Sustainability Transitions and the Politics of Electricity Planning in South Africa

Chapter
Part of the Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace book series (HSHES, volume 10)

Abstract

After decades of cheap, abundant coal-fired electricity, from which large international mining and energy conglomerates and wealthy households have benefitted disproportionately, South Africa is experiencing a supplyside crisis. In 2011, the country’s first integrated resource plan for electricity (IRP) was promulgated following a prolonged and contested consultation process throughout 2010. This plan anticipates that renewable energy will constitute twenty per cent of installed generation capacity by 2030, which will deliver approximately nine per cent of supply. Coal will retain the greatest share alongside a potential yet currently uncertain nuclear fleet. The objectives of this chapter are twofold: to examine electricity governance in South Africa and the highly politicized policy-making process in relation to IRP in which vested interests have played a major role; and to consider the extent to which the IRP has facilitated a low carbon transition. The chapter finds that despite the creation of a successful renewable energy ‘niche’, the coal-fired ‘regime’ is also being reinforced and the electricity mix under analysis is fuelling an unsustainable trajectory of production and consumption. The chapter also considers definitions of sustainability and concepts of a ‘just’ transition.

Keywords

South Africa sociotechnical transitions electricity integrated resource plan renewable energy coal 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adger, W. Neill; Brown, Katrina; Conway, Declan, 2010: “Progress in global environmental change”, in: Global Environmental Change, 20: 547–549.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, Lucy, 2012: “Power shifts? The political economy of socio-technical transitions in South Africa’s electricity sector” (PhD thesis, University of East Anglia, School of International Development).Google Scholar
  3. Baker, Lucy, 2014: “Renewable Energy in South Africa‘s minerals-energy complex: a ‘low carbon’ transition?”, in: Review of African Political Economy, 42: 245–261.Google Scholar
  4. Baker, Lucy; Newell, Peter; Phillips, Jon, 2014: “The Political Economy of Energy Transitions: The Case of South Africa”, in: New Political Economy, published online, January 2014.Google Scholar
  5. Banerjee, Subhabrata Bobby, 2008: “Corporate Social Responsibility: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly”, in: Critical Sociology 34: 51–79.Google Scholar
  6. Bazilian, Morgan; Rogner, Holger; Howell, Mark; Hermannc, Sebastian; Arentd, Douglas; Gielene, Dolf; Stedutof, Pasquale; Muellerf, Alexander; Komorg, Paul; Tolh, Richard S.J.; Yumkella, Kandeh K., 2011: “Considering the energy, water and food nexus: Towards an integrated modelling approach”, in: Energy Policy, 39, 7896–7906.Google Scholar
  7. Bekker, Bernard; Eberhard, Anton; Gaunt, Trevor; Marquard, Andrew, 2008: “South Africa’s rapid electrification programme: Policy, institutional, planning, financing and technical innovations”, in: Energy Policy, 36: 3125–3137.Google Scholar
  8. Berkhout, Frans; Smith, Adrian; Stirling, Andrew, 2004: “Socio-technical regimes and transition contexts”, in: Elzen, Boelie; Geels, Frank W.; Green, Ken, (Eds): System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability. Theory, Evidence and Policy (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar): 48–75.Google Scholar
  9. Buscher, Bram, 2009: “Connecting political economies of energy in South Africa”, in: Energy Policy 37,10: 3951–3958.Google Scholar
  10. Byrne, Robert; Smith, Adrian; Watson, Jim; Ockwell, David, 2011: “Energy Pathways in Low Carbon Development: from Technology Transfer to Socio-technical Transformation”, STEPS Working Paper 46 (Brighton: STEPS Centre).Google Scholar
  11. Cape Town Chamber of Commerce, 2010: “Comment on IRP 2010, Energy plan may provide for more power than we actually need”, 29 November 2010, at: <http://www.doe-irp.co.za/irpCPT/CAPE_CHAMBER_OF_COMMERCE.pdf>.
  12. CDP [Carbon Disclosure Project], 2011: South Africa JSE 100 Report 2011, Partnering for a low carbon future (Johannesburg: Carbon Disclosure Project).Google Scholar
  13. COSATU, 2012: A just transition to a low-carbon and climate resilient economy, COSATU Policy Framework on Climate Change (Johannesburg: COSATU).Google Scholar
  14. CURES, 2009: Exploring Energy Poverty in South Africa (Midrand: CURES).Google Scholar
  15. DoE, 2010a: Integrated Resource Plan for Electricity, 2010, Revision 2, Report, Draft, 8 (DoE: October); at: <http://www.energy.gov.za/files/media/pr/INTEGRATED_RESOURCE_PLAN_ELECTRICITY_2010.pdf> (20 October 2014).
  16. DoE, 2010b: DOE IRP 2010, Power point presentation at the public hearing, Cape Town (DoE, 29 November); at: <http://www.doe-irp.co.za/irpCPT/DOE_IRP2010_Presnt_Public_Hearings_v2.pdf> (20 October 2014).
  17. DoE, 2010c: Proposed IRP planning process (DoE, 10 May); at: <http://www.doe-irp.co.za/content/Proposed_IRP_Planning_Process.pdf> (20 October 2014).
  18. DoE, 2011a: “Electricity Regulation Act No.4 of 2006, Electricity Regulations on the Integrated Resource Plan 2010–2030 (‘Policy-Adjusted IRP’)”, in: Government Gazette, Pretoria, 6 May).Google Scholar
  19. DoE, 2011b: IRP2: Public hearings and outcomes, Departmental Briefing. Presented to members of the parliamentary portfolio committee on energy (Parliamentary Monitoring Group, 26 January).Google Scholar
  20. Earthlife Africa, 2010: “IRP2 Presentation, Pretoria”, 7 June 2010.Google Scholar
  21. Eberhard, Anton, 2007: “The Political Economy of Power Sector Reform in South Africa”, in: Victor, David; Heller, Thomas C. (Eds.): The Political Economy of Power Sector Reform (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 215–253.Google Scholar
  22. Eberhard, Anton, 2011: “The future of South African coal: market, investment, and policy challenges”, Paper for the Programme on Energy and Sustainable Development, Stanford University, Working paper #100 (Stanford: Stanford University, January).Google Scholar
  23. Eberhard, Anton; Kolker, Joel; Leigland, James, 2014: “South Africa’s Renewable Energy IPP Procurement Program: Success Factors and Lessons” (Washington, DC: World Bank, Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility (PPIAF), May).Google Scholar
  24. Edkins, Max; Marquard, Andrew; Winkler, Harald, 2010: Assessing the effectiveness of national solar and wind energy policies in South Africa (Cape Town: University of Cape Town, Energy Research Centre, June).Google Scholar
  25. EIUG (Energy Intensive User’s Group), 2010: “Comments on the IRP2010 Input Planning Parameters”, Pretoria, 8 June 2010.Google Scholar
  26. Eskom, 2010: On the path to recovery, Integrated Report 2010 (Johannesburg: Eskom).Google Scholar
  27. Eskom, 2013: Integrated Report for the year ended 31 March 2013 (Johannesburg: Eskom).Google Scholar
  28. Eskom Systems Operation and Planning, 2010: IRP 2010 Energy Forecast Revision 2 Report (Johannesburg: Eskom, July).Google Scholar
  29. Fine, Ben; Rustomjee, Zavareh, 1996: The Political Economy of South Africa: From Minerals-Energy-Complex to Industrialisation (London: C. Hurst).Google Scholar
  30. Fine, Ben, 2009: “Engaging the MEC: Or a few of my views on a few things”, in: Transformation: 71: 26–49.Google Scholar
  31. Foxon, Timothy, 2010: “A Co-evolutionary framework for analysing a transition to a sustainable low carbon economy”, Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, Working Paper No. 31 (Leeds—London: Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy).Google Scholar
  32. Geels, Frank W.; Elzen, Boelie; Green, Ken, 2004: “General introduction: system innovation and transitions to sustainability”, in: Elzen, G; Geels, Frank W; Green, K. (Eds.): System innovation and the transition to sustainability: theory evidence and policy (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
  33. Geels, Frank W.; Schot, Johan, 2007: “Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways”, in: Research Policy, 36,3: 399–417.Google Scholar
  34. Geels, Frank W., 2011: “The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms”, in: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1,1: 24–40.Google Scholar
  35. Goldthau, Andreas; Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2012: “The uniqueness of the energy security, justice, and governance problem”, in: Energy Policy, 41: 232–240Google Scholar
  36. Gratwick, Katherine Nawal; Eberhard, Anton, 2008: “Demise of the standard model for power sector reform and the emergence of hybrid power markets”, in: Energy Policy, 36,10: 3948–3960.Google Scholar
  37. Greyling, Lance, 2010: “The role of Parliament in energy oversight, Lance Greyling, MP, Independent Democrats”, in: Baker, Lucy (Ed.), 2011: Sustainable energy solutions for South Africa: Ensuring public participation and improved accountability in policy processes. Conference report of the South African Civil Society Energy Caucus in Cape Town on 14 and 15 September 2010” (Pretoria: Institute for Security Studies).Google Scholar
  38. Grin, John; Rotmans, Jan; Schot, Johan, 2010: “Introduction from persistent problems to system innovation and transitions”, in: Grin, John; Rotmans, Jan; Schot, Johan: Transitions to Sustainable Development, New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change (London: Routledge): 1–11.Google Scholar
  39. Grin, John, 2010: “Understanding transitions from a governance perspective”, in: Grin, John; Rotmans, Jan; Schot, Johan: Transitions to Sustainable Development, New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change (London: Routledge): 223–319.Google Scholar
  40. Hajer, Maarten, 2002: “Discourse analysis and the study of policy making”, in: European political science, 2,1; 61–65.Google Scholar
  41. Hallowes, David; Munnik, Victor, 2007: “Peak Poison: The Elite Energy Crisis and Environmental Justice” (Pietermaritzburg: groundwork).Google Scholar
  42. Ham, Christopher; Hill, Michael, 1993: The Policy Process in the Modern Capitalist State (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf).Google Scholar
  43. Hughes, Thomas Parke, 1983: Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society 18801930 (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
  44. Hughes, Alison, 2010: “IRP 2010 Assumptions” (Cape Town: University of Cape Town, Energy Research Centre, Energy modelling and analysis group, June).Google Scholar
  45. IEA (International Energy Association), 2011: World Energy Outlook (Paris: ORCD/IEA); at: <http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/resources/energydevelopment/accesstoelectricity/> (20 June 2014).
  46. Jasanoff, Sheila, 2003: “Accountability: (No?) Accounting for Expertise”, Science and Public Policy, 30, 152–162.Google Scholar
  47. Keeley, James; Scoones, Ian, 2003: “Knowledge, Power and Politics: Environmental Policy Processes in Africa”, in: Keeley, James; Scoones, Ian (Eds.): Understanding Environmental Policy Processes: Cases from Africa (London: Earthscan).Google Scholar
  48. Lawhon, Mary; Murphy, James T., 2012: “Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions: Insights from political ecology”, in: Progress in Human Geography, 36,3: 354–378.Google Scholar
  49. Leach, Melissa; Scoones, Ian; Stirling, Andrew, 2010: Dynamic Sustainabilities: Technology, Environment, Social Justice (London: Earthscan).Google Scholar
  50. Ljung, Per, 2007: Energy sector reform: strategies for growth, equity and sustainability. (Stockholm, Sida).Google Scholar
  51. McDaid, Liziwe; Austin, Brenda; Bragg, Christy (Eds.), 2010: “Power to the people: raising the voice of civil society in electricity planning—Integrated Resources Plan 2010 inputs and departmental responses” (Cape Town: WWF, South African Faith Communities Environment Institute, Institute for Security Studies, October).Google Scholar
  52. Mainstream Renewable Power, 2010a: “IRP 2 Preliminary Comments, 1st Stakeholder Workshop” by Davin Chown, Director, Pretoria, 7 June 2010 (Mainstream Renewable Power); at: <http://www.doe-irp.co.za/hearing1/MAINSTREAM_REN_POWER.pdf> (20 October 2014).
  53. Mainstream Renewable Power, 2010b: “IRP 2010 comments and inputs, presented to Department of Energy IRP2010 Hearings”, Johannesburg, 2 December 2010 (Mainstream Renewable Power). at: <http://www.doe-irp.co.za/irp-JHB/MAINSTREAM_RENEWABLE_POWER.pdf> (20 October 2014).
  54. McDonald, David (Ed.), 2009: Electric Capitalism: Recolonising Africa on the Power Grid (Cape Town: HSRC Press).Google Scholar
  55. Meadowcroft, James, 2011: “Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions”, in: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1: 70–75.Google Scholar
  56. Meadows, Donella H.; Meadows, Dennis; Randers, Jorgen; Behrens III, William W., 1972: The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind (New York: Universe).Google Scholar
  57. Moe, Espen, 2007: Governance, Growth and Global Leadership (Aldershot: Ashgate). Moe, Espen, 2009: “Mancur Olson and structural economic change”, in: Review of International Political Economy, 16,2: 202–230.Google Scholar
  58. Moe, Espen, 2010: “Energy, industry and politics: Energy, vested interests, and long-term economic growth and development”, in: Energy, 35: 1730–1740.Google Scholar
  59. Nakhooda, Smita, 2011: “Empowering a Sustainability Transition? Electricity Planning in a Carbon Constrained South Africa” (MSc thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science).Google Scholar
  60. Newell, Peter; Mulvaney, Dustin, 2013: “The political economy of the ‘just transition’”, in: The Geographical Journal, 179,2: 132–140.Google Scholar
  61. Ockwell, David; Ely, Adrian; Mallett, Alexandra; Johnson, Oliver, 2009: “Low Carbon Development: the Role of Local Innovative Capabilities”, STEPS Working Paper 31 (Brighton: STEPS Centre & Sussex Energy Group, SPRU, University of Sussex).Google Scholar
  62. Pienaar, Gary; Nakhooda, Smita, 2010: “The great policy disconnect”, Heinrich Boell Stiftung Southern Africa, Cape Town.Google Scholar
  63. PC Energy (Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Energy), 2010: Meeting of the Energy Portfolio Committee: Committee Programme & Outstanding Reports, Parliamentary Monitoring Group, 1 June 2010.Google Scholar
  64. Peters, Dipuo, 2010: “Letter from the Minister of Energy to Ms. Samantha Bailey of 350.org South Africa, regarding the Integrated Resource Plan for Electricity”, 21 June 2010.Google Scholar
  65. Prasad, Gisela, 2008: “Energy sector reform, energy transitions and the poor in Africa”, in: Energy Policy, 36,8: 2806–2811.Google Scholar
  66. Rip, Arie; Kemp, Rene, 1998: “Technological Change”, in: Rayner, S.; Malone, E.; Columbus, L., in: Human Choice and Climate Change volume 2: Resources and Technology (city: OH, Battelle Press).Google Scholar
  67. Roberts, J. Timmons; Parks, Bradley C, 2007: A Climate of Injustice (London: The MIT Press).Google Scholar
  68. Rockstrom, Johan; Steffen, Will; Noone, Kevin; Persson, Asa; Chapin, F. Stuart; Lambin, Eric F.; Lenton, Timothy M.; Scheffer, Marten; Folke, Carl; Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim; Nykvist, Bjorn; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Hughes, Terry; van der Leeuw, Sander; Rodhe, Henning; Sorlin, Sverker; Snyder, Peter K.; Costanza, Robert; Svedin, Uno; Falkenmark, Malin; Karlberg, Louise; Corell, Robert W.; Fabry, Victoria J.; Hansen, James; Walker, Brian; Liverman, Diana; Richardson, Katherine; Crutzen, Paul; Foley, Jonathan A., 2009b: “A safe operating space for humanity”, in: Nature, 461,24 (September): 472–475.Google Scholar
  69. Sappi, 2010: Sappi Presentation at the IRP 2010 Stakeholder function, 7 June 2010.Google Scholar
  70. Scrase, Ivan; Smith, Adrian, 2009: “The (non-)politics of managing low carbon socio-technical transitions”, in: Environmental Politics, 18: 707–726.Google Scholar
  71. Smith, Adrian; Stirling, Andrew; Berkhout, Frans, 2005: “The Governance of Sustainable Socio-Technical Transitions” in: Research Policy, 34: 1491–1510.Google Scholar
  72. Swilling, Mark; Annecke, Eve, 2012: Just Transitions: Explorations of Sustainability in an Unfair World (South Africa: UCT Press).Google Scholar
  73. Torgerson, Douglas, 2003: “Democracy through policy discourse”, in: Hajer, Maarten A.; Wagenaar, Hendrik (Ed.): Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  74. Victor, David; Heller, Thomas C. (Ed.), 2007: The Political Economy of Power Sector Reform, (New York—Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  75. Wamukonya, Njeri, 2003: “Power sector reform in developing countries: mismatched agendas”, in: Energy Policy, 31,2: 1273–1289.Google Scholar
  76. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development), 1987: Our Common Future (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  77. Weischer, Lutz; Wood, Davida; Ballesteros, Athena; Fu-Bertaux, Xing, 2011: Grounding green power, bottom-up perspectives on smart renewable energy policy in developing countries. Climate and Energy Paper series (Washington DC: German Marshall Fund of the United States—World Resources Institute—Heinrich Boll Stiftung).Google Scholar
  78. Wildavsky, Aaron, 1979: Speaking truth to power: the art and craft of policy analysis, (Canada: Little Brown and Company).Google Scholar
  79. WWF South Africa, 2010: 50% renewable energy for a just transition to sustainable electricity supply through low carbon re-industrialisation. Living Planet Unit Climate Change Programme, IRP2 input, 7 June 2010.Google Scholar
  80. Yi-chong, Xu, 2006: “The myth of the single solution: electricity reforms and the World Bank”, in: Energy 31,6–7: 802–814.Google Scholar
  81. Ziramba, Emmanuel, 2009: “Disaggregate energy consumption and industrial production in South Africa”, in: Energy Policy, 37,6: 2214–2220.Google Scholar

Other Literature

  1. Statistics South Africa, 2012: Quarterly Labour Force Survey, Quarter 4, 2012, 7 February 2012; at: <http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0211/P02114thQuarter2011.pdf> (20 March 2012). The Presidency, Republic of South Africa, 2009: Development Indicators 2009; at: <http://www.thepresidency.gov.za/learning/me/indicators/2009/indicators.pdf> (22 August 2011).

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Science Policy Research UnitUniversity of SussexFalmerUK

Personalised recommendations