Skip to main content

Abstract

The concept of medical futility often arises when patients or surrogate decision-makers request interventions that medical professionals view as being without benefit or having a significant risk of causing undue harm. However, the concept of futility is fraught with ethical challenges as it often involves judgments about what constitutes a reasonable risk/benefit ratio or acceptable quality of life. In cases where an intervention could reasonably accomplish the physiologic goal, but strong ethical arguments can be made against it, the intervention should instead be termed “potentially inappropriate.” When making decisions regarding potentially inappropriate interventions, it is important for the medical team to maintain clear, open communication with the patient and family. In addition, advanced care planning, appropriate consultation, and aggressive palliation can be helpful in minimizing conflict and ensuring patients receive appropriate care which is in keeping with their medical goals. Decisions regarding resuscitation are often emotionally charged, and conflict can arise when medical providers feel resuscitative efforts are not indicated but patients/families want “everything” to be done. It is important for care teams to fully understand the patient’s goals as related to resuscitation and past experiences which may be influencing their decision. In addition, the team should ensure that the patient/family is as informed as possible regarding prognosis and the risks/benefits associated with resuscitation attempts in their specific case. If resuscitation is clearly inappropriate, providers should advocate for the patient to be “do not resuscitate” and could consider employing the concept of informed assent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Luce JM. Chronic disorders of consciousness following coma: part two: ethical, legal, and social issues. Chest. 2013;144(4):1388–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Judge rejects request by doctors to remove a patient’s respirator. New York Times. July 2, 1991. http://www.nytimes.com/1991/07/02/us/judge-rejects-request-by-doctors-to-remove-a-patient-s-respirator.html. Accessed 21 Apr 2016.

  3. American Thoracic Society. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115(6):478–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Truog RD, Brett AS, Frader J. The problem with futility. N Engl J Med. 1992;326(23):1560–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Danis M, Truog R, Devita M, et al. Consensus statement of the Critical Care Medicine’s Ethics Committee regarding futile and other possibly inadvisable treatments. Crit Care Med. 1997;25(5):887–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bosslet GT, Pope TM, Rubenfeld GD, et al. An official ATS/AACN/ACCP/ESICM/SCCM policy statement: responding to requests for potentially inappropriate treatments in intensive care units. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191(11):1318–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rao JK, Anderson LA, Lin FC, Laux JP. Completion of advanced directives among U.S. consumers. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(1):65–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gamertsfelder EM, Seaman JB, Tate J, et al. Prevalence of advanced directives among older adults admitted to intensive care units and requiring mechanical ventilation. J Gerontol Nurs. 2016;42(4):34–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare program; revisions to payment policies under the physician fee schedule and other revisions for Part B for CY 2016. Federal register. 16 Nov 2015. https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2015/11/16/2015-28005/medicare-program-revisions-to-payment-policies-under-the-physician-fee-schedule-and-other-revisions. Accessed 21 Apr 2016.

  10. Tolle SW, Tilden VP, Nelson CA, Dunn PM. A prospective study of the efficacy of the physician order form for life-sustaining treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46(9):1097–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Oregon POLST Registry Act. House Bill 2009. Oregon Administrative Rules ch. 595, sec. 1184, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wilson KS, Kottke TE, Schettle S. Honoring choices Minnesota: preliminary data from a community-wide advance care planning model. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(12):2420–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Baile WF, Buckman R, Lenzi R, et al. SPIKES-a six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist. 2000;5(4):302–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Health and Safety Code. Sec. 166.001. Advanced directives act. Texas. Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 450, Sec. 1.02, eff. Sept. 1, 1999. http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/HS/htm/HS.166.htm. Accessed 25 June 2016.

  15. Truog RD. Counterpoint: the Texas advanced directives act is ethically flawed: medical futility disputes must be resolved by a fair process. Chest. 2009;136(4):968–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Diem SL, Lantos JD, Tulsky JA. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation on television: miracles and misinformation. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(24):1578–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ehlenbach WJ, Barnato AE, Curtis JR, Kreuter W, et al. Epidemiologic study of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the elderly. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:22–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Chan PS, Nallamothu BK, Krumholz HM, Spertus JA, et al. Long-term outcomes in elderly survivors of in-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1019–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Beach MC, Morrison RS. The effect of do-not-resuscitate orders on physician decision-making. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(12):2057–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Siracuse JJ, Jones DW, Meltzer EC, Graham AR, et al. Impact of “do not resuscitate” status on the outcome of major vascular surgical procedures. Ann Vasc Surg. 2015;29(7):1339–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Curtis JR. The use of informed assent in withholding cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the ICU. Virtual Mentor. 2012;14(7):545–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Plows CW, Tenery RM, Hartford A, Miller D, et al. Medical futility in end-of-life care: report of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. JAMA. 1999;281(10):937–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory A. Holton MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holton, G.A., Catic, A.G. (2017). Medical Futility. In: Catic, A. (eds) Ethical Considerations and Challenges in Geriatrics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44084-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44084-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44083-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44084-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics