Advertisement

A Quiet Revolution: Communicating and Resolving Patient Harm

  • William M. Sage
  • Madelene J. Ottosen
  • Ben Coopwood
Chapter

Abstract

Good patient care includes not only avoiding error and injury but also acting honestly and constructively should it occur. Communication and Resolution Programs (CRPs) commit the sponsoring institution to vigilant detection of error, full disclosure to patients and families, and timely redress. CRPs also seek to incorporate the perspectives of patients and family members into safety improvement activities. This chapter explains the principles underlying CRPs, traces their history, and describes current best practices for physicians, provider organizations, and the legal and regulatory environment. Transparency about error and proactive response to injury lagged other professional commitments to patient self-determination because of the emotion and politics surrounding medical malpractice. However, recent generations of physicians, patients, and policymakers have engineered a “quiet” revolution. Silence and secrecy are no longer ethically acceptable responses to medical error. Although additional research is needed on how CRPs affect safety, patient and provider satisfaction, and cost, the American College of Surgeons in 2014 declared CRPs to be, on balance, the most promising approach to medical liability reform.

Keywords

Communication and resolution Medical error Malpractice Patient safety Disclosure Transparency 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank medical student Adam Hensley, University of Texas Medical Branch, for research assistance. The authors extend special thanks to Dr. Tom Gallagher at the University of Washington for providing detailed, current information about CRP initiatives nationwide.

References

  1. 1.
    Sanchez J, Barach P. High reliability organizations and surgical microsystems: re-engineering surgical care. Surg Clin North Am. 2012;92(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2011.12.005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Classen DC, et al. ‘Global trigger tool’ shows that adverse events in hospitals may be ten times greater than previously measured. Health Aff. 2011;30:581–9.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    James JT. A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care. J Patient Saf. 2013;9:122–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blendon RJ, DesRoches CM, Brodie M, Benson JM, Rosen AB, Schneider E, Altman DE, Zapert K, Herrmann MJ, Steffenson AE. Views of practicing physicians and the public on medical errors. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1933–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gallagher TH, Waterman AD, Ebers AG, Fraser VJ, Levinson W. Patients’ and physicians’ attitudes regarding the disclosure of medical errors. JAMA. 2003;289(8):1001–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Iezzoni LI, Rao SR, DesRoches CM, Vogel C, Campbell EG. Survey shows that at least some physicians are not always open or honest with patients. Health Aff. 2012;31(2):383–91.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gallagher TH, Bell SK, Smith KM, Mello MM, McDonald TB. Disclosing harmful medical errors to patients: tackling three tough cases. Chest. 2009;136(3):897–903.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barach P, Cantor M. Adverse event disclosure: benefits and drawbacks for patients and clinicians. In: Clarke S, Oakley J, editors. The ethics of auditing and reporting surgeon performance. Cambridge: Cambridge Press; 2007. p. 76–91. ISBN 9780521687782.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    American College of Surgeons. Statement on medical liability reform. 2015. https://www.facs.org/about-acs/statements/77-medical-liability-reform.
  10. 10.
    Sage WM. Regulating through information: disclosure laws and American health care. Columbia Law Rev. 1999;99(7):1701–829.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Cantor M, Barach P, Derse A, Maklan C, Woody G, Fox E. Disclosing adverse events to patients. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2005;31:5–12.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Etchegaray JM, Ottosen MJ, Burress L, Sage WM, Bell SK, Gallagher TH, Thomas EJ. Structuring patient and family involvement in medical error event disclosure and analysis. Health Aff. 2014;33(1):46–52.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vincent CA, Coulter A. Patient safety: what about the patient? Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11:76–80.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zimmerman T, Amori G. Including patients in root cause and system failure analysis: legal and psychological implications. J Healthc Risk Manag. 2007;27:27–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Friedman SM, Provan D, Moore S, Hanneman K. Errors, near misses and adverse events in the emergency department: what can patients tell us? CJEM. 2008;10:421–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu AW, Boyle DJ, Wallace G, Mazor KM. Disclosure of adverse events in the United States and Canada: an update, and a proposed framework for improvement. J Public Health Res. 2013;2, e32.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sage WM. Putting the patient in patient safety. JAMA. 2002;287(22):3003–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Duclos CW, Eichler M, Taylor L, Quintela J, Main DS, Pace W, et al. Patient perspectives of patient-provider communication after adverse events. Int J Qual Health Care. 2005;17(6):479–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Entwistle VA, McCaughan D, Watt IS, Birks Y, Hall J, Peat M, et al. Speaking up about safety concerns: multi-setting qualitative study of patients’ views and experiences. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(6), e33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Millman EA, Pronovost PJ, Makary MA, Wu AW. Patient-assisted incident reporting: including the patient in patient safety. J Patient Saf. 2011;7:106–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Weingart SN, et al. What can hospitalized patients tell us about adverse events? Learning from patient-reported incidents. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:830–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Johnson J, Haskell H, Barach P, editors. Case studies in patient safety: patients and providers. Burlington: Jones and Bartlett Learning; 2015. ISBN 81449681548.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sage WM. Relating health law to health policy: a frictional account. In: Cohen IG, Hoffman A, Sage WM, editors. Oxford Handbook of US Health Law. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Black B, Silver C, Hyman DA, Sage WM. Stability, not crisis: medical malpractice claim outcomes in Texas, 1988–2002. J Empir Leg Stud. 2005;2(2):207–59.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sage WM. Medical malpractice reform: When is it about money? Why is it about time? JAMA. 2014;312(20):2103–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gold JA. Wiser than the laws?: the legal accountability of the medical profession. Am J Law Med. 1981;7(2):145–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Grady MF. Why are people negligent?: technology, nondurable precautions, and the medical malpractice explosion. Northwest Univ Law Rev. 1988;82:293–334.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mohr JC. American medical malpractice litigation in historical perspective. JAMA. 2000;283(13):1731–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sage WM. Reputation, malpractice liability, and medical error. In: Sharpe VA, editor. Accountability: patient safety and policy reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2004. p. 159–83.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sage WM, Jablonski JS, Thomas EJ. Use of non-disclosure agreements in medical malpractice settlements by a large academic health care system. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(7):1130–5. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1035, published online May 11, 2015.
  32. 32.
    Mello MM, Boothman RC, McDonald T, Driver J, Lembitz A, Bouwmeester D, Dunlap B, Gallagher T. Communication-and-resolution programs: the challenges and lessons learned from six early adopters. Health Aff. 2014;33(1):20–9.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Truog RD, Browning DM, Johnson JA, Gallagher TH, Leape LL. Talking with patients and families about medical error: a guide for education and practice. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vincent C. Understanding and responding to adverse events. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1051–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kraman SS, Hamm G. Risk management: extreme honesty may be the best policy. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131:963–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hamm GM, Kraman SS. New standards, new dilemmas—reflections on managing medical mistakes. Bioethics Forum. 2001;17(2):19–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Department of Veterans Affairs. Final rule, policy regarding participation in National Practitioner Data Bank, 67(78) Fed. Reg. 19678. 2002.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Boothman RC, Blackwell AC, Campbell DA, Commiskey E, Anderson S. A better approach to medical malpractice claims? The University of Michigan experience. J Health Life Sci Law. 2009;2(2):125–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kachalia L, Kaufman S, Boothman R, et al. Liability claims and costs before and after implementation of a medical error disclosure program. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(4):213–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    McDonald TB, Helmchen LA, Smith KM, Centomani N, Gunderson A, Mayer D, Chamberlin WH. Responding to patient safety incidents: the “seven pillars”. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(6), e11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Robeznieks A. Full disclosure first: alternative med-mal approaches show promise. Modern Healthcare; 2 Feb 2013. http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20130202/MAGAZINE/302029954.
  42. 42.
  43. 43.
    Institute of Medicine. Fostering rapid advances in health care: learning from system demonstrations (Corrigan JM, Greiner A, Erickson SM, editors). Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Joint Commission. Health Care at the Crossroads: Strategies for Improving the Medical Liability System and Preventing Patient Injury. 2005. https://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/Medical_Liability.pdf.
  45. 45.
    National Quality Forum. Safe practices for better healthcare—2009 update: a consensus report. Washington, DC: NQF; 2009.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    American Medical Association. Opinion 8.121—ethical responsibility to study and prevent error and harm. 2003.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Institute of Medicine. Improving diagnosis in health care (Balogh EP, Miller BT, and Ball JR, editors). Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2015.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Liebman CB, Hyman CS. Medical error disclosure, mediation skills, and malpractice litigation: a demonstration project in Pennsylvania. New York: Project on Medical Liability in Pennsylvania; 2005.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hyman CS, Liebman CB, Schechter C, Sage WM. Interest-based mediation of medical malpractice lawsuits: a route to improved patient safety? J Health Polit Policy Law. 2010;35(5):797–828.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Liebman CB, Hyman CS. A mediation skills model to manage disclosure of errors and adverse events to patients. Health Aff. 2004;23:422–32.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Barach P, Wolfson J, Stark S, Glass L. Establishing a Florida patient safety network. Report submitted to the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA), 29 June 2004.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Gallagher TH, Studdert D, Levinson W. Disclosing harmful medical errors to patients. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(26):2713–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Corrigan JM, Greiner A, Erickson SM, editors. Fostering rapid advances in health care: learning from system demonstrations. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Medical liability reform and patient safety initiative (Internet). Rockville, MD: AHRQ; 2012. http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patient-safety-resources/liability/index.html. Accessed 9 Dec 2013.
  55. 55.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Demonstration grants (Internet). Rockville, MD: AHRQ; 2010. http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/liability/demogrants.htm. Accessed 4 Dec 2013.
  56. 56.
    Mello MM, Senecal SK, Kuznetsov Y, Cohn JS. Implementing hospital-based communication-and-resolution programs: lessons learned in New York City. Health Aff. 2014;33(1):30–8.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hendrick A, McCoy CK, Gale J, Sparkman L, Santos P. Ascension Health’s demonstration of full disclosure protocol for unexpected events during labor and delivery shows promise. Health Aff. 2014;33(1):39–45.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Full Disclosure Working Group. When things go wrong: responding to adverse events. A consensus statement of the Harvard Hospitals. Boston: Massachusetts Coalition for the Prevention of Medical Errors; 2006.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Massachusetts Alliance for Communication and Resolution Following Medical Injury (MACRMI). About CaRE. 2015. http://www.macrmi.info/about-macrmi/about-dao/#sthash.dvKmNie8.dpbs.
  60. 60.
    Conway J, Federico F, Stewart K, Campbell M. Respectful management of serious clinical adverse events, IHI Innovation Series white paper. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2011.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Marx D. Patient safety and the “Just Culture”: a primer for health care executives. New York: Columbia University; 2001.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Mello MM, Gallagher TH. Malpractice reform—opportunities for leadership by health care institutions and liability insurers. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(15):1353–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Gilula M, Barach P. Designing a patient safety curriculum. In: Sheikh A, Hurwitz B, editors. Health care errors and patient safety. London: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. p. 238–53. ISBN 9781405146432.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Sage WM, Gallagher TH, Armstrong S, Cohn J, McDonald T, Gale JL, Woodward A, Mello MM. How policy makers can smooth the way for communication-and resolution programs. Health Aff. 2014;33(1):11–9.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Medical Quality Assurance Commission (State of Washington). Guidelines: endorsement of just culture principles to increase patient safety and reduce medical errors. 2014.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Medical Quality Assurance Commission (State of Washington). Guideline: a collaborative approach to reducing medical error and enhancing patient safety (MD2015-08). 2015.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Oregon Patient Safety Commission. Oregon collaborative on communication and resolution programs. 2015. http://oregonpatientsafety.org/discussion-resolution/discussion-resolution/OCCRP/1849.
  68. 68.
    National Practitioner Data Bank. NPDB guidebook. 2015. http://www.npdb.hrsa.gov/resources/npdbguidebook.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • William M. Sage
    • 1
  • Madelene J. Ottosen
    • 2
  • Ben Coopwood
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Law and Dell Medical School, University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  2. 2.Department of Family HealthUTHealth-Memorial Hermann Center for Healthcare Quality and SafetyHoustonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical SchoolUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations