Human Factors and Operating Room Design Challenges

Chapter

Abstract

Diffusing innovations from other industries have been suggested as a source to improve safety and quality of surgical patient care. Operating rooms are high-risk areas for preventable patient harm. Many studies focus on teaching, training, and changing staff behaviour as an approach to improvement. Most safety improvements in other high-risk industries, however, first focus on work area design before attempting to change behaviour. Design can purposefully shape behaviour towards more sustainable practices and improve teamwork dynamics and situational awareness. Human factor engineering, concerned with the understanding of interactions among humans and other elements of a system, can help in ‘mistake proofing’ by changing designs to make processes more reliable and effective. The field of design and human factor engineering can assist improving safety in the operating room. The application of these principles will be demonstrated in two case studies: Effects of operating floor marking on the position of surgical devices to promote clean air flow compliance and minimize infection risks, and use of video feedback and computer-assisted systems using video imaging technology to improve sensomotor and non-technical skills.

Keywords

Diffusion of innovations Human factor engineering Design thinking Video analytics Feedback 

References

  1. 1.
    Apostolakis G, Barach P. Lessons learned from nuclear power. In: Hatlie M, Tavill K, editors. Patient safety, international textbook. Faithersburg: Aspen; 2003. p. 205–25.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wilf-Miron R, et al. From aviation to medicine: applying concepts of aviation safety to risk management in ambulatory care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:35–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sower VE, et al. Benchmarking for hospitals: achieving best-in-class performance without having to reinvent the wheel. Milwaukee: ASQ Quality Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Singh H, et al. Comparing safety climate in naval aviation and hospitals: implications for improving patient safety. Health Care Manage Rev. 2006;35:134–46.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shaw J, Calder K. Aviation is not the only industry: health care could look wider for lessons on patient safety. Health Care Manage Rev. 2008;35:134–46.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    van der Schraaf TW. Medical applications of industrial safety science. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11:205–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roberts KH, Tadmor CT. Lessons learned from non-medical industries: the tragedy of the USS Greenville. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11:355–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pronovost PJ, et al. Reducing health care hazards: lessons from the commercial aviation safety team. Health Aff. 2009;28:w479–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Powell SM. My copilot is a nurse: using crew resource management in the OR. AORN J. 2006;83:179–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dunn EJ, et al. Medical team training: applying crew resource management in the Veterans Health Administration. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Sat. 2007;33:317–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Flin R, et al. Leadership for safety: industrial experience. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13 suppl 2:ii45–51.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kao LS, Thomas EJ. Navigating towards improved surgical safety using aviation based strategies. J Surg Res. 2007;145:327–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press; 1995.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Greenhalgh T, et al. Diffusion of innovations in health services organisations: a systematic literature review. Malden: Blackwell; 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cassin B, Barach P. Making sense of root cause analysis investigations of surgery-related adverse events. Surg Clin North Am. 2012;92(1):101–15. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2011.12.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haynes AB, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2010;360:12–21.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Langelaan M, et al. Monitor health care related harm in Dutch hospitals 2008 [in Dutch]. Utrecht: Nivel; 2010.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leape L, et al. Transforming healthcare: a safety imperative. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:424–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mangram AJ, et al. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20:247–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pasquarella C, et al. A mobile laminar airflow unit to reduce air bacterial contamination at surgical area in a conventionally ventilated operating theatre. J Hosp Infect. 2007;66:313–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Seiden S, Barach P. Wrong-side, wrong procedure, and wrong patient adverse events: are they preventable? Arch Surg. 2006;141:1–9.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gosden PE, et al. Importance of air quality and related factors in the prevention of infection in orthopedic implant surgery. J Hosp Infect. 