Advertisement

A Process Model of Invention and the Role of Government, Institutions, and Geography. Anecdotal Evidence from the Aerospace Industry in the Years 1800–1950

  • Ben VermeulenEmail author
  • Daniel Guffarth
Chapter
  • 821 Downloads
Part of the Economic Complexity and Evolution book series (ECAE)

Abstract

We propose a complexity-theoretic model of how invention is an iterative process of design conceptualization, component decomposition, overcoming technical challenges, and absorbing and recombining knowledge. Using this model, we study the technology development over time and space of two historic aerospace inventions (heavier-than-air aircraft and the jet engine), hereby discussing contributions of individual inventors, knowledge flows of various sorts, government interventions, role of institutes, and the moderating role of geographical distance. We find corroboration for iterative, decentralized search among different design paradigms, with inventors engaged in experiments with (configurations of) component technology. We also find evidence for flows across national borders of an accumulating body of technical knowledge ‘shelved’ in books and articles, embodied in inventions, and by public and private communications. Specific institutions played an important role in absorbing and diffusing knowledge, funding research tools, and establishing credibility to the field. Both invention processes feature substantial dynamic inefficiencies because of overlooked ‘shelved’ technological knowledge, late selection of design paradigms, and a lack of an integrated system perspective. We find that national governments did not support fundamental nor experimental research in the early stage, but invested in concrete projects and coordination at a later stage.

Keywords

Wind Tunnel Innovation System Inventive Activity Knowledge Flow Regional Innovation System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ackroyd JAD (2011) Sir George Cayley: the invention of the aeroplane near Scarborough at the time of Trafalgar. J Aeronaut Hist 6:130–181.Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design rules: the power of modularity. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  3. Basalla G (1988) The evolution of technology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Bathelt H, Malmberg A, Maskell P (2004) Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progr Hum Geogr 28(1):31–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baxter WE (2016) Samuel P. Langley: aviation pioneer. http://www.sil.si.edu/ondisplay/langley/part_two.htm. Retrieved 1 Mar 2016
  6. Bijker WE, Hughes TP, Pinch TJ (eds) (1987) The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  7. Boschma R (2005) Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Reg Stud 39:61–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlsson B, Stankiewicz R (1991) On the nature, function, and composition of technological systems. J Evol Econ 1:93–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Champonnois S (2009) Les Wright et l’armée française: les débuts de l’aviation militaire (1900-1909). Revue historique des armées 255:108–121Google Scholar
  10. Chanute O (1894) Opening address by chairman Octave Chanute. In: Proceedings of the international conference on aerial navigation, Chicago, 1–4 Aug 1893. The American Engineer and Railroad Journal, New York, p 9Google Scholar
  11. Clark KB (1985) The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution. Res Policy 14(5):235–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooke P (1992) Regional innovation systems: competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum 23:365–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooke P (2001) Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Ind Corp Chang 10(4):945–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crouch T (2008) Oldies and oddities: where do ailerons come from? Air Space MagGoogle Scholar
  15. Curley R (ed) (2012) The complete history of aviation: from ballooning to supersonic flight. Britannica, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. David EJ (1919) Aircraft: its development in war and peace and its commercial future. University of California LibrariesGoogle Scholar
  17. Dewey AP (1962) Robert Goddard: space pioneer. Little, Brown, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  18. Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res Pol 11(3):147–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flight (1912) The Paris Aero Salon. Flight, 9 November, IV(45):S. 1022–1028Google Scholar
  20. Flight (1920) New air screw. Flight, 6 May, XII(19):S. 487–500Google Scholar
  21. Flight (1929) Editorial comment, 21 March, XXI(12):228Google Scholar
  22. Flight (1944) Two bells, 3 August, p 116Google Scholar
  23. Flottau J (2011) Dünne Luft: Airbus, Boeing und die neuen Herausforderer. Carl Hanser, MunichCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Freeman C (1987) Technology and economic performance: lessons from Japan. Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Frenken K (2006) Innovation, evolution and complexity theory. Edward Elgar, Northampton, MAGoogle Scholar
  26. Galli R, Teubal M (1997) Paradigmatic shifts in national innovation systems. In: Edquist C (ed) Systems of innovation. Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Geels FW (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Pol 31(8):1257–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Geels FW (2006) Major system change through stepwise reconfiguration: a multi-level analysis of the transformation of American factory production (1850–1930). Technol Soc 28:445–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Giampaolo T (2006) The gas turbine handbook: principles and practices, 3rd edn. Fairmont, Lilburn, GAGoogle Scholar
  30. Gibbs-Smith CH (1965) The invention of the aeroplane 1799–1909. Faber and Faber, The University Press, GlasgowGoogle Scholar
  31. Grant RM, Baden-Fuller C (1995) A knowledge-based theory of inter-firm collaboration. Acad Manag Proc 1:17–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Guffarth D (2015) Hartley, Keith: the political economy of aerospace industries: a key driver of growth and international competitiveness? J Evol Econ 25(2):537–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Guffarth D (2016) Ambidextrie in Netzwerken komplexer Produkte. Exploration und Exploitation in der Luftfahrtindustrie. Dissertation, University of HohenheimGoogle Scholar
  34. Hall PA, Soskice D (eds) (2001) Varieties of capitalism. The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  35. Hallion R (2003) Taking flight: inventing the aerial age, from antiquity through the First World War. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Harsch V, Bardrum B, Illig P (2008) Lilienthal’s fatal glider crash in 1896: evidence regarding the cause of death. Aviat Space Environ Med 79:993–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hartley K (2014) The political economy of aerospace industries: a key driver of growth and international competitiveness? Edward Elgar, Northampton, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hekkert MP, Suurs RAA, Negro SO, Kuhlmann S, Smits REHM (2007) Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change. Technol Forecast Soc Change 74(4):413–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation. The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin Sci Q 35:9–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hunley JD (1995) The enigma of Robert H. Goddard. Technol Cult 36(2):327–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jacob PL (1990) Visions of a flying machine, the Wright Brothers and the process of invention. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  42. Kay AL (2002) German jet engine and gas turbine development, 1930-45. Crowood, MarlboroughGoogle Scholar
  43. Kotha S (2010) Spillovers, spill-ins, and strategic entrepreneurship: America’s first commercial jet airplane and Boeing’s ascendancy in commercial aviation. Strat Entrepren J 4(4):284–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lehman M (1988) Robert H. Goddard: pioneer of space research. Da Capo, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Lundvall B-Å (ed) (1992) National systems of innovation. Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. Malerba F (1999) Sectoral systems of innovation and production. In: DRUID conference on: national innovation systems, industrial dynamics and innovation policyGoogle Scholar
  47. Mattison D (2013) Aerial photography. In: Hannavy J (ed) Encyclopedia of nineteenth-century photography. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Meyer PB (2014) An inventive commons: sources of the airplane and its industry. In: Frischmann BM, Madison MJ, Strandburg KJ (eds) Governing knowledge commons. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  49. Miller R, Sawers D (1968) The technical development of modern aviation. Routledge & Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Moon FC (2014) Social networks in the history of invention and innovation. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moret R (2000) Through the sound barrier, a historical and technical survey. PIR reportGoogle Scholar
  52. Murphy JD (2005) Military aircraft, origins to 1918: an illustrated history of their impact. ABC, Santa Barbara, CAGoogle Scholar
  53. Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  54. Niosi J, Zhegu M (2010) Anchor tenants and regional innovation systems: the aircraft industry. Int J Technol Manag 50(263):284Google Scholar
  55. Nooteboom B, VanHaverbeke W, Duysters G, Gilsing V, van den Oord A (2007) Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Res Policy 36(7):1016–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pavelec SM (2010) The jet race and the Second World War. Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, MDGoogle Scholar
  57. Raleigh W (1922) The war in the air. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  58. Roberts BW, Radivojević M (2015) Invention as a process: pyrotechnologies in early societies. Camb Archaeol J 25(1):299–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rose NL (1986) The government’s role in the commercialization of new technologies: lessons for space policy. Working paper. Sloan School of Management, pp 1811–1886Google Scholar
  60. Saxenian A (1994) Regional advantage. Culture and competition in silicon valley and route 128. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  61. Schiffer MB (2005) The devil is in the details: the cascade model of invention processes. Am Antiq 70(3):485–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc Am Phil Soc 106(6):467–482Google Scholar
  63. Streissguth T (1995) Rocket man: the story of Robert Goddard. Lerner, Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
  64. Tissandier G (2014) La Navigation Aérienne. BnF collection ebooksGoogle Scholar
  65. Van Pelt M (2012) Rocketing into the future: the history and technology of rocket planes. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vertesy D, Szirmai A (2010) Interrupted innovation: innovation system dynamics in latecomer aerospace industries. UNU-MERIT working paper 2010-059Google Scholar
  67. Wenham FH (1866) On aerial locomotion and the laws by which heavy bodies impelled through air are sustained, read at the first meeting of the Aeronautical Society of Great Britain, transcript retrieved 20 Mar 2016. http://invention.psychology.msstate.edu/library/Wenham/WenhamLocomotion.html
  68. Wright W (1900) Octave Chanute papers: special correspondence: Wright Brothers, 13 May 1900Google Scholar
  69. Younossi O, Mark VA, Moore RM, Lorell MA, Mason J, Graser JC (2002) Military jet engine acquisition: technology basics and cost-estimating methodology. In: RAND, MR-1596-AF, Santa Monica, CAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of EconomicsUniversität HohenheimStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations