Advertisement

Comparing Topic Coverage in Breadth-First and Depth-First Crawls Using Anchor Texts

  • Thaer Samar
  • Myriam C. Traub
  • Jacco van Ossenbruggen
  • Arjen P. de Vries
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9819)

Abstract

Web archives preserve the fast changing Web by repeatedly crawling its content. The crawling strategy has an influence on the data that is archived. We use link anchor text of two Web crawls created with different crawling strategies in order to compare their coverage of past popular topics. One of our crawls was collected by the National Library of the Netherlands (KB) using a depth-first strategy on manually selected websites from the .nl domain, with the goal to crawl websites as completes as possible. The second crawl was collected by the Common Crawl foundation using a breadth-first strategy on the entire Web, this strategy focuses on discovering as many links as possible. The two crawls differ in their scope of coverage, while the KB dataset covers mainly the Dutch domain, the Common Crawl dataset covers websites from the entire Web. Therefore, we used three different sources to identify topics that were popular on the Web; both at the global level (entire Web) and at the national level (.nl domain): Google Trends, WikiStats, and queries collected from users of the Dutch historic newspaper archive. The two crawls are different in terms of their size, number of included websites and domains. To allow fair comparison between the two crawls, we created sub-collections from the Common Crawl dataset based on the .nl domain and the KB seeds. Using simple exact string matching between anchor texts and popular topics from the three different sources, we found that the breadth-first crawl covered more topics than the depth-first crawl. Surprisingly, this is not limited to popular topics from the entire Web but also applies to topics that were popular in the .nl domain.

Keywords

User Query Link Structure Target Host Anchor Text Topic Coverage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the National Library of the Netherlands for their support. This research was funded by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO CATCH program, WebART project), and Dutch COMMIT/ program (SEALINCMedia project). Part of the analysis work was carried out on the Dutch e-infrastructure with the support of the SURF Foundation.

References

  1. 1.
    Baeza-Yates, R.A., Poblete, B.: Evolution of the Chilean web structure composition. In: LA-WEB, pp. 11–13 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Broder, A.Z., Kumar, R., Maghoul, F., Raghavan, P., Rajagopalan, S., Stata, R., Tomkins, A., Janet, L.: Wiener.: graph structure in the web. Comput. Netw. 33(1–6), 309–320 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brügger, N.: Historical network analysis of the web. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 31(3), 306–321 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Craswell, N., Hawking, D., Robertson, S.: Effective site finding using link anchor information. In: SIGIR, pp. 250–257. ACM (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Donato, D., Leonardi, S., Millozzi, S., Tsaparas, P.: Mining the inner structure of the web graph. In: WebDB, pp. 145–150 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dou, Z., Song, R., Nie, J.-Y., Wen, J.-R.: Using anchor texts with their hyperlink structure for web search. In: SIGIR, pp. 227–234 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eiron, N., McCurley, K.S.: Analysis of anchor text for web search. In: SIGIR, pp. 459–460 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fujii, A.: Modeling anchor text and classifying queries to enhance web document retrieval. In: WWW, pp. 337–346 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huurdeman, H.C., Kamps, J., Samar, T., de Vries, A.P., Ben-David, A., Rogers, R.A.: Lost but not forgotten: finding pages on the unarchived web. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 16, 247–265 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jin, R., Hauptmann, A.G., Zhai, C.: Title language model for information retrieval. In: SIGIR, 11–15 August 2002, Tampere, Finland, pp. 42–48 (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kamps, J.: Web-centric language models. In: CIKM, pp. 307–308 (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kanhabua, N., Nejdl, W.: On the value of temporal anchor texts in wikipedia. In: SIGIR Workshop on Temporal, Social and Spatially-Aware Information Access (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Klein, M., Nelson, M.L.: Moved but not gone: an evaluation of real-time methods for discovering replacement web pages. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 14, 17–38 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kleinberg, J.M.: Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. J. ACM 46, 604–632 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koolen, M., Kamps, J.: The importance of anchor text for ad hoc search revisited. In: SIGIR, pp. 122–129 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kraft, R., Zien, J.: Mining anchor text for query refinement. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2004, pp. 666–674. ACM, New York (2004). doi: 10.1145/988672.988763. ISBN: 1-58113-844-X
  17. 17.
    Masanès, J.: Web Archiving. Springer, Berlin (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Metzler, D., Novak, J., Cui, H., Reddy, S.: Building enriched document representations using aggregated anchor text. In: SIGIR (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Meusel, R., Vigna, S., Lehmberg, O., Bizer, C.: Graph structure in the web - revisited: a trick of the heavy tail. In: WWW, pp. 427–432 (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mühleisen, H.: Wikistats – wikipedia pageviews (2013). http://wikistats.ins.cwi.nl
  21. 21.
    Ntoulas, A., Cho, J., Olston, C.: What’s new on the web? The evolution of the web from a search engine perspective. In: WWW, pp. 1–12 (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rauber, A., Bruckner, R.M., Aschenbrenner, A., Witvoet, O., Kaiser, M.: Uncovering information hidden in web archives: a glimpse at web analysis building on data warehouses. D-Lib Mag. 8(12), 1082–9873 (2002). doi: 10.1045/december2002-rauber Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ángeles Serrano, M., Maguitman, A.G., Boguñá, M., Fortunato, S., Vespignani, A.: Decoding the structure of the www: a comparative analysis of web crawls. ACM Trans. Web (TWEB) 1(2), 10 (2007). doi: 10.1145/1255438.1255442 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zheng, S., Pavel Dmitriev, C., Giles, L.: Graph-based seed selection for web-scale crawlers. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM, Hong Kong, China, 2–6 November 2009, pp. 1967–1970 (2009)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhu, J.J.H., Meng, T., Xie, Z., Li, G., Li, X.: A teapot graph and its hierarchical structure of the Chinese web. In: WWW, pp. 1133–1134 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thaer Samar
    • 1
  • Myriam C. Traub
    • 1
  • Jacco van Ossenbruggen
    • 1
  • Arjen P. de Vries
    • 2
  1. 1.Centrum Wiskunde & InformaticaAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Radboud UniversityNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations