Use of Data from Surgical Registries to Improve Outcomes

Chapter

Abstract

Data from surgical registries may serve multiple purposes including the assessment of outcomes, the improvement of quality of healthcare, and the enhancement of patient safety. The increasing sophistication and analytic capabilities of clinical registries and databases contribute considerably in all of these domains due to their use of accurate, credible, risk adjusted, and concurrent clinical data which is acquired for these specific purposes and not simply for generating financial claims for reimbursement. In order to perform meaningful multi-institutional analyses of outcomes, any database must incorporate the following seven essential elements: (1) Use of a common language and nomenclature, (2) Use of a database with an established uniform core dataset for collection of information, (3) Incorporation of a mechanism of evaluating case complexity, (4) Availability of a mechanism to assure and verify the completeness and accuracy of the data collected, (5) Collaboration between medical and surgical subspecialties, (6) Standardization of protocols for lifelong follow-up, and (7) Incorporation of strategies for quality assessment and quality improvement.

For optimal use, clinical registries should be able to link and collaborate with other clinical and administrative datasets and should be able to follow patients along the continuum of care in order to facilitate longitudinal assessment of outcomes, comparative effectiveness research, and quality improvement. Finally, datasets must be able to measure risk-adjusted outcomes and discriminate quality at the level of hospitals, surgical teams, and individual surgeons; such measurement and discrimination will identify high-performing and low-performing groups and therefore facilitate quality improvement and enhance patient safety. Two surgical databases, The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program® (ACS NSQIP®) and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database, have established sophisticated and effective methods for analysis of outcomes and assessment of quality. Both of these two databases are platforms for multiple quality measures endorsed by The National Quality Forum (NQF). Some of these NQF endorsed quality measures are multi-domain composite performance metrics that combine the outcome domains of mortality and morbidity and thereby recognize that survival is only one of many measures of the quality of care.

Surgical registries are valuable tools to improve the outcomes of our patients and advance the art and science of outcomes analysis, quality improvement, and patient safety. As public reporting of surgical outcomes evolves, surgical registries will also be important platforms for transparency. Thoughtful graphical depiction of data will support and enhance all of these efforts. In the final analyses, surgical registries should allow surgical teams to provide better care for our patients.

Keywords

Outcomes analysis Quality improvement Patient safety Surgical registry Surgical database 

References

  1. 1.
    Barach P, Jacobs J, Lipshultz SE, Laussen P, editors. Pediatric and congenital cardiac care—volume 1: outcomes analysis. London: Springer-Verlag; 2015. p. 1–515. ISBN: 978-1-4471-6586-6 (Print). 978-1-4471-6587-3 (Online). Published in 2014.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barach P, Jacobs J, Lipshultz SE, Laussen P, editors. Pediatric and congenital cardiac care—volume 2: quality improvement and patient safety. London: Springer-Verlag; 2015. p. 1–456. ISBN: 978-1-4471-6565-1 (Print). 978-1-4471-6566-8 (Online). Published in 2014.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program® (ACS NSQIP®). https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/acs-nsqip. Accessed 6 Feb 2015.
  4. 4.
    STS National Database. http://www.sts.org/national-database. Accessed 28 Sept 2015.
  5. 5.
    Definition of quality. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/quality. Accessed 10 Nov 2015.
  6. 6.
    Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966;44(Suppl):166–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Michael E. Porter, Ph.D. perspective. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2477–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dokholyan RS, Muhlbaier LH, Falletta J, Jacobs JP, Shahian D, Haan CK, Peterson ED. Regulatory and ethical considerations for linking clinical and administrative databases. Am Heart J. 2009;157(6):971–82. PMID: 19464406.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jacobs JP. Databases for assessing the outcomes of the treatment of patients with congenital and pediatric cardiac disease—the perspective of cardiac surgery. In: Barach P, Jacobs JP, Lipshultz SE, Laussen P, editors. Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Care - Volume 1: Outcomes Analysis. Springer-Verlag London. Pages 1 – 515. ISBN: 978-1-4471-6586-6 (Print).978-1-4471-6587-3 (Online). Published in 2014.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jacobs JP, Mayer Jr JE, Mavroudis C, O’Brien SM, Austin 3rd EH, Pasquali SK, Hill KD, He X, Overman DM, St Louis JD, Karamlou T, Pizarro C, Hirsch-Romano JC, McDonald D, Han JM, Dokholyan RS, Tchervenkov CI, Lacour-Gayet F, Backer CL, Fraser CD, Tweddell JS, Elliott MJ, Walters 3rd H, Jonas RA, Prager RL, Shahian DM, Jacobs ML. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database: 2016 update on outcomes and quality. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(3):850–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program® (ACS NSQIP®) program overview. https://www.facs.org/~/media/files/quality%20programs/nsqip/nsqipoverview1012.ashx. Accessed 6 Feb 2015.
  12. 12.
    Grover FL, Shahian DM, Clark RE, Edwards FH. The STS National Database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97(1 Suppl):S48–54. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.10.015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jacobs JP, Shahian DM, Prager RL, Edwards FH, McDonald D, Han JM, D’Agostino RS, Jacobs ML, Kozower BD, Badhwar V, Thourani VH, Gaissert HA, Fernandez FG, Wright C, Fann JI, Paone G, Sanchez JA, Cleveland Jr JC, Brennan JM, Dokholyan RS, O’Brien SM, Peterson ED, Grover FL, Patterson GA. Introduction to the STS National Database Series: Outcomes Analysis, Quality Improvement, and Patient Safety. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100(6):1992–2000. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.10.060. Epub 2015 Oct 31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cronk CE, Malloy ME, Pelech AN, et al. Completeness of state administrative databases for surveillance of congenital heart disease. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2003;67:597–603.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Frohnert BK, Lussky RC, Alms MA, Mendelsohn NJ, Symonik DM, Falken MC. Validity of hospital discharge data for identifying infants with cardiac defects. J Perinatol. 2005;25:737–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Strickland MJ, Riehle-Colarusso TJ, Jacobs JP, Reller MD, Mahle WT, Botto LD, Tolbert PE, Jacobs ML, Lacour-Gayet FG, Tchervenkov CI, Mavroudis C, Correa A. The importance of nomenclature for congenital cardiac disease: implications for research and evaluation. In: Jacobs JP (editor) 2008 Cardiology in the young supplement: databases and the assessment of complications associated with the treatment of patients with congenital cardiac disease. Prepared by: the multi-societal database committee for pediatric and congenital heart disease. Cardiology in the young, vol 18, Issue S2 (Suppl. 2), pp 92–100; 2008.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pasquali SK, Peterson ED, Jacobs JP, He X, Li JS, Jacobs ML, Gaynor JW, Hirsch JC, Shah SS, Mayer JE. Differential case ascertainment in clinical registry versus administrative data and impact on outcomes assessment for pediatric cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95(1):197–203. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.08.074. Epub 2012 Nov 7.h.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jantzen DW, He X, Jacobs JP, Jacobs ML, Gaies MG, Hall M, Mayer JE, Shah SS, Hirsch-Romano J, Gaynor JW, Peterson ED, Pasquali SK. The impact of differential case ascertainment in clinical registry versus administrative data on assessment of resource utilization in pediatric heart surgery. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2014;5(3):398–405. PMID: 24958042, [Epub ahead of print].CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barach P, Lipshultz S. The benefits and hazards of publicly reported quality outcomes. Progr Pediatr Cardiol. 2016;42:45–9. doi:10.1016/j.ppedcard.2016.06.001.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jacobs JP, Mavroudis C, Jacobs ML, Maruszewski B, Tchervenkov CI, Lacour-Gayet FG, Clarke DR, Yeh T, Walters 3rd HL, Kurosawa H, Stellin G, Ebels T, Elliott MJ. What is operative mortality? Defining death in a surgical registry database, a report from the STS Congenital Database Task Force and the Joint EACTS-STS Congenital Database Committee. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81(5):1937–41.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Overman D, Jacobs JP, Prager RL, Wright CD, Clarke DR, Pasquali S, O’Brien SM, Dokholyan RS, Meehan P, McDonald DE, Jacobs ML, Mavroudis C, Shahian DM. Report from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database Work Force: clarifying the definition of operative mortality. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2013;4(1):10–2. doi: 10.1177/2150135112461924.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shahian DM, He X, Jacobs JP, Rankin JS, Peterson ED, Welke KF, Filardo G, Shewan CM, O’Brien SM. Issues in quality measurement: target population, risk adjustment, and ratings. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96(2):718–26. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.03.029. Epub 2013 Jun 29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    O’Brien SM, Jacobs JP, Pasquali SK, Gaynor JW, Karamlou T, Welke KF, Filardo G, Han JM, Kim S, Shahian DM, Jacobs ML. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database Mortality Risk Model: part 1-statistical methodology. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100(3):1054–62. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.07.014. Epub 2015 Aug 3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jacobs JP, O’Brien SM, Pasquali SK, Gaynor JW, Mayer Jr JE, Karamlou T, Welke KF, Filardo G, Han JM, Kim S, Quintessenza JA, Pizarro C, Tchervenkov CI, Lacour-Gayet F, Mavroudis C, Backer CL, Austin 3rd EH, Fraser CD, Tweddell JS, Jonas RA, Edwards FH, Grover FL, Prager RL, Shahian DM, Jacobs ML. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database Mortality Risk Model: part 2-clinical application. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100(3):1063–70. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.07.011. Epub 2015 Aug 3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pasquali SK, Jacobs ML, O’Brien SM, He X, Gaynor JW, Gaies MG, Peterson ED, Hirsch-Romano JC, Mayer JE, Jacobs JP. Impact of patient characteristics on hospital-level outcomes assessment in congenital heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100(3):1071–7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.05.101. Epub 2015 Aug 3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shahian DM, He X, Jacobs JP, Kurlansky PA, Badhwar V, Cleveland Jr JC, Fazzalari FL, Filardo G, Normand SL, Furnary AP, Magee MJ, Rankin JS, Welke KF, Han J, O’Brien SM. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Composite Measure of Individual Surgeon Performance for Adult Cardiac Surgery: a report of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Quality Measurement Task Force. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100(4):1315–25. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.06.122. Epub 2015 Aug 29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cohen M, Jacobs JP, Quintessenza JA, Chai PJ, Lindberg HL, Dickey J, Ungerleider RM. Mentorship, learning curves, and balance. In 2007 Supplement to Cardiology in the Young: Controversies and Challenges Facing Paediatric Cardiovascular Practitioners and their Patients, Anderson RH, Jacobs JP, and Wernovsky G, editors. Cardiol Young. 2007;17 Suppl 2:164–74. doi: 10.1017/S1047951107001266.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jacobs JP, Wernovsky G, Cooper DS, Karl TR. Principles of shared decision-making within teams. Cardiol Young. 2015;25(8):1631–6. doi: 10.1017/S1047951115000311. Epub 2015 Aug 18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jacobs JP, editor. 2008 Supplement to Cardiology in the Young: databases and the assessment of complications associated with the treatment of patients with congenital cardiac disease, prepared by: the Multi-societal Database Committee for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease. Cardiol Young. 2008; 18(suppl S2):1–530.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jacobs JP, Edwards FH, Shahian DM, Haan CK, Puskas JD, Morales DLS, Gammie JS, Sanchez JA, Brennan JM, O’Brien SM, Dokholyan RS, Hammill BG, Curtis LH, Peterson ED, Badhwar V, George KM, Mayer Jr JE, Chitwood WR, Murray GF, Grover FL. Successful linking of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare Data. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:1150–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pasquali SK, Jacobs JP, Shook GJ, O’Brien SM, Hall M, Jacobs ML, Welke KF, Gaynor JW, Peterson ED, Shah SS, Li JS. Linking clinical registry data with administrative data using indirect identifiers: implementation and validation in the congenital heart surgery population. Am Heart J. 2010;160:1099–104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jacobs JP, Edwards FH, Shahian DM, Prager RL, Wright CD, Puskas JD, Morales DL, Gammie JS, Sanchez JA, Haan CK, Badhwar V, George KM, O’Brien SM, Dokholyan RS, Sheng S, Peterson ED, Shewan CM, Feehan KM, Han JM, Jacobs ML, Williams WG, Mayer Jr JE, Chitwood Jr WR, Murray GF, Grover FL. Successful linking of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database to Social Security Data to examine survival after cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92(1):32–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jacobs JP, O’Brien SM, Shahian DM, Edwards FH, Badhwar V, Dokholyan RS, Sanchez JA, Morales DL, Prager RL, Wright CD, Puskas JD, Gammie JS, Haan CK, George KM, Sheng S, Peterson ED, Shewan CM, Han JM, Bongiorno PA, Yohe C, Williams WG, Mayer JE, Grover FL. Successful linking of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database to Social Security data to examine the accuracy of Society of Thoracic Surgeons mortality data. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(4):976–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.11.094.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Barach P, Lipshultz S. Readmitting children with heart failure: the importance of communication, coordination, and continuity of care. J Pediatr. 2016;177:13–6. PII: S0022-3476(16)30562-5.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Johnson J, Barach P. Quality improvement methods to study and improve the process and outcomes of pediatric cardiac surgery. Progr Pediat Cardiol. 2011;32:147–53.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jacobs JP, Cerfolio RJ, Sade RM. The ethics of transparency: publication of cardiothoracic surgical outcomes in the lay press. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87(3):679–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shahian DM, Edwards FH, Jacobs JP, Prager RL, Normand SL, Shewan CM, O’Brien SM, Peterson ED, Grover FL. Public reporting of cardiac surgery performance: part 1-history, rationale, consequences. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92(3 Suppl):S2–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shahian DM, Edwards FH, Jacobs JP, Prager RL, Normand SL, Shewan CM, O’Brien SM, Peterson ED, Grover FL. Public reporting of cardiac surgery performance: part 2-implementation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92(3 Suppl):S12–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Shahian DM, Grover FL, Prager RL, Edwards FH, Filardo G, O’Brien SM, He X, Furnary AP, Rankin JS, Badhwar V, Cleveland Jr JC, Fazzalari FL, Magee MJ, Han J, Jacobs JP. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons voluntary public reporting initiative: the first 4 years. Ann Surg. 2015;262(3):526–35. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001422.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lopez C, Hanson C, Yorke D, Johnson J, Mill M, Brown K, Barach P. Improving communication with families of patients undergoing pediatric cardiac surgery. Progr Pediatr Cardiol. Accepted 9 July 2016.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    McNelis J, Castaldi M. The National Surgery Quality Improvement Project” (NSQIP): a new tool to increase patient safety and cost efficiency in a surgical intensive care unit. Patient Safe Surg. 2014;8:190.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Spiegelhalter DJ. Funnel plots for comparing institutional performance. Stat Med. 2005;24:1185–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jacobs JP, O’Brien SM, Pasquali SK, Jacobs ML, Lacour-Gayet FG, Tchervenkov CI, Austin 3rd EH, Pizarro C, Pourmoghadam KK, Scholl FG, Welke KF, Mavroudis C, Richard E. Clark paper: variation in outcomes for benchmark operations: an analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database Richard Clark Award recipient for best use of the STS Congenital Heart Surgery Database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92(6):2184–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Barach P. The end of the beginning. J Legal Med. 2003;24:7–27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Johns Hopkins All Children’s Heart Institute, Johns Hopkins All Children’s HospitalJohns Hopkins UniversitySaint PetersburgUSA

Personalised recommendations