1998;39:173–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Knobben BAS. Intra-operative bacterial contamination: control and consequences. Thesis. Groningen: University of Groningen; 2006.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rowlands J, Yeager MP, Beach M, Patel HM, Huysman BC, Loftus RW. Video observation to map hand contact and bacterial transmission in operating rooms. Am J Infect Control. 2014;42(7):698–701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Allo MD, Tedesco M. Operating room management: operative suite considerations, infection control. Surg Clin North Am. 2005;85(6):1291–7. xii.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Laufman H. The control of operating room infection: discipline, defence, mechanisms, drugs, design and devices. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1978;54(5):465–83.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dharan S, Pittet D. Environmental controls in operating theatres. J Hosp Infect. 2002;51:79–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pryor F, Messmer PR. The effect of traffic patterns in the OR on surgical site infections. AORN J. 1998;68(4):649–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Grout JR. Mistake proofing: changing designs to reduce error. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15(Suppl I):i44–9.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Erlandson RF, Sant D. Poka-yoke process controller: designed for individuals with cognitive impairments. Assist Technol. 1998;10(2):102–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Erlandson RF, et al. Impact of a poka-yoke device on job performance of individuals with cognitive impairments. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1998;6(3):269–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jalote A, Badke P. Workflow integration matrix: a framework to support the development of surgical information systems. Des Stud. 2008;29:338–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lilley D. Design for sustainable behaviour: strategies and perceptions. Des Stud. 2009;30:704–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shepherd A. Process plant design and the operator’s task. Des Stud. 1982;3(1):19–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Heerema. 2011. http://www.heerema.com/default.aspx?tabid=1560. Accessed 2 Feb 2011.
  36. 36.
    Schiphol. A/CAP/safety & environment. Safety & security handbook. 2011. http://www.schiphol.nl/web/file?uuid=0c9a559b-3b4e-41e0-9984-a78c421fcbcc&owner=41022ae1-e3d5-428b-9e9c-db2b2af87123. Accessed 29 Apr 2016.
  37. 37.
    Barach P, Johnson J, Ahmed A, Galvan C, Bognar A, Duncan R, Starr J, Bacha E. Intraoperative adverse events and their impact on pediatric cardiac surgery: a prospective observational study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136(6):1422–8.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Frerichs L, Brittin J, Intolubbe L, Trowbridge M, Sorensen D, Huang TT. The role of school design in shaping healthy eating-related attitudes, practices and behaviors among school staff. J Sch Health. 2016;86(1):11–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Taneva S, Grote G, Easty A, Plattner B. Decoding the perioperative process breakdowns: a theoretical model and implications for systems design. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(1):14–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Baker D, Gustafson S, Beaubien J, Salas E, Barach P. Medical teamwork and patient safety: the evidence-based relation. AHRQ Publication No. 05-0053. 2005. http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/medteam/.
  41. 41.
    Endsley MR. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors. 1995;37(1):32–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Buckle P, et al. Design for patient safety. London: Department of Health and Design Council; 2003.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Vincent C, Amalberti R. Safer healthcare. Strategies for the real world. New York: Springer Open; 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rostenberg B, Barach P. Design of cardiovascular operating rooms for tomorrow’s technology and clinical practice, part 1. Prog Pediatr Cardiol. 2011;32:121–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    de Korne DF, van Wijngaarden JD, van Rooij J, Wauben LS, Hiddema F, Klazinga NS. Safety by design: effects of operating floor marking on the position of surgical devices to promote clean air flow compliance and minimize infection risks. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(9):746–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    WIP. Working safe in ophthalmology. Working group infection prevention. [in Dutch]. 2008. http://www.wip.nl/disclaim.asp?url=http://www.wip.nl/free_content/Richtlijnen/101020%20Veilig%20werken%20oogheelkunde%20def.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2011.
  47. 47.
    Kanski JJ. Clinical ophthalmology. A synopsis. London: Elsevier; 2004.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    de Korne DF, van Wijngaarden J, Hiddema F, Bleeker FG, Pronovost PJ, Klazinga NS. Diffusing aviation innovations in a hospital in the Netherlands. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010;36(8):339–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    de Korne DF, Van Wijngaarden JD, Van Dyck C, Hiddema UF, Klazinga NS. Evaluation of aviation-based safety team training in a hospital in The Netherlands. J Health Organ Manag. 2014;28(6):731–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S, Maran N. Non-technical skills for surgeons in the operating room: a review of the literature. Surgery. 2006;139:140–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Karamichalis J, Barach P, Henaine R, Nido del P, Bacha E. Assessment of surgical competency in pediatric cardiac surgery. Prog Pediatr Cardiol. 2012;33;15–20. doi: 20110.1016/j.ppedcard.2011.12.003.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Sterkenburg A, Barach P., Kalkman C, Ten Cate O. Entrustable educational agents and patient safety, Academic Medicine 2010;85:1408 –1417.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Schraagen JM, Schouten A, Smit M, van der Beek D, Van de Ven J, Barach P. Improving methods for studying teamwork in cardiac surgery. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Bann S, Darzi A. Selection of individuals for training in surgery. Am J Surg. 2005;190:98–102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Cushieri A, Francis N, Crosby J, Hanna G. What do master surgeons think of surgical competence and revaliation? Am J Surg. 2001;182:110–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Causer J, Barach P. Williams M. Expertise in Medicine: Using the expert performance approach to improve simulation training. Medical Education 2014: 48: 115–123 doi: 10.1111/medu.12306.
  57. 57.
    Iedema R, Mesman J, Carrol K. Visualizing health care practice improvement: innovation from within. New York: Radcliffe; 2013.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Iedema R, Hor S-Y, Wyer M, Gilbert GL, Jorm C, Hooker C, O’Sullivan M. An innovative approach to strengthen health professionals’ infection control and limiting hospital-acquired infection: video-reflexive ethnography. BMJ Innov. 2015;1:157–62. doi: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2014-000032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Nebeker, J., Samore, M., Barach, P. Clarifying Adverse Drug Events: A Clinicians guide to Terminology, Documentation, and Reporting. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2004; 140(10):1–8.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Ashcroft DM, Cooke J. Retrospective analysis of medication incidents reported using an online reporting system. Pharm World Sci. 2006;28:359–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Edmondson AC. Speaking up in the operating room: how team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. J Manag Stud. 2003;40(6):1419–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Buljac M, Dekker C, van Wijngaarden J, van Wijk K. Interventions to improve team effectiveness: a systematic review. Health Policy. 2010;94(3):183–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Kemper P, de Bruijne M, van Dyck C, So RL, Tangkau P, Wagner C. Crew resource management training in the intensive care unit: a multisite controlled before-after study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(8):577–87. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003994.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Bonrath EM, Gordon LE, Grantcharov TP. Characterising ‘near miss’ events in complex laparoscopic surgery through video analysis. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24(8):516–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Bowermaster R, Miller M, Ashcraft T, Boyd M, Brar A, Manning P, Eghtesady P. Application of the aviation black box principle in paediatric cardiac surgery: tracking all failures in the paediatric operating room. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220(2):149–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Guerlain S, Adams RB, Turrentine B, Shin T, Guo H, Collins SR, Calland JF. Assessing team performance in the operating room: development and use of a ‘black-box’ recorder and other tool for the operative environment. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;200(1):29–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Husslein H, Shirreff L, Shore EM, Lefebre GG, Grantcharov TP. The generic error rating tool: a novel approach to assessment of performance and surgical education in gynaecologic laparoscopy. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(6):1259–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Lynch RJ, Englesbe MJ, Sturm L, et al. Measurement of foot traffic in the operating room: implications for infection control. Am J Med Qual. 2009;24(1):45–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Parikh SN, Grice SS, Schnell BM, Salisbury SR. Operating room traffic: is there any role of monitoring it? J Pediatr Orthop. 2010;30(6):617–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Young RS, O’Regan DJ. Cardiac surgical theatre traffic: time for traffic calming measures? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;10(4):526–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Lalys F, Riffaud L, Bouget D, Jannin P. A framework for the recognition of high-level surgical tasks from video images for cataract surgeries. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012;59(4):966–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Younessian E, Rajan D. Scene signatures for unconstrained news video stories. Multimedia modeling (MMM). Klagenfurt, Austria; 4–6 Jan 2012.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Gauba V, Tsangaris P, Tossounis C, Mitra A, McLean C, Saleh GM. Human reliability analysis of cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(2):173–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Martell J, Elmer T, Gopalsami N, Park YS. Visual measurement of suture strain for robotic surgery. Comput Math Methods Med. 2011;2011:879086. doi: 10.1155/2011/879086.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Stephanidis D, Sevdalis N, Paige J, Zevin B, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov T, Jones D. Simulation in surgery: what’s needed next? Ann Surg. 2015;261(5):846–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    de Korne DF. Divergent sight: studies on the application of industrial quality and safety improvement methods in eye hospitals. University of Amsterdam; 2011.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Catchpole KR, et al. A multicenter trial of aviation-style training for surgical teams. J Patient Safety. 2010;6(3):180–6.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Entin E, Lei F, Barach P. Teamwork skills training for patient safety in the peri-operative environment: a research agenda. Surg Innov. 2006;3:3–13.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Phelps G, Barach P. Why the safety and quality movement has been slow to improve care? International Journal of Clinical Practice,2014:68 (8);932–935.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Kok L, et al. The relation between medical specialists and the hospital [in Dutch]. SEO Economics Research, 2010. Report 2010–16. 2010.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Cangialose C, et al. Impact of managed care on quality of healthcare: theory and evidence. Am J Manag Care. 1997;3:1153–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Houben A. Health use and supply-driven demand. Background report for RVZ-study [in Dutch]. The Hague: National Council for Public Health; 2010.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Gosden T, et al. How should we pay doctors? A systematic review of salary payments and their effect on doctor behaviour. Q J Med. 1999;92(1):47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Chaix-couturier C, et al. Cardiac revascularization in specialty and general hospitals. N Engl J Med. 2000;352(14):1454–62.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Kruijthof K. Doctors’ orders. Specialists’ day to day work and their jurisdictional claims in Dutch. Rotterdam: Erasmus University; 2005.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Bjornberg A, et al. Euro Health Consumer Index 2009. Brussels: Health Consumer Powerhouse; 2009.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Sexton JB, et al. Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys. BMJ. 2000;320:745–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Hesselink G, Vernooij-Dassen M, Barach P, Pijnenborg L, Gademan P, Johnson JK, Schoonhoven., Wollersheim H. Organizational culture: an important context for addressing and improving hospital to community patient discharge. Medical Care, 2012; doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31827632ec.
  89. 89.
    Argyris C. Teaching smart people how to learn. Harv Bus Rev. 1991;4(2):4–15.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Baker DP, et al. Teamwork as an essential component of high-reliability organizations. Health Serv Res. 2006;41(4):1576–98.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Argyris C. Reasons and rationalisations: the limits to organisational knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Barach P, Small DS. Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems. Br Med J. 2000;320:753–63.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Birnbach DJ, et al. Patient safety begins with proper planning: a quantitative method to improve hospital design. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:462–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Lowe CM. Accidents waiting to happen: the contribution of latent conditions to patient safety. Qual Safety Health Care. 2006;15(Suppl I):i72–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Rostenberg B, Barach P. Design of cardiovascular operating rooms for tomorrow’s technology and clinical practice, Part 2. Prog Pediatr Cardiol. 2012;33:57–65.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Rostenberg B, Barach P. Design of cardiac surgery operating rooms and the impact of the built environment. In: Barach P, Jacobs J, Laussen P, Lipshultz S, editors. Outcomes analysis, quality improvement, and patient safety for pediatric and congenital cardiac disease. New York: Springer Books; 2014.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dirk F. de Korne
    • 1
  • Huey Peng Loh
    • 2
  • Shanqing Yin
    • 3
  1. 1.Medical Innovation & Care TransformationKK Women’s & Children’s HospitalSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Operating TheatreSingapore National Eye Centre (SNEC)SingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.Department of Quality, Safety, & Risk ManagementKK Women’s & Children’s HospitalSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations