Decision of 13th June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States’ (revised version), COM(2006) 8 final; Commission of the European Communities (2006): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission based on Article 34 of the Council Framework Decision of 13th June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States’ (revised version), Commission staff working document, SEC(2006)79.
547.
Commission of the European Communities (2006): ‘Report from the Commission based on Article 34 of the Council Framework Decision of 13th June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States’ (revised version), COM(2006) 8 final, p. 2.
548.
Commission of the European Communities (2006): ‘Report from the Commission […]’ (revised version), p. 4.
549.
Commission of the European Communities (2006): ‘Report from the Commission […]’ (revised version), p. 4.
550.
Commission of the European Communities (2006): ‘Report from the Commission […]’ (revised version), p. 4.
551.
Commission of the European Communities (2006): ‘Report from the Commission […]’ (revised version), p. 6.
552.
Commission of the European Communities (2006): ‘Report from the Commission […]’ (revised version), p. 7.
553.
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 of the Council Framework Decision of 13th June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States’, COM(2007) 407; Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 of the Council Framework Decision of 13th June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States’, Commission staff working document, SEC(2007) 979.
554.
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 3.
555.
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 4.
556.
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 4.
557.
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 3.
558.
European Commission (2011): ‘Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation since 2007 of the Council Framework Decision of 13th June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States’, COM(2011) 175.
559.
European Commission (2011): ‘Report from the Commission […] on the implementation since 2007 […]’, p. 3.
560.
European Commission (2011): ‘Report from the Commission […] on the implementation since 2007 […]’, p. 11.
561.
Council of the European Union (2009): ‘Final report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations – The practical application of the European Arrest Warrant and corresponding surrender procedures between Member States’, 8302/2/09, REV 2.
562.
As far as the Slovak Republic is concerned, see Council of the European Union document No. 7060/1/09 CRIMORG 33.
563.
Council of the European Union (2009): ‘Final report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations […]’, p. 5.
564.
Council of the European Union (2009): ‘Final report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations […]’, p. 7 et seq.
565.
Council of the European Union (2009): ‘Final report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations […]’, p. 7.
566.
Council of the European Union (2009): ‘Final report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations […]’, p. 8.
567.
Council of the European Union (2009): ‘Final report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations […]’, p. 11.
568.
Council of the European Union (2009): ‘Final report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations […]’, p. 13.
569.
Council of the European Union (2009): ‘Final report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations […]’, p. 15.
570.
Council of the European Union (2009): ‘Final report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations […]’, p. 18.
571.
See documents of the Council of the European Union: Austria—7024/1/08, REV 1, p. 40 et seq.; Belgium—16454/2/06, REV 2, p. 51 et seq.; Bulgaria—8265/2/09, REV 2, p. 35 et seq.; 14111/11, p. 1 et seq.; Cyprus—14135/2/07, REV 2, p. 48 et seq.; Czech Republic—15691/2/08, REV 2, p. 45 et seq.; 13743/11, p. 1 et seq.; Denmark—13801/2/06, REV 2, p. 42 et seq.; Estonia—5301/2/07, REV2, p. 40 et seq.; 14276/11, p. 1 et seq.; Finland—11787/2/07, REV 2, p. 40 et seq.; 14282/11, p. 1 et seq.; France—9972/2/07, REV 2, p. 49 et seq.; 14286/11, p. 1 et seq.; Germany—7058/2/09, REV 2, p. 45 et seq.; 14446/11, p. 1 et seq.; Greece—13416/2/08, REV 2, p. 41 et seq.; Hungary—15317/2/07, REV 2, p. 35 et seq.; 14243/11, p. 1 et seq.; Ireland—11843/2/06, REV 2, p. 49 et seq.; Italy—5832/2/09, REV 2, p. 75 et seq.; 17113/11, p. 1 et seq.; Latvia—17220/1/08, REV 1, p. 34 et seq.; Lithuania—12399/2/07, REV 2, p. 37 et seq.; 17135/11, p. 1 et seq.; Luxembourg—10086/2/07, REV 2, p. 38 et seq.; 13324/11, p. 1 et seq.; Malta—9617/2/08, REV 2, p. 37 et seq.; the Netherlands—15370/2/08, REV 2, p. 53 et seq.; Poland—14240/2/07, REV 2, p. 61 et seq.; 13691/11, p. 1 et seq.; Portugal—7593/2/07, REV 2, p. 43 et seq.; 13706/11, p. 2 et seq.; Romania—8267/2/09, REV 2, p. 37 et seq.; Slovakia—7060/2/09, REV 2, p. 37 et seq.; 16895/11, p. 1 et seq.; Slovenia—7301/2/08, REV 2, p. 39 et seq.; 14032/11, p. 2 et seq.; Spain—5085/2/07, REV 2, p. 48 et seq.; 15111/11, p. 1 et seq.; Sweden—9927/2/08, REV 2, p. 45 et seq.; 14876/11, p. 1 et seq.; and United Kingdom—9974/2/07, REV 2 EXT 1, p. 69 et seq.
572.
Záhora (2012), p. 297.
573.
Cryer et al. (2010), p. 94.
574.
Apap and Carrera (2004), p. 16.
575.
Lagodny (2005), pp. 39 and 40.
576.
Klip (2012), pp. 411 and 412.
577.
Vennemann (2003), pp. 105 and 121.
578.
Bureš (2009), p. 29.
579.
Mackarel (2007), pp. 43 and 45.
580.
Gay (2006).
581.
Long (2009), p. 10.
582.
Vermeulen and De Bondt (2015), p. 122.
583.
Van Sliedregt (2007), pp. 252 and 253.
584.
Deen-Racsmány (2007), pp. 170, 171 and 173.
585.
Zurek (2012), p. 66.
586.
Mitsilegas (2009), p. 115.
587.
Peers (2011), p. 293.
588.
Fletcher et al. (2008), p. 11.
589.
Dumitrescu (2011), p. 147.
590.
Díez (2015), pp. 42, 46 and 139.

References

Alegre S, Leaf M (2004) Mutual recognition in European judicial cooperation: a step too far too soon? Case study – the European arrest warrant. Eur Law J 10:200–217
Article Google Scholar
Anderson M, Apap J (2002) Striking a balance between freedom, security and justice in an enlarged European Union. Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels
Google Scholar
Apap J, Carrera S (2004) European arrest warrant: a good testing ground for mutual recognition in the enlarged EU? Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels
Google Scholar
Askin KD (1999) Crimes within the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court. Crim Law Forum 10:33–59
Article Google Scholar
Bainbridge T, Teasdale A (1995) The Penguin companion to European Union. Penguin, London
Google Scholar
Balzacq T, Carrera S (2006) The Hague Programme: the long road to freedom, security and justice. In: Balzaq T, Carrera S (eds) Security versus freedom? A challenge for Europe’s future. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 1–32
Google Scholar
Bednarek G (2009) Translation of the European arrest warrant in the light of intercultural communication. Investigationes Linguisticae 17:84–99
Google Scholar
Bellamy R, Warleigh A (2005) Citizenship and governance in the European Union. Continuum, London
Google Scholar
Blekxtoon R (2005) Commentary on an article by article basis. In: Blekxtoon R, Van Ballegooij W (eds) Handbook on the European arrest warrant. T. M. C. Asser Press, The Hague, pp 219–278
Chapter Google Scholar
Bomberg E, Peterson J, Stubb A (2008) The European Union: how does it work? 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York
Google Scholar
Bulnes MJ (2008) Country report – Spain. In: Górski A, Hofmañski P (eds) The European arrest warrant and its implementation in the Member States of the European Union. Conference proceedings. International conference, Kraków, 9–12 November 2006. Wydawnictwo C. H. Beck, Warszawa, pp 354–369
Google Scholar
Bureš O (2009) European arrest warrant: implications for EU counterterrorism efforts. Cent Eur J Int Secur Stud 3:21–43
Google Scholar
Bureš O (2011) EU counterterrorism policy: a paper tiger? Ashgate, Farnham
Google Scholar
Burgess M, Vllaard H (2006) State territoriality and European integration. Routledge, Abingdon
Google Scholar
Calderoni F (2010) Organized crime legislation in the European Union: harmonization and approximation of criminal law, national legislations and the EU framework decision on the fight against organized crime. Springer, Heidelberg
Book Google Scholar
Casale D (2008) Institutional and legal aspects of EU counter-terrorism. In: Legal aspects of combating terrorism, vol 47. Centre of Excellence, Ankara
Google Scholar
Chalmers D, Davies G, Monti G (2010) European Union law, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Book Google Scholar
Cimamoti S (2009) European arrest warrant in practice and ne bis in idem. In: Keijyer N, Van Sliedregt E (eds) The European arrest warrant in practice. T. M. C. Asser Press, The Hague, pp 11–129
Google Scholar
Cryer R, Friman H, Robinson D, Wilmshurst E (2010) An introduction to international criminal law and procedure, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York
Book Google Scholar
De Hert P, Weis K, Cloosen N (2009) The Framework Decision of 18 December 2008 on the European evidence warrant for the purpose of obtaining objects, documents and data for use in proceedings in criminal matters – a critical assessment. N J Eur Crim Law 0(Special Edition):55–78
Google Scholar
De Witte B, Geecllioed A, Inghelram J (2008) Legal instruments, decision-making and EU finances. In: McDonnell A, Kapteyn PJG, Mortelmans K, Timmermans CWA (eds) The law of the European Union and the European communities. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, pp 273–419
Google Scholar
Deen-Racsmány Z (2006) The European arrest warrant and the surrender of nationals revisited: the lessons of constitutional challenges. Eur J Crime Crim Law Crim Justice 14:293–299
Article Google Scholar
Deen-Racsmány Z (2007) Lessons of the European arrest warrant for domestic implementation of the obligation to surrender nationals to the International Criminal Court. Leiden J Int Law 20:167–191
Article Google Scholar
Deen-Racsmány Z, Blekxtoon R (2005) The decline of the nationality exception in European extradition? Eur J Crime Crim Law Crim Justice 13:317–364
Article Google Scholar
Delmas-Marty M, Van den Wyngaert C (1998) Corpus Juris. Intersentia, Antwerpen
Google Scholar
Delmas-Marty M, Vervaele JAE (2000) Corpus Juris, vol 1. Intersentia, Antwerpen
Google Scholar
Díez CG-J (2015) European federal criminal law. The federal dimension of EU criminal law. Intersentia, Cambridge
Google Scholar
Doria J, Gasser H-P, Bassiouni MC (eds) (2009) The legal regime of the International Criminal Court: essays in honour of Professor Igor Blishchenko. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden
Google Scholar
Dumitrescu L (2011) The evolution of criminal judicial cooperation in the European Union. Revista de Stiinte Politice 32:141–156
Google Scholar
Fletcher M, Lööf R, Gilmore B (2008) EU criminal law and justice. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Book Google Scholar
Gay C (2006) The European arrest warrant and its application by the Member States. In: European Issues, No. 16/2006. http://www.asser.nl/upload/eurowarrant-webroot/documents/cms_eaw_id1675_1_EuropeanIssues.16.pdf. Accessed 29 Dec 2008
Gless S, Schaffner D (2009) The handing over of property according to Article 29 of the European arrest warrant framework decision: legal scope, implementation and alternative regimes for handing over property in the EU Member States. In: Keijyer N, Van Sliedregt E (eds) The European arrest warrant in practice. T. M. C. Asser Press, The Hague, pp 279–315
Google Scholar
Grabenwarter C, Pabel K (2013) Article 6 [Fundamental rights – the charter and the ECHR]. In: Blanke H-J, Mangiameli S (eds) The Treaty on European Union (TEU): a commentary. Springer, Berlin, pp 287–348
Google Scholar
Hailbronner K (2006) Nationality in public international law and European law. In: Bauböck R, Ersbøll E, Groenendijk K, Waldrauch H (eds) Acquisition and loss of nationality, vol I, Comparative analyses, policies and trends in 15 European countries. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, pp 35–104
Google Scholar
Hamuľák O (2011) Eurozatykač, tři ústavní soudy a dominance práva Evropské unie [transl.: Eurowarrant, three constitutional courts and the dominance of European Union law]. Iuridicum Olomoucense, Olomouc
Google Scholar
Herczeg J (2009) Evropský zatýkací rozkaz [transl.: European arrest warrant]. In: Tomášek M et al (eds) Europeizace trestního práva [transl.: Europeanisation of criminal law]. Linde, Praha, pp 340–354
Google Scholar
Hinarejos Parga A (2006) Bundesverfassungsgericht (German Constitutional Court), Decision of 18 July 2005 (2 BvR 2236/04) on the German European arrest warrant law. Common Mark Law Rev 43:53–595
Google Scholar
Ivor J, Klimek L, Záhora J (2013) Trestné právo Európskej únie a jeho vplyv na právny poriadok Slovenskej republiky [transl.: Criminal law of the European Union and its impact on the legal order of the Slovak Republic]. Eurokódex, Žilina
Google Scholar
Jones JRWD, Davidson R, Sambei A, Gibbins B (2010) Extradition and mutual legal assistance handbook. Oxford University Press, New York
Google Scholar
Kapaedis A, Stephanou E (2008) Country report – Cyprus. In: Górski A, Hofmañski P (eds) The European arrest warrant and its implementation in the Member States of the European Union. Conference proceedings. International conference, Kraków, 9–12 November 2006. Wydawnictwo C. H. Beck, Warszawa, pp 161–170
Google Scholar
Klimek L (2009a) Európsky zatýkací rozkaz [transl.: European arrest warrant]. Student research competition held at the Faculty of Law. Bratislava College of Law, Bratislava
Google Scholar
Klimek L (2009b) Zmeny európskeho zatýkacieho rozkazu, týkajúce sa konania in absentia [transl.: Amendments of the European arrest warrant concerning the in absentia trial]. Justičná revue 61:1282–1288
Google Scholar
Klimek L (2010) European arrest warrant. Diploma Work. Faculty of Law. Bratislava College of Law, Bratislava
Google Scholar
Klimek L (2011a) Genéza európskeho zatýkacieho rozkazu a proces jeho implementácie v Slovenskej republike [transl.: Genesis of the European arrest warrant and its implementation in the Slovak Republic]. Právny obzor 94:462–483
Google Scholar
Klimek L (2011b) Odovzdávanie štátnych príslušníkov prostredníctvom európskeho zatýkacieho rozkazu [transl.: Surrender of nationals via European arrest warrant]. In: Dufalová L et al (eds) Míľniky práva v stredoeurópskom priestore 2011 [transl.: Milestones of law in the area of Central Europe, vol 2011]. Conference proceedings from the conference, Faculty of Law, Comenius University, 31 March–2 April 2011, Častá-Papiernička. Comenius University, Bratislava, pp 442–448
Google Scholar
Klimek L (2011c) Právo na tlmočenie a preklad v konaní o európskom zatýkacom rozkaze [transl.: Right to interpretation and translation in the European arrest warrant procedure]. Justičná revue 63:262–269
Google Scholar
Klimek L (2011d) The European arrest warrant procedure and the Nordic countries. Int Comp Law Rev 10:47–60
Google Scholar
Klimek L (2011e) Úvahy de lege ferenda k novému slovenskému zákonu o európskom zatýkacom rozkaze [transl.: Lex ferenda towards New Slovak Act on the European arrest warrant]. Trestní právo 15:54–58
Google Scholar
Klimek L (2012a) Joint investigation teams in the European Union. Intern Secur 4:63–67
Google Scholar
Klimek L (2012b) New law on the European arrest warrant in the Slovak Republic: does it fulfil standards at the level of the EU? Eur J Crime Crim Law Crim Justice 20:181–192
Google Scholar
Klimek L (2012c) Zákon verzus medzinárodná zmluva: ako účel svätí prostriedky v prípade európskeho zatýkacieho rozkazu [transl.: Act versus international agreement: how the end justifies the means in case of the European arrest warrant]. In: Akademické akcenty 2011 [transl.: Academic accents, vol 2011]. Conference proceedings from the conference, Faculty of Law, Pan-European University, 22 September 2011, Bratislava. Eurokódex, Bratislava, pp 451–458
Google Scholar
Klimek L (2012d) Európsky zatýkací rozkaz: tlaky ústavných súdov na vnútroštátnych zákonodarcov za účelom prijatia záväzkov prameniacich z noriem EÚ [transl.: European arrest warrant: constitutional courts pressures on national legislators in order to adoption of obligations stemming from EU standards]. In: Hamuľák O, Madleňaková L (eds) Limity práva: Olomoucké debaty mladých právníků 2012 [transl.: Legal limits: young lawyers debates in Olomouc, vol 2012]. Conference proceedings from the international conference, Faculty of Law, Palacký University, 16–18 September 2012, Hrubá Voda. Linde, Prague, pp 129–136
Google Scholar
Klimek L (2013a) European arrest warrant. Dissertation thesis, Pan-European University, Bratislava
Google Scholar
Klimek L (2013b) Letter of rights for persons arrested on the basis of a European arrest warrant: a novelty under the Directive 2012/13/EU. Int Comp Law Rev 13:159–166
Google Scholar
Klimek L (2014a) European arrest warrant: mutual recognition as the primary principle of the surrender procedure. Intern Secur 6:33–43
Google Scholar
Klimek L (2014b) Právo na prístup k obhajcovi v konaní o európskom zatýkacom rozkaze [transl.: The right of access to a lawyer in European arrest warrant procedure]. Justičná revue 66:1559–1574
Google Scholar
Klimek L (2014c) Zásada špeciality v konaní o európskom zatýkacom rozkaze [transl.: The rule of speciality in the European arrest warrant procedure]. Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi 22:75–80
Google Scholar
Klimek L (2015) European arrest warrant. Springer, Cham
Book Google Scholar
Klip A (2012) European criminal law: an integrative approach, 2nd edn. Intersentia, Cambridge
Google Scholar
Kloučková S (2008) Country report – The Czech Republic. In: Górski A, Hofmañski P (eds) The European arrest warrant and its implementation in the Member States of the European Union. Conference proceedings. International conference, Kraków, 9–12 November 2006. Wydawnictwo C. H. Beck, Warszawa, pp 171–188
Google Scholar
Komárek J (2007) European constitutionalism and the European arrest warrant: in search of the limits of “Contrapunctual Principles”. Common Mark Law Rev 44:9–40
Google Scholar
Lagodny O (2005) Extradition’ without a granting procedure: the concept of ‘surrender’. In: Blekxtoon R, Van Ballegooij W (eds) Handbook on the European arrest warrant. T. M. C. Asser Press, The Hague, pp 39–45
Chapter Google Scholar
Lagodny O, Rosbaud C (2009) Speciality rule. In: Keijyer N, Van Sliedregt E (eds) The European arrest warrant in practice. T. M. C. Asser Press, The Hague, pp 265–296
Chapter Google Scholar
Łazowski A (2005) Poland: constitutional tribunal on the surrender of Polish citizens under the European arrest warrant. Decision of 27 April 2005. Eur Constitutional Law Rev 1:569–581
Article Google Scholar
Łazowski A (2007) Accession Treaty: Polish Constitutional Tribunal: Conformity of the Accession Treaty with the Polish Constitution. Decision of 11 May 2005. Eur Constitutional Law Rev 3:148–150
Article Google Scholar
Łazowski A, Nash S (2009) Detention. In: Keijyer N, Van Sliedregt E (eds) The European arrest warrant in practice. T. M. C. Asser Press, The Hague, pp 33–55
Chapter Google Scholar
Long N (2009) Implementation of the European arrest warrant and joint investigation teams at EU and national level. European Parliament, Brussels
Google Scholar
Mackarel M (2007) The European arrest warrant – the early years: implementing and using the warrant. Eur J Crime Crim Law Crim Justice 15:37–65
Article Google Scholar
Mann GJ (2007) The European arrest warrant: a short-lived mechanism for extradition? Syracuse J Int Law Commerce 34:715–740
Google Scholar
Marin L (2008) The European arrest warrant in the Italian Republic. Eur Constitutional Law Rev 4:251–273
Article Google Scholar
Mickevicius D (2008) Country report – Lithuania. In: Górski A, Hofmañski P (eds) The European arrest warrant and its implementation in the Member States of the European Union. Conference proceedings. International conference, Kraków, 9–12 November 2006. Wydawnictwo C. H. Beck, Warszawa, pp 288–299
Google Scholar
Mitsilegas V (2006) The constitutional implications of mutual recognition in criminal matters in the EU. Common Mark Law Rev 43:1277–1311
Google Scholar
Mitsilegas V (2008) Drafting to implement EU law: the European arrest warrant in the United Kingdom. In: Stefanou C, Xanthaki H (eds) Drafting legislation: a modern approach. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 199–211
Google Scholar
Mitsilegas V (2009) EU criminal law. Hart, Oxford
Google Scholar
Mölders S (2006) European arrest warrant act is void – the decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court of 18 July 2005. German Law J 7:45–58
Google Scholar
Murphy CC (2011) The European evidence warrant: mutual recognition and mutual (dis)trust? In: Eckes C, Konstadinides T (eds) Crime within the area of freedom, security and justice: a European public order. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 224–248
Chapter Google Scholar
Paladinu L (2011) The European charter of fundamental rights after Lisbon: a “Timid” Trojan Horse in the domain of the common foreign and security policy? In: Di Federico G (ed) The EU charter of fundamental rights: from declaration to binding document. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 265–285
Chapter Google Scholar
Peers S (2011) EU justice and home affairs law (non-civil). In: Craig P, De Búrca G (eds) The evolution of EU law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 269–298
Google Scholar
Peers S, Hervey T, Kenner J, Ward A (eds) (2014) The EU charter of fundamental rights: a commentary. Hart, Oxford
Google Scholar
Plachta M, Van Ballegooij W (2005) The framework decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between the Member States of the European Union. In: Blekxtoon R, Van Ballegooij W (eds) Handbook on the European arrest warrant. T. M. C. Asser Press, The Hague, pp 13–38
Chapter Google Scholar
Pollicino O (2008) European arrest warrant and constitutional principles of the Member States: a case law-based outline in the attempt to strike the right balance between interacting legal systems. German Law J 9:1313–1354
Google Scholar
Radtke H (2005) The proposal to establish a European Prosecutor. In: Husabø EJ, Strandbakken A (eds) Harmonization of criminal law in Europe. Intersentia, Antwerpen, pp 103–118
Google Scholar
Regan E, O’Mahony P (2002) The third pillar of the European Union: the emerging structure of EU police and judicial co-operation in criminal matters, and its impact on Irish criminal justice and civil liberties. In: O’Mahony P (ed) Criminal justice in Ireland. Institute of Public Administration, Dublin, pp 297–323
Google Scholar
Rijken C (2006) Joint investigation teams: principles, practice, and problems. Lessons learnt from the first efforts to establish a JIT. Utrecht Law Rev 2:99–118
Article Google Scholar
Rijken C, Vermeulen G (eds) (2006) Joint investigation teams in the European Union: from theory to practice. T. M. C. Asser Press, The Hague
Google Scholar
Sarmiento D (2008) European Union: the European arrest warrant and the quest for constitutional coherence. Int J Constitutional Law 6:171–183
Article Google Scholar
Schabas WA (2015) The European convention on human rights: a commentary. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Google Scholar
Shaw MN (2008) International law, 6th edn. Cambridge University Press, New York
Book Google Scholar
Sievers J (2008) Too different to trust? First experiences with the application of the European arrest warrant. In: Guild E, Geyer F (eds) Security versus justice? Police and judicial cooperation in the European Union. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 109–128
Google Scholar
Sinn A, Wörner L (2007) The European arrest warrant and its implementation in Germany – its constitutionality, laws and current developments. Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik 3:204–220
Google Scholar
Sinn A, Wörner L (2008) Country report – Germany. In: Górski A, Hofmañski P (eds) The European arrest warrant and its implementation in the Member States of the European Union. Conference proceedings. International conference, Kraków, 9–12 November 2006. Wydawnictwo C. H. Beck, Warszawa, pp 224–265
Google Scholar
Smith RKM (2007) Textbook on international human rights, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, New York
Google Scholar
Spencer JR (2000) The Corpus Juris Project – has it a future? In: Dashwood A, Ward A (eds) The Cambridge Yearbook of European legal studies, vol 2. Hart, Oxford, pp 355–372
Google Scholar
Spencer JR (2002) Introduction. In: Delmas-Marty M, Spencer JR (eds) European criminal procedures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–75
Google Scholar
Spencer JR (2005) The European arrest warrant. In: Bell J, Kilpatrick C (eds) The Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies, vol 6. Hart, Oxford, pp 201–217
Google Scholar
Šramel B (2014) Trestná zodpovednosť mladistvých vo svetle vybraných medzinárodnoprávnych dokumentov [transl.: Criminal responsibility of minors in the light of selected international legal documents]. In: Medelský J (ed) Aktuálne otázky trestnej zodpovednosti [transl.: Contemporary issues of criminal responsibility]. Proceedings of the international conference, Faculty of Law, Pan-European University, 26–30 May 2014, Bratislava. Eurokódex, Žilina, pp 139–149
Google Scholar
Šramel B (2015a) Ústavné súdnictvo [transl.: Constitutional justice]. Občianske združenie FSV, Trnava, 104 pp
Google Scholar
Šramel B (2015b) Prevencia viktimácie mládeže vo svetle Odporúčania Výboru ministrov členským štátom Rady Európy č. R (91) 11 o sexuálnom vykorisťovaní, pornografii, prostitúcii a obchodovaní s deťmi a mládežou [transl.: Preventing youth victimisation in the light of the recommendation no R (91) 11 concerning sexual exploitation, pornography and prostitution of, and trafficking in, children and young adults]. In: Medelský J (ed) Obete trestných činov [transl.: Victims of crime]. Proceedings of the international conference, Faculty of Law, Pan-European University, Bratislava. Wolters Kluwer, Bratislava, pp 116–122
Google Scholar
Tomášek M (2009) Vývoj pojmu “europeizace” trestního práva v systému evropského práva [transl.: Development of the term “Europeanisation” in the system of the European law]. In: Tomášek M et al (eds) Europeizace trestního práva [transl.: Europeanisation of criminal law]. Linde, Praha, pp 13–23
Google Scholar
Tomuschat C (2006) Inconsistencies – The German Federal Constitutional Court on the European arrest warrant. Eur Constitutional Law Rev 2:209–226
Article Google Scholar
Tsadiras A (2007) Cyprus Supreme Court (Aνώτατo Διkαστήριo Kύπρoυ), Judgment of 7 November 2005 (Civil Appeal no. 294/2005) on the Cypriot European Arrest Warrant Law. Common Mark Law Rev 44:1515–1528
Google Scholar
Van Bockel B (2010) The ne bis in idem principle in EU law. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, p 41 et seq.
