Abstract
This chapter presents a critical psychological approach to the study of mindfulness as a situated social, cultural and historical practice. We combine discourse and conversation analysis of language use within mindfulness courses with attention to how subjectivity is collaboratively reconstructed moment-by-moment. Applying the concept of affective–discursive practice to the analysis allows attention to be paid to embodied meaning-making in terms of power, pattern and context. In particular, we aim to illustrate practices of ‘inquiry’ through which mindfulness teachers initiate specific inter-subjective procedures, especially reformulations of participant accounts of what they ‘noticed’ during meditation, which function to practically produce mindful subjects who can monitor, govern and take care of themselves. Mindful subjectivity is produced through the application of liberal power and negotiation of ideological dilemma within inquiry sequences, functioning as technologies of the self.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Antaki, C. (2008). Formulations in psychotherapy. In A. Peräkylä, et al. (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barker, K. K. (2014). Mindfuness meditation: Do-it-yourself medicalization of every moment. Social Science and Medicine, 106, 168–176.
Billig, M., et al. (1988). Ideological dilemmas. London: Sage.
Billig, M. (2008). The hidden roots of critical psychology. London: Sage.
Braun, E. (2013). The birth of insight. London: The University of Chicago Press.
Carrette, J. R. (1999). Michel Foucault and Zen: a stay in a Zen temple (1978). In J. R. Carrette (Ed.), Religion and culture: Michel Foucault (pp. 110–114). London: Routledge.
Chaskalson, M., & Hadley, S. G. (2015). Mindfulness: historical and contemplative context and recent developments. In J. Reb & P. W. B. Atkins (Eds.), Mindfulness in organizations (pp. 42–66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, E. (2010). From the Bodhi tree, to the analyst’s couch, then into the MRI scanner: The psychologisation of Buddhism. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 8, 97–119.
Cook, J. (2010). Meditation in modern Buddhism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crane, R. (2009). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. London: Routledge.
Crane, R., et al. (2014). Disciplined improvisation: Characteristics of inquiry in mindfulness-based teaching. Mindfulness, 6(5), 1104–1114.
Cederström, C., & Spicér, A. (2015). The wellness syndrome. Cambridge: Polity.
Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind. London: Sage.
Davidson, R. J., & Dimidjian, S. (2015). Special issue: The emergence of mindfulness in basic and clinical psychological science. American Psychologist, 70 (7), 581–665.
Davies, W. (2015). The happiness industry. London: Verso.
Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dryden, W., & Still, A. (2006). Historical aspects of mindfulness and self-acceptance in psychotherapy. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 24 (1), 3–28.
Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse & cognition. London: Sage.
Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge. London: Routledge.
Ericsson, C., & Lindgren, M. (2011). The conditions for establishing an ideological dilemma: antagonistic discourses and over-determined identity in school music teaching. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(5), 713–728.
Gardner, R. (2013). Conversation analysis in the classroom. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 593–611). London: Wiley-Blackwell.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Grubin, D. [Producer]. (1993). Bill Moyers: Healing and the mind [Video Recording]. New York: Ambrose Video.
Hall, S. (2001). Foucault: Power, knowledge and discourse. In M. Wetherell, et al. (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice (pp. 72–81). London: Sage.
Harrington, A. (2008). The cure within. London: WW Norton & Co.
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. London: Polity.
Heritage, J. C., & Watson, D. R. (1979). Formulations as conversational objects. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language (pp. 123–162). New York: Irvington.
Jackson, M. (2013). The age of stress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jefferson, G. (1984). On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 346–369). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jefferson, G. (1985). An exercise in the transcription and analysis of laughter. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 3, pp. 25–34). London: Academic Press.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go, there you are. London: Hyperion.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2011). Some reflections on the origins of MBSR, skilful means, and the trouble with maps. Contemporary Buddhism, 12(1), 281–306.
Lee, Y.-A. (2007). Third turn position in teacher talk: contingency and the work of teaching. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(6), 1204–1230.
Madsen, O. J. (2014). The therapeutic turn. London: Routledge.
Martin, L. H., Gutman, H., & Hutton, P. J. (1988). Technologies of the self. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.
McMahan, D. (2008). The making of Buddhist modernism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moyers, B. (1993). Healing and the mind. London: Doubleday.
Pagis, M. (2009). Embodied self-reflexivity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72(3), 265–283.
Peräkylä, A. (2013). Conversation analysis in psychotherapy. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 551–574). West Sussex: WileyBlackwell.
Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: a way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9, 219–229.
Preston, D. L. (1988). The social organization of Zen practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Purser, R. E., & Milillo, J. (2015). Mindfulness revisited: A Buddhist-based conceptualization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(1), 3–24.
Rakow, K. (2013). Therapeutic culture and religion in America. Religion Compass, 7(11), 485–497.
Rose, N. (1998). Inventing our selves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. London: Penguin.
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382.
Sharf, R. (1995). Buddhist modernism and the rhetoric of meditative experience. Numen, 42(3), 228–283.
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2015). Phenomenology and the life sciences: Clarifications and complementarities. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 119, 493–501.
Stanley, S. (2013). ‘Things said or done long ago are recalled and remembered’: The ethics of mindfulness in early Buddhism, psychotherapy and clinical psychology. European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling, 15(2), 151–162.
Stanley, S., & Crane, R. (2016). Discourse analysis of naturally occurring data: The relational development of mindfulness. SAGE Research Methods Datasets,. doi:10.4135/9781473958845.
Sun, J. (2014). Mindfulness in context: A historical discourse analysis. Contemporary Buddhism, 15(2), 394–415.
van Langenhove, L., & Harré, R. (1999). Introducing positioning theory. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory (pp. 14–31). Oxford: Blackwell.
Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9(3), 387–412.
Wetherell, M. (2013). Affect and emotion. London: Sage.
Wetherell, M., Stiven, H., & Potter, J. (1987). Unequal egalitarianism: A preliminary study of discourses concerning gender and employment opportunities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26(1), 59–71.
Williams, J. M. G., & Kabat-Zinn, J. (2013). Mindfulness: Diverse perspectives on its meaning, origins and applications. Oxon: Routledge.
Wilson, J. (2014). Mindful America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Acknowledgments
Thank you to Rebecca Crane for initiating this project and making available the data. We would like to thank Sara Rees for feedback on this chapter and the mindfulness teachers and participants featured in the extracts. We are also grateful for funding from the Cardiff University Research Opportunity Placement scheme and support from Qualitative Research and Analysis Workshop participants.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Key for Transcription Notation (Based on a Simplified Jefferson-Style Transcription)
Appendix: Key for Transcription Notation (Based on a Simplified Jefferson-Style Transcription)
Notation | Example | Phenomenon |
---|---|---|
Rounded brackets enclosing full stop | right (.) so that again is interesting | Pause |
Double rounded brackets enclosing text | ((lines omitted)) | Transcriber comments |
Square brackets | [it wanders [it does wander yes | Speaker overlap |
Less than followed by greater than signs | >“get back to what we’re doing”< | Quicker speech |
Double quotation marks | “what am I thinking that for” | Direct reported speech or private thoughts |
Hyphen | there’s some- is there a bit of judgement | Cut off or repair of word |
Comma | it’s getting easier, | Continuing intonation |
Question mark | does yours? | Questioning intonation |
Underlining | mm mm mm mmm | Emphasis |
Equals | is that right= =yes | Contiguous words |
Colon | so:: | Elongated sound |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stanley, S., Longden, C. (2016). Constructing the Mindful Subject: Reformulating Experience Through Affective–Discursive Practice in Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction . In: Purser, R., Forbes, D., Burke, A. (eds) Handbook of Mindfulness. Mindfulness in Behavioral Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44019-4_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44019-4_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44017-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44019-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)