Does Methodological Superiority Lead the Way for SOF into Cyber Operations?
The author of Chap. 8 addresses direct action from a new, contemporary, and most relevant perspective—he suggests cyber operations might be a conceptually new way to conduct direct action in future conflicts. Further, a new argument is made: the conceptual similarities between direct action and cyber operations make a theoretical foundation to which the concept of relative superiority can be adapted, therefore providing an equally important understanding of cyber operations through “methodological superiority.”
The study shows that special operations theories cannot explain cases of cyber operations. However, the theory has individual elements that might contribute to a theoretical framing of cyber operations. These elements might also be able to support the explanation of offensive cyber operations and make up an element in a cyber theory. This way, cyber operations can find support in the operational focus that can be found in a developed special operations theory.
KeywordsTarget System Special Operation Special Force Internal Logic Physical Risk
- Timothy Franz, The Cyber Warfare Professional: Realizations for Developing the Next Generation (AIR AND SPACE POWER JOURNAL MAXWELL AFB AL, 2011).Google Scholar
- Robert Martinage, Strategy for the Long Haul. Special Operations Forces: Future Challenges and Opportunities (Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2008).Google Scholar
- Robert G. Spulak Jr, “A Theory of Special Operations: The Origin, Qualities, and use of SOF,” No. JSOU-R-07-7 (Sandia National Labs Albuquerque NM, 2007).Google Scholar
- Richard Stiennon, Surviving Cyberwar (Lanham, MD: Government Institutes, 2010).Google Scholar