Google Scholar
Van der Wilt H (2005a) The European arrest warrant and the principle ne bis in idem. In: Blekxtoon R, Van Ballegooij W (eds) Handbook on the European arrest warrant. T. M. C. Asser Press, The Hague, pp 99–117
Chapter Google Scholar
Van der Wilt H (2005b) The principle of reciprocity. In: Blekxtoon R, Van Ballegooij W (eds) Handbook on the European arrest warrant. T. M. C. Asser Press, The Hague, pp 71–81
Chapter Google Scholar
Van der Wilt H (2008) Country report – The Netherlands. In: Górski A, Hofmañski P (eds) The European arrest warrant and its implementation in the Member States of the European Union. Conference proceedings. International conference, Kraków, 9–12 November 2006. Wydawnictwo C. H. Beck, Warszawa, pp 307–318
Google Scholar
Van Sliedregt E (2007) The European arrest warrant: between trust, democracy and the rule of law. Introduction. The European arrest warrant: extradition in transition. Eur Constitutional Law Rev 3:244–252
Article Google Scholar
Vennemann N (2003) The European arrest warrant and its human rights implications. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 63:103–122
Google Scholar
Vermeulen G (2005) Essential texts on international and European criminal law, 4th edn. Maklu Publishers, Antwerpen
Google Scholar
Vermeulen G (2008) Country report – Belgium. In: Górski A, Hofmañski P (eds) The European arrest warrant and its implementation in the Member States of the European Union. Conference proceedings. International conference, Kraków, 9–12 November 2006. Wydawnictwo C. H. Beck, Warszawa, pp 151–160
Google Scholar
Vermeulen G, De Bondt W (2015) Justice, home affairs and security: European and international institutional and policy development. Maklu, Antwerpen
Google Scholar
Vestergaard J (2008) Country report – Denmark. In: Górski A, Hofmañski P (eds) The European arrest warrant and its implementation in the Member States of the European Union. Conference proceedings. International conference, Kraków, 9–12 November 2006. Wydawnictwo C. H. Beck, Warszawa, pp 189–232
Google Scholar
Wahl T (2009) The European Union as an actor in the fight against terrorism. In: Wade M, Maljević A (eds) A war on terror? The European stance on a new threat, changing laws and human rights implications. Springer, New York, pp 107–170
Google Scholar
Záhora J (2012) Implementácia Európskeho zatýkacieho rozkazu v podmienkach Slovenskej republiky [transl.: Implementation of the European arrest warrant in the Slovak Republic]. In: Záhora J (ed) Aktuálne otázky trestného zákonodarstva [transl.: Current issues of criminal law legislative power]. Conference proceedings from the conference, Faculty of Law, Pan-European University, 19 January 2012. Eurokódex, Bratislava, pp 283–298
Google Scholar
Zazra ÁG (2014) Exchange of information between judicial authorities in different steps of criminal proceedings. In: Zazra ÁG (ed) Exchange of information and data protection in cross-border criminal proceedings in Europe. Springer, Berlin, pp 147–156
Google Scholar
Zurek J (2012) Against tradition: the European arrest warrant. Educ Sci Without Borders 3:66–70
Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Faculty of Law, Pan-European University, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
Libor Klimek

Authors

Libor Klimek
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klimek, L. (2017). European Arrest Warrant (Surrender Procedure). In: Mutual Recognition of Judicial Decisions in European Criminal Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44377-5_5

Download citation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44377-5_5
Published: 10 December 2016
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44375-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44377-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics