Advertisement

Sustainability and Complexity: A Few Lessons from Modern Systems Thinking

  • Czesław MesjaszEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace book series (HSHES, volume 10)

Abstract

Sustainable development, sustainability and sustainability transition are associated with the growing complexity of sociopolitical systems and ecological systems, and of their interactions. These concepts are becoming even more intricate since in academic considerations and in policy-making the concept of complexity is not precisely defined. The term complexity usually relates to a special class of non-linear mathematical models which are relevant to phenomena described with characteristics measurable in the ratio scale which occur in nature and in social systems. It is also used as analogy and metaphor. The aim of this chapter is to identify and to assess the applications of the concepts deriving from complexity studies in the discourse on sustainability and sustainable development and on related terms—transition to sustainability and management of transition to sustainability. The main hypothesis of the chapter is that a sophisticated language dealing with complexity and applied in the narratives on sustainability and related ideas requires a profounder clarification so as to provide new insights concerning description, explanation of causal links, prediction, normative approach and influence upon societal phenomena.

Keywords

Complexity sustainable development sustainability transition transition management 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, William M., 2006: “The Future of Sustainability: RethinkingEnvironment and Development in the TwentyfirstCentury”, Report of the IUCN Renowned ThinkersMeeting, 29-31 January; at: <http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/iucn_future_of_sustanability.pdf> (27 August 2014).
  2. Anand, Sudhir; Sen Amartya, 2000: “Human Development and Economic Sustainability”, in: World Development, 28,12: 2029–2049.Google Scholar
  3. Ashby, W. Ross, 1963: An Introduction to Cybernetics (New York: Wiley).Google Scholar
  4. Bak, Per, 1996: How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality (New York: Springer).Google Scholar
  5. Barabasi, Albert-Laszlo, Albert Reka, 1999: “Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks”, in: Science, 286,5439 (October): 509–512.Google Scholar
  6. Barabasi, Albert-Laszlo, 2003: Linked. How Everything is Connected to Everything Else and What It Means for Business, Science, and Everyday Life (New York: Penguin).Google Scholar
  7. Bar-Yam, Yaneer, 1997: Dynamics of Complex Systems (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).Google Scholar
  8. Baudrillard, Jean, 1994: Simulacra and Simulation (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
  9. Bauman, Zygmunt, 2000: Liquid Modernity (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
  10. Beck, Ulrich; Giddens, Anthony; Lash, Scott, 1994: Reflexive Modernization. Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
  11. Bednarz, John, jr., 1984: “Complexity and Intersubjectivity: Towards the Theory of Niklas Luhmann”, in: Human Studies, 7,1/4: 55–69.Google Scholar
  12. Bell, David E.; Raiffa, Howard; Tversky, Amos (Eds.), 1988: Decision Making: Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Interactions (Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  13. Bertalanffy, Ludvig von, 1968: General Systems Theory (New York: Braziller).Google Scholar
  14. Beer, Stafford, 1979: The Heart of Enterprise (London–New York: John Wiley).Google Scholar
  15. Biggiero, Lucio, 2001: “Sources of Complexity”, in: Human Systems, Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology and LifeSciences, 5,1 (January): 3–19.Google Scholar
  16. Brekke, Kjell Arne, 1997: Economic Growth and the Environment: On the Measurement of Income and Welfare (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
  17. Bratland, John, 2006: “Toward a Calculational Theory and Policy of Intergenerational Sustainability”, in: The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 9,2 (Summer): 13–45.Google Scholar
  18. Camaren, Peter; Swilling, Mark, 2014: “Linking Complexityand Sustainability Theories: Implications for Modeling Sustainability Transitions”, in: Sustainability, 6,3 (March), 1594–1622.Google Scholar
  19. Campbell, David K., 1987: “Nonlinear Science. From Paradigms to Practicalities”, in: Los Alamos Science, 15, Special Issue, Stanislaw Ulam: 218–262; at: <http://library.lanl.gov/cgi-bin/getfile?00285753.pdf > (17 June 2007).
  20. Capra, Fritjof, 1982: The Turning Point. Science, Society, and the Rising Culture (New York: Bantam Books).Google Scholar
  21. Carroll, Tim; Burton, Richard M., 2000: “Organizations and Complexity: Searching for the Edge of Chaos”, in: Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 6,4 December): 319–337.Google Scholar
  22. Castellani, Brian, 2014: “Brian Castellani on the Complexity Sciences”, Theory, Culture & Society, blog, 9 October; at: <http://theoryculturesociety.org/brian-castellani-onthe-complexity-sciences/> (20 November 2014).
  23. Chaitin Gregory J., 2001: Exploring Randomness (London: Springer).Google Scholar
  24. Chichilnisky, Graciela, 1997: “What is sustainable development?”, in: Land Economics 73,4: 467–491.Google Scholar
  25. Cilliers, Paul, 2008: “Complexity Theory as a GeneralFramework for Sustainability Science”, in: Burns, Michael; Weaver, Alex (Eds.): Exploring Sustainability Science: A Southern African Perspective (Stellenbosch: Sun Press): 39–57.Google Scholar
  26. Cowan, George A.; Pines, David; Meltzer, David (Eds.), 1994: Complexity, Metaphors, Models, and Reality. Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity Proceedings, vol. 19 (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley).Google Scholar
  27. Diamond, Jared, 1997: Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies (New York: W. W. Norton).Google Scholar
  28. Diamond, Jared, 2005: Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed (New York: Viking Press).Google Scholar
  29. Dobuzinskis, Laurent, 1992: “Modernist and Postmodernist Metaphors of the Policy Process: Control and Stability vs. Chaos and Reflexive Understanding”, in: Policy Sciences, 25,4 (November): 355–380.Google Scholar
  30. Elkington, John, 1997: Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of Twenty-First Century Business (Oxford: Capstone).Google Scholar
  31. Espinosa, Angela; Harnden, Roger; Walker Jon, 2008: “A Complexity Approach to Sustainability—Stafford Beer Revisited”, in: European Journal of Operational Research, 187,2 (June): 636–651.Google Scholar
  32. Espinosa, Angela; Porter, Terry, 2011: “Sustainability, Complexity and Learning: Insights from Complex Systems Approaches”, in: The Learning Organization, 18,1: 54–72.Google Scholar
  33. Espinosa, Angela; Walker, Jon, 2011: A Complexity Approach to Sustainability: Theory and Application. Series on Complexity Science (London: Imperial College Press).Google Scholar
  34. Faber, Albert; Alkemade, Floortje, 2011: “Success or Failure of Sustainability Transition Policies. A Framework for the Evaluation and Assessment of Policies in Complex Systems”, Paper for the DIME (Dynamics of Institutions & Markets) Final Conference, Maastricht, 6–8 April.Google Scholar
  35. Figuieres, Charles; Guyomard, Herve; Rotillon, Gilles, 2010: “Sustainable Development: Between Moral Injunctions and Natural Constraints”, in: Sustainability, 2,11: 3608–3622.Google Scholar
  36. Foucault, Michel, 2007: Security, Territory, Population. Lectures at the Collège de France 19771978 (New York: Picador/Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
  37. Foerster, von Heinz, 1982: Observing Systems (Seaside, CA: Intersystems Publications).Google Scholar
  38. Geels, Frank W., 2010: “Ontologies, Socio-Technical Transitions (to Sustainability), and the Multi-Level Perspective”, in: Research Policy, 39,4, 495–510.Google Scholar
  39. Geels, Frank W., Schot Johan, 2007: “Typology of Sociotechnical Transition Pathways”, in: Research Policy, 36,3: 399–417.Google Scholar
  40. Gell-Mann, Murray, 1994: “Complex Adaptive Systems”, in: Cowan George A.; Pines, David; Meltzer, David (Eds.): Complexity, Metaphors, Models, and Reality, Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity Proceedings, vol. 19 (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley): 17–45.Google Scholar
  41. Gell-Mann, Murray, 1995: “What is Complexity?”, in: Complexity, 1,1: 16–19.Google Scholar
  42. Gillespie, Alex; Cornish, Flora, 2009: “Intersubjectivity: Towards a Dialogical Analysis”, in: Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 40,1: 19–46.Google Scholar
  43. Glazersfeld, Ernst, von, 1995: Radical Constructivism: A New Way of Knowing and Learning, (London: The Farmer Press).Google Scholar
  44. Gleick, James, 1987: Chaos: The Making of a New Science (New York: Viking Press).Google Scholar
  45. Goergen, Marc; Malline, Christine; Mitleton-Kelly, Eve; Al-Hawamdeh, Ahmed; Hse-Yu Chiu, Iris, 2010: Corporate Governance and Complexity Theory (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
  46. Gold, Mary V., 2007; “Alternative Farming Systems Information Center, National Agricultural Library”, in: US Department of Agriculture; at: <http://afsic.nal.usda.gov/sustainable-agriculture-definitions-and-terms>.
  47. Grin, John; Rotmans, Jan; Schot Johan, in collaboration with Geels, Frank; Loorbach, Derk, 2010: Transitions to Sustainable Development. New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  48. Haken, Hermann, 2004: Synergetics. Introduction and Advanced Topics (Berlin: Springer).Google Scholar
  49. Hawken, Paul, 1993: The Ecology of Commerce. A Declaration of Sustainability (New York: Harper Business).Google Scholar
  50. Hawken, Paul 2007: Blessed Unrest: How the Largest Movement in the World Came Into Being and Why No One Saw It Coming (New York: Penguin).Google Scholar
  51. Heal, Geoffrey, 1998: Valuing the Future: Economic Theory and Sustainability (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
  52. Holland, John D., 1995: Hidden Order. How Adaptation Builds Complexity (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
  53. Holland, John D., 2006: “Studying Complex Adaptive Systems”, in: Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 19,1: 1–8Google Scholar
  54. Homer-Dixon, Thomas, 2002: The Ingenuity Gap. Facing the Economic, Environmental, and Other Challenges of an Increasingly Complex and Unpredictable World (New York: Vintage Books).Google Scholar
  55. Husserl, Edmund, 1970: The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).Google Scholar
  56. Ilachinski, Andrew, 1996: Land Warfare and Complexity, Part I: Mathematical Background and Technical Sourcebook (Alexandria, VA: Center for Naval Analyses); at: <http://www.cna.org/isaac/lw1.pdf> (4 September 2006).
  57. IISD (International Institute for Sustainable Development), 2009: “The Sustainable Development Timeline”; at: <http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2009/sd_timeline_2009.pdf> (13 February 2014).
  58. IUCN/UNEP/WWF, 1991, Caring for the Earth: A Strategy for Sustainable Living (Gland, Switzerland: IUCN: The World Conservation Union—UNEP: United Nations Environment Programme—WWF: Worldwide Fund for Nature); at: <https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/CFE-003.pdf> (16 April 2012).
  59. James, Paul, 2015: Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice. Circles of Sustainability (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  60. Jenks, Chris; Smith, John, 2006: Qualitative Complexity: Ecology, Cognitive Processes and the Re-Emergence of Structure in Post-Humanist Social Theory (London—New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  61. Jessop, Bob, 2004: “Multi-level Governance and Multi-level Meta-governance”, in: Bache Ian; Flinders Matthew (Eds.): Multi-Level Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 49–74.Google Scholar
  62. Kahneman, Daniel, Tversky, Amos, 1979: “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk”, in: Econometrica, 47,2: 263–292.Google Scholar
  63. Kates, Robert W.; Clark, William C.; Corell, Robert; Hall, J. Michael; Jaeger, Carlo C.; Lowe, Ian; McCarthy, James J.; Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim; Bolin, Bert; Dickson, Nancy M.; Faucheux, Sylvie; Gallopin, Gilberto C.; Grubler, Arnulf; Huntley, Brian; Jager, Jill; Jodha, Narpat S.; Kasperson, Roger E.; Mabogunje, Akin; Matson, Pamela; Mooney, Harold; Berrien, Moore III; O’Riordan, Timothy; Svedin, Uno, 2001: “Environment and Development—Sustainability Science”, in: Science 292,5517 (April): 641–642.Google Scholar
  64. Kauffman, Stuart A., 1993: The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  65. Kauffman, Stuart A., 1995: At Home in the Universe. The Search for Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  66. Klasen, Stephan, 2006: “UNDP’s Gender-Related Measures: Some Conceptual Problems and Possible Solutions”, in: Journal of Human Development, 7,2 (July): 243–274.Google Scholar
  67. Kooiman, Jan, (2003): Governing as Governance (Newbury Park, CA: Sage).Google Scholar
  68. Kotter, John P., 1995: “Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail”, in: Harvard Business Review, 73,2 (March–April): 59–67.Google Scholar
  69. Lakoff, George; Johnson, Mark, 1980, 1999: Metaphors We Live By (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  70. Lakoff, George, 1993: “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor”, in: Ortony, Andrew (Ed.): Metaphor and Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 202–251.Google Scholar
  71. Laszlo, Aleksander, 2003: “Evolutionary Systems Design: A Praxis for Sustainable Development”, in: Organisational Transformation and Social Change, 1,1 (March): 29–46.Google Scholar
  72. Levin, Simon A., 2006. “Learning to Live in a Global Commons: Socioeconomic Challenges for a Sustainable Environment”, in: Ecological Research, Special Feature, 21,3: 328–333.Google Scholar
  73. Leydesdorff, Loet, 2001: A Sociological Theory of Communication: The Self-Organization of the Knowledge-Based Society (Universal Publishers/uPUBLISHCOM, USA).Google Scholar
  74. Lloyd, Seth, 2001: “Measures of Complexity: A Nonexhaustive List”, in: IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 21,4: 7–8.Google Scholar
  75. Loorbach, Derk A., 2007: “Transition Management. New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development” (PhD thesis, Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam); at: <repub.eur.nl/pub/10200/proefschrift.pdf> (14 June 2013).Google Scholar
  76. Loorbach, Derk, 2008: “Why and How Transition Management Emerges”, Paper for the Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, Berlin 22–23 February; at: <http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/ffu/akumwelt/bc2008/papers/bc2008_393_Loorbach.pdf> (24 March 2013).
  77. Loorbach, Derk; Rotmans, Jan, 2010: “The Practice of Transition Management: Examples and Lessons from Four Distinct Cases”, in: Futures, 42: 237–246.Google Scholar
  78. Loorbach, Derk; Frantzeskaki, Niki; Thissen, Wil, 2011: “A Transition Research Perspective on Governance for Sustainability”, in: Jaeger, Carlo C.; Tabara, J. David; Jaeger,Google Scholar
  79. Julia (Eds.): European Research on Sustainable Development, vol. 1: Transformative Science Approaches for Sustainability (Berlin—Heidelberg: Springer): 73–89.Google Scholar
  80. Lowell Center for Sustainable Production (no year); at: <http://www.sustainableproduction.org/abou.what.php> (18 September 2013).
  81. Luhmann, Niklas [Bednarz, Jr., John; Baecker, Dirk (translators)], 1995: Social systems (Palo Alto: Stanford University Press); originally published in German in 1984.Google Scholar
  82. Luhmann, Niklas, 1990: Essays on Self-Reference (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
  83. Map of Complexity Science (no year); at: <http://www.artsciencefactory.com/complexity-map_feb09.html> (18 January 2014).
  84. McGillivray, Mark, 1991: “The Human Development Index: Yet Another Redundant Composite Development Indicator?”, in: World Development, 19,10: 1461–1468.Google Scholar
  85. Meadows, Donella H.; Meadows, Dennis L.; Randers, Jorgen; Behrens, William W. III, 1972: The Limits to Growth (New York: New American Library).Google Scholar
  86. Meadows, Donella H., 1998: Indicators and Information Systems for Sustainable Development (Hartland Four Corners, VT: Sustainability Institute).Google Scholar
  87. Meadows, Donella H.; Randers, Jorgen; Meadows, Dennis L., 2004: The Limits to Growth: The 30 Year Update (London: Chelsea Green Publishing).Google Scholar
  88. Mesjasz, Czesław, 1988: “Applications of Systems Modelling in Peace Research”, in: Journal of Peace Research, 25,3: 291 334.Google Scholar
  89. Mesjasz, Czesław, 2008: “Security as Attributes of Social Systems”, in: Brauch, Hans Gunter; Oswald Spring, Ursula; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Grin, John; Dunay, Pal; Behera, Navnita Chadha; Chourou, Bechir; Kameri-Mbote, Patricia; Liotta, P.H. (Eds.): Globalization and Environmental Challenges: Reconceptualizing Security in the 21st Century (Berlin—Heidelberg—New York: Springer): 45–62.Google Scholar
  90. Mesjasz, Czesław, 2008a: “Prediction in Security Theory and Policy, in: Brauch, Hans Gunter; Oswald Spring, Ursula; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Grin, John; Dunay, Pal; Behera, Navnita Chadha; Chourou, Bechir; Kameri-Mbote, Patricia; Liotta, P.H. (Eds.): Globalization and Environmental Challenges: Reconceptualizing Security in the 21st Century (Berlin—Heidelberg—New York: Springer): 889–900.Google Scholar
  91. Mesjasz, Czesław, 2010: “Complexity of Social Systems”, in: Acta Physica Polonica A, 117,4 (April), 706–715; at: <http://przyrbwn.icm.edu.pl/APP/PDF/117/a117z468.pdf> (29 October 2011).
  92. Midgley, Gerard (Ed.), 2003: Systems Thinking, vols I–IV (London: Sage).Google Scholar
  93. Mirowski, Philip, 1989: More Heat than Light: Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature’s Economics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  94. Mirowski, Philip (Ed.), 1994: Natural Images in Economic Thought: ‘Markets Read in Tooth and Claw’ (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  95. Morgan, Gareth, 1996: Images of Organization (London: Sage).Google Scholar
  96. Nicolis, Gregoire; Prigogine, Ilya, 1989: Exploring Complexity: An Introduction (New York: W. H. Freeman).Google Scholar
  97. Ortony, Andrew (Ed.), 1993: Metaphor and Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  98. Pezzey John C. V., Toman Michael A., 2002: “The Economics of Sustainability: A Review of Journal Articles”, in: Discussion Paper 0203 (Washington DC: Resources for the Future).Google Scholar
  99. Picard, Kezia E., 2010: “A Radical Relational Agency: Foucault, Complexity Theory and Environmental Resistances” (PhD thesis, University of Nottingham); at: <http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/11450/1/Thesis.pdf> (7 May 2014).
  100. Popper, Karl R., 1974: The Poverty of Historicism (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
  101. Prigogine, Ilya; Stengers Isabelle, 1984: Order Out of Chaos (New York: Bantam).Google Scholar
  102. Prigogine, Ilya, 1997: End of Certainty (New York: The Free Press).Google Scholar
  103. Prigogine, Ilya, 2003: Is Future Given? (Singapore: World Scientific Publishers).Google Scholar
  104. Richardson, Kurt; Cilliers, Paul, 2001: “Special Editors’ Introduction. What Is Complexity Science? A View from Different Directions”, in: Emergence, 3,1: 5–23.Google Scholar
  105. Riley, Ralph, 1992: “The Challenge to Science in Food and Agriculture”, in: Towards Sustainable Crop Production Systems, Monograph Series, 11 (Stoneleigh: Royal Agricultural Society of England): 13–15.Google Scholar
  106. Rotmans, Jan, 2005: Societal Innovation: Between Dream and Reality Lies Complexity (Rotterdam: Erasmus Research Institute of Management); at: <http://repub.eur.nl/pub/7293/EIA-2005-026-ORG%209058921050%20ROTMANS.pdf> (22 July 2014).
  107. Rotmans, Jan; Kemp, Rene; van Asselt, Marjolein, Geels, Frank; Verbong, Geert; Molendijk, Kirsten, 2001): Transitions & Transition Management: The Case For a Low Emission Energy Supply (Maastricht: International Centre for Integrated Assessment and Sustainable Development (ICIS)).Google Scholar
  108. Rotmans, Jan; Kemp, Rene; van Asselt, Marjolein, 2001: “More Evolution Than Revolution: Transition Management in Public Policy”, in: Foresight, 3,1: 15–31.Google Scholar
  109. Rotmans, Jan; Loorbach, Derk, 2009: “Complexity and Transition Management”, in: Journal of Industrial Ecology, 13,2 (April): 184–196.Google Scholar
  110. Ruckelshaus, William D., 1989: “Toward a Sustainable World”, in: Scientific American, 261,3 (September): 166–174.Google Scholar
  111. Schwaninger, Markus, 2006: “The Quest for Ecological Sustainability: A Multi-Level Issue”, in: Trappl, Robert (Ed.): Cybernetics and Systems, vol. 1, Proceedings of the Eighteenth European Meeting on Cybernetics and Systems Research (Vienna: University of Vienna and Austrian Society for Cybernetic Studies): 149–154.Google Scholar
  112. Sen, Amartya, 2013: “The Ends and Means of Sustainability”, in: Journal of Human Development and Capabilities: A Multi-Disciplinary Journal for People-Centered Development, 14,1: 6–20.Google Scholar
  113. Senge, Peter M., 1990: The Fifth Discipline. The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization (New York: Doubleday).Google Scholar
  114. Simon, Herbert A., 1962: “The Architecture of Complexity”, in: Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106,6 (December): 467–482.Google Scholar
  115. Simon, Herbert, 1997: Models of Bounded Rationality: Empirically Grounded Reason (vol. 3) (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  116. Sokal, Alan; Bricmont, Jean, 1998: Fashionable Nonsense. Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science (New York: Picador).Google Scholar
  117. Stacey, Ralph D., 1996: Complexity and Creativity in Organizations (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler).Google Scholar
  118. Stacey, Ralph D.; Griffin, Douglas; Shaw, Patricia, 2000: Complexity and Management. Fad or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking? (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  119. Tainter, Joseph, 1988: The Collapse of Complex Societies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  120. Tainter, Joseph, 2000: “Problem Solving: Complexity, History, Sustainability, Population and Environment”, in: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 22,1 (September): 3–41.Google Scholar
  121. Timmermans, Jos, 2008: “Punctuated Equilibrium in a Non-Linear System of Action”, in: Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 14: 350–375; at: <http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10588-008-9031-5> (10 June 2014).
  122. Timmermans, Jos; de Haan, Hans; Squazzoni, Flaminio, 2008: “Computational and Mathematical Approaches to Societal Transitions”, in: Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 14: 391–414; at: <http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10588-008-9035-1> (10 June 2014).
  123. Triple Pundit (no year); at: <http://www.triplepundit.com/> (24 July 2014).
  124. Urry, John, 2005: “The Complexity Turn”, in: Theory, Culture & Society, 22,5: 1–14.Google Scholar
  125. Vandenberghe, Frederic, 2014: What’s Critical about Critical Realism?: Essays in Reconstructive Social Theory (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  126. Waldrop, M. Mitchell, 1992: Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos (New York: Simon & Schuster).Google Scholar
  127. Wallerstein, Immanuel, 2000: The Essential Wallerstein (New York: The New Press).Google Scholar
  128. Weaver, Warren, 1948: “Science and Complexity”, in: American Scientist, 36,4: 536–544.Google Scholar
  129. Wiener, Norbert, 1948/1961: Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine (Paris: Hermann & Cie—Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  130. Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 2002: Philosophical Investigations [German text with a revised English translation] (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
  131. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development), 1987: Our Common Future, Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (United Nations); at: <http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf> (16 April 2007).
  132. Zadeh, Lotfi, 1975: “The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning”, in: Information Sciences, part I,8: 199–249; Part II,8: 301–357; Part III,9: 43–80.Google Scholar

Other Literature

  1. A Portal on Sustainability (no year): “Definitions of Sustainability”; at: <http://www.cap-lmu.de/fgz/portals/sustainability/definitions.php> (27 April 2013).
  2. Goodland, Robert, (no year): Sustainability: Human, Social, Economic and Environmental (Washington, DC: World Bank); at: <http://www.earthfutureaustralia.org/-4-pillars-of-sustainability.html> (18 September 2013).
  3. Merriam-Webster Dictionary (no year); at: <http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sustainability> (6 March 2013).
  4. Sustainable Kingston (no year), Four Pillars of Sustainability, Sustainable Kingston Corporation; at: <http://sustainablekingston.ca/community-plan/four-pillars-of-sustainability> (11 February 2014).
  5. Sustainable Measures Company (no year); at: <http://www.sustainablemeasures.com/company> (24 March 2014).

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cracow University of EconomicsCracowPoland

Personalised recommendations