Abstract
Since its emergence as a theory of sustainability transformation, transitions theory has started to gain currency with both policymakers and researchers. As transitions approaches become established in research and policy, a process of institutionalization can be witnessed. Yet notwithstanding this mainstreaming, transitions theory continues to be controversial. Questions have been raised about its theorization of agency and transformation dynamics, and especially about the normative assumptions underlying its intervention strategies. Arguably, these recurring questions call for ‘critical approaches’ to transitions theory. This contribution explores these, guided by a constructive attitude. The argument starts from the consideration that transitions theory harboursdistinctly ‘critical’ elements, and that polemical juxtapositions between critical and uncritical transitions approaches are unnecessary: What are the critical contents of transitions theory? How can the critical contents of transitions theory be retained and developed further? These questions are answered through a historical comparison with the critical-theoretical project as initiated by Marx, Horkheimer and Adorno, amongst others.As with transitions studies, this project was meant to diagnose the social problems of its time, and to articulate corresponding remedial strategies. It ran into various internal contradictions, however, and these provide useful insights for the further development of critical transitions. The main conclusion is that transitions theory is well equipped to deal with these critical-theoretical paradoxes, but also displays tendencies towards relapsing into the pitfalls.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Avelino, Flor, 2009: “Empowerment and the challenge of applying transition management to ongoing projects”, in: Policy Science, 42,4: 369–390.
Avelino, Flor, 2011: “Power in Transition: Empowering Discourses on Sustainability Transitions” (PhD dissertation, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Dutch Research Institute for Transitions).
Avelino, Flor; Grin, John, 2014: “Beyond Deconstruction. A Reconstructivist Perspective on Sustainability Transition Governance”, paper for the Fifth International Conference on Sustainability Transitions, 27–29 August 2014, Utrecht.
Beck, Ulrich; Bonns, Wolfgang; Lau, Christoph, 2003: “The theory of reflexive modernization: problematic, hypotheses and research programme”, in: Theory, culture & society, 20, 2: 1–33.
Berkhout, Frans; Smith, Adrian; Stirling, Andy, 2004: “Socio-technological regimes and transition contexts”, in: Elzen, Boelie; Geels, Frank; Green, Ken (Eds.), 2004: System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence, and Policy (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar): 48–75.
Berkhout, Frans, 2006: “Normative Expectations in Systems Innovation”, in: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18,3–4: 299–311.
Chilvers, Jason; Longhurst, Noel, 2013: Participation in Transition(s): Emergent engagement, politics and actor dynamics in low carbon energy transitions (University of East Anglia, Norwich: Science, Society and Sustainability Research Group).
Cohen, Maurie, 2010: “Destination Unknown: Pursuing Sustainable Mobility in the Face of Rival Societal Aspirations”, in: Research Policy, 39,4: 459–470.
Coenen, Lars; Benneworth, Paul; Truffer, Bernhard, 2012: “Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions”, in: Research Policy, 41,6: 968–979.
De Haan, Hans, 2010: “Towards Transition Theory” (PhD dissertation, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Dutch Research Institute For Transitions).
Duineveld, Martijn; Beunen, Raoul; van Ark, R.; van Assche, Kris; During, Roel, 2008: The difference between knowing the path and walking the path: een essay over het terugkerend maakbaarheidsdenken in beleidsonderzoek (Wageningen: Leerstoelgroep Sociaal-ruimtelijke Analyse Wageningen Universiteit).
Elzen, Boelie; Geels, Frank; Green, Ken (Eds.), 2004: System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence, and Policy (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
Eshuis, Jasper; Spekkink, Wouter; Loorbach, Derk; Roorda, Chris; Stuiver, Marian; van Steenbergen, Frank, 2012: “Challenges and Tensions in Area Based Transitions”, Paper for the Seventh International Conference in Interpretive Policy Analysis, Tilburg, NED, 5–7 July.
Farla, Jacco; Markard, Jochen; Raven, Rob; Coenen, Lars, 2012: “Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources; in: Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 79,6: 991–998.
Foucault, Michel, 1998: “Two Lectures”, in Kelly, Michael (Ed.): Critique and Power: recasting the Foucault/Habermas debate (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press): 17–46.
Geels, Frank, 2005a: Technological Transitions and System Innovations: A Co-evolutionary and Socio-Technical Analysis (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
Geels, Frank, 2005b: “The dynamics of transitions in sociotechnical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930)”, in: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17,4: 445–476.
Geels, Frank; Kemp, Rene; Dudley, Geoff; Lyons, Glenn (Eds.), 2012: Automobility in transition? A sociotechnical analysis of sustainable transport (Routledge: London).
Geels. Frank; Schot, Johan, 2007: “Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways”, in: Research Policy, 36,3: 399–417.
Geels, Frank, 2010: “Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective”, in: Research Policy, 39,4: 495–510.
Geels, Frank; Penna, Caetano 2014: “Societal problems and industry reorientation: Elaborating the Dialectic Issue LifeCycle (DILC) model and a case study of car safety in the USA (1900–1995)”, in: Research Policy, 2014.
Geels, Frank, 2014: “Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: Introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective”, in: Theory, Culture & Society, 31,5: 21–40
Genus, Audley; Coles, Anne-Marie 2008: “Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions”, in: Research Policy 37, 9: 1436–1445.
Grin, John, 2010: “Understanding Transitions from a Governance Perspective” in: Grin, John; Rotmans Jan; Schot, Johan (Eds.), Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change (New York: Routledge): 221–319.
Grin, John; Rotmans, Jan; Schot, John (Eds.), 2010: Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change (New York: Routledge).
Habermas, Jurgen, 1998: “Some Questions Concerning the Theory of Power: Foucault again”, in: Kelly, Michael (Ed.): Critique and Power: recasting the Foucault/Habermas debate (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press): 79–107.
Hargreaves, Tom; Haxeltine, Alex; Longhurst, Noel; Seyfang, Gill., 2011: Sustainability transitions from the bottom-up: Civil society, the multi-level perspective and practice theory, Norwich: CSERGE Working Paper 2011-0.1.
Haxeltine, Alex; Whitmarsh, Lorraine; Bergman, Noam; Rotmans, Jan; Schilperoord, Michel; Kohler, Jonathan, 2008: “A Conceptual Framework for transition modelling”, in: .International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 3,1: 93–114.
Hess, David J., 2014: “Sustainability transitions: A political coalition perspective”, in: Research Policy, 43,2: 278–283.
Hekkert, Marko; Suurs, Roald; Negro, Simona; Kuhlmann, Stefan; Smits, Ruud, 2007: “Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change”, in: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74,4: 413–432.
Hendriks, Carolyn, 2009: “Policy design without democracy? Making democratic sense of transition management”, in: Policy Science, 42,4: 341–368.
Hodson, Mike; Marvin, Simon, 2010: “Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were?”, in: Research Policy, 39,4: 77–485.
Honneth, Axel, 1991: The critique of power: Reflective Stages in a Critical Social Theory (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).
Honneth, Axel, 1996: “Pathologies of the Social: The Past and Present of Social Philosophy”, in: Rasmussen, David (Ed.): The Handbook of Critical Theory (Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell): 369–396.
Horkheimer, Max; Adorno, Theodor, 1947, 2002: Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments (Stanford: University Press).
Jhagroe, Shivant; Loorbach, Derk, 2014: “See no evil, hear no evil: The democratic potential of transition management”, in: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions; at: <doi:10.1016/j.eist.2014.07.001>.
Jorgensen, Ulrik, 2012: “Mapping and navigating transitions—The multi-level perspective compared with arenas of development”, in: Research Policy, 41: 996–1010.
Kelly, Michael. (Ed.), 1998: Critique and Power: recasting the Foucault/Habermas debate (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).
Kemp, Rene; Schot, Johan; Hoogma, Remco, 1998: “Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management“, in: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10,2: 175–198.
Kemp, Rene; Rotmans, Jan, 2009: “Transitioning policy: coproduction of a new strategic framework for energy innovation policy in the Netherlands”, in: Policy Sciences, 42,4: 303–322.
Kenis, Anneleen; Mathijs, Erik, 2014: “(De)politicising the local: The case of the Transition Towns movement in Flanders (Belgium)”, in: Journal of Rural Studies, 34: 172–183.
Kern, Florian; Howlett, Michael, 2009: “Implementing transition management as policy reforms: a case study of the Dutch energy sector”, in: Policy Sciences, 42,4: 391–408.
Latour, Bruno, 2004: “Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern”, in: Critical Inquiry, 30,2: 225–248.
Loorbach, Derk, 2007: Transition Management: New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development (Utrecht: International Books).
Loorbach, Derk; Rotmans, Jan, 2010: “The practice of transition management: Examples and lessons from four distinct cases”, in: Futures, 42: 237–246.
Loorbach, Derk, 2010: “Transition Management for Sustainable Development: A Prescriptive, Complexity-Based Governance Framework”, in: Governance, 23,1: 161–183.
Luhmann, Niklas, 1990, “Ich sehe was, was Du nicht siehst”, in: Soziologische Aufklärung, 1990,5: 228–234.
Luhmann, Niklas, 2002: Theories of distinction: redescribing the descriptions of modernity (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
Maassen, Anne, 2012: “Heterogeneity of Lock-In and the Role of Strategic Technological Interventions in Urban Infrastructural Transformations”, in: European Planning Studies, 20,3: 441–460.
Markard, Jochen; Raven, Rob; Truffer, Bernhard, 2012: “Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects”, in: Research Policy, 41,6: 955–967.
McCarthy, Thomas, 1998: “The Critique of Impure Reason: Foucault and the Frankfurt School”, in: Kelly, Michael (Ed.): Critique and Power: recasting the Foucault/Habermas debate (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press): 243–282.
Meadowcroft, John, 2009: “What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions”, in: Policy Science 42,4: 323–340.
Paredis, Erik, 2008: Transition management in Flanders. Policy context, first results and surfacing tensions (Ghent: Ghent University, Centre for Sustainable Development and Flemish Policy Research Centre on Sustainable Development).
Pel, Bonno; Boons, Frank, 2010: “Transition through subsystem innovation? The case of traffic management”, in: Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 77,8: 1249–1259.
Pel, Bonno, 2012a: “System innovation as Synchronization: innovation attempts in the Dutch traffic management field” (PhD dissertation, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Department of Public Administration).
Pel, Bonno, 2012b: “Reflection on transition management: mobility policy between integration and differentiation”, in: Shiftan, Yoram; Stead, Dominic; Geerlings, Harry (Eds.), Transition towards Sustainable Mobility: the Role of Instruments, Individuals and Institutions (Farnham: Ashgate): 53–69.
Pel, Bonno, 2014: “Interactive Metal Fatigue: a conceptual contribution to Social Critique in Mobilities Research”, in: Mobilities, No.,Issue: 1–19.
Rasmussen, David (Ed.), 1996: The Handbook of Critical Theory (Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell).
Raven, Rob; Verbong, Geert, 2007: “Multi-Regime Interactions in the Dutch Energy Sector: The Case of Combined Heat and Power in the Netherlands 1970–2000”, in: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19,4: 491–507.
Raven, Rob; Verbong, Geert, 2009: “Boundary Crossing Innovations: Case studies from the energy domain”, in: Technology in Society, 31: 85–93.
Raven, Rob; Verbong, Geert; Schilpzand, Wouter; Witkamp, Marten, 2011: “Translation mechanisms in socio-technicalniches: a case study of Dutch river management”, in: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23,10: 1063–1078.
Raven, Rob; Schot, Johan; Berkhout, Frans, 2012: “Space and scale in socio-technical transitions”, in: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2012,4: 63–78.
Riddell, Darcy; Westley, Frances, 2013: “Mutual Reinforcement Dynamics and Sustainability Transitions: Civil Society’s Role in Influencing Canadian Forest Sector Transition”, Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Sustainability Transitions, Zurich, SUI, 19–21 June 2013.
Rip, Arie, 2006, “A co-evolutionary approach to reflexive governance—and its ironies”, in: Vos, Jan-Peter; Bauknecht, Dierk; Kemp, Rene (Eds.): Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar): 82–100.
Ropke, Inge, 2012: “The unsustainable directionality of innovation—The example of the broadband transition”, in: Research Policy, 41,9: 1631–1642.
Rosa, Hartmut, 2012: Weltbeziehungen im Zeitalter der Beschleunigung—Umrisse einer neuen Gesellschaftskritik (Berlin: Suhrkamp).
Rotmans, Jan, 2006: Societal Innovation: Between dream and reality lies complexity (Rotterdam: Erasmus University).
Schot, Johan; Geels, Frank, 2008: “Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy”, in: Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 20,5: 537–554.
Schuitmaker, Tjerk Jan, 2012: “Identifying and unravelling persistent problems”, in: Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 79,6: 1021–1031.
Seyfang, Gill; Haxeltine, Alex, 2012: “Growing Grassroots Innovations: Exploring the role of community-based social movements in sustainable energy transitions”, in: Environment and Planning C, 30,3: 381–40
Shove, Elisabeth, 2004: “Sustainability, system innovation and the laundry”, in: Elzen, Boelie; Geels, Frank; Green, Ken (Eds.), 2004: System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence, and Policy (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar): 76–94.
Shove, Elisabeth; Walker, Gordon, 2007: “CAUTION! Transitions ahead: politics, practice, and sustainable transition management”, in: Environment and Planning A, 39,4: 763–770.
Shove, Elisabeth; Walker, Gordon, 2008: “Transition Management™ and the politics of shape shifting” in: Environment and Planning A, 40, 4: 1012–1014.
Shove, Elisabeth, 2012: “The Shadowy Side of Innovation: Unmaking and Sustainability”, in: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24,4: 363–375.
Smith, Adrian; Vos, Jan-Peter; Grin, John, 2010: “Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges”, in: Research Policy 39, 4: 435–448.
Smith, Adrian; Stirling, Andy, 2008, Social-ecological resilience and socio-technical transitions: critical issues for sustainability governance (Brighton: STEPS Centre).
Smith, Adrian; Stirling, Andy, 2010: “The politics of socialecological resilience and sustainable socio-technical transitions”, in: Ecology and Society, 15,1, article 11. [we need the pages]
Smith, Adrian; Raven, Rob, 2012: “What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability”, in: Research Policy, 41: 1025–1036.
Spath, Philipp; Rohracher, Harald, 2012: “‘Energy regions’: The transformative power of regional discourses on socio-technical futures”, in: Research Policy, 39,4: 49–458.
Stirling, Andy, 2009: Direction, Distribution and Diversity! Pluralising Progress in Innovation, Sustainability and Development (Brighton: STEPS Centre).
Stirling, Andy, 2011: “Pluralising progress: From integrative transitions to transformative diversity”, in: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1,1: 82–88.
Turnheim, Bruno; Geels, Frank, 2013: “The destabilisation of existing regimes: Confronting a multi-dimensional framework with a case study of the British coal industry (1913–1967)”, in: Research Policy, 42,10: 1749–1767.
Ulrich, Werner, 2003: “Beyond methodology choice: critical systems thinking as critically systemic discourse”, in: Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54,3: 325–342.
Unger, Roberto M., 1987: False Necessity: Anti-necessitarian Social Theory in the Service of Radical Democracy (Cambridge: University Press).
Van der Brugge, Rutger; van Raak, Roel, 2007: “Facing the adaptive management challenge: insights from transition management”, in: Ecology & Society, 12,2: 33.
Vos, Jan-Peter; Bauknecht, Dierk; Kemp, Rene (Eds.), 2006: Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
Vos, Jan-Peter; Smith, Adrian; Grin, John, 2009: “Designing long-term policy: Rethinking transition management”, in: Policy Sciences, 42,4: 275–302.
Wells, Peter; Nieuwenhuis, Paul, 2012: “Transition failure: Understanding continuity in the automotive industry”, in: Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 79,9:1681–1692.
Westley, Frances; Olssen, Per; Folke, Carl; Homer-Dixon, Thomas; Vredenburg, Harrie; Loorbach, Derk; Thompson, John; Nilsson, Mans; Lambin, Eric; Sendzimir, Jan; Banerjee, Banny; Galaz, Victor; Van der Leeuw, Sander, 2011, “Tipping towards sustainability: Emerging pathways of transformation”, in: AMBIO, A journal of the human environment, 40,7: 762–780.
Wieczorek, Anna; Hekkert, Marko, 2012: “Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: A framework for policy makers and innovation scholars”, in: Science and Public Policy, 39: 74–87.
Young, Iris, 1990, Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton: University Press).
Zijlstra, Toon; Avelino, Flor, 2012: “A Socio-Spatial Perspective on the Car Regime”, in: Geels, Frank; Kemp, Rene; Dudley, Geoff; Lyons, Glenn (Eds.): Automobility in transition? A sociotechnical analysis of sustainable transport (Routledge: London): 153–170.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pel, B., Avelino, F.R., Jhagroe, S.S. (2016). Critical Approaches to Transitions Theory. In: Brauch, H., Oswald Spring, Ú., Grin, J., Scheffran, J. (eds) Handbook on Sustainability Transition and Sustainable Peace . Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43884-9_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43884-9_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43882-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43884-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)