Abstract
Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is a well-established non-invasive technique for the evaluation of intracranial arterial and venous vasculature. It can be performed without and with administration of contrast agent. The use of high field scanners offer important advantages such as increase of the spatial and temporal resolution. Additional gains are obtained with parallel imaging, which significantly reduces examination times and increases anatomical coverage providing the same image quality.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Krings T, Hans FJ, Moeller-Hartmann W et al (2002) Time of flight, phase contrast and contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for pre-interventional determination of aneurysm size, configuration, and neck morphology in an aneurysm model in rabbits. Neurosci Lett 326:46–50
Lenz GW, Haacke E, Masaryk TJ et al (1988) In plane vascular imaging: pulse sequences design and strategy. Radiology 166:876–882
Zou Z, MA L, Cheng L, Cay Y, Meng X (2008) Time resolved contras enhanced MR angiography of intracranial lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 27:692-699
Prince MR, Yucel EK, Kaufmann JA et al (1993) Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced three dimensional abdominal MR arteriography. J Magn Reson Imaging 3:877–881
Leung DA, Mckinnon GC, Davis CP et al (1996) Breath-hold contrast-enhanced 3 D MR angiography. Radiology 201:569–571
Prince MR, Narasimhan DL, Jacoby WT (1996) Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the thoracic aorta. Am J Roentgenol 166:1387–1397
Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC (1995) Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology 197:785–792
Scarabino T, Giannatempo GM, Nemore F et al (2003) RM 3.0 Tesla. II parte: L’imaging morfo-funzionale cerebrale. Radiol Med 105:150–161
Scarabino T, Nemore F, Giannatempo GM et al (2003) Risonanza Magnetica 3.0 Tesla. Riv Neuroradiol 16(Suppl):314–315
Scarabino T, Nemore F, Giannatempo GM et al (2003) 3.0 T magnetic resonance in neuroradiology. Eur J Radiol 48:154–164
Scarabino T, Nemore F, Giannatempo GM et al (2004) 3.0 T MR angiography. Riv Neuroradiol 17:777–783
Huang BY, Castillo M (2009) Neurovascular imaging at 1.5 tesla versus 3.0 tesla. Magn Reson Clin N Am 17(1):29–46
Frayne R, Goodyear BG, Dickhoff, et al. (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 tesla: challenges and advantages in clinical neurological imaging. Invest Radiol 38(7): 385–402
Scarabino T, Nemore F, Giannatempo GM et al (2004) Semeiological features of 3.0 T MR imaging: what changes at high magnetic field. Riv Neuroradiol 17:755–764
Takahashi M, Uematsu H, Hatabu H (2003) MR imaging at high magnetic fields. Eur J Radiol 46:45–52
Norris DG (2003) High field human imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 18:519–529
Alvarez-Linera J (2008) 3T MRI : Advances in brain imaging. Eur J Radiol 67:415–426
Thomas SD, Al-Kwifi O, Emery DJ et al (2002) Application of magnetization transfer at 3.0 T in three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial arteries. J Magn Reson Imaging 15:479–483
Parker DL, Buswell HR, Goodrick KC et al (1995) The application of magnetization transfer to MR angiography with reduced total power. Magn Reson Med 34:283–286
Al-Kwifi O, Emery DJ, Wilman AH (2002) Vessel contrast at 3.0 T in time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial and carotid arteries. Magn Reson Imaging 20:181–187
Bernstein MA, Huston J 3rd, Lin C et al (2001) High-resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0 T: technical considerations and initial experience. Magn Reson Med 46:955–962
Reichenbach JR, Barth M, Haacke EM et al (2000) High resolution MR venography at 3.0 Tesla. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24:949–957
Rutherford M, Malamateniou C, Zeka J et al (2004) MR imaging of the neonatal brain at 3 Tesla. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 8:281–289
Willinek WA, Gieseke J, von Falkenhausen M et al (2004) Sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for high spatial resolution time-of-flight MR angiography of the intracranial arteries at 3.0 T. Rofo 176:21–26
Kaufmann TJ, Huston J 3rd, Cloft HJ et al (2010) A prospective trial of 3 T and 1.5 T time of flight and contrast enhanced MR angiography in the follow up of coiled intracranial aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31(5):912–918
Sommer T, Maintz D, Schmiedel A et al (2004) High field MR imaging: magnetic field interactions of aneurysm clips, coronary artery stents and iliac artery stents with a 3.0 Tesla MR system. Rofo 176(5):731–738
Schaafsma JD, Velthuis BK, Majoie CB et al (2010 Jul) (2010) Intracranial aneurysm treated with coil replacement: test characteristics of follow up MR angiography – Multicenter study. Radiology 256(1):209–218
Shellock FG, Gounis M, Wakhloo A (2005) Detachable coil for cerebral aneurysms: in vitro evaluation of magnetic field interaction, heating, and artifacts at 3 T. AJNR 26:363–366
Gibbs GF, Huston J 3rd, Bernstein MA et al (2004) Improved image quality of intracranial aneurysms: 3.0-T versus 1.5-T time-of-fight MR angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 25(1):84–87
Anna MH, Sailer MD et al (2014) Diagnosing intracranial aneurysms with MR angiography: systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 45(1):119–126
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scarabino, T., Pollice, S., Giannatempo, G.M., Nasuto, M., Balzano, R.F., Popolizio, T. (2017). 3.0 T MR Angiography. In: Scarabino, T., Pollice, S., Popolizio, T. (eds) High Field Brain MRI. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44174-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44174-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44173-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44174-